That certainly is the main issue. I don't think anybody who is interested in extending human lifespan thinks that 70 more years of life on a respirator with a feeding tube is really the way to go. I don't think many would call that "life" in any meaningful sense.Jeff V wrote:The trick isn't merely to extend life, but extend the productive years. While people live longer than they ever have historically, we're all pretty much geezerfied by 65 and this hasn't changed appreciably (although the definition of geezerfied probably has).
Assuming that such a thing could be done, let me throw some pretty arbitrary age definitions out there:
0-18 childhood/adolescence
19-30 young adult
31-50 middle age
51-65 golden years
66-75 infirmity
Now let's say some magic anti-aging treatment comes along and gives us a simple x2 multiplier to everything but childhood/adolescence.
I don't think any of us are itching for 20 years of infirmity... and perhaps many don't see the value of 30 years of watching Matlock and going to Denny's.
But, think about how sweet it would be to have your "20's" last for over 20 years.
From my own anecdotal evidence (thus completely useless, natch)... I recently turned 28, am involved in scientific research, absolutely love it, but only have a BS... I should go to grad school... however, I am concerned about the "ticking clock" and being forced to live like a pauper (er, student) while earning that advanced degree. If I could take all the things I've learned since college, and put them back into my just-graduated-college former self, there would be no question as to what I would do.
The limitations of "getting older" make the question more complex. In essence: aging limits me.
I think everybody here can come up with a: "If I knew then, what I know now..." type situation.
This is why I think increasing lifespan is fundamentally good. Wisdom acquired through life experience on a longer time scale. That has to be good.
As an aside:
If you are concerned that the "population problem" would be exacerbated, you shouldn't be. Average liifespan has a pretty minuscule effect on population growth... the real issue is how many kids do you have?
Would it change if you live for 150 years? I would say no....