Re: One Night Ultimate Werewolf - It is Day
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:26 pm
Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.
btw, I'm Insomniac.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://www.octopusoverlords.com/forum/
Well? Share some info with us...Archinerd wrote:Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.
Interesting now that I have thought on it for a bit.Holman wrote:OK, this game won't take long. I can't think of a reason to wait on this:
I have had back-to-back dumb luck in recent sessions. Last time I shot the Alien on Day One. This time I am the Seer, and I scanned Vorret because of the running joke that we should lynch Vorret.
Well guess what? Vorret is a werewolf.
This is a bad idea. We need to hear from the Robber and Troublemaker - either of whom could have altered the role card after your scan.String him up! I've already voted.
So, steps 1, 2, 3 are the various players being told their 'original' role and who their partners are (or were).stessier wrote:Night Activities
- Roles are randomly assigned leaving three roles unassigned (Grave A, B and C)
- After all roles are received, orders are sent into the Moderator and resolved in the following order:
- Werewolves are told who their partner is (if any)
- Minion is told who the Werewolves are (if any)
- Masons are told who their partner is (if any)
- Seer has a Vision
- Robber may choose to swap Roles with the Target.
- Troublemaker may choose to switch the cards of two other players.
- Drunk must choose a Grave to swap Roles with.
- Insomniac verifies what Role they have.
Uh... is there some kind of special rulez where you have to mention your role twice.Archinerd wrote:Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.
Yeah, whats the deal with this?Holman wrote:Vorret wrote:It's so bright in here.
It's ... day ?Scoop20906 wrote:Yeah, whats the deal with this?Holman wrote:Vorret wrote:It's so bright in here.
hehRemus West wrote:Werewolves are told who their partner is (if any) - they will probably not tell us
Minion is told who the Werewolves are (if any) - he will probably not tell us
Masons are told who their partner is (if any) - they who are not appearing in this game
Seer has a Vision - should tell us
Robber may choose to swap Roles with the Target. - should tell us who he swapped with as that person is not a wolf.
Troublemaker may choose to switch the cards of two other players. - should have done so and should tell us who he swapped so they can tell us what the other person now is.
Drunk must choose a Grave to swap Roles with.
Insomniac verifies what Role they have. - should verify to us what he now is.
So one guy doesn't vote and we have 4-4, or we threeway the vote 3-3-3Moliere wrote:With 9 players a tie vote is unlikely. You See too much.Holman wrote:We win if we kill a Wolf. If the Tanner also dies, we still win--but the secret vote makes this difficult because the only way to get two deaths is to engineer a tie. It's going to be hard to make a secret ballot turn out accurately. (My understanding is that if we kill the Tanner but fail to kill a Wolf, *only* the Tanner wins.)
There are more roles than players. Those not allocated to players are in "graves," but some roles can swap with them.Scoop20906 wrote:Grave number 2?
Holman wrote:I think I'm still trying to get my head around this.
The whole game is one lynch vote, right? There is no wolf kill, and there are no deaths other than (a) the victim (or victims if tied) of the lynch and possibly (b) the hunter's chosen target if he is lynched. Is that correct?
At 1:59PMMoliere wrote:Not it!bb2112 wrote:Camp RosterIn Captain Obvious fashion I am going to assume if you checked in you are not the seer.
- bb2112 - Checked in - Not Seer
- Vorret - Checked in - Not Seer
- Holman
- Unagi - Checked in - Not Seer
- Remus West - Checked in - Not Seer
- Archinerd - Checked in - Not Seer
- Chaosraven
- Scoop20906
- Moliere
At 2:07PMHolman wrote:OK, this game won't take long. I can't think of a reason to wait on this:
I have had back-to-back dumb luck in recent sessions. Last time I shot the Alien on Day One. This time I am the Seer, and I scanned Vorret because of the running joke that we should lynch Vorret.
Well guess what? Vorret is a werewolf.
String him up! I've already voted.
Moliere wrote:Dumb luck for me since you're actually a wolf and I scanned you last night.Holman wrote:OK, this game won't take long. I can't think of a reason to wait on this:
I have had back-to-back dumb luck in recent sessions. Last time I shot the Alien on Day One. This time I am the Seer, and I scanned Vorret because of the running joke that we should lynch Vorret.
Well guess what? Vorret is a werewolf.
String him up! I've already voted.
Holman
Well if he is, he can always come right out and say it.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
While you could be right, it's also pretty in your face and hence avoidable and makes me think of the second layer, if you follow.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
Nope. Sorry, I'm just having weird issues with double posts lately. Happened in the last game too.Scoop20906 wrote:Uh... is there some kind of special rulez where you have to mention your role twice.Archinerd wrote:Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.
Another possibility is he is the Hunter. It's possible he's using himself as bait to somehow reveal a wolf then take one down with him when he goes.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
Trouble maker needs to speak up for sure. Robber would be nice but he may not have any real incentive to do so.Remus West wrote:This is a bad idea. We need to hear from the Robber and Troublemaker - either of whom could have altered the role card after your scan.
Right. But I think he stepped into that stance weirdly as well.Unagi wrote:While you could be right, it's also pretty in your face and hence avoidable and makes me think of the second layer, if you follow.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
As the Troublemaker why would I make the switches public? You will find out soon enough.Archinerd wrote:Nope. Sorry, I'm just having weird issues with double posts lately. Happened in the last game too.Scoop20906 wrote:Uh... is there some kind of special rulez where you have to mention your role twice.Archinerd wrote:Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.Another possibility is he is the Hunter. It's possible he's using himself as bait to somehow reveal a wolf then take one down with him when he goes.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
Tanner is probably a safer bet though.
Trouble maker needs to speak up for sure. Robber would be nice but he may not have any real incentive to do so.Remus West wrote:This is a bad idea. We need to hear from the Robber and Troublemaker - either of whom could have altered the role card after your scan.
Wait... you claimed seer and now troublemaker?Moliere wrote:As the Troublemaker why would I make the switches public? You will find out soon enough.Archinerd wrote:Nope. Sorry, I'm just having weird issues with double posts lately. Happened in the last game too.Scoop20906 wrote:Uh... is there some kind of special rulez where you have to mention your role twice.Archinerd wrote:Any other "seers" want to come forward with their scan to make this a 3-way?
btw, I'm Insomniac.Another possibility is he is the Hunter. It's possible he's using himself as bait to somehow reveal a wolf then take one down with him when he goes.Holman wrote:That's why I think Moliere is the Tanner. He's trying to get killed by looking weird and suspicious.
Tanner is probably a safer bet though.
Trouble maker needs to speak up for sure. Robber would be nice but he may not have any real incentive to do so.Remus West wrote:This is a bad idea. We need to hear from the Robber and Troublemaker - either of whom could have altered the role card after your scan.
Sorry, no. It means they were in the pile of potential roles only. Same with the wolves (as noted in the rules where the only way the Village can win in a no wolf situation is to lynch no one).Unagi wrote:No, we are 'garanteed' a seer (and 2 wolves). I checked that earlier. I assume stessier's comment that they 'will be in the game' means that they are not in the Graves.
Unagi wrote:No, we are 'garanteed' a seer (and 2 wolves). I checked that earlier. I assume stessier's comment that they 'will be in the game' means that they are not in the Graves..
I did. Right away. Since Unagi has as well that means there are a lot of folks not sharing information.Scoop20906 wrote:Does anyone want to claim villager?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk