Amazon has whacked our affiliate account. Hosting Donations/Commitments $2063 of $1920 (Sept 13/18). In Hand $1466 (Lump sum payments minus paypal graft). Paypal Donation Link Here

School shooting (elementary) in CT

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 25804
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana
Contact:

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Blackhawk » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:08 pm

Daehawk wrote: In fact I told the wife to get me a membership to the NRA for my birthday later next year.
This probably belongs in the R&P thread, but support gun rights - that's fine. Don't do it by supporting the NRA. Their extremist angle doesn't help anyone, including gun owners.
[This space left intentionally blank.]

User avatar
Anonymous Bosch
Posts: 7204
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Northern California [originally from the UK]

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Anonymous Bosch » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:26 pm

Forgive me if this has already been posted here or in the lengthy R&P thread, but Charlie Brooker's Newswipe circa 2009 absolutely skewered the media coverage following the Winnenden school shooting in 1999, and remains every bit as relevant to the current grief-porn media coverage related to the Newtown massacre.

I would also tend to agree with Roger Ebert's commentary on said media grief-porn and the Newtown massacre:
Roger Ebert wrote:The tragedy has dominated the airwaves this weekend, but the networks haven't dropped many regularly scheduled prime-time weekend shows to make way for breaking news coverage. By now, however, the Sunday morning TV news talks shows have assembled their expert "panels" to speculate about the reasons for the deaths of 26 murdered people, 20 of them in grade school.

Is this a heartless, cynical way to appoach Newtown? No doubt it is. In my opinion, the most useful way to "analyze" is to recall reactions to similar incidents in the past. I would like to quote the following words from an article by me, as follows:
"From his review of Gus Van Sant's 'Elephant', a fictionalized account of a Columbine-like school shooting, here's Roger Ebert on the media's behavior while reporting these kinds of events:

"Let me tell you a story. The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. "Wouldn't you say," she asked, "that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?" No, I said, I wouldn't say that. "But what about 'Basketball Diaries'?" she asked. "Doesn't that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?"

"The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it's unlikely the Columbine killers saw it.

"The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. "Events like this," I said, "if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn't have messed with me. I'll go out in a blaze of glory."

"In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of "explaining" them.

The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy."
This is Ebert again, back in the present. I gather my point is what goes around, comes around.
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters." -- Daniel Webster

User avatar
Dogstar
Posts: 1476
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:20 pm

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Dogstar » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:18 pm

My local paper graciously posted my response to the Newtown tragedy.
If the days to come are for grieving the horrible loss of life in Connecticut, of school officials who died doing their job and of little children who had their lives cut tragically short, let us also resolve to make the days ahead ones of action.

I don't speak to a single cause or of unattainable goals. There will be plenty who make clarion calls to one specific course or another. What I'm talking about is actively engaging the world and the people around you, even more so than you already do. It could be a small gesture, like letting a car in front of you or dropping off some canned goods at a homeless shelter. It could be something personal, like reaching out to a family member or friend who needs your support -- even if it's tough to do so -- or simply letting the people close to you know how much you care about them. It could be getting involved with a group of people that tries to help others; it could be promoting a certain cause or action that you think will help make the world better. There are a million opportunities to do so -- we just have to be look for them, and make the effort to make them happen.

Why do any or all of this? Because the world gets darker every time we pull back from each other, become more afraid, become less pledged to the common good. It makes things like this at more of a risk to happen, regardless of all our efforts to protect ourselves and our loved ones. Because we need to do so, if only to say that our actions, our commitment to our basic humanity and decency to one another, is immensely greater than what evil can accomplish. Because that which unites us -- our universal goal for a better world, both for ourselves and for our children -- far outweighs any differences that might divide us. And because thoughts and prayers only take us so far, we need a real and active commitment through whatever we can afford to give, be it our time, money, effort or love, to create a better world.

So if you find moments where you can help, tiny things that you can do or even great ideas that you want to passionately pursue, go for it. Don't abdicate the world we live in to the madmen, where we all simply shake our heads and wonder why the world is going to hell. We have the power to try and change it, to shape it towards that which we like and of which we dream. So while we mourn the dead and console the bereaved, commit to doing something -- to doing anything -- to make that better world happen.

User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 13491
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Zarathud » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:41 pm

Yes, the solution is to make the community a better place however small.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein
"When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal. - Nixon
"I don't stand by anything." - Trump
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” - John Stuart Mill, Inaugural Address Delivered to the University of St Andrews, 2/1/1867

User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 58951
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:
Isgrimnur’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Isgrimnur » Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:53 pm

New school
Nearly four years after tragedy struck Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., the school is opening its doors to students again. But those doors, like the rest of the building, look a little different today than they did in 2012, when a shooting rampage killed 20 first-graders and six educators.

