Moderator: Zaxxon
stessier wrote:I think that is a very bad idea. Additionally, you have to say "torture" for it to be effective today.


Grundbegriff wrote:Russia does not wish to enforce the no-fly zone.
That's what she said.

bb2112 wrote:We interrogated Unagi twice. Did we learn anything???? I mean aside from his "clue" of course...
So, do we interrogate/torture him again, or do we move on?
Qantaga wrote:since we don't have any certainty of the false/true/misleading nature of Unagi's clues.
Unagi wrote: I will die if you torture me.
I think I should only be tortured if:
Your Team's Handler told you that my clues were lies, but they weren't, and no Handler is going to tell their team that.
Unagi wrote:
What I expect will happen is that perhaps 1 team does indeed know that I am not on their team and they will try and get me killed off.
Unagi wrote:
If I was to be tortured anyhow - you guys totally wasted a day yesterday in interrogating me.
Unagi wrote:Qantaga wrote:since we don't have any certainty of the false/true/misleading nature of Unagi's clues.
I imagine both handler's already know that my clues were true.
Lassr wrote:Does knowing if Unagi is or is not KIM help right now compared to later? Or does it even matter?
Grundbegriff wrote: KIM starts out with fewer clues, but gains clues at a faster rate.
The longer KIM agents can stay under cover, the faster they overcome their disadvantage and perhaps gain an edge.
bb2112 wrote:If we do vote for Unagi again, then one of the following scenarios occur.
1. Unagi is KIM, is removed from his forum, and loses his scan tonight. One team can then share clues freely, while the other is still encumbered with their agent. Overall, it still slows down KIM.
2. Unagi is not KIM, he dies. Upside, we are then assured his 2 clues are not fabricated. However, the downside would be, if he dies, his team is then unbalanced, causing the other team to get a numbers advantage.
Qantaga wrote:bb2112 wrote:If we do vote for Unagi again, then one of the following scenarios occur.
1. Unagi is KIM, is removed from his forum, and loses his scan tonight. One team can then share clues freely, while the other is still encumbered with their agent. Overall, it still slows down KIM.
2. Unagi is not KIM, he dies. Upside, we are then assured his 2 clues are not fabricated. However, the downside would be, if he dies, his team is then unbalanced, causing the other team to get a numbers advantage.
This is indeed an interesting conundrum.
The value of a pure forum is quite high. But, which is higher, the short term, massive value of the pure forum... or the long term, steady value of the numbers advantage?
Nicely set up Grund!
Grund, does a KIM agent have to use fake clues, or can they use their real clues just like anyone else?
Qantaga wrote:bb2112 wrote:We interrogated Unagi twice. Did we learn anything???? I mean aside from his "clue" of course...
So, do we interrogate/torture him again, or do we move on?
I think we do need to interrogate/torture him.
1. We don't know if Unagi's first clue was submitted as an exact copy of mine to simulate a duplicate clue. We also don't know if his second clue is true or not.
2. It would be folly to allow KIM to use two interrogations with a false duplicate and a false clue, then to be left as the only holder of his two true clues.
3. If he is KIM, the next clue will be true.
4. Even if Unagi is not KIM, it would benefit KIM much more than us to move on to interrogate someone else, since we don't have any certainty of the false/true/misleading nature of Unagi's clues. In addition, there is a pretty good chance that, even if Unagi is not KIM, the KIM agent on Unagi's team has already figured that out and knows the nature of Unagi's clues, giving him a crucial step up on our Chiefs.
The only way to know definitively if Unagi is KIM or a member of a "good" team is to interrogate him again.
If he is KIM, we've severely hampered their chances. That is something that is very important to do, since they are gaining two clues to our Chiefs' one each night.
If he isn't KIM, then our Chiefs' will have certainty about Unagi's clues.
Unagi
The only reason (IMHO) not to interrogate/torture Unagi is if you are absolutely convinced that he is not KIM.
Unagi wrote:Qantaga wrote:since we don't have any certainty of the false/true/misleading nature of Unagi's clues.
I imagine both handler's already know that my clues were true.
Lassr wrote:and that is what crossed my mind also...if the team knows their members then they could just start torturing everyone else at will.
stessier wrote:Lassr wrote:and that is what crossed my mind also...if the team knows their members then they could just start torturing everyone else at will.
They really can't. Each team only have 5 of the needed 6 votes. If a team dogpiles every vote, it will quickly become obvious and still requires someone from the other team to help them. The worst that could happen is a stalemate every day and that only helps KIM.
stessier wrote:Ahh, I see. Yes, after the first person dies, a team will have an advantage. As long as KIM continues to vote with them of course.
bb2112 wrote:stessier wrote:Ahh, I see. Yes, after the first person dies, a team will have an advantage. As long as KIM continues to vote with them of course.
In that case, why wouldn't the KIM agent keep voting torture; even if he accidently helps torture The mole in the other camp, that team is finished anyway. The tortured mole just then goes to KIM's own forum and waits for his partner to join him, basically cutting the teams down to 2.
I think this is the first time I've seen a fairly successful balance in a three team game. Will have to see how the rest of this plays out, but the dynamics so far have been very interesting
bb2112 wrote:stessier wrote:Ahh, I see. Yes, after the first person dies, a team will have an advantage. As long as KIM continues to vote with them of course.
In that case, why wouldn't the KIM agent keep voting torture; even if he accidently helps torture The mole in the other camp, that team is finished anyway. The tortured mole just then goes to KIM's own forum and waits for his partner to join him, basically cutting the teams down to 2.
I think this is the first time I've seen a fairly successful balance in a three team game. Will have to see how the rest of this plays out, but the dynamics so far have been very interesting
Lassr wrote:sure why not. Let's squeeze that 2nd clue out of him.
I'll vote Q tomorrow if another train isn't started on someone else but I do not want to kill Unagi...at least not yet.
Remus West wrote:Lassr wrote:sure why not. Let's squeeze that 2nd clue out of him.
I'll vote Q tomorrow if another train isn't started on someone else but I do not want to kill Unagi...at least not yet.
Lets torture Chaosraven. It'll be fun.
Lassr wrote:Remus West wrote:Lassr wrote:sure why not. Let's squeeze that 2nd clue out of him.
I'll vote Q tomorrow if another train isn't started on someone else but I do not want to kill Unagi...at least not yet.
Lets torture Chaosraven. It'll be fun.
fun for him or us?
Newcastle wrote: El guapo
why waterboard man...so so so uncool.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests