Page 4 of 8
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:31 pm
by Jaddison
Moliere wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:31 pm
Jaddison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:20 pm
Don't think Patton is the greatest American general, not even close. It's clear we needed heroes for PR purposes and the press gave them to the public. Patton was pretty flawed- suggest reading An Army at Dawn to get a a more detailed look at Patton in North Africa. He was also morally flawed- the affair with his niece by marriage was an ongoing thing. Patton's wife was on her way to divorce him when the accident happened. Eisenhower, George Marshall, US Grant and probably Winfield Scott would be in the pantheon as would George Washington. If general means flag officer you can throw in Thomas McDonaugh from 1812, Nimitz, Ernest J. King...reluctantly MacArthur and the man who personally saved us from disaster in Korea Oliver P. smith....al these men are on par with if not better than Patton. Other than MacArthur none sought personal glory and press like Patton did.
Ike wasn't really a field commander as much as a politician and strategic director of the War. He was great at dealing with the personalities of all the competing Ally generals and politicians.
Washington was great because he understood that winning meant not facing the British and risking his entire army. As long as he could keep moving around and allow the Continentals to claim they had an army then they won the morale and PR battle against the British, giving time for the French to enter the war. And what made Washington greater was that twice he walked away from ultimate power.
If we're talking about field commanders then what about the Confederate generals like Lee? Grant won because he didn't care about losses. He knew it was a numbers game and the North had the numbers, finances, and infrastructure to grind the South down.
Lee is overrated in my opinion. Stonewall Jackson and perhaps Nathan Bedford Forrest,
Eisenhower out generaled the Gernans. He, Marshall and King are the reason there was a D-Day in 1944. Any major screw ups an the invasion is pushed off for quite a while. I think I would throw Curtis LeMay into the mix of great generals as well.
Grant gets a bad rap but he really was a brilliant commander just look at what came before him- they all had the same resources.
Do you think Patton could have done what Washington did? From all I have read I doubt it.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:12 pm
by Moliere
Jaddison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:31 pm
Grant gets a bad rap but he really was a brilliant commander just look at what came before him- they all had the same resources.
Maybe I'm
wrong
Some historians have viewed Grant as a "butcher" commander who in 1864 used attrition without regard to the lives of his own soldiers in order to kill off the enemy which could no longer replenish its losses.[3] Throughout the Civil War Grant's armies incurred approximately 154,000 casualties, while having inflicted 191,000 casualties on his opposing Confederate armies.[4] In terms of success, Grant was the only general during the Civil War who received the surrender of three Confederate armies.[3] Although Grant maintained high casualties during the Overland Campaign in 1864, his aggressive fighting strategy was in compliance with the U.S. government's strategic war aims.[3] Grant has recently been praised by historians for his "military genius", and viewed as a decisive general who emphasized movement and logistics.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:58 pm
by El Guapo
Moliere wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:12 pm
Jaddison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:31 pm
Grant gets a bad rap but he really was a brilliant commander just look at what came before him- they all had the same resources.
Maybe I'm
wrong
Some historians have viewed Grant as a "butcher" commander who in 1864 used attrition without regard to the lives of his own soldiers in order to kill off the enemy which could no longer replenish its losses.[3] Throughout the Civil War Grant's armies incurred approximately 154,000 casualties, while having inflicted 191,000 casualties on his opposing Confederate armies.[4] In terms of success, Grant was the only general during the Civil War who received the surrender of three Confederate armies.[3] Although Grant maintained high casualties during the Overland Campaign in 1864, his aggressive fighting strategy was in compliance with the U.S. government's strategic war aims.[3] Grant has recently been praised by historians for his "military genius", and viewed as a decisive general who emphasized movement and logistics.
