Moderator: Zaxxon
Charlie Brown wrote:
Good grief.
bb2112 wrote:And for reference, Remus has used the skip a lynch as a strategy in past games, regardless of what he posted earlier.
Remus West wrote:bb2112 wrote:And for reference, Remus has used the skip a lynch as a strategy in past games, regardless of what he posted earlier.
Yeah, I'm gonna need a quote for that one. When have I suggested that we simply skip a lynch in any game?
Remus West wrote:LordMortis wrote: It only just occurred to me that we are this strange sort of odd versus even loss giving the wolfs an extra advantage. That being the case, if raven is not wolf (and I think and hope he is) then I still thing the better to not lynch tomorrow and increase the village odds for success and force the wolf to leave himself in a smaller pool.
This is likely a good plan. If we missed on Chaosraven then tomorrow we will be choosing between 3 people - none of them trusted since Scoop is the likely night kill. Allowing the wolf another kill simply means the final choice is between two rather than 3.
Remus West wrote:LordMortis wrote: save
Does he need another or does that prove a majority can't be had?
He needs another as either of us could change our vote.
bb2112 wrote:Damn. I pretty much knew it was going to be Q or I.
purge wrote:[mod question] Are the wolves in this game allowed to skip a meal?
Remus West wrote:bb2112 wrote:Damn. I pretty much knew it was going to be Q or I.
Why?
purge wrote:The next lynch we miss, we lose.
The only thing a skip would do is force the wolf to kill again, reducing our numbers from four to three.
[mod question] Are the wolves in this game allowed to skip a meal?
Rev, Remus, BB, or skip?
Cripes. I still think Rev. Holding off votes till you all speak up.
bb2112 wrote:purge wrote:The next lynch we miss, we lose.
The only thing a skip would do is force the wolf to kill again, reducing our numbers from four to three.
[mod question] Are the wolves in this game allowed to skip a meal?
Rev, Remus, BB, or skip?
Cripes. I still think Rev. Holding off votes till you all speak up.
Uh, why wouldn't the wolf choose you for a meal?
Newcastle wrote:also sift through grund's posts for any hints at if he might be the seer.
look at the pool of remus, BB, and rev.
i think Q & purge are innocent.
Bb could be lying in the weeds and platying a quiet wolf
remus -i've never seen him so closeminded
rev- he's been feeling more innocent to me over the day as i've focused on remus.
again i also could be blinded by my back and forths w/ remus today.
but do go through grund's posts and maybe even lassr. One of them was the seer, i am betting grund.
Good luck.
bb2112 wrote: Newcastle
5 voted for Stess, 3 did not. Newcastle, Rev, and Purge.
Of the 3, I don't have much experience with Purge, none with Rev, and Newcastle has seemed off to me all game.
stessier wrote:Lassr wrote:Lassr wrote:Remus West wrote: withdraw Remus West
Sigh. Nobody wants to try that game. I wondered if it could lead to both baddies again this time but guess not.
two games in a row...this time it could be an even more prefect disguise.
The self vote is going to get you killed again...
I can't decide whether you should die today or have a scan wasted on you.
Poke the innocents much?
Lassr
purge wrote:PLEASE READ THIS POST THOROUGHLY
This is my contribution to our win. It's train-of-thought while reading, so bear with me.(should say wolf with me)
I have a giant list of train-of thought and summation of the first five pages. It is contained in this spoiler, and is ugly. Feel free to peruse it - it is a condensed form of the significant (and several seemingly insignificant) actions taken:
[*]Lassr wrote:[re: Remus]I can't decide whether you should die today or have a scan wasted on you.
Seer slip, wolf plant? Stess hopped all over him on that comment and he justified it with "likely lynch means wasted scan" and then claimed villager. Died that night and the tender care of the wolves. (we know what happened to your packmate)
[*]Qantaga wrote:Just getting back to civilization and catching up.
Observations:
This game is a whole lot of fluff so far. Rev and Grund voting, but mostly quiet. Newcastle, purge, and bb2112 volleying trivialities. Stess visiting from Prague and gearing up his participation to join the Remus/Lassr debates.
I don't see anything to diminish my suspicions of any of you having sharp, pointy teeth that spring out in the moonlight.
It is somewhat interesting that Lassr thinks the scan would be "wasted" on Remus, but is that a true slip, or wolfy stess trying to create a "slip," as he has been known to do in the past?
Remus' self-vote makes me want to vote for him, as I'm sure he's well aware.
I suspect that one of Lassr or stess is bad, so let's try stessier
The only thing I "volleyed" was a puppies comment. There are now two votes on Stess at this point. Would a wolf contribute to a train and give it momentum, I wonder?(were you wondering this before or after you realized Stess blew it?)
[*]
RevHempus71 wrote:I have just one question Qantaga. If you believe one of Stess or Lassr is evil, why vote for the one that is not voting for you? Qantaga
Newcastle wrote:Remus West wrote:....snip..... I find it odd that Newcastle decline to express any intention to vote stessier yesterday but simply questioned the vote being there. ......snip.......
wanted to know why people were voting for him. I hadnt read the thread thoroughly (skimmed it) and was curious why he was run up so fast. I was also waiting to see how things woudl turn and develop as well. I really didnt expect him to go to the gallows so quick.
if anything, i think Remus comes out smelling hte best there...yea, i am sure thats gonna heighten your paranoia about me....but mainly due to Rev's statement of not putting your partner at #4.
Question woul dbe: would grund put his partner over the edge like that? So i cant clear grund...and yes i think he'd do something like that. Especially due to these short games, his chances at surviving to end game are high.
RevHempus71 wrote:Qantaga wrote:RevHempus71 wrote: How's that for a moment of clarity??
Your moment is the exact opposite of clarity.
I have no experience with you to know if, as a wolf, you would come out so strongly on the offensive. ( you are right you don't know how I play)
What I do find interesting is that, after I accused stess yesterday, you came out questioning that vote and accused me, in what could have been a diversion tactic in stess' defense. ( I found it odd that you didn't at least throw some kind of jab Lassr's way after he voted for you.)
I think anyone can look back with "clarity" and see that my accusation of stess provided the momentum for his death. If I were a wolf, there would be no reason for me to put stess in that position. ( how is being the 2nd vote providing momentum? )
I'm suspicious of Grund's vote, too. Rev comes out with an elaborate theory, drawing "evidence" (color coded, no less) from a post where I correctly named a wolf. Grund doesn't bother to try to explain why he thinks Rev's unlikely conclusion has any merit (all he offers is a hemp joke), he just throws down a vote. What a nice gift for a wolfy Grund. If Rev is a misguided innocent and not the wolf, Grund helps kill me today, then gets to watch Rev come under scutiny for being so wrong about me. (I am an innocent, maybe misguided {pot can do that sometimes}. )(now reread that from the Idea that Grund was our seer)
So, not surprisingly, I'm suspicious of both Rev and Grund at the moment, but It would be nice to hear opinions from the rest of the players.
Grundbegriff wrote:theohall wrote:Newcastle (3): bb2112, Remus West, RevHempus71 N-1
I put Newc back at N-1 after Rev pulled away, because I wanted to watch a wolf pounce and put him over.
It didn't happen.
For this reason, I strongly suspect that our wolf is either Remus West or bb2112.
RevHempus71 wrote: withdraw Rev Hempus
Thinking.....
Grundbegriff wrote:Qantaga wrote:Then, why did you vote purge?
That's my default vote, as illustrated at day's beginning.
purge wrote:Sorry for some of the formatting errors, it's a bloody long-arsed message, and the BBcode here is different than GT's ([li] vs [*], for example, and close tags for [li], with none for [*]).
That being said,
Our survivors:
1) Purge - mostly silent. Absent for much of the game, and trying to play differently to learn more about the villagers. Not in on ANY votes in Day2, and only had one vote on BB2112 from the get-go because of a puppies comment.Wolf ploy? Unlikely.( does anyone else find it odd that he got upset when others called him silent.....yet here he says it about himself? This "trying to play differently" sounds like setting up a defense (to be used in case of emergency). Also note the reference to "not in on ANY votes in Day2 & the seemingly harmless puppies inspired vote( is this a set up for "wouldn't a wolf be trying to get villagers lynched" argument?)
2) Qantaga - Day 1 vote on Stess with no wavering. Could have undercut the momentum. Stacking the game against the wolves on day 1? Unlikely.
3) bb2112 - Day 1 on Stess after dancing with accusations against me. His voting goes here and there, but I don't think he's our wolf.
4) Remus West - Day 1 on Stess, N-1. Likely wolf move? Nope. Possible, perhaps Grunds decisiveness surprised them. His behaviour is consistent with his normal gameplay though, and while he's not always right, he is a natural leader and has been doing so.
