[movie] Blade Runner 2049

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63531
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

[movie] Blade Runner 2049

Post by Daehawk »

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/16/ ... ner-sequel

Im not sure I want a sequel. It might be ok with him as the older guy but not sure.


EDIT: Old thread title.... Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel
Last edited by Daehawk on Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by GreenGoo »

No interest.

Not everything needs a sequel, no matter how desperate hollywood is getting for ideas.
User avatar
TheMix
Posts: 10905
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Broomfield, Colorado

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by TheMix »

GreenGoo wrote:No interest.

Not everything needs a sequel, no matter how desperate hollywood is getting for ideas.
This. Absolutely agree. I'll even go a step farther to say that I would expect it to be absolutely terrible.

Black Lives Matter

Isgrimnur - Facebook makes you hate your friends and family. LinkedIn makes you hate you co-workers. NextDoor makes you hate your neighbors.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

If it's good then it will be good. If it's bad then it will be bad.

It will probably be bad.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12369
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by McNutt »

This is a bad idea. See Prometheus for an example of Ridley Scott unnecessarily revisiting a successful movie. Next he'll get Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine to sign up for a sequel to The Duelists.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by LordMortis »

Doesn't need a sequel.

Doesn't need to be remade.

From a moviegoer perspective, Ford needs to call it a good career while we can remember that he had a good career. (Ford may see it differently, like having the Micheal Caine style of acting.)
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

I don't see any reason to be opposed to them making the movie. If it's good, then wonderful, we get more exploration of the BR universe. If it sucks, then we shrug and ignore it.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by GreenGoo »

El Guapo wrote:I don't see any reason to be opposed to them making the movie. If it's good, then wonderful, we get more exploration of the BR universe. If it sucks, then we shrug and ignore it.
But that's not what happens. It sullies our positive association with the original movie. Fill the world with bad batman movies and it becomes much more difficult to enjoy the idea of batman.

Let's go with a Citizen Kane sequel while we're at it. Either it's good, or it's bad. No big deal.

I guess I'm saying "I disagree" =D
Jeff V
Posts: 36414
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Jeff V »

LordMortis wrote:Doesn't need a sequel.

Doesn't need to be remade.

From a moviegoer perspective, Ford needs to call it a good career while we can remember that he had a good career. (Ford may see it differently, like having the Micheal Caine style of acting.)
I don't think he needs to hang it up...he just needs to be in more geezerfied-roles and not try playing the action star.
Black Lives Matter
Jeff V
Posts: 36414
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Jeff V »

LordMortis wrote:Doesn't need a sequel.

Doesn't need to be remade.

From a moviegoer perspective, Ford needs to call it a good career while we can remember that he had a good career. (Ford may see it differently, like having the Micheal Caine style of acting.)
I don't think he needs to hang it up...he just needs to be in more geezerfied-roles and not try playing the action star.
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12369
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by McNutt »

A bad sequel can really taint your perception of the original. I found the second two Matrix movies to be so bad that it took away a bit of the magic of the first one. Blade Runner could really screw things up by telling you Decker or this person were actually replicants and it would make you see the original in a different way. I don't want to see the original any other way.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

GreenGoo wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I don't see any reason to be opposed to them making the movie. If it's good, then wonderful, we get more exploration of the BR universe. If it sucks, then we shrug and ignore it.
But that's not what happens. It sullies our positive association with the original movie. Fill the world with bad batman movies and it becomes much more difficult to enjoy the idea of batman.

Let's go with a Citizen Kane sequel while we're at it. Either it's good, or it's bad. No big deal.

I guess I'm saying "I disagree" =D
Prometheus sucked. I don't see people thinking less of Alien or Aliens.

And the world IS full of bad Batman movies (and bad Batman shows). That didn't keep people from enjoying the Bale batman movies.

Everyone hated Godfather III, but the first two movies are still beloved.

Better yet - Highlander II was awful, and introduced lots of character twists that made no sense and would likely cause one to look at the original differently. But, I think we've all agreed to ignore the movie. Problem solved.