I'm most of the way through the Chernow biography of Grant, and it basically makes the case that the idea of Grant as a butcher is mostly a Lost Cause myth (part of glorifying Lee). There were significant casualties in the Overland campaign, but partly that's the result of Grant necessarily having to be constantly on the attack, plus Lee was really good at building strong defensive fortifications (and I think towards the end of the war you started to see carbines and early preludes to trench warfare). Grant didn't just throw his men at those for the most part, though - he tried to maneuver around where he could (though Richmond finally settled into kind of a siege situation).
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 1:25 pm
by Scuzz
Moliere wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:31 pm
Jaddison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:20 pm
Don't think Patton is the greatest American general, not even close. It's clear we needed heroes for PR purposes and the press gave them to the public. Patton was pretty flawed- suggest reading An Army at Dawn to get a a more detailed look at Patton in North Africa. He was also morally flawed- the affair with his niece by marriage was an ongoing thing. Patton's wife was on her way to divorce him when the accident happened. Eisenhower, George Marshall, US Grant and probably Winfield Scott would be in the pantheon as would George Washington. If general means flag officer you can throw in Thomas McDonaugh from 1812, Nimitz, Ernest J. King...reluctantly MacArthur and the man who personally saved us from disaster in Korea Oliver P. smith....al these men are on par with if not better than Patton. Other than MacArthur none sought personal glory and press like Patton did.
Ike wasn't really a field commander as much as a politician and strategic director of the War. He was great at dealing with the personalities of all the competing Ally generals and politicians.
Washington was great because he understood that winning meant not facing the British and risking his entire army. As long as he could keep moving around and allow the Continentals to claim they had an army then they won the morale and PR battle against the British, giving time for the French to enter the war. And what made Washington greater was that twice he walked away from ultimate power.
If we're talking about field commanders then what about the Confederate generals like Lee? Grant won because he didn't care about losses. He knew it was a numbers game and the North had the numbers, finances, and infrastructure to grind the South down.
Yea, Eisenhower was not really a field commander. And as for MacArther, he is perhaps one of the most over rated Generals in American history.
As for Lee and Grant, Lee was a great counter puncher, but he was not a great offensive general. Grant was a great general I think because he did what he had to do against the enemy he faced. He did what what countless others could not do. And while he regretted a few moves (the attack in Richmond I think), his aggressive nature won the war.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:42 pm
by Jaddison
Scuzz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 1:25 pm
Moliere wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:31 pm
Jaddison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:20 pm
Don't think Patton is the greatest American general, not even close. It's clear we needed heroes for PR purposes and the press gave them to the public. Patton was pretty flawed- suggest reading An Army at Dawn to get a a more detailed look at Patton in North Africa. He was also morally flawed- the affair with his niece by marriage was an ongoing thing. Patton's wife was on her way to divorce him when the accident happened. Eisenhower, George Marshall, US Grant and probably Winfield Scott would be in the pantheon as would George Washington. If general means flag officer you can throw in Thomas McDonaugh from 1812, Nimitz, Ernest J. King...reluctantly MacArthur and the man who personally saved us from disaster in Korea Oliver P. smith....al these men are on par with if not better than Patton. Other than MacArthur none sought personal glory and press like Patton did.
Ike wasn't really a field commander as much as a politician and strategic director of the War. He was great at dealing with the personalities of all the competing Ally generals and politicians.
Washington was great because he understood that winning meant not facing the British and risking his entire army. As long as he could keep moving around and allow the Continentals to claim they had an army then they won the morale and PR battle against the British, giving time for the French to enter the war. And what made Washington greater was that twice he walked away from ultimate power.
If we're talking about field commanders then what about the Confederate generals like Lee? Grant won because he didn't care about losses. He knew it was a numbers game and the North had the numbers, finances, and infrastructure to grind the South down.
Yea, Eisenhower was not really a field commander. And as for MacArther, he is perhaps one of the most over rated Generals in American history.
As for Lee and Grant, Lee was a great counter puncher, but he was not a great offensive general. Grant was a great general I think because he did what he had to do against the enemy he faced. He did what what countless others could not do. And while he regretted a few moves (the attack in Richmond I think), his aggressive nature won the war.