5) NewCastle - I believe him to be human as well. Although he missed the Day 1 kill vote, he has been solid in his arguments and there haven't been any slip-ups. He'd be my second pick over our wolfy candidate.
6) RevHempus - Wow. Just read my above post and focus solely on Rev's actions. From attacking an all-but-proven Qantaga, to the "inspired" actions, self-votes, dramatic defense when no heat was on him to late votes and the "Thinking..." in the midst of Grunds trap, he's got all the markings of the wolf. He was desperately trying to get trains started during the day2 dusk / lynch crunch. Plus, he's been playing the "I'm a stoner" card pretty damned hard, and he DEFENDED STESS.( 3 strikes your our wolf, again I never defended Stess. I merely asked why Q felt the triggercut principle didn't apply in that situation since it was Day1(isn't that by definition when that very thing is to apply?)
Purge is human (not seer)
Qantaga is human
Remus is human
BB2112 is human
Newcastle is likely human
RevHempus?
RevHempus needs to die like his packmate, Stessier
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:This is my contribution to our win. It's train-of-thought while reading, so bear with me.(should say wolf with me)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:Stess hopped all over him on that comment and he justified it with "likely lynch means wasted scan" and then claimed villager. Died that night and the tender care of the wolves. (we know what happened to your packmate)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:There are now two votes on Stess at this point. Would a wolf contribute to a train and give it momentum, I wonder?[color=#0000FF](were you wondering this before or after you realized Stess blew it?)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:RevHempus71 wrote:I have just one question Qantaga. If you believe one of Stess or Lassr is evil, why vote for the one that is not voting for you? Qantaga
Right after Qan posted his vote on stess, Rev leaps to Stess's defense and instead of voting for either or opening discussion, accuses Qan.
(the underlined is Purge; (leaps??? I was refering to the use, or lack thereof, of the Tirggercut principle.)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:[*]Following that, Stess then steps up on Qan's accusation of the "slip" that Lassr may have been planting false hints of being a seer to later claim he is the seer. Lassr swings his vote over to Stess at that point, and withdraws Qan.( again underlined is Purge; Qan's accusation of Lassr? Was it not Stess with the "poke the innocents much" comment. Is this your way of trying provide a back door to mess with Q , when the frame job on me fails?)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:Qan basically calls out Rev right away with Day 1: Rev defended Stess.[color=#0000FF](again with the Rev Defended Stess statement)
RevHempus71 wrote:purge wrote:Rev then pipes up with this (emphasis his):RevHempus71 wrote:Qantaga wrote:RevHempus71 wrote: How's that for a moment of clarity??
Your moment is the exact opposite of clarity.
I have no experience with you to know if, as a wolf, you would come out so strongly on the offensive. ( you are right you don't know how I play)
What I do find interesting is that, after I accused stess yesterday, you came out questioning that vote and accused me, in what could have been a diversion tactic in stess' defense. ( I found it odd that you didn't at least throw some kind of jab Lassr's way after he voted for you.)
I think anyone can look back with "clarity" and see that my accusation of stess provided the momentum for his death. If I were a wolf, there would be no reason for me to put stess in that position. ( how is being the 2nd vote providing momentum? )
I'm suspicious of Grund's vote, too. Rev comes out with an elaborate theory, drawing "evidence" (color coded, no less) from a post where I correctly named a wolf. Grund doesn't bother to try to explain why he thinks Rev's unlikely conclusion has any merit (all he offers is a hemp joke), he just throws down a vote. What a nice gift for a wolfy Grund. If Rev is a misguided innocent and not the wolf, Grund helps kill me today, then gets to watch Rev come under scutiny for being so wrong about me. (I am an innocent, maybe misguided {pot can do that sometimes}. )[color=#0000FF](now reread that from the Idea that Grund was our seer)
RevHempus71 wrote: Purge
Remus West wrote:Oh....I like me. I'll help simplify my life.
Remus West
stessier wrote:Lassr wrote:Lassr wrote:Remus West wrote: withdraw Remus West
Sigh. Nobody wants to try that game. I wondered if it could lead to both baddies again this time but guess not.
two games in a row...this time it could be an even more prefect disguise.
The self vote is going to get you killed again...
I can't decide whether you should die today or have a scan wasted on you.
Poke the innocents much?
Lassr
Remus West wrote:Lassr wrote:Remus West wrote:Lassr wrote:The self vote is going to get you killed again...
Probably. And yet you are still avoiding voting for me just like you were doing last time. Strange isn't it.
Not to me.
