Active Shooter [Aurora, IL]

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55354
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by LawBeefaroni »

$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:33 pm I'm hoping we get some information about where the student got the guns because if it was from the parents and they were unsecured we need to have a serious talk about what to do about that.
For sure. Under the Playboy in the nightstand doesn't cut it anymore. Your gun, your responsibility.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20386
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Skinypupy »

Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:39 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:29 pm Little B 9.4 hasn't ever mentioned anything about school shootings, but I know I need to talk with her about it.

I'm torn between proactively raising the topic and running the risk of her panicking about bad guys coming into her school with guns, and making sure she's aware/prepared in case something happens.
How are you going to prepare her for something like that? The kids at Sandy Hook did what they practice in active shooter drills, and got massacred for it.
Honestly, I have no idea. Which is a big part of my hesitation to even bring it up.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55354
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:39 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:29 pm Little B 9.4 hasn't ever mentioned anything about school shootings, but I know I need to talk with her about it.

I'm torn between proactively raising the topic and running the risk of her panicking about bad guys coming into her school with guns, and making sure she's aware/prepared in case something happens.
How are you going to prepare her for something like that? The kids at Sandy Hook did what they practice in active shooter drills, and got massacred for it.
The drills have changed, largely because of what happened in Newtown. It's no longer stay in place, it's Run/hide/fight. It's not perfect, but it works better than sheer blind panic or huddling in place.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
em2nought
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:48 am

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by em2nought »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:41 pm
$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:33 pm I'm hoping we get some information about where the student got the guns because if it was from the parents and they were unsecured we need to have a serious talk about what to do about that.
For sure. Under the Playboy in the nightstand doesn't cut it anymore. Your gun, your responsibility.
Even though I don't have kids I've been looking for a good safe on craigslist. I could live with providing proof of firearm safe ownership being a prerequisite to purchasing a firearm. If I did have kids, I'd certainly have a ballistic panel stuffed into their backpacks by now. I think you can get them for $50.
Stop funding for NPR
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20386
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Skinypupy »

$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:33 pm I'm hoping we get some information about where the student got the guns because if it was from the parents and they were unsecured we need to have a serious talk about what to do about that.
Holding parents liable when they don’t bother to keep their guns out of the hands of their kids seems like one of those “common sense” type of things.

Which, of course, means it’ll never happen.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70191
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by LordMortis »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 7:02 pm Holding parents liable when they don’t bother to keep their guns out of the hands of their kids seems like one of those “common sense” type of things.

Which, of course, means it’ll never happen.


Wait. Is that not the case now?
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13686
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by $iljanus »

Texas does have a liability law but it only applies to children under 17 using their parent's guns. The shooter in Santa Fe is 17.
Black lives matter!

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20386
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Skinypupy »

LordMortis wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 7:37 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 7:02 pm Holding parents liable when they don’t bother to keep their guns out of the hands of their kids seems like one of those “common sense” type of things.

Which, of course, means it’ll never happen.


Wait. Is that not the case now?
I assumed not since I’ve never heard it mentioned, but admit to not actually looking into it.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13686
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by $iljanus »

The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence has a good breakdown of liability laws in the states that have them. Some are more stringent than others. Indiana didn’t seem to have one of the strongest of laws.
Black lives matter!

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Blackhawk »

$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 8:23 pm Indiana didn’t seem to have one of the strongest of laws.
Gasp.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 20028
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Carpet_pissr »

em2nought wrote:
LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:41 pm
$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:33 pm I'm hoping we get some information about where the student got the guns because if it was from the parents and they were unsecured we need to have a serious talk about what to do about that.
For sure. Under the Playboy in the nightstand doesn't cut it anymore. Your gun, your responsibility.
Even though I don't have kids I've been looking for a good safe on craigslist. I could live with providing proof of firearm safe ownership being a prerequisite to purchasing a firearm. If I did have kids, I'd certainly have a ballistic panel stuffed into their backpacks by now. I think you can get them for $50.
Not sure if this is more widespread than here locally, but modern school kids’ backpacks are off the charts heavy. Like, my very strong and athletic 13 YO soccer player has some trouble with hers due to bulk and weight. My skinny 10 YO always fights hers. (At first I thought it might be just my kids, but no, it’s all the scurrying ants in the morning, staggering around trying to manage backpack weight.)
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55354
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Carpet_pissr wrote: Sat May 26, 2018 7:24 am
em2nought wrote:
LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:41 pm
$iljanus wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 3:33 pm I'm hoping we get some information about where the student got the guns because if it was from the parents and they were unsecured we need to have a serious talk about what to do about that.
For sure. Under the Playboy in the nightstand doesn't cut it anymore. Your gun, your responsibility.
Even though I don't have kids I've been looking for a good safe on craigslist. I could live with providing proof of firearm safe ownership being a prerequisite to purchasing a firearm. If I did have kids, I'd certainly have a ballistic panel stuffed into their backpacks by now. I think you can get them for $50.
Not sure if this is more widespread than here locally, but modern school kids’ backpacks are off the charts heavy. Like, my very strong and athletic 13 YO soccer player has some trouble with hers due to bulk and weight. My skinny 10 YO always fights hers. (At first I thought it might be just my kids, but no, it’s all the scurrying ants in the morning, staggering around trying to manage backpack weight.)
It's the same everywhere from what I've seen. Where is the digital classroom we were promised?


As for ballistic plates in backpacks, that's just silly. It only makes even a little bit of sense in gang infested areas or warzones. Where you're in danger of catching a stray on the commute. But it's also where such luxuries are probably not going to be a priority purchase.

Something that you take off and put away when you get to school isn't going to be much use if you're looking for protection in school.

Now if I were a kid protesting "gun violence", I'd be wearing a plate carrier in school every day. Seems like that would be a statement.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
em2nought
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:48 am

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by em2nought »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Sat May 26, 2018 8:31 am Something that you take off and put away when you get to school isn't going to be much use if you're looking for protection in school.
I wasn't aware that backpacks have to be "put away". I seem to remember always carrying mine with me instead of having to use that locker in a remote hallway in which I had no classes, I was sort of an exception in that regard though. Later at university everyone carried their backpack everywhere they went as I remember it.

As for weight I wasn't thinking "plate" so much as soft armor. Of course maybe three or four textbooks in a backpack might serve the same purpose depending on the round used. https://www.concealedcarry.com/safety/w ... p-bullets/ Maybe they should do away with lockers, and make kids carry their backpacks at all times. Ballistic desks might be an idea too, probably cost the same as a regular desk. Kids could form up like roman legions in a turtle. :wink:
Image
Stop funding for NPR
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Blackhawk »

I always carried mine, too, but that was decades ago. In my kids' school (also in Indiana) they're required to leave them in their lockers at all times. They carry what they need for their next class or two with them.

Of course, the fact that they have a school issued Chromebook instead of any textbooks makes that a lot more practical than it was for me. I just feel sorry for the nerds who have to carry all their D&D books by hand! Of course, my kids don't get a full lunch break the way I did, either. They get just long enough to shovel their food down their throats before having to get back to class.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
em2nought
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:48 am

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by em2nought »

em2nought wrote: Sat May 26, 2018 10:30 am Ballistic desks might be an idea too
What do ya know http://www.sheltrusa.org/sheltr-usa_desk.html
Image
Stop funding for NPR
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26467
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Unagi »

but if we make every single thing bulletproof, what's the point of guns! :doh:
User avatar
em2nought
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:48 am

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by em2nought »

Unagi wrote: Sat May 26, 2018 4:20 pm but if we make every single thing bulletproof, what's the point of guns! :doh:
Requests for increasing budgets and taxes from both sides of the aisle of course. :doh:
Stop funding for NPR
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20386
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Skinypupy »

So the proposed solutions to gun violence are:

a) More guns
b) Make everything bulletproof

It'd be funny if it wasn't so utterly absurd.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Blackhawk »

Solutions? The solutions to gun violence, at this point, have nothing to do with guns.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Punisher
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Punisher »

Unagi wrote: Sat May 26, 2018 4:20 pm but if we make every single thing bulletproof, what's the point of guns! :doh:
We will leave the guns as not bulletproof.. happy now?
All yourLightning Bolts are Belong to Us
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63675
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Daehawk »

Father of 2 Parkland School survivors robbed and shot to death

The dude robbed him then came back and killed him.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
Moliere
Posts: 12342
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Walking through a desert land

Re: Active Shooter [Indiana middle school]

Post by Moliere »

At Least 8 Dead in Mass Shooting at Pittsburgh Synagogue
Police have confirmed to local media outlets that at least eight people were killed in or around Tree of Life synagogue in the city's Squirrel Hill neighborhood. At least two others have serious and life-threatening injuries, according to NBC News, which also reports that three police officers were shot while responding to the incident. Police exchanged fire with the gunman as they arrived on the scene.

The suspect has been identified as 46-year-old Robert Bowers. He was arrested after surrendering to police. Over police scanners, officers reported that the suspect was shouting about wanting to kill Jewish people.
"The world is suffering more today from the good people who want to mind other men's business than it is from the bad people who are willing to let everybody look after their own individual affairs." - Clarence Darrow
User avatar
gameoverman
Posts: 5908
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Glendora, CA

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by gameoverman »

He shot up a religious place AND shot up police yet they took him alive? How does that happen? Cops have killed people for much less than that. Shooting him and letting him die might have helped. It was an opportunity to send a message to the recently emboldened whackos out there that their crimes won't be tolerated. Of course, to do that the authorities need to be against types of crimes...
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28960
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Holman »

gameoverman wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 3:54 pm He shot up a religious place AND shot up police yet they took him alive? How does that happen?
Dude, it's not like he was a black pre-teen with a toy gun in his own backyard. What are you thinking?
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5892
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Kurth »

gameoverman wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 3:54 pm He shot up a religious place AND shot up police yet they took him alive? How does that happen? Cops have killed people for much less than that. Shooting him and letting him die might have helped. It was an opportunity to send a message to the recently emboldened whackos out there that their crimes won't be tolerated. Of course, to do that the authorities need to be against types of crimes...
Really? You’re suggesting the authorities are in favor of hate inspired mass shootings at places of worship? Please tell me I misinterpreted that, and this was not your suggestion.

Also, cops aren’t supposed to be doing summary executions. This is supposed to be a country founded on laws with a basis in due process. We don’t kill people to send a message.

Your post is misguided.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
User avatar
Pyperkub
Posts: 23649
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Pyperkub »

One thing I will say. As I recall Sessions directed the DoJ to de-emphasize the right wing hate group terror monitoring the Obama DoJ was doing (being charitable here I think, as I seem to remember him tearing it down completely).
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!

Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
gameoverman
Posts: 5908
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Glendora, CA

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by gameoverman »

Kurth wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 6:08 pm
gameoverman wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 3:54 pm He shot up a religious place AND shot up police yet they took him alive? How does that happen? Cops have killed people for much less than that. Shooting him and letting him die might have helped. It was an opportunity to send a message to the recently emboldened whackos out there that their crimes won't be tolerated. Of course, to do that the authorities need to be against types of crimes...
Really? You’re suggesting the authorities are in favor of hate inspired mass shootings at places of worship? Please tell me I misinterpreted that, and this was not your suggestion.

Also, cops aren’t supposed to be doing summary executions. This is supposed to be a country founded on laws with a basis in due process. We don’t kill people to send a message.

Your post is misguided.
I didn't say anything about executing him. This story, about the hunt for Christopher Dorner, is the kind of thing to which I'm referring. How is it that cops will unload on someone for what they 'think' is a threat, but this guy actually shot cops and he's still alive? This synagogue attack is one instance where shooting at the guy until they all run out of ammo would be justified. As to what I'm suggesting, I'm actually noting that cops seem to go berserk on certain kinds of people but for some reason take it easy on other people even when those other people do worse things.
link
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 21253
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Grifman »

It should not go unnoted that the shooter was active in far right media, applauding the description of immigrants as invaders and attacking Jewish organizations for aiding immigrants and refugees. #MAGA
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Blackhawk »

gameoverman wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:14 am This synagogue attack is one instance where shooting at the guy until they all run out of ammo would be justified.
Why?

If he ran out of ammo and was just hiding, would it still be justified to fill the air with lead when there were possibly still survivors hiding near the line of fire? If he was wounded (as he apparently was in this case?) If he surrendered? Should they just keep shooting to teach him a lesson, and people down the street be damned when a bullet went through the drywall and into their living room? Or should they just keep shooting until he was dead as punishment? I'm not sure which of these you think would be 'justified.'

For once we have police using deadly force the way they're supposed to, and they still get criticized.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
msteelers
Posts: 7170
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
Contact:

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by msteelers »

Yeah, I think police should be applauded for capturing him alive. I hope they can look back on the tactics used and find something here to help them capture other shooters and attackers alive. They need to be held accountable in a court of law, not killed in the street.

However, I do find it shocking that he wasn't either killed by police or took his own life.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28960
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Holman »

I do see gameoverman's point that there is a huge discrepancy between what gets you killed by police as a dark-skinned person and what gets you taken alive as white-skinned person.

Obviously the goal is for police to use as little violence as possible and to capture suspects rather than kill them. The problem isn't that this guy was apprehended but that so many black people are killed for nothing or next to nothing.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Blackhawk »

Holman wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:05 am I do see gameoverman's point that there is a huge discrepancy between what gets you killed by police as a dark-skinned person and what gets you taken alive as white-skinned person.

Obviously the goal is for police to use as little violence as possible and to capture suspects rather than kill them. The problem isn't that this guy was apprehended but that so many black people are killed for nothing or next to nothing.
I got that, but he didn't suggest that other situations were unjustified, he stated that using excessive force in this case would have been justified.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54664
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Smoove_B »

It's nothing short of amazing they took him alive. Not only because of the entire scenario and how it unfolded, but because (as mentioned) these types of a-holes usually take their own lives in the end. If they killed him, no one would have thought twice. It's a testament to the training and skills of those involved that they were able to apprehend him at all.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70191
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by LordMortis »

msteelers wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:56 am Yeah, I think police should be applauded for capturing him alive. I hope they can look back on the tactics used and find something here to help them capture other shooters and attackers alive. They need to be held accountable in a court of law, not killed in the street.

However, I do find it shocking that he wasn't either killed by police or took his own life.
I dunno. I'm not going to knock them for capturing him alive, but I wouldn't have risked a single officer or civilian to do so. I don't know the details to know how I feel. The second he shot someone, my calculus is whatever it take to minimize risk to everyone but the shooter. The only regard I have the shooters safety is in relation to the greater safety of the people in harm's way. I do applaud the police for putting their lives on the line, no matter what happens to the piece of shit.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5892
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Kurth »

Holman wrote: Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:05 am I do see gameoverman's point that there is a huge discrepancy between what gets you killed by police as a dark-skinned person and what gets you taken alive as white-skinned person.
Correlation is not equal to causation.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55354
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by LawBeefaroni »

It's specific to this particular scenario, the responding officers (training, unit, weapons), and the timing. You can't expect another shooting to turn out the same, one way or the other.

The difference between this and a traffic stop, among hundreds of other things, is that they knew what they were dealing with. When a guy in a traffic stop pulls out a gun (or what a cop thinks is a gun) the cops don't get the benefit of tactical deployment and measured use of force.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55354
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Btw, I mentioned it in another thread, but when I go to the range lateky, it's full of Orthodox Jews teaching their kids/grandkids to shoot. My FIL fought Nazis and he has been begging me to get him a handgun, after years of owning nothing but a varmit shotgun.

I was in a class with a guy who was on his Church's security team and he was tasked with arming and training the civilian members (they had like 3 cops on staff too). He said they always have at least 3 armed "ushers" at a given service. And honestly, if his skill was any indication, they probably have really safe services. Would not recommend trying to shoot up his church.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
naednek
Posts: 10872
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by naednek »

Holman wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 5:04 pm
gameoverman wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 3:54 pm He shot up a religious place AND shot up police yet they took him alive? How does that happen?
Dude, it's not like he was a black pre-teen with a toy gun in his own backyard. What are you thinking?
<sigh>
hepcat - "I agree with Naednek"
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 21253
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Grifman »

My church has two armed police officers at every service. We once had a woman who I believe was mentally disturbed sort of charge the stage before some church ushers tackled her and the police dragged her out, screaming, “Don’t let them execute me, they are going to kill me!”
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54664
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Active Shooter [Pittsburgh Synagogue]

Post by Smoove_B »

I can't even imagine being at a building of religious worship and having armed officers there. I was in NYC a few weeks ago and there were police officers standing around in full tactical gear (helmets, vests, boots, etc...) and opening displaying M4 Commandos (or whatever they were). There were groups of 4 or 5 just standing on street corners like it was normal. It was not normal.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
Post Reply