Why me?

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
Default
Posts: 6422
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Handling bombs.

Why me?

Post by Default »

rm -rf
Last edited by Default on Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
"pcp, lsd, thc, tgb...it's all good." ~ Kraken
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: Why me?

Post by Rip »

Default wrote:I used to be such a fine respectable person, go to work, come home, eat dinner, have a glass of warm milk and read GG, then to bed by 9 pm. I was faithful, and remained true to one forum, like society expected me too. Now, I'm registered in so many forums, I'm the internet equivalent of the drunk fat girl doing it on the pile of coats in the guest bedroom. Oh well, what's one more, hop on big boy!
Quick someone throw me a 2X4 and some rope.
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 14974
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by ImLawBoy »

You know, there's something to be said for that drunk girl. She brings a lot of pleasure to a lot of people.

(Until the visit to the clinic, that is.)
User avatar
triggercut
Posts: 13807
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Man those Samoans are a surly bunch.

Post by triggercut »

2 more sips!
User avatar
warning
Posts: 1578
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:07 pm

Re: Why me?

Post by warning »

Default wrote:I'm the internet equivalent of the drunk fat girl doing it on the pile of coats in the guest bedroom. Oh well, what's one more, hop on big boy!
Image
User avatar
MHS
Posts: 9808
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: Longmont CO

Post by MHS »

warning... nothing wrong with that picture per se... but we are trying to avoid having possibly NSFW pictures done in threads where people would not be expecting them. Since you didn't start the thread, you can't edit the title to include a NSFW warning, and the thread-starter really shouldn't have to. If you wanted to change that image to a link, I'd be more comfortable with it.

And again, it's not the picture, it's just the having it pop-up in a thread unexpectedly that we're trying to steer clear of.

Thanks,

MHS
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43771
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Post by Kraken »

First Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction, and now this.
User avatar
CeeKay
Posts: 9174
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:13 am

Post by CeeKay »

My eyes! my sweet innocent eyes! :p
CeeKay has left the building. See him exclusively at Gaming Trend!
User avatar
Rubyeye
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:58 am
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by Rubyeye »

I just ran this thread by my boss and he didn't deem it NSFW. :D
User avatar
Debris
Posts: 4455
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Over Dresden at Angels one five

Post by Debris »

Drunk fat girls need lovin' too!
User avatar
CeeKay
Posts: 9174
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:13 am

Post by CeeKay »

More cushion for the pushin!
CeeKay has left the building. See him exclusively at Gaming Trend!
User avatar
Eduardo X
Posts: 3702
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by Eduardo X »

Debris wrote:Drunk fat girls need lovin' too!
Is that picture of a fat girl?
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25745
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Post by dbt1949 »

Image
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
Exodor
Posts: 17209
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:10 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by Exodor »

Eduardo X wrote:
Debris wrote:Drunk fat girls need lovin' too!
Is that picture of a fat girl?
I was wondering that, too.

People have some pretty high standards online, eh?


But really, we should drop this line of conversation before someone posts that pic of the amazon woman in a neglige' ...


Image
User avatar
Debris
Posts: 4455
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Over Dresden at Angels one five

Post by Debris »

Exodor wrote:
Eduardo X wrote:
Debris wrote:Drunk fat girls need lovin' too!
Is that picture of a fat girl?
I was wondering that, too.

People have some pretty high standards online, eh?


But really, we should drop this line of conversation before someone posts that pic of the amazon woman in a neglige' ...


Image
I was actually referring to Default's analogy of being a drunk fat girl in the pile of coats, not about the picture.

Personally I don't like real skinny women and prefer a little meat on the bone. Not too much where it distorts her figure, just enough where I don't feel like I'm holding onto a stick figure. Fortunately my wife falls into this category and it's also beneficial, at least for me, that she has a penchant for fat guys like me.
Dirt
Posts: 11025
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 am

Post by Dirt »

I like my women fairly thin and that girl in the pic doesn't look fat.
User avatar
Asharak
Posts: 7907
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Asharak »

Definitely not fat, and definitely needing to end this before the Amazonian neglige picture shows up.

- Ash
Post Reply