Page 3 of 11

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 4:21 pm
by Daehawk
12 tries. 1 I simply let fall to see what happened :P

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 12:41 am
by Zaxxon
Successful landing tonight. https://youtu.be/1B6oiLNyKKI

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 2:23 am
by Enough
So amazing, totally gave me the chills. Here's an HD sequence from a helicopter.

Great backgrounder here on the significance, don't miss the comparison (or more accurately how there is no comparison) to Blue Origin.

Enlarge Image

Enlarge Image

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:24 am
by Kraken
That's some B-movie Buck Rogers stuff right there. :clap:

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:04 am
by Zaxxon
Yeah, Bezos totally walked into the fire with his asinine tweet...

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:08 am
by Hrdina
Enough wrote:So amazing, totally gave me the chills. Here's an HD sequence from a helicopter.

Great backgrounder here on the significance, don't miss the comparison (or more accurately how there is no comparison) to Blue Origin.
Thanks for both of those!
Zaxxon wrote:Yeah, Bezos totally walked into the fire with his asinine tweet...
Musk's tweet after the BO launch wasn't exactly great either, but Bezos should have taken the high road.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:11 am
by Zaxxon
Agreed on Musk's tweet. I do think he had a bit more reason to go there though, as there were a lot of articles somewhat incorrectly stating that Blue Origin had beaten SpaceX to the punch at the time.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:24 am
by Hrdina
Zaxxon wrote:Agreed on Musk's tweet. I do think he had a bit more reason to go there though, as there were a lot of articles somewhat incorrectly stating that Blue Origin had beaten SpaceX to the punch at the time.
Both of these guys pay a lot of money to PR people for their companies. They should let them do their jobs. :D

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:28 am
by Zaxxon
Whatever Musk is paying his PR guy, it's not enough. What a nightmare job.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:58 am
by Isgrimnur
I'm making a note here: huge success:
SpaceX completed an historic vertical landing of its Falcon 9 rocket on Monday night — the first time such a feat had been achieved.

The launch and landing in Cape Canaveral, Florida, were the first from the private U.S. spaceflight company since its rocket exploded on liftoff in June.
...
SpaceX had not previously attempted to land a rocket on land, and it marked the firm's first successful attempt to recover a rocket from an orbital flight.

Previous attempts, all unsuccessful, were attempted on floating landing pads.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:06 am
by LawBeefaroni
You know Zax is aleady on it...
Zaxxon wrote:Successful landing tonight. https://youtu.be/1B6oiLNyKKI

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:43 am
by Isgrimnur
:doh:

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:56 am
by wonderpug
And suddenly I have the urge to fire up Kerbal Space Program again.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 12:46 pm
by Enough
Hrdina wrote:
Zaxxon wrote:Agreed on Musk's tweet. I do think he had a bit more reason to go there though, as there were a lot of articles somewhat incorrectly stating that Blue Origin had beaten SpaceX to the punch at the time.
Both of these guys pay a lot of money to PR people for their companies. They should let them do their jobs. :D
In some ways I don't mind the posts, it's great to see competition thriving, we need it to!

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 6:18 pm
by Hrdina
Enough wrote:
Hrdina wrote:
Zaxxon wrote:Agreed on Musk's tweet. I do think he had a bit more reason to go there though, as there were a lot of articles somewhat incorrectly stating that Blue Origin had beaten SpaceX to the punch at the time.
Both of these guys pay a lot of money to PR people for their companies. They should let them do their jobs. :D
In some ways I don't mind the posts, it's great to see competition thriving, we need it to!
Oh, I love the competition. It's the ****ing contest that is a little off-putting. Then again, we're talking about rockets, so maybe that's appropriate after all...

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:20 pm
by Zaxxon
T-5 days to an attempt to repeat the landing, this time on the droneship. Until then, enjoy this recap.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:52 pm
by Kraken
D'oh! Close, but no cigar: another booster landing failed. After a soft touchdown right on target, a landing strut failed to lock. The booster tipped over and went kerboom.