So, I'm confused. Bad sequels happen all the time, and people don't stop loving the original(s). Why would this be different?
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55318
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by LawBeefaroni »

There's a whole universe to explore but the Story of Blade runner is complete. I could handle: Same universe, unrelated story, Harrison Ford as Rick Deckard cameo.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by LordMortis »

GreenGoo wrote:But that's not what happens. It sullies our positive association with the original movie. Fill the world with bad batman movies and it becomes much more difficult to enjoy the idea of batman.
I don't know about that Tim Burton and his franchise didn't ruin Batman. They were just the foundation of my belief that Tim Burton doesn't need to interpret existing stories.
Let's go with a Citizen Kane sequel while we're at it. Either it's good, or it's bad. No big deal.

I guess I'm saying "I disagree" =D
Always no sometimes
think it's me
But you know I know when it's a dream
I think I know I mean a Yes
but it's all wrong


But I like where you're going. I want a Sequel to Titanic and Apollo 13 and Princess Bride.
User avatar
Jaymann
Posts: 19324
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: California

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Jaymann »

McNutt wrote:This is a bad idea. See Prometheus for an example of Ridley Scott unnecessarily revisiting a successful movie. Next he'll get Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine to sign up for a sequel to The Duelists.
That would be sweet. Is Carradine still alive?
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55318
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Jaymann wrote:
McNutt wrote:This is a bad idea. See Prometheus for an example of Ridley Scott unnecessarily revisiting a successful movie. Next he'll get Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine to sign up for a sequel to The Duelists.
That would be sweet. Is Carradine still alive?
Keith? Yes.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by GreenGoo »

El Guapo wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I don't see any reason to be opposed to them making the movie. If it's good, then wonderful, we get more exploration of the BR universe. If it sucks, then we shrug and ignore it.
But that's not what happens. It sullies our positive association with the original movie. Fill the world with bad batman movies and it becomes much more difficult to enjoy the idea of batman.

Let's go with a Citizen Kane sequel while we're at it. Either it's good, or it's bad. No big deal.

I guess I'm saying "I disagree" =D
Prometheus sucked. I don't see people thinking less of Alien or Aliens.

And the world IS full of bad Batman movies (and bad Batman shows). That didn't keep people from enjoying the Bale batman movies.

Everyone hated Godfather III, but the first two movies are still beloved.

So, I'm confused. Bad sequels happen all the time, and people don't stop loving the original(s). Why would this be different?
Until the Bale movies were made, Batman movies were a punchline. If bale made another batman movie that had Arnold throwing around bad one liners, people WOULD enjoy the others less.

Many, many people feel that Godfather III sulled the first two. I didn't say that Blade Runner would suddenly be considered shit. I said a poor sequel (or unneeded one) reflects poorly on the original. Just like a bad book in a series can completely derail your enjoyment of a series.

Some people will be immune to this effect. Some people will overreact to this effect. Some people will just think it's sad that a successful, artistic commercial work is pimped out to generate additional revenue, in all likelihood leaving the artistic merit behind.

Just make another shitty movie. Don't try to make another shitty movie but pretend it's part of this awesome thing that I love so I'll be more inclined to give you money.

edit: I actually thought I was responding to Lawbeef's points. i.e. I thought El Guapo's post was Lawbeefs. Oddly, I'm somewhat relieved it was not.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28907
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Holman »

Don't want. Blade Runner is near perfect. Adding to it would diminish it.

Anyway, BR *is* a sequel, of a sort. It's an SF remake of the whole detective-noir genre, and everything in it depends on that relationship. Trying to extend it into a franchise would make it look like a dumb gimmick.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Rip »

LawBeefaroni wrote:
Jaymann wrote:
McNutt wrote:This is a bad idea. See Prometheus for an example of Ridley Scott unnecessarily revisiting a successful movie. Next he'll get Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine to sign up for a sequel to The Duelists.
That would be sweet. Is Carradine still alive?
Keith? Yes.

and David is still hanging around.

Too soon?
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

I'm curious why you are glad that you were responding to me and not LawBeef.

It just seems to be that there are lots of examples of series of movies being composed of good ones and bad ones, and people enjoying the good ones but not the bad ones, even after the bad ones come out. There are lots of shitty Star Trek movies that do silly things with known characters (Final Frontier, anyone?). People still enjoy Wrath of Khan a lot. There were good Bond movies, then shitty ones, then good ones, and there will probably be at least one more shitty Bond movie sooner or later. Goldfinger and Casino Royale will still be good (especially the latter). Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom Raiders of the Lost Ark is still beloved notwithstanding Crystal Skull.

