My impressions of two of the three of you. (See note at end of post as to why it's only two right now.)
I have an early start tomorrow, so I can't be nearly as detailed as Unagi and stessier have been and probably won't quote much. However, I'll be more than happy to address anything at all tomorrow evening and answer any questions any of you might have on anything here.
Scoop
Good:
- RMC hanging all over Scoop (his oft-repeated refrain that he was only following Scoop) seems so heavy handed that Scoop has some mighty big cojones if he agreed to this strategy. I would think RMC would choose to hang all over someone who is not an evil teammate in case one of them is lynched. The key moment that makes me give thought to Scoop being innocent is that, when the heat turned up in the last day, RMC played the "Scoop is the evil one here" card. I can see RMC wanting to be reckless (to draw the 'zerker lynch) and I guess pointing at your partner would give you street cred if that partner turns up evil. However, I would have thought (if Scoop were bad) RMC would have pointed at any one of us (Qantaga, Unagi, stessier - not Chaos or msteelers as they were proven at that time) to square off against a (theoretically) good agent rather than to square off against his partner.
- Scoop seemed to be bopping along the whole game. I've already mentioned that his play strikes me as that of reckless abandon. I realize that others here know that to be normal, but he has brought it to an art form if he can keep that recklessness up when he's evil.
- He is seeing, and standing by, the logic of the n-1 vote against me, when it would have been very easy for (theoretically) evil Scoop to align himself with Unagi in Unagi's campaign against me.
Bad:
- He was consistently voting against me early and often. Yes, I know that is triggercut-ish, but it is still valid, since he went from "due" to his "virtually certain" comment of mine to his actively campaigning for (Unagi, Chaos, RMC, and Lassr) to vote me off ("breathing life" into the game) to his "hey Unagi, will you vote for Q with me?" Since I know I'm good, I also know that every one of these reasons is a made up excuse to lynch a good agent.
- He did have an awful lot of interaction with RMC and Lassr that looked antagonistic. Unagi sees it as proof that Scoop is good. I see it as something that could easily be imagined and constructed in the thread, especially given Scoop's (and Unagi's) admission that he rarely checks in with his partners when he's evil.
- His semi-claiming of special roles. Yes, I know he claims that he was hoping the bad guys would kill him at night, but it strikes me more as a ploy to try to get a real special to counter him ("oh, hey, I was just trying to get killed in your place") while the special is now exposed.
- As stessier mentioned, he listed RMC as his lead candidate for Odd Job, then proceeded to push for a vote for him.
My problem with Scoop is that I see more good in him than stessier sees and I see more evil in him than Unagi does.
Unagi
Good:
- I've been preaching all along that anything posted can be manufactured and tweaked to look convincing. However, there were two things Unagi said that struck me as pure:
Unagi wrote:
I can also add that I know 100% that your villain will not be me.
There is a 0% chance that you and I will be arguing this morning about my status.
(Unless you decide to torment me briefly,
)
and:
Unagi wrote:Remus.
If I'm a villain I'll buy your lunch at the next octocon.
No wait, if I'm a villain, I'll buy you and chaos lunch and give you and chaos $100 for some titty bar.
Heh. Now that's meta gaming.
I remember reading the first comment and thinking, "That is quite a bit of confidence for someone who may easily have been Remus' scan at that moment." I remember reading the second comment and thinking, "Man, if Unagi is evil, Remus will never trust him again in anything." Of course, I don't know how far people push assurances here to gain victory. It may be standard OO practice that anything goes and is expected.
- As I said earlier, it's hard for me to imagine Hugo sinking his teeth so deeply into only one conclusion (his conviction that I am evil). I realize it is possible, but Unagi's persistence seems more good than evil.
Bad:
- Seems to have been campaigning for the lynching of quite a few good agents, especially his fervor against Remus before Chaos proved Remus. It struck me odd that he still voted on Remus, even after he acknowledged that Remus was claiming the Seer role (albeit, before Chaos proved Remus). I even wonder if Remus was on to something with his theory that Unagi thought Remus was spoofing the Seer because Remus said he had two scans, when only the Seer and the wolves knew the EMP had gone off.
- When his back was up against the wall (he had been all over Remus, then Remus turned out to be the proven Seer) and Remus was calling for Bond to shoot Unagi, Unagi came out with an analysis for Bond to shoot RMC. On the surface, that would seem to exonerate Unagi, but at that point, Lassr was already uncovered. It would make sense for a (theoretically) bad Unagi to want to be able to say, "I gave you Odd Job" why would I ever do that if I were bad? Normally, it wouldn't seem logical, but with Unagi already being suggested for the cross-hairs, what a way to waltz to the end game by being the one to uncover the 'zerker? Once tru1cy was shot and votes started piling up on Lassr, Unagi backpedalled on RMC, saying he wasn't sure if RMC was a villain or not.
*Gents, the night has gotten away from me. I still have a couple items that I need to add to the Scoop and Unagi lists and I haven't even started on stessier yet. So, I still owe you more of my thoughts tomorrow.