Lee wasn't a very good general if you take away the myths. Grant basically sealed the Souths fate at Vicksburg before he ever got overall command- Vicksburg was crucial. If field commander only means ground we miss a lot of great commanders. One name I forgot was Pershing who held his own in WW1. MacArthur had his moments but his reputation was inflated a lot like Patton though Patton was probably a more skilled general tactically. What Thomas McDonaugh pulled off in the War of 1812 is one of the greatest feats of American military history
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:21 pm
by Scuzz
Lee did pretty damn good for three years. He was either exceptional or the Union commanders were terrible. Well, it might have been a little of both. But I think the general consensus is that Lee was a very good defensive general who was willing to take chances with his numerically inferior force.
Pershing probably only ran one offensive. Other than that he was a politician and organizer. Eisenhower did much more than that.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:02 pm
by Jeff V
Leonardo DaVinci by Walter Issacson (A)
Leonardo was the quintessential Renaissance man, although not the first. Enamored with all things artistic, scientific, mathematical, and biological, he spent his life painting, engineering, and recording in his journals studies from the world around him. Only late in his life did he even leave Italy. His lifestyle was one that could be dangerous outside of enlightened communities, but such was his creative genius that he was a coveted associate of brutal warlords such as the Sforza's (Milan), the di Medici's (Florence) and the Borgia's (Valencia, Rome).
Da Vinci was a perfectionist and procrastinator. The Mona Lisa was a commission he never actually finished. Other commissions similar were never completed. One masterpiece, The Last Supper, started degrading after just 10 years. Many of his engineering projects were never realized. He was even a consultant on warfare, but his siege ideas were never implemented.
Unfortunately, the library audiobook doesn't include the PDF with all of the images referred to in the book. I might have to buy it because as good as this book was, it's probably 10x better with pictures.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:06 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:13 pm
by Jeff V
The Lawyer Lifeguard by James Patterson (A)
A short story about a lawyer who survives a bombing, only to find out he's a person of interest . Among the victims are his fiance; they were in the process of packing for a trip. Then he is unceremoniously fired from his job, runs into an old associate and begs her to allow him to return working for her as a lifeguard. He passes the test, but manages to keep his sordid customers from the law firm follows the breadcrumbs to some serious mobster types. And a girl he thought he knew very well.
This is a fast paced story, not terribly original but it'll keep you entertained if you have a couple of hours to kill.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:22 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:28 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 11:55 am
by ImLawBoy
Finished Grave Peril, book 3 in the Dresden Files. Vampires and ghosts and demons and ghosts of demons. Fun, but these books are exhausting. Just when you think Dresden is doomed, Butcher puts him in even more peril (which he naturally overcomes).
Up next is a Kindle First free book, Punishment by Scott J. Holliday. It's a crime/detective novel, with the twist being some kind of technology that gives the cops access to the memories of the dead.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:06 pm
by Archinerd
The Dispossessed - Ursula K. Le Guin. This one was a lot harder for me to get into than Left Hand of Darkness, and I don't think I enjoyed it quite as much. My one big criticism is the two ideologies of the two societies were taken too far at times and ended up feeling like caricatures instead of plausible places. All in all, another worthwhile journey into her world(s).
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:54 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:04 pm
by Jeff V
City of Endless Night by Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child (A)
Special Agent Pendergast had a bad time of it in the last book. His status with his FBI boss is at a low tide, certainly in the dog house. Even though he gets to work with a NYPD associate DiGusta at his new assignment, Pendergast certainly doesn't relish the case. And the case involves a body found in a warehouse. Sans head.
When other decapitation murders start piling up, Pendergast suddenly becomes very interested. The pacing of the story, however, follows what DiGusta knows or thinks he knows. Playing coy as usual, Pendergast frustrates his fellow law officer and some of the book involves him tracking down dead ends.
