[TV] Any show without its own thread...

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
tjg_marantz
Posts: 14688
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Queen City, SK

[TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by tjg_marantz »

Home of the Akimbo AWPs
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25742
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by dbt1949 »

I always hated Sara Gilbert's character. I'm afraid it's not a sign of progress for me.
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
mori
Posts: 4590
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Edge of Darkness

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by mori »

Nope.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28958
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Holman »

I've lived my whole life without watching any incarnation of Roseanne. Let it fucking die.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20381
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Skinypupy »

Holman wrote: Fri Jun 01, 2018 7:08 pm I've lived my whole life without watching any incarnation of Roseanne. Let it fucking die.
Same here.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43763
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Kraken »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Jun 01, 2018 10:07 pm
Holman wrote: Fri Jun 01, 2018 7:08 pm I've lived my whole life without watching any incarnation of Roseanne. Let it fucking die.
Same here.
From what little I know about it, I am not her demographic. More like the opposite of her demographic. And since I know next to nothing about it, I'm content to leave it at that.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51444
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by hepcat »

When it first appeared in its original incarnation, it was a return to sitcoms with a family that reflected the average watcher. At that point in time, the tv landscape for sitcoms was full of hip young New Yorkers living in apartments they should not have been able to afford, and bemoaning how hard they had it. Roseanne brought back the sensibilities of an All in the Family. It was also pretty smartly written.

I haven't watched this new incarnation though. Sounds like she was relying too much on the current political clime for my taste. But I might give it a watch to see if I'm wrong. That it had the great Wanda Sykes on the writing staff tells me it might be good.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Z-Corn
Posts: 4894
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:16 pm

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Z-Corn »

I liked the original show way-back and I thought this incarnation was really good. There was good conflict between the character Roseanne and the other family members. Too bad she can't keep her shitty opinions to herself in the real world.
User avatar
tjg_marantz
Posts: 14688
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Queen City, SK

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by tjg_marantz »

hepcat wrote:When it first appeared in its original incarnation, it was a return to sitcoms with a family that reflected the average watcher. At that point in time, the tv landscape for sitcoms was full of hip young New Yorkers living in apartments they should not have been able to afford, and bemoaning how hard they had it. Roseanne brought back the sensibilities of an All in the Family. It was also pretty smartly written.

I haven't watched this new incarnation though. Sounds like she was relying too much on the current political clime for my taste. But I might give it a watch to see if I'm wrong. That it had the great Wanda Sykes on the writing staff tells me it might be good.
The first episode was Trump and pussy hat heavy but subsequent episodes were not just about that. They were about people struggling and I liked it. We watched to episode six then fell behind because of my work. We were going to sit down and binge the last three and that fateful day. Not happening now and I can't recommend watching them only because of her. But what I saw was good.
Home of the Akimbo AWPs
User avatar
Ralph-Wiggum
Posts: 17449
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:51 am

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Ralph-Wiggum »

(Non-Rosanne related): did anyone else watch the first season of Killing Eve on BBC America? It's a dark comedy about a woman working for British intelligence trying to track down a female assassin and becoming obsessed with finding out who the assassin is. What makes the show more interesting or more unique is that almost half of the story focuses on the assassin herself; I didn't recognize the actress playing the assassin, but she's great.
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24466
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

[TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by RunningMn9 »

tjg_marantz wrote:The first episode was Trump and pussy hat heavy but subsequent episodes were not just about that.
While true, it was not done in a “OMG Trump is the best!!” way. The Trump stuff was presented as a humorous conflict between Roseanne (super pro-trump) and Laurie Metcalf (super pro-Hillary). I found it entertaining.

The original series was very well written. And I was struck by how continuous the new show felt with the old and how incredibly rare that is (looking at you Arrested Development).

Roseanne is a loathsome human being, but the show was a well written sitcom.

That said, I hate Darlene. I’d rather watch a show about DJ.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43763
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Kraken »

I've been recording Killing Eve for Wife, who liked the first couple of episodes. She fell behind and we have a few in the can.

Does Orphan Black have a thread, or can I mention it here? We are on the last season and going to miss it when it's over.
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4317
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by gilraen »

I've been seeing promos for Killing Eve on TV quite a bit - but I guess they aren't great promos, because I couldn't tell for the life of me what that show was supposed to be about...

I'm finishing watching Low Winter Sun - an AMC adaptation of a BBC miniseries. It's an old show from 2013, so it's on Netflix now. Normally I wouldn't care about the subject matter (crooked Detroit cops tangle with the local mob and kill one of their own, who was even more crooked, and then things just go off the rails as they try to cover it up). But I wanted to see Mark Strong in a leading role, since he's always either a supporting actor or a villain. I'm also looking forward to his new show, Deep State - a British production about an MI6 spy. It's already aired all but the last episode in Europe, so with the right VPN it's available to stream on foxtv.co.uk; it starts airing in the US in a couple of weeks.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82240
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Isgrimnur »

RunningMn9 wrote: Sat Jun 02, 2018 11:58 am That said, I hate Darlene. I’d rather watch a show about DJ.
My Two Beckys?
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82240
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by Isgrimnur »

The Conners
Roseanne Conner may be dead, but Roseanne Barr wants you to know she’s still here.

The comedian, who was fired from ABC’s “Roseanne” revival following a racist Twitter rant, returned to the social media platform Tuesday night after the premiere of “The Conners,” the spinoff ABC ordered after canceling her namesake sitcom. The debut episode revealed that Roseanne, the Conner family matriarch, had died of an opioid overdose. “I AIN’T DEAD,” Barr tweeted, adding a variation of a four-letter word.

Roseanne’s fate should not have come as a surprise to Barr, who told conservative vlogger Brandon Straka last month that her character would die exactly that way. The revelation made sense — before its cancellation in May, “Roseanne” had revealed the character was struggling with an addiction to prescription medication.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25742
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Re: [TV] Any show without its own thread...

Post by dbt1949 »

In my best Monty Python voice "I got better!"
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
Post Reply