Not that there isn't a nerd rage effect when a bad movie is made in a beloved franchise, I just think that people generally overstate its impact.
Last edited by El Guapo on Fri May 16, 2014 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82096
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Isgrimnur »

Temple of Doom was the weakest before Crystal Skull.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

Isgrimnur wrote:Temple of Doom was the weakest before Crystal Skull.
Really? Indiana Jones was never my particular nerd focus so I guess I'm not up to date, but I thought it was better regarded. Is Raiders of the Lost Ark the only good one, then?
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12369
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by McNutt »

I gave you a specific example of how a sequel can taint the original and described a possible plot element in a Blade Runner sequel that would forever change the way we look at the original. It's possible that another Blade Runner could rock, but I have many examples where revisiting a beloved movie or franchise was a really bad idea and few examples of when it wasn't.
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12369
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by McNutt »

El Guapo wrote:
Isgrimnur wrote:Temple of Doom was the weakest before Crystal Skull.
Really? Indiana Jones was never my particular nerd focus so I guess I'm not up to date, but I thought it was better regarded. Is Raiders of the Lost Ark the only good one, then?
Temple of Doom was a pretty bad movie. Last Crusade was pretty good, but nowhere near as good as the original.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82096
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Isgrimnur »

^ That.

The opening sequence, the trap room, mine carts, and the rope bridge. Other than that, I'm hard pressed to remember anything from ToD that I cared for.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by LordMortis »

I liked ToD. Not as much as Last Crusade but I liked it.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

McNutt wrote:I gave you a specific example of how a sequel can taint the original and described a possible plot element in a Blade Runner sequel that would forever change the way we look at the original. It's possible that another Blade Runner could rock, but I have many examples where revisiting a beloved movie or franchise was a really bad idea and few examples of when it wasn't.
There are lots of examples where revisiting a beloved movie was a bad idea insofar as it produced a shitty sequel (say, Prometheus). The question is how often does a bad sequel taint the original so as to reduce general enjoyment of the original, and I think that's pretty rare.

As for the Matrix sequels, that's a problem partly because the first movie was written clearly as part of a trilogy and less as a standalone story. That the subsequent sequels (i.e. two thirds of the overall story) sucked diminishes the value of the original because the majority of the story sucks, and the movie is good but not great on a standalone basis (IMO). It'd be like if Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi sucked - A New Hope would still be a decent movie, but it would lose the value of being part of a epic trilogy story.

Blade Runner's a great standalone story, and if a new Blade Runner is made and sucks, it will still be a great standalone story.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

Isgrimnur wrote:^ That.

The opening sequence, the trap room, mine carts, and the rope bridge. Other than that, I'm hard pressed to remember anything from ToD that I cared for.
I guess replace it with Raiders of the Lost Ark in my post, then - apparently I overstated the original reception of Temple of Doom, but that's not central to what I'm saying anyway.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12369
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by McNutt »

What if the movie does something really stupid, like says that the replicants in the first movie weren't really replicants at all and that they were just brainwashed people or something dumb like that? Would you still be able to watch Blade Runner the same way? I know that's a far-fetched example, but such stupidity has been added to prequels/sequels like the midichlorians and that the immortals of Highlander were alien exiles.

As has been said before, just put all of this energy into making another movie and not try an unnecessary sequel/reboot/remake.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41250
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by El Guapo »

McNutt wrote:What if the movie does something really stupid, like says that the replicants in the first movie weren't really replicants at all and that they were just brainwashed people or something dumb like that? Would you still be able to watch Blade Runner the same way? I know that's a far-fetched example, but such stupidity has been added to prequels/sequels like the midichlorians and that the immortals of Highlander were alien exiles.

As has been said before, just put all of this energy into making another movie and not try an unnecessary sequel/reboot/remake.
Yes, I would. Blade Runner's a complete story, so if another shitty movie says something stupid about the universe it's severable. Your examples are exactly what I mean - everyone's agreed to ignore midichlorians and the existence of Highlander II.

It's different when the original movie is written as part of a trilogy (part of an overall story) and the later movies in the sequence suck, so that questions raised in the first movie are given shitty answers in the subsequent movies (as in the Matrix trilogy). Then you're left with an incomplete story.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
tru1cy
Posts: 5175
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:49 am
Location: Somewhere in Baltimore, MD

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by tru1cy »

IN -


Also, to add I hate ambiguous endings,( Hi, Inception and thanks to Michael Caine ), so anything that expands on Blade Runner is good in my book
Last edited by tru1cy on Fri May 16, 2014 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
xbox live gamertag:Soulchilde
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12674
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Rumpy »

One of my favourite roles of his is in 42. He's so great in that, that he owns the role. He should look to taking on more roles outside his comfort zone.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by GreenGoo »

El Guapo wrote:I'm curious why you are glad that you were responding to me and not LawBeef.
Me too.

I thought about it a bit and might have an idea now. Not something worth sharing though.

It's nothing for anyone to be offended about. My apologies if it came across that way.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by GreenGoo »

El Guapo wrote:
Isgrimnur wrote:Temple of Doom was the weakest before Crystal Skull.
Really? Indiana Jones was never my particular nerd focus so I guess I'm not up to date, but I thought it was better regarded. Is Raiders of the Lost Ark the only good one, then?
indiana Jones was right around the time I was getting heavily into D&D. The whole cave/temple spelunking treasure hunting really struck me with the right tone ay the right time in my life. That initial sequence with the traps and treasure at the end? Straight out of a kid's D&D fantasy adventure.

Not to mention it is a far better movie that Temple, which superficially has all the same D&D elements, but is just terrible. Even as a kid I thought it was weak sauce comparatively.
User avatar
hentzau
Posts: 15094
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Castle Zenda, Ruritania

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by hentzau »

GreenGoo wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
Isgrimnur wrote:Temple of Doom was the weakest before Crystal Skull.
Really? Indiana Jones was never my particular nerd focus so I guess I'm not up to date, but I thought it was better regarded. Is Raiders of the Lost Ark the only good one, then?
indiana Jones was right around the time I was getting heavily into D&D. The whole cave/temple spelunking treasure hunting really struck me with the right tone ay the right time in my life. That initial sequence with the traps and treasure at the end? Straight out of a kid's D&D fantasy adventure.

Not to mention it is a far better movie that Temple, which superficially has all the same D&D elements, but is just terrible. Even as a kid I thought it was weak sauce comparatively.
I had written up a lengthy post about why I thought Temple didn't deserve the bad rap that it got, because I thought it was really about the birth of the Indy that we know and love, but I deleted it because it was all over the place and rambling.

Fortunately someone over at AICN wrote up my thoughts much more coherently than I did.
“We can never allow Murania to become desecrated by the presence of surface people. Our lives are serene, our minds are superior, our accomplishments greater. Gene Autry must be captured!!!” - Queen Tika, The Phantom Empire
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63531
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Daehawk »

A little info in that spoiler. Its a link to it. But theres also a small spoiler in there. Click at your own risk.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by tgb »

I'm OK with it, as long as they stick to the source material, Phil Dick's Do Androids Bitch About Kids These Days And Their Goddamned Loud Music? or the third book of the trilogy, Do Androids Kvetch About Their Digestion?
I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
User avatar
Suitably Ironic Moniker
Posts: 3601
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:09 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Suitably Ironic Moniker »

tru1cy wrote:IN -


Also, to add I hate ambiguous endings,( Hi, Inception and thanks to Michael Caine ), so anything that expands on Blade Runner is good in my book
I don't see Inception as being ambiguous; the point wasn't whether it was a dream or not, it was that Leo didn't care. He was just happy to be with his kids, regardless of its reality.
When I was a boy, I laid in my twin-sized bed and wondered where my brother was. - Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
Grundbegriff
Posts: 22277
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 am
Location: http://baroquepotion.com
Contact:

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Grundbegriff »

Thanks for clarifying the point. I guess those weeks of widespread discussion were a function of stupidity, not ambiguity.
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63531
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Harrison Ford offered Blade Runner sequel

Post by Daehawk »

--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
Post Reply