The UBG was not a surprise to me, I guessed it early on although the clues were scarce. I would have much preferred a book that provided all of the clues in the course of the story instead of a lengthy AAR following the climax. This was the second book in a row that ended this way...and it's a cheap ending IMO. Still, the story is notable for two things: (1) Pendergast very nearly meets his match in spite of knowing what he knows and (2) this book uncharacteristically avoids supernatural elements, and that is a plus.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:11 pm
by Jeff V
Stealing Gulfstreams by James Patterson (A)
Rarely do I find a story glorifying criminals all that entertaining, unless it's Robin Hood. This ain't Robin Hood.
Two brothers watch their father die in a plane crash during a plane race in Nevada. Fast forward and they are crack pilots, determined to make good on their father's passion to win this particular race. The problem is, racing planes is expensive. Ostensibly, they have a plane repair and customization business, but it doesn't bring in enough clients to pay the bill for their racing. They make up the difference stealing planes for a mobster, who pays them a fraction of the value.
The story has very much a "Smoky and the Bandit" vibe and is an entertaining short story if you're into that sort of thing.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:20 pm
by Jeff V
The Exile by James Patterson (A)
Finn is self-exiled cop from Ireland who leaves into a self-imposed exile after a murder investigation goes bad. He returns when the sister of the victim becomes concerned that a fairytale is playing out, targeting her family. While Finn does not believe in "The Green Man", someone certainly is using the tale as a template for murders that are terrorizing her and her family. Local law enforcement is not happy to seem him back in town and animosity rules the day.
The ending has an unexpected twist, that's a plus side. Mostly though the story was steeped in stereotypical Irish ruffians, most who get what's coming to them. The ending might have been unpredictable, the fate of most of the characters however was not.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:22 pm
by Jeff V
1st quarter in the books. Stats: Books read: 29 Pages read: 9,086 Pages per day: 101
Off to my best start since i started tracking. If I don't slack off, I'm well on a pace to break 100.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:20 pm
by Scuzz
I have just finished reading The Assassin’s Apprentice by Robin Hobb.I was kinda leery of reading this as a quick look made me think it might be a YA novel, but I was convinced to give it a try. And I am glad I did.
This is the first book in the Farseer Trilogy. It reminds me somewhat of the Harry Potter series and somewhat of the Name of the Wind. This book is about the childhood and education of young FitzChivalry, a bastard of the Prince of the Realm.
It is well written, different in just the right ways and has enough action and questions to keep you interested.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:24 pm
by Rumpy
American War by Omar El Akkad. The author's a war correspondent, having covered Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay among other things, and he uses his experience to craft a believable dystopia in which amid an environmentally ravaged near future, a second American civil war breaks out. He essentially poses the question: What if the things we hear happening in the middle-east were to happen on American soil? The result was a gripping read and a thought-provoking one at that.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:32 am
by Archinerd
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - J.K. Rowling. (re-read)
I originally read this when I was in college working a temp job at a glue factory. I was there for 2-weeks and my only responsibility for 8 hours a day was to make copies of stacks and stacks of paperwork. There was some sort of internal company audit and a woman was at the facility from the main office (which was overseas) and needed copies of a ton of documents to take back with her as reference. The internet hadn't quite come into it's own yet so that's probably part of the reason these documents weren't just emailed to her. I also don't know why they couldn't have been copied and just sent to her either. It doesn't really matter though. The point is, I would have a lot of time just standing around waiting for the copier to finish after I put a giant stack of paper on it, so I needed something entertaining and easy to read (it was also too loud in the copy room to listen to my discman). Harry Potter was perfect.
I'm reading it now because it's on Amazon Kindle Unlimited, my subscription to it expires at the end of the month and I didn't see anything else on there I wanted to read. I haven't read any of the others before and I've never seen the movies. I did needed a refresher so I re-read the first one. One down, six to go. Also, I can't believe this book is already over 20 years old.
Next up, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:05 pm
by ImLawBoy
Finished Punishment by Scott J. Holliday, which I got as an Amazon First Read book for free a few months ago. This one was actually quite good. While I does use the genius serial killer trope that I have previously mentioned I'm bored with, the rest of the book was well done. It's set in modern day Detroit, with the twist that there is a technology that allows one to extract memories from a person (living or recently dead), and then those memories get shoved into another person's brain. For entertainment purposes, some celebrities will hook into the machine and record things, and then regular schmucks can pay to essentially be that celebrity for a bit. For crime fighting purposes, it's used to allow detectives to see from the victim's eyes how that person was killed, including possible clues to the identity of a killer. The machine is risky, though, as it has addictive qualities (those addicted are called "munkies", for "machine junkies"), and the trauma received by detectives who live through multiple murders isn't fully understood.
This story follows Detective Barnes, who is investigating the Pickax Man, or as he's known to the cops, Calavera. He wears a mask in the form of a candy Day of the Dead skull while murdering (to hide his identity from the machine when the cops eventually view the memories of the deceased). He also knows that Barnes is on the case, and he talks to his victims as though they are Barnes just before killing them, leaving Barnes clues to be followed. Barnes is slowly losing it with all of the memories of Calavera's victims rattling around his brain, and he finds that he might also be on the hit list.
I liked the writing and the characters, and the plot had a lot of fun twists that I didn't always see coming. I thought things got a little bit muddled toward the end, particularly around the motivations for the killings, but it was still an entertaining ride. The book says that it's "Book 1 in the Detective Barnes series", but the ending doesn't seem to leave a lot of room for more books. If another comes out, though, I may look into it.
Up next, I'm going back to the Dresden Files for book four - Summer Knight.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 9:34 pm
by xenocide
Finally got around to updating for the first time this year. After ripping through all 14 Wheel of Time audios back to back fairly quickly I slowed my reading down some at the end of Jan/ beginning of Feb (Wheel of Time is still awesome and still my favorite fantasy series of all time). Added my 13 finished to the first page if anyone is interested, I'll just hit a few highlights here.
Time for the Stars - Good silver age Sci-Fi. Worth the read if you like Heinlein. Not as good as "Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or "Orphans of the Sky" but it's in that syle, much better than "Stranger in a Strange Land".
Dune - My personal favorite novel of all time, I reread it every now and then. You can look up what it's about, I'm just going to talk about the audio version I listened to. Irrespective of the content, this is the best done audio book I've ever listened to (maybe I'm biased by my love of the content, who knows). Simon Vance (prob my favorite narrator, yes, yes, lots of my favs in this review
) is the main narrator, but there is also a cast. Certain sections are read by the cast with some sound effects in the background and certain sections are narrated completely by Vance like a normal audio book. The cast sections are NOT an audio play with the sound of a door slamming instead of reading "the door slammed" , just some subtle sounds like wind blowing during desert scenes with Vance reading the book but the dialog voiced by the cast. It's
really well done. If someone had explained it to me before I listened I would have been very skeptical as I generally just like the book read straight out but this version is great. All the cast members do a wonderful job, the subtle background sounds are just right, and even though it seems weird the transitions from fully voiced cast to just Vance reading all are seamless. Well worth a listen.
Saturn Run - Near future sci-fi about a race to be the first to contact a strange object in orbit around Saturn. I liked this novel a lot. In the hard sci-fi vein, kind of reads like "The Martian". Heard Howard Tayler (author of Schlock Mercenary) recommend this. One of my top reads of 2018 so far.
The Water Knife Good not great. When I read Bacigalupi I sometimes feel like I
should like his novels more than I actually do; this book felt that way.
The Handmaid's Tale Eh... interesting concept, kind of a boring read. Overrated IMO.
Lovecraft Country Read based on the 2017 book thread. Really good book. Not sure I liked it
quite as well as Yellowking though.
Falling Free first chronologically in the Miles Vorkosigan saga which I have heard a lot about but never read. This actually takes place about 200 years before the birth of Vorkosigan (which I didn't know when I started reading it). Liked this quite a bit. Some interesting concepts and some very frustrating antagonists (in the good way that makes for a better read). Looking forward to more in the series (although it looks like the next chronological book does not feature Miles yet either, that's ok though
)
One Did Not Finish so far this year.
Kushiel's Dart. Very well reviewed, also very boring. No more for me.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:11 pm
by Moliere
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:25 pm
by xenocide
The Collapsing Empire by John Scalzi - I know I said it in my last post on Scalzi books but I didn't listen to myself. I have to read Scalzi not listen to audio. This is two in a row now; does every f'n character have to say every f'n line f'n sarcasticly!?
Other than that a good start to a new series from Scalzi. I liked the world and the plot. Will
READ more in the series.
Ubik by Philip K. Dick - This was only my 2nd Philip K. Dick novel after
The Man in the High Castle (which I found to be one of the most plot-less boring books I have ever read). Maybe K Dick is just not for me. Did not really enjoy this, I had to speed up the audio to 3x speed to get through it. I know part of the point of the book is to be ambiguous about the actual nature of what's going on/where people are, but that didn't work for me. It's laid out too soon as to what could be going on even if ultimately it's not spelled out 100%. I would have liked it more as a short story where the nature of where the people are is hidden until an end reveal. I might still read
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? as I love Blade Runner but if that does not wow me I will be done with Philip K. Dick books.
All Systems Red by Martha Wells - I loved this. Impulse buy as a daily deal for super cheep. Novella length. Sci Fi about a cyborg security bot who has hacked his own programming, told 1st person from the bot's perspective. Awesome main character and a good story. First in a series, I can't wait for the rest.
His Majesty's Dragon: Temeraire Book 1 by Naomi Novik - I enjoyed this quite a bit. Think Napoleonic wars from the British side but with dragons. I heard someone say it reads a lot like
Master and Commander, I've only seen the movie but this is a good way to describe it. It's obviously a fantasy, Dragons, but it's not Tolkien style fantasy. There are no mages or elves, just our world as it was in Napoleonic times but with dragons. There are different breeds and sizes that they use a lot like navel vessels. Really good relationship between the main character and his dragon Temeraire. Looking forward to more.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:41 pm
by xenocide
God what a great mix of a Lit professor's dream and the hoi polloi.
Said from the hoi polloi side of the fence
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:00 pm
by Jeff V
Dragon Teeth by Michael Crichton (A)
In a Stephen King novel, the protagonist, himself a novelist, explains that it is common for authors to have several books in the vault ready for submission for those times when their muse fails them. In Creighton's case, it would be post-mortem.
Dragon's Teeth is a historical novel that his widow suggests influenced Jurassic Park. Unlike the blockbuster story of an implausible scientific breakthrough regenerating dinosaurs in our time; Dragon's Teeth is a well-grounded story based on the rivalry between two famed paleontologists back in the day when the science was just getting off the ground.
The most lucrative hunting grounds were in territories controlled by Indians who, prior to the story, gave Custer his comeuppance. The protagonist, a college student posing as a photographer, is an entirely fictional character, caught up as a pawn in the middle of the rivalry.
It's an interesting story -- one that not only covers the ever-present danger in the wild west, but also the impact of "The Octopus" (railroads) on the frontiers and the passion the main characters had for their scientific discoveries - discoveries of which they could scarcely grasp the nature of.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:17 pm
by Rumpy
I read it last summer. I thought it was fun, but quite thin on actual building up the rivalry. There was a very thin framework, and It felt like he meant to return to flesh it out but never did. There are some parts of it that seem to happen far too quickly as a result. Having written it before Jurassic Park, I think he got waylaid by that when he had the idea for Jurassic Park. The first half was rough, and it was only when they got to Deadwood that things started to feel more fleshed out and things picked up. Having an Uncle in paleontology and being quite familiar with the rivalry, I was quite disappointed with how it was treated in this. It would have benefited from a bit more back-and-forth between the two. Still, quite a fun novel and was a very quick read.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:16 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:25 pm
by Jeff V
Never Never by James Patterson (A)
Usually I am entertained by Patterson books, even if the legion of co-authors are sometimes uneven. Everyone though I listen to on audiobook, and the performance of the reader can be a turn-off. This is such a case.
