Well, this attitude fits in perfectly well with the fact that games are a luxury item, period. Valve knows this. Valve also knows that not all luxury items are created equal, and their product is a little higher priced than others (when you factor in the cost of an internet connection).Zekester wrote: Dude, i'll gladly go back to broadband......as soon as I start receiving your monthly checks to pay for it.
Duh.
Oh, and I don't have Steam now, so i don't know where your first paragraph is coming from.
I'm glad Steam is working so well for you, really.
But it has kept me from spending my 'not-so-easy-to-come-by' cash on HL2 because I don't fit into Valve's perfect "model consumer"
And guess what i did then?
Went out and bought Doom3 to play instead.....and it's quite good
While it may not sit well with a consumer who doesn't have the cash to afford a broadband connection, one cannot expect Valve to do something about that. It's not like Valve is a socialist company or is releasing something that improves the good of mankind. It's a game, a luxury item, something that is not critical to life, nor critical to improving the quality of life.
As Zekester has shown, he has chosen a luxury item that is cheaper yet provides the same enjoyment to him as HL2 would to another person.
[edited to fix a stupid spelling error]