Successfully landing on a floating platform is important because it requires a lot less fuel than flying all the way back to the launch site on land. The floating platform can be towed downrange so that the booster can basically travel straight down rather than retracing its launch path.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:55 pm
by Zaxxon

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:09 pm
by Ralph-Wiggum
I just watched that launch from the beach in St. Augustine! Pretty cool!

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:11 pm
by Zaxxon
Ralph-Wiggum wrote:I just watched that launch from the beach in St. Augustine! Pretty cool!
I'm jealous. Watching it live felt enough like being part of history--seeing it in person...

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 8:10 pm
by Ralph-Wiggum
Well, to be fair, I saw a large flame and a contrail. We weren't close enough to see it in any detail and I didn't have binoculars. Still was pretty cool though.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 11:19 am
by Isgrimnur
[url\http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0 ... aceX-video]Success #2[/url]
SpaceX had its second successful rocket landing at sea on Friday, lending validity to the idea that private space companies really can make dreams soar.

The unmanned Falcon 9 rocket carried a communications satellite, which it put in orbit. Less than three minutes later, the rocket turned around and headed back toward Earth, ultimately landing on a platform in the Atlantic Ocean.

SpaceX didn’t expect a successful return landing because of the rocket’s high altitude and speed. Elon Musk was jubilant about the mission on Twitter.
...
The company is the only one so far to recover a rocket following an orbital launch. Blue Origin, founded by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, has also performed rocket re-launches and landings, but has yet to put anything into orbit.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 11:28 am
by Zaxxon
Worth noting that this was a much more difficult landing. Due to the higher velocity and relatively less remaining fuel, they had to light 3 engines for the landing and forego the boostback burn.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 11:55 pm
by Zaxxon

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 9:18 am
by coopasonic
It was off center.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:40 am
by Zaxxon
Another successful droneship landing tonight. I believe that's now 4 by sea and two by land.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:51 am
by Daehawk
Are the British on their way?

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:13 am
by WYBaugh
Daehawk wrote:Are the British on their way?
:D

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:31 am
by Zaxxon
Give me reusable rockets or give me death.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:23 pm
by Zaxxon
Zaxxon wrote:Give me reusable rockets or give me death.
First flight-proven* rocket launch customer is go for a Q4 2016 launch target.

* - used

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:04 pm
by coopasonic
Lucky. That death thing was coming due in a couple months.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:17 pm
by Jeff V
coopasonic wrote:Lucky. That death thing was coming due in a couple months.
I thought Zax was volunteering to be the first monkey to fly into space in a used rocket.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:16 am
by Moliere

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:28 am
by Zaxxon
I imagine we can kiss that re-flight and any Falcon Heavy 2016 launches goodbye.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:42 am
by Kraken
Bummer. No details yet and only video/pics of heavy smoke from a great distance. I guess it's marginally better to lose the vehicle and payload on the launch pad than in flight.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:43 am
by Zaxxon
Rumors I've seen indicated that this occurred around T-3 min, so perhaps a fuel loading issue rather than something with the engines or firing. Of course, rumors can be full of shit.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:47 am
by Jeff V
Zaxxon wrote:I imagine we can kiss that re-flight and any Falcon Heavy 2016 launches goodbye.
Whew, good thing you opted out of their Space Monkey program!

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:15 pm
by Zaxxon

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:46 pm
by malchior
Kraken wrote:Bummer. No details yet and only video/pics of heavy smoke from a great distance. I guess it's marginally better to lose the vehicle and payload on the launch pad than in flight.
Unless the explosion damages the launch pad. I'd think that the debris from a failure falling into the ocean is probably not great ecologically but cheaper from an infrastructure POV.

Re: SpaceX

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:03 pm
by LawBeefaroni
Payload:
The Amos-6 communications satellite reportedly cost $195 million and was built for Spacecom by Israel Aerospace Industries to serve as a replacement for Spacecom's Amos-2 satellite, which is expected end its mission this year. In October 2015, Facebook and the satellite communications company Eutelsat also announced a $95 million agreement to lease broadband capacity on the satellite from Spacecom, according to SpaceNews.
I'm sure it's insured but ouch.