In general, foreign accents can be a distraction, although I've gotten used to most of them and I've previously listened to books read by an Aussie (such as in Private: Down Under). The woman reading this book though is remarkably uninteresting, rambles and drones, making it hard to follow the story, much less care about the characters. This is the start of a series - my library already has the second book - but I think I'll pass. The protagonist, Harriet Blue, is not an interesting character, nor a pleasant person.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:42 pm
by Scuzz
I got a bunch of Cussler's at a used book sale awhile back but didn't get any of the Isaac Bell series. All NUMA stuff. I will have to look for this series next time they have the sale. The current Dirk Pitt one I am reading is full of climate predictions that probably would have made more sense written farther into the future.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:42 pm
by Jeff V
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:57 am
by MonkeyFinger
Okay, guess it's time to expose either my ignorance or lack of puzzle solving skills early in the morning. Don't really hit this thread often but today I'm wondering about the use of
(A) at the end of a book title with the very occasional
(K) by Jeff V.
A is for... Audible?
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 3:09 pm
by hitbyambulance
xenocide wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:25 pm
but if that does not wow me I will be done with Philip K. Dick books.
don't stop until you've read
Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said
A Scanner Darkly
The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 4:39 pm
by WYBaugh
MonkeyFinger wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:57 am
Okay, guess it's time to expose either my ignorance or lack of puzzle solving skills early in the morning. Don't really hit this thread often but today I'm wondering about the use of
(A) at the end of a book title with the very occasional
(K) by Jeff V.
A is for... Audible?
K is for Kindle
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:25 pm
by Jeff V
MonkeyFinger wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:57 am
Okay, guess it's time to expose either my ignorance or lack of puzzle solving skills early in the morning. Don't really hit this thread often but today I'm wondering about the use of
(A) at the end of a book title with the very occasional
(K) by Jeff V.
A is for... Audible?
This year I omitted the legend I had last year.
A - Audio
K - Kindle
B - Archaic thing made of paper (I'm reading one of those for the first time this year).
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:54 pm
by MonkeyFinger
Jeff V wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:25 pm
MonkeyFinger wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:57 am
Okay, guess it's time to expose either my ignorance or lack of puzzle solving skills early in the morning. Don't really hit this thread often but today I'm wondering about the use of
(A) at the end of a book title with the very occasional
(K) by Jeff V.
A is for... Audible?
This year I omitted the legend I had last year.
A - Audio
K - Kindle
B - Archaic thing made of paper (I'm reading one of those for the first time this year).
Thanks! Wasn't sure at first when all I saw were (A) books but then saw a lone (K) and thought I was on the right track.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:25 pm
by Jeff V
Lone K? I've finished 8 of them so far this year! Most, but not all, of the Kindle books are Librarything early review copies that I'm obliged to review.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:40 pm
by MonkeyFinger
... that I noticed before asking the question. That was all I meant.
Re: Books Read 2018
Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 3:30 pm
by ImLawBoy
Finished Summer Knight by Jim Butcher, book four in the Dresden Files. I think I probably liked this one the best so far. While the previous books often seemed to focus on the limits of Dresden's powers, this one allowed him to flex a bit more, and that made things more fun.
BTW, I always imagine Alan Rickman in Snape mode with an American accent when I read these books.
Next up is Bandwidth by Eliot Peper. This is an Amazon first free book, and it's some sort of sci-fi political thriller or something. I don't have terribly high hopes, but I've been wrong before.