A new elementary school opened Monday in Newtown, replacing the Sandy Hook school that was torn down after the shooting. The replacement facility, which cost $50 million to build, stands on the same property as the old school, but bears little resemblance to its predecessor. The new building features three courtyards, study spaces designed to look like treehouses, and a moat-like rain garden, and was inspired by the "regenerative, restorative and healing elements of nature," according to the project website.

Newtown residents voted to tear down the old school and construct a new one after the 2012 shooting.
...
As part of the design process, architecture firm Svigals and Partners spent months talking to people in the community, making its construction a collaborative process.

"They were very passionately protective," said project manager Julia McFadden to local radio station WSHU. "They really communicated heartfelt feelings about wanting the whole community to come together and recreate the school in a way the town could reconnect to it. Cause they really had their heart ripped out."

Roughly 70 out of the 390 students returning to Sandy Hook this year attended the old school at the time of the shooting, school officials said. About half were in the building at the time, though none witnessed the shootings. Around 60 percent of the faculty has returned with them.

School officials say they are meeting with the families of the shooting victims to discuss how best to remember the victims at the school. A more overt memorial will be built in another part of town, as the school will be geared more toward the future than the past.
Silver - 2k

Autobots and Starfleet officers — we fight together!

User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26878
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:
Rip’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Rip » Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:15 pm

Adam Lanza expressed his desire to commit the Sandy Hook massacre years before the tragedy took place — and when a witness alerted police the cops said there was nothing they can do.

The Sandy Hook shooter told an unidentified male in 2008 that he had access to assault weapons and planned to kill students at the elementary school along with his mother Nancy Lanza, according to FBI documents released this week.

The revelation was first reported by the near the New York Times on Thursday.

The witness — whose name has been redacted from the files — told feds that he had alerted the Newtown Police Department about the disturbing information after being privy to a conversation about the plot.

According to the witness, Newtown police said “Lanza’s mother owned the guns and that there was nothing N.P.D. could do about it.”
http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/sandy-hook ... cops-knew/
There is no refuge from memory and remorse in this world. The spirits of our foolish deeds haunt us, with or without repentance.
--

User avatar
gameoverman
Posts: 5117
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Glendora, CA

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by gameoverman » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:14 pm

The cops can't do anything if no crime has been committed, and I'm glad of that since who knows how long I'd have been in prison if someone could get the cops to lock me up by saying I talked about doing something illegal.

Maybe one day we'll have a viable alternative for people, something besides 'do nothing' or 'call cops'.

User avatar
funnygirl
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:47 pm
Location: next to a cornfield

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by funnygirl » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:50 pm

gameoverman wrote:
Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:14 pm
The cops can't do anything if no crime has been committed, and I'm glad of that since who knows how long I'd have been in prison if someone could get the cops to lock me up by saying I talked about doing something illegal.

Maybe one day we'll have a viable alternative for people, something besides 'do nothing' or 'call cops'.
Is it not possible for the police (maybe a high ranking individual or a police psychologist) to contact the mother with the fact they have credible information that her son has been talking about this. At least give her the information so she could lock up or remove the weapons from the home and speak to the son's mental health provider if he had one, or get him to one post haste if not?
Since light travels faster than sound, many people appear bright before you hear them speak.

User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26878
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:
Rip’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Rip » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:55 pm

Making a threat of harm is a crime.

Even if you say it on snapchat.
There is no refuge from memory and remorse in this world. The spirits of our foolish deeds haunt us, with or without repentance.
--

User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 25804
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana
Contact:

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Blackhawk » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:56 pm

gameoverman wrote:
Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:14 pm
The cops can't do anything if no crime has been committed, and I'm glad of that since who knows how long I'd have been in prison if someone could get the cops to lock me up by saying I talked about doing something illegal.

Maybe one day we'll have a viable alternative for people, something besides 'do nothing' or 'call cops'.
Today they'd at least treat it as a credible threat and investigate. If they could actually find confirmation of the threat, there would likely be charges.
[This space left intentionally blank.]

User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 13491
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Zarathud » Thu Oct 26, 2017 9:16 pm

Is Rip really arguing for the police to arrest every gun owner who makes a threat? Can the government confiscate their guns and prosecute?

Because I'd pass that law in a heartbeat if the NRA would get out of the way.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein
"When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal. - Nixon
"I don't stand by anything." - Trump
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” - John Stuart Mill, Inaugural Address Delivered to the University of St Andrews, 2/1/1867

User avatar
AWS260
Posts: 10166
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by AWS260 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:59 pm

Five years ago today.

User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 14019
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Carpet_pissr » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:33 pm

And the typical right-wing ranters still saying it was staged. So sad.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 86656.html

User avatar
Moliere
Posts: 12007
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Walking through a desert land

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Moliere » Tue Apr 17, 2018 11:20 am

Sandy Hook Parents Hit Alex Jones With Defamation Lawsuits
Alex Jones has spent years claiming the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School ― where a shooter killed 20 small children and six adults ― was faked. He has claimed the parents of these dead children are liars and “crisis actors.”

Now, those parents are coming after him.

In a pair of lawsuits filed late Monday, the parents of two children who died in the December 2012 shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, say Jones’ repeated lies and conspiratorial ravings have led to death threats. The suits join at least two other recent cases accusing the Infowars host of defamation.
Any lawyers around here want to confirm if they have a valid claim? I hope they do and I hope Alex Jones has to pay them millions in damages.
"The world is suffering more today from the good people who want to mind other men's business than it is from the bad people who are willing to let everybody look after their own individual affairs." - Clarence Darrow

User avatar
Punisher
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Punisher » Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:24 pm

Moliere wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 11:20 am
Sandy Hook Parents Hit Alex Jones With Defamation Lawsuits
Alex Jones has spent years claiming the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School ― where a shooter killed 20 small children and six adults ― was faked. He has claimed the parents of these dead children are liars and “crisis actors.”

Now, those parents are coming after him.

In a pair of lawsuits filed late Monday, the parents of two children who died in the December 2012 shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, say Jones’ repeated lies and conspiratorial ravings have led to death threats. The suits join at least two other recent cases accusing the Infowars host of defamation.
Any lawyers around here want to confirm if they have a valid claim? I hope they do and I hope Alex Jones has to pay them millions in damages.
I'm not a lawyer, but it sounds like they'd have a case..
Defamation of character occurs when someone makes a false statement about you that causes you some type of harm. The statement must be published (meaning some third party must have heard it), false, and it must result in harm, usually to the reputation.
All yourLightning Bolts are Belong to Us

User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 39980
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by GreenGoo » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:02 pm

It also has to be believable by a "reasonable" person familiar with the context.

How that applies to Jones and his swarm of parasites I have no idea.

I'm thinking the suit fails, but maybe having a popular platform and repeated untruths might sway a judge? We'll see I guess.

User avatar
Remus West
Posts: 32749
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Not in Westland

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Remus West » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:06 pm

GreenGoo wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:02 pm
It also has to be believable by a "reasonable" person familiar with the context.

How that applies to Jones and his swarm of parasites I have no idea.

I'm thinking the suit fails, but maybe having a popular platform and repeated untruths might sway a judge? We'll see I guess.
I'd hope that the size of the audience and the ease with which these things have spread makes it acceptable (to me, no idea what it means legally) to set aside the "reasonable" piece. If they don't set that aside they are essentially saying it is legal to gaslight the entire nation as long as you make them believe something ridiculous enough.
“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” - H.L. Mencken

User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 60301
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by LordMortis » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:48 pm

Remus West wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:06 pm
GreenGoo wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:02 pm
It also has to be believable by a "reasonable" person familiar with the context.

How that applies to Jones and his swarm of parasites I have no idea.

I'm thinking the suit fails, but maybe having a popular platform and repeated untruths might sway a judge? We'll see I guess.
I'd hope that the size of the audience and the ease with which these things have spread makes it acceptable (to me, no idea what it means legally) to set aside the "reasonable" piece. If they don't set that aside they are essentially saying it is legal to gaslight the entire nation as long as you make them believe something ridiculous enough.
Or as long as you can demonstrate the people aren't reasonable. Like for instance, if they believe someone Alex Jones and his horseshit, they can instantly thought to be not reasonable... Hey... Wait a second....

User avatar
Scuzz
Posts: 9155
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: The Arm Pit of California

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Scuzz » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:54 pm

As long as they force Jones to pay some attorney an outrageous amount of money to defend himself they might be happy. Make him think twice about doing the same thing, although I have no doubt he probably has. I hope they have found someone to take the case based on a percentage of any payoff.

User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 39980
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by GreenGoo » Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:01 pm

It's very possible that the parents will be made to pay Jone's legal fees if the lawsuit fails.

Mr. Fed covers all this stuff pretty extensively. I wonder what he'd have to say on this particular example.

User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 58951
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:
Isgrimnur’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Isgrimnur » Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:37 pm

Texas Monthly
His defense, meanwhile, argues that while Jones says that Cooper and De La Rosa faked the interview, and provides evidence for that claim that draws upon Jones’s own authority with video production, Jones didn’t intend to speak factually—and, in fact, no reasonable person would expect that Jones spoke factually on his show.
...
“No reasonable reader or listener would interpret Mr. Jones’ statements regarding the possibility of a ‘blue-screen’ being used as a verifiably false statement of fact, and even if it is verifiable as false, the entire context in which it was made discloses that the statements are mere opinions ‘masquerading as a fact.'”

That may be the best argument available to Jones in defending the suit, but it also puts him once more in a position where his lawyers are arguing in court that the things he says during his broadcasts aren’t true—and, in fact, that any “reasonable reader or listener” would conclude that Jones, when he makes statements like “the green screen isn’t set right,” isn’t speaking factually. If Jones isn’t to be taken seriously when making statements like that, though, it becomes harder to understand what, exactly, Infowars is supposed to be informing its audience of.
Silver - 2k

Autobots and Starfleet officers — we fight together!

User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 15540
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish
coopasonic’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by coopasonic » Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm

and, in fact, that any “reasonable reader or listener” would conclude that Jones, when he makes statements like “the green screen isn’t set right,” isn’t speaking factually.
He's got a point.
-Coop

User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 58951
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:
Isgrimnur’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Isgrimnur » Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:21 pm

Have we seen a study on how many viewers could actually be labeled as reasonable?
Silver - 2k

Autobots and Starfleet officers — we fight together!

User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 15540
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish
coopasonic’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by coopasonic » Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:32 pm

Infowars viewers? Drop a couple quarters on opposite sides of your desk and you have the Venn diagram.
-Coop

User avatar
Sepiche
Posts: 7833
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Olathe, KS
Sepiche’s avatar
Loading…

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Sepiche » Wed Aug 01, 2018 4:44 pm

If Jones isn’t to be taken seriously when making statements like that, though, it becomes harder to understand what, exactly, Infowars is supposed to be informing its audience of.
Duh, it's informing them where they can spend money to make Alex Jones richer.

User avatar
Moat_Man
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:44 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Moat_Man’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Moat_Man » Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:41 pm

So it's a comedy show?
Hold the line
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

User avatar
Moliere
Posts: 12007
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Walking through a desert land

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Moliere » Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:35 pm

Major Internet Platforms Ban Alex Jones
Jones is a noted conspiracy theorist and the founder of the InfoWars website and podcast. In a Monday tweet, he confirmed that Facebook, YouTube, Spotify, and Apple had completely unpublished and/or removed his professional pages and podcasts. All four companies stated that Jones' inflammatory statements about Muslims, immigrants, members of the LGBT community, and other groups violated their terms of service.

"We believe in giving people a voice, but we also want everyone using Facebook to feel safe," Facebook said in a statement. "It's why we have Community Standards and remove anything that violates them, including hate speech that attacks or dehumanizes others. Earlier today, we removed four Pages belonging to Alex Jones for repeatedly posting content over the past several days that breaks those Community Standards." The company also called Jones a "repeat offender."

YouTube listed some similar reasons for its ban in an email to NBC News. Spotify and Apple removed the InfoWars podcast from their streaming services, though a number of InfoWars apps are still available for download on the Apple store.
Probably just fuel for his next conspiracy rant.
"The world is suffering more today from the good people who want to mind other men's business than it is from the bad people who are willing to let everybody look after their own individual affairs." - Clarence Darrow

User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 45574
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, where we only use the old smilies

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by LawBeefaroni » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:02 am

He really has no grounds. Not only are companies like FB not bound by the 1st Amendment, he has admitted in court that it was bullshit. Dude is toast.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT

User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 37304
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by hepcat » Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:07 pm

He's had grounds for his previous rants?
I beat a camel to death with a monkey. Can I do that?
-Mr Bismarck

You have to whack a few rabbits before you are ready to punch a camel.
-Coopasonic

User avatar
Holman
Posts: 20243
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Approximately Wissahickon

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Holman » Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:27 pm

Alex Jones news:


Families of Sandy Hook shooting victims win legal victory in lawsuit against InfoWars and Alex Jones, after judge grants families’ discovery requests, allowing access to InfoWars’ internal marketing and financial documents. https://abcn.ws/2D2QN4D
Bring it on. I hope the discovery process amounts to colonoscopy-by-chainsaw.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.

User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 58951
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:
Isgrimnur’s avatar
Offline

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by Isgrimnur » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:12 am

NBC News
A Connecticut judge has ruled that Infowars host Alex Jones must undergo a sworn deposition in the defamation case brought against him by family members of Sandy Hook school shooting victims.
...
The superior court judge also ruled Wednesday that the families can depose several other defendants in the case, including those critical to Infowars' business operations.

Jones has defended the discussions on his show. He has cited First Amendment rights and says he believes the shooting happened.
Silver - 2k

Autobots and Starfleet officers — we fight together!

User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 45574
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, where we only use the old smilies

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by LawBeefaroni » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:50 pm

"Denying it gets me a lot more listeners, sponsors, and sells my herbal supplements. However, I do believe it happened. Can I go now?"

"Oh, and Bilderberg/Rothschild/Inside Job!!!!!"
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT

User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 31902
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: School shooting (elementary) in CT

Post by El Guapo » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:16 pm

"No no, I knew it wasn't true. I was just lying about it so that people would give me more money. Wait, why are my lawyers shaking their heads like that?"

Post Reply