So you detail why I am going to get lynched today or tomorrow but withhold your vote and you do not find that strange? Interesting.
stessier, I actually agree with Lassr's thinking on the scanning. If you think someone is going to get lynched anyway then scanning them is a waste. Although that is not the same thing as saying it is a waste to scan me. While I expect I will get lynched things do not always go to my expectations in these games. A living confirmed Human is valuable.
Remus West wrote:anyway, if my count is correct, this puts
stessier
at n-1.
Remus West wrote:Lassr wrote:Newcastle wrote:so why is everyone running up stessier? Whats the big pull there?
well my vote is based on him voting for me using the excuse that he thought I made a slip...when in fact I did not.
Meh. I could see reading it both ways depending how you approach the Seer role. You and I share the same philosophy on it (we'd rather find scans that will live rather than risk one that will likly get lynched in an effort to find a wolf). stessier and I have talked about it in the past and he feels you should always target a suspected wolf. Thus, I initially read what you wrote as you claim to have intended but I can see where he would read it differently.
As for my vote, I'm voting him because he was nearest the edge and I wanted to see what would happen to him when pushed to the brink.
Grundbegriff wrote:Not at all as retribution for posting our private brainstorming into the Prague thread, I accuse stessier
Remus West wrote:I guess we'll find out.
Remus West wrote:Thinking things over I have a hard time thinkning that anyone voting stessier is a wolf. Day 1 in a game with only 1 other wolf they would be stacking the deck against themselves. I find it very interesting that Rev says only Grund or I would be willing to try the solo run - thus implying that Qantaga and bb2112 would not be willing to make that play but then he turns around and votes for one of the players that voted stessier. I find it odd that Grundbegriff agrees with him quickly and jumps aboard that vote. I find it odd that Newcastle decline to express any intention to vote stessier yesterday but simply questioned the vote being there. Currently looking at those three but need to go back and read again as that is all by memory and what has happened since day break (both posts - well, all three if you want to count me razzing Rev - posts since then).
Grundbegriff wrote:Fascinating.
With stessier out of the way, the least we can do is vote against Remus West
Remus West wrote:Grundbegriff wrote:Fascinating.
With stessier out of the way, the least we can do is vote against Remus West
Now that is interesting.
Remus West wrote:purge wrote:I generally don't make it to day 3. Trying to keep a low profile.
Actually, been really busy, and you people all know each other waaaaay better. I've not wolfed in a very long time (this is what, 7 games incl. GT) where I'm villager. The tells and the strategies have changed so drastically (a silent Grund?! REALLY?!!).
I think Remus' accusation of Newcastle is more telling than Newcastles "gentle" persuasion, but that could just be my ignorance.
Thats very interesting.
withdraw Newcastle
Grundbegriff wrote: Remus West
He's trying too hard to make hay.
Qantaga wrote:Ah, my very favorite gambit... the self vote.![]()
Rev, if you are innocent, why are you self voting?
My morning fled rather quickly and my afternoon is flying away, too. I haven't forgotten the deadline.
As I said, I am suspicious of everyone at the moment:
- Rev, mainly for his post voting for me after I accused stess. Now knowing that stess is a wolf, it strikes me as an attempt to deflect attention from stess. Also, for his rather elaborate case against me at the start of this game day, which I know to be completely false.
[...]
[...]
- Remus, for the calculated self vote early on, which struck me as an attempt to do what he did in the previous game when he was innocent. I got the feeling that it was an attempt at trying to try to put himself in the same perceived state of innocence. Lassr seized on that. Is that why Lassr was killed? The n-1 on stess looks good for Remus, but he would know that, wouldn' he? One thing that will probably keep me from voting Remus today is that he may have been a good scan target last night, based on his arguing not to be scanned yesterday. So, I think there is a possibility that, unless Lassr is the Seer, Remus may have already been outed today, if he were the remaining wolf.
- Purge, for not resembling the WW persona I'm used to seeing with him. Meta reasons, or wolfish ones?
[...]
I need about an hour to think things over, then I'll vote.
Grundbegriff wrote:theohall wrote:Newcastle (3): bb2112, Remus West, RevHempus71 N-1
I put Newc back at N-1 after Rev pulled away, because I wanted to watch a wolf pounce and put him over.
It didn't happen.
For this reason, I strongly suspect that our wolf is either Remus West or bb2112.
Grundbegriff wrote:I'm going to leave my vote on Remus West
because he's the only one who stands out to me as conspicuously wolfy. If I were Mitt Romney, I'd bet $10,000 on it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests