Avengers: End Game

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
Victoria Raverna
Posts: 5012
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:23 am
Location: Jakarta

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Victoria Raverna »

Punisher wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:31 pm
Paingod wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 7:33 am
Isgrimnur wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 12:36 pm So many families destroyed because Tony wanted to preserve his.
To be fair, Tony also preserved millions of other families that had emerged in the five years since the original dusting. At the cost of royally messing with the heads of everyone on both sides when lost loved ones re-materialized. All the people on planes that died when the planes fell out of the sky after the first dusting? Still dead. I don't think there was any good answer by the movie's logic - but what they did was the best answer.
I dont think this was the best answer. I think reverting the original snap so that it never happened is the best option because then it messes with nobody...technically...
the way they did it messes with everyone. both the survivors and the ones brought back. you have things were people have moved on and re-married (ala The Manifest), people have died naturally and the returnees didnt get to say their goodbyes. you have the people that were on the plane that crashed where half of them were snapped, and now they are back and lost their loved ones from the crash.

If they revert, then NONE of it happened. Including the new families and NO ONE would realize anything was wrong since the snap never happened. They wouldn't realize they lost any new family members. Yes it would suck that some of the new children would vanish, but the over all best thing is to have it so that everyone forgets permanently.
But that won't work with Endgame's version of time travel. That'll require them to change the past which will create an alternate future but won't change MCU's timeline.
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13132
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Paingod »

Jaymann wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 11:33 pmNot to mention the people who snapped back in at 10,000 feet.
I automatically assumed the result would have a stipulation "... safely back at home"
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43493
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Blackhawk »

Yeah, I sort of agree. I still think the stones would have to work by interpreting intent rather than specific instructions, as the actual instructions would take far more than a human mind - even Stark's - could manage, especially in a single second on a battlefield while injured.

His intent would simply be to have all that was vanished by the first snap back safe and sound. The stones would make sure that happened.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25688
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by dbt1949 »

So these stones are another form of life?
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43493
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Blackhawk »

dbt1949 wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 10:38 am So these stones are another form of life?
In the MCU, some of them are almost certainly sentient. The Mind and Soul stones for sure, and the Space stone seems to have used judgment when it sent Red Skull off to be the guardian for the soul stone. I'm told the comics are a little different.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25688
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by dbt1949 »

So they're sentient beings that allow themselves to be used by other sentient beings for whatever purpose they want as long as they are powerful enough. Otherwise they burn em to a cinder.
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41246
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by El Guapo »

Punisher wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 12:40 pm
El Guapo wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 11:53 am
Punisher wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:31 pm
Paingod wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 7:33 am
Isgrimnur wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 12:36 pm So many families destroyed because Tony wanted to preserve his.
To be fair, Tony also preserved millions of other families that had emerged in the five years since the original dusting. At the cost of royally messing with the heads of everyone on both sides when lost loved ones re-materialized. All the people on planes that died when the planes fell out of the sky after the first dusting? Still dead. I don't think there was any good answer by the movie's logic - but what they did was the best answer.
I dont think this was the best answer. I think reverting the original snap so that it never happened is the best option because then it messes with nobody...technically...
the way they did it messes with everyone. both the survivors and the ones brought back. you have things were people have moved on and re-married (ala The Manifest), people have died naturally and the returnees didnt get to say their goodbyes. you have the people that were on the plane that crashed where half of them were snapped, and now they are back and lost their loved ones from the crash.

If they revert, then NONE of it happened. Including the new families and NO ONE would realize anything was wrong since the snap never happened. They wouldn't realize they lost any new family members. Yes it would suck that some of the new children would vanish, but the over all best thing is to have it so that everyone forgets permanently.
But by the time travel logic established in the movie, they *can't* really undo the snap - that was the point of the "strangling baby Thanos" discussion. If they tried that all that they would do is create a new divergent timeline where the snap never happened - it wouldn't fix the timeline where it did. So the Avengers could basically go live in a universe / timeline where the snap wouldn't happened, but in their original timeline (where the snap happened) everyone would still be missing half the population. By bringing things forward into the future they basically fixed the future (what hadn't happened yet), which does fix their timeline.

To the extent that any of this makes actual logical sense, anyway.
I could have sworn they didnt undo the snap only because Tony said not to because he didnt want to lose his family. I'll have to watch again I guess.
That was Tony's condition for getting involved in the time travel scheme planning - he was understandably freaked out about the potential implications of annihilating his daughter from the space-time continuum. After that point the Avengers as a group (and later Banner / Hulk with the Sorceress Supreme) discuss the time travel / timeline rules for the movie, which basically establish that any significant change in the past breaks off a new timeline but doesn't change the original timeline (which is why they have to go back and put the stones back exactly where / when they found them).

So it is both true that Tony was only involved on the condition that they not undo the snap, and also that it turned out that they couldn't really have undone the snap regardless.

I suppose that there's a possible scenario where: (1) the Avengers undo the snap, thus breaking off a timeline where the snap doesn't happen; and (2) Tony Stark is in that new timeline rather than the Prime timeline, and potentially (depending on what happens with Pym particles and whatnot) gets 'stuck' in that timeline, and thus is separated from his daughter. So I suppose Tony would still have a concern about trying to undo the snap even though they can't really undo it.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Jaymann
Posts: 19320
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: California

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Jaymann »

So how did Captain America travel to other planets to return the stones?
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Isgrimnur »

It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41246
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by El Guapo »

Jaymann wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:20 pm So how did Captain America travel to other planets to return the stones?
Well, the Pym particles / quantum realm contraption lets them travel through space and time. Which is how they got all the stones to begin with - they went to the past at different locations / planets.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 16434
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Zarathud »

Stark figured out time travel and had the stones which alter everything. I would expect Stark took time before to consider how to word the direction, then a few seconds with the time stone to check it worked out ok, and then tweaked the ask. Well within the fictional character's capabilities as a genius to figure out.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein
"I don't stand by anything." - Trump
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” - John Stuart Mill, Inaugural Address Delivered to the University of St Andrews, 2/1/1867
“It is the impractical things in this tumultuous hell-scape of a world that matter most. A book, a name, chicken soup. They help us remember that, even in our darkest hour, life is still to be savored.” - Poe, Altered Carbon
User avatar
hentzau
Posts: 15092
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Castle Zenda, Ruritania

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by hentzau »

Zarathud wrote:Stark figured out time travel and had the stones which alter everything. I would expect Stark took time before to consider how to word the direction, then a few seconds with the time stone to check it worked out ok, and then tweaked the ask. Well within the fictional character's capabilities as a genius to figure out.
Except Banner did the first snap. Tony snapped away Thanos and goons.
“We can never allow Murania to become desecrated by the presence of surface people. Our lives are serene, our minds are superior, our accomplishments greater. Gene Autry must be captured!!!” - Queen Tika, The Phantom Empire
User avatar
Jaymann
Posts: 19320
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: California

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Jaymann »

So when Iron Man was snapping out Thanos and crew, couldn't he have also included Loki, Dr. Doom, Ultron and Paste Pot Pete?
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
hentzau
Posts: 15092
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Castle Zenda, Ruritania

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by hentzau »

In the middle of seeing this for a third time with my middle kid that didn’t have a chance to see it while she was in college.

They just stopped the movie for a tornado warning. We’re hunkered down between the seats.

Most exciting screening ever.
“We can never allow Murania to become desecrated by the presence of surface people. Our lives are serene, our minds are superior, our accomplishments greater. Gene Autry must be captured!!!” - Queen Tika, The Phantom Empire
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43493
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Blackhawk »

Oh snap!
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Suitably Ironic Moniker
Posts: 3601
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:09 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Suitably Ironic Moniker »

Blackhawk wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 11:04 pmOh snap!
THREAD IS NOW LOCKED
When I was a boy, I laid in my twin-sized bed and wondered where my brother was. - Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Isgrimnur »

The Verge
Avengers: Endgame is finally getting an official post-credits scene, with a limited-time rerelease in theaters this weekend.

Marvel Studios co-president Kevin Feige told Screen Rant that a new version of Endgame will appear in theaters that has a couple of additional scenes not in the original. Feige said if people “stay and watch the movie, after the credits, there’ll be a deleted scene, a little tribute, and a few surprises.”
...
Endgame marked the end of a 22-movie journey through the Marvel Cinematic Universe over the last 11 years. The film brought in more than $2.7 billion worldwide — and is approximately $45 million away from beating Avatar as the top-grossing movie of all time. Could that also be why Disney and Marvel Studios are sending the film back to theaters? Maybe.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
msteelers
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by msteelers »

I’ll be going back to see it again.
User avatar
rittchard
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by rittchard »

I wanted to too but there are so few showtimes near me and the one good time they put it in a tiny tiny theater :x
User avatar
Kelric
Posts: 30196
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: Whip City

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Kelric »

Of course they want the record. I'll need more than just end scenes to get me back in theater, though.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Isgrimnur »

Comic Book
Avengers: Endgame was re-released in theaters this past weekend, with the promise of offering fans exclusive new bonus footage. Well, it didn't take long for Marvel fans to head out and see the Avengers: Endgame re-release and immediately take to social media with their complaints about the so-called "extras."

As it turns out, the Avengers: Endgame re-released included just one deleted scene of Smart Hulk saving a group of people - a scene that wasn't even fully finished in terms of the visual effects. That underwhelming reward now has some Marvel fans crying foul
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
AWS260
Posts: 12664
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by AWS260 »

I went back to see it, and enjoyed it just as much as the first time. It's not as good as Infinity War, but still plenty of fun.

The after-credits content consists of one nice thing and two throwaway things. The nice thing:
Spoiler:
A sweet tribute to Stan Lee
The throwaway things:
Spoiler:
A deleted scene with the Hulk saving people from a burning building. I don't know why they chose to include it. It has Mark Ruffalo doing his great-as-usual acting, but adds nothing to the story or the character.
Spoiler:
A very brief clip from the new Spider-Man movie, showing Fury and Hill meeting Jake Gyllenhaal.
User avatar
rittchard
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by rittchard »

Just checked out the deleted scenes from the digital release. All of them were OK, but one of them it seems like a real shame was cut.
Spoiler:
It's an extended moment during Tony's death, showing more characters' reactions and many of them bending a knee in honor of him. I thought it was incredibly moving even watching it out of context, and it brought a tear to my eye. I remember when I watched the movie I felt like that moment got inexplicably cut short but it was such a long movie and they had the funeral later so it didn't bother me too much. This really fills that void for me; I really wish we could watch the whole sequence with the shot edited back in. It's not too long but it just felt like a needed moment that was missing.
User avatar
AWS260
Posts: 12664
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by AWS260 »

I saw that clip online, and had pretty much the opposite reaction. Overwrought and unnecessary.
User avatar
McNutt
Posts: 12368
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: What's the opposite of the Twittersphere

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by McNutt »

I agree. Too forced.
User avatar
msteelers
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by msteelers »

I hate having to wait two weeks to get this on Blu-ray.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Isgrimnur »

I’m waiting for the phase 3 box set. You can wait.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 25688
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Hogeye Arkansas

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by dbt1949 »

I finally got to see this. Altho I liked it, it was no where near my favorite. Started off kind of slow but was jam packed with action at the end. The return of the missing Avengers was awesome.
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Zaxxon »

Not sure why this entertains me greatly, but it does...

User avatar
stimpy
Posts: 6102
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by stimpy »

Wait until rittchard gets a load of this.....
He/Him/His/Porcupine
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51302
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by hepcat »

So I finally got around to buying this on a streaming service last week, and I watched it last night. I had already caught a 3D show at the theater, so this was my second viewing. A few things STILL stick out for me though:

1) Putting a guy from 2019 on a starship with a hyperdrive, even if that man is Tony Stark, and then having him seemingly "work on it" in such a capacity that the advanced cyborg he's stranded with is taking orders from him in such repairs, is like putting Thomas Edison on the Apollo space capsule and then watching him upgrade it. Even if he WASN'T successful, it's still a stretch for me. To be faaaiiirrr, this happens a LOT in these types of films. An auto mechanic from Boise, Idaho gets stranded in space and picked up by a starship, then the following episode he's the chief engineer or something.

2) When Black Widow and Hawkeye Pierce land on Mordor Vormir, could they (or more precisely, Nebula) have landed the damn ship closer than 27 miles from the bloody mountain?

3) Did Hope (Wasp) speak even once in that entire film?

4) I still can't stand Pepper Potts. Probably because I can't stand Gwyneth Paltrow. I kept wondering if she was wearing GOOP brand products under the suit. Hopefully Tony's death means no more of her.

5) Why would you make Hulk take the stairs/elevator to the ground floor? Just jump out one of the 39 broken windows in that office, dude.

6) I think they're trying to hard to mold Captain Marvel into a masculine stereotype of a super hero. I think Marvel has a chance to do something truly interesting with her character in light of her immense power. Just making her a female version of Thor/Hulk is too lazy, IMHO.

Still, it's a wonderful film overall and I still enjoyed it. Even if it was less watchable for me the second time around than it was the first.
Covfefe!
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Zaxxon »

hepcat wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 9:51 am1) Putting a guy from 2019 on a starship with a hyperdrive, even if that man is Tony Stark, and then having him seemingly "work on it" in such a capacity that the advanced cyborg he's stranded with is taking orders from him in such repairs, is like putting Thomas Edison on the Apollo space capsule and then watching him upgrade it. Even if he WASN'T successful, it's still a stretch for me. To be faaaiiirrr, this happens a LOT in these types of films. An auto mechanic from Boise, Idaho gets stranded in space and picked up by a starship, then the following episode he's the chief engineer or something.
Thankfully, the MCU is otherwise devoid of ridiculous technological leaps of faith.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51302
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by hepcat »

:lol: :lol:

I think my complaint about this mainly comes from the wealth of offenders out there in films. It's a common trope. It's not "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" bad for me, but it's getting there.
Covfefe!
User avatar
Jaymon
Posts: 3006
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Jaymon »

hepcat wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 9:51 am

6) I think they're trying to hard to mold Captain Marvel into a masculine stereotype of a super hero. I think Marvel has a chance to do something truly interesting with her character in light of her immense power. Just making her a female version of Thor/Hulk is too lazy, IMHO.
I think they had trouble deciding what to do with her in general. Her power level is not on scale with the other folks. She can destroy interstellar warships with seemingly little trouble and fly at warp speeds. So its unclear how exactly that lady with the spear was going to "clear the way" for her.

I thought it was good to have her in there, after all she is listed as "Earths mightiest hero" and she was an Avenger but they may have overdone her power for the MCU.
Bunnies like beer because its made from hops.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51302
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by hepcat »

I wasn't a close follower of her character in the comics. Was she ever at the level they put her in the MCU? I always thought she was supposed to be on scale with a Thor or Hulk.
Covfefe!
User avatar
Jaymon
Posts: 3006
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Jaymon »

the comics constantly fiddle with things, as you know but generally,

she can survive in space unaided, can exceed light speed flight
her photon blasts cut through all but the strongest materials (such as vibranium or adamantine, etc)
she can absorb various types of energy and become stronger from them
she sheathes her body in the photons and becomes nearly indestructible, which also give her strength, thus she is an excellent hero to call when you need to have a fleet of attacking space ships defeated. she literally just flies straight through them.


she doesn't have any particular defense against magic or psionics
her personal combat skills are typical for a well trained human
she is vulnerable while distracted, if her photons are not "up"
Bunnies like beer because its made from hops.
User avatar
Jaymon
Posts: 3006
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Jaymon »

so this is the theory.
we know that Thanos can be damaged, and that he has a mortal level of reaction time. After all, he gets hit from Thors axe without dodging it, and its a very serious wound.


What is to stop Captain Marvel from flying at near light speed, slamming straight through Thanos, and ending the fight in a spray of atomized gore?
Bunnies like beer because its made from hops.
User avatar
disarm
Posts: 4951
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: Hartford, CT
Contact:

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by disarm »


Jaymon wrote:so this is the theory.
we know that Thanos can be damaged, and that he has a mortal level of reaction time. After all, he gets hit from Thors axe without dodging it, and its a very serious wound.


What is to stop Captain Marvel from flying at near light speed, slamming straight through Thanos, and ending the fight in a spray of atomized gore?
You're forgetting that Thanos wears special plot armor with resistance that varies according to the needs of the story...
User avatar
Punisher
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by Punisher »

Jaymon wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:16 pm
hepcat wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 9:51 am

6) I think they're trying to hard to mold Captain Marvel into a masculine stereotype of a super hero. I think Marvel has a chance to do something truly interesting with her character in light of her immense power. Just making her a female version of Thor/Hulk is too lazy, IMHO.
I think they had trouble deciding what to do with her in general. Her power level is not on scale with the other folks. She can destroy interstellar warships with seemingly little trouble and fly at warp speeds. So its unclear how exactly that lady with the spear was going to "clear the way" for her.

I thought it was good to have her in there, after all she is listed as "Earths mightiest hero" and she was an Avenger but they may have overdone her power for the MCU.
I thought the same thing.. Captain Marvel doesn't need any help. She should be able to just fly right through the opposition.
She is powerful enough to take a hit from Thanos and just smile like nothing happened.
They could have just made time limits or something along the lines of "she cant maintain the power indefinitely"
All yourLightning Bolts are Belong to Us
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41246
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Avengers: End Game

Post by El Guapo »

disarm wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:37 pm
Jaymon wrote:so this is the theory.
we know that Thanos can be damaged, and that he has a mortal level of reaction time. After all, he gets hit from Thors axe without dodging it, and its a very serious wound.


What is to stop Captain Marvel from flying at near light speed, slamming straight through Thanos, and ending the fight in a spray of atomized gore?
You're forgetting that Thanos wears special plot armor with resistance that varies according to the needs of the story...
That is one thing that bothered me marginally about End Game. In Infinity War the Avengers almost defeated Thanos a couple times (most notably when the Guardians, Iron Man, Spider-Man, and Dr. Strange succeed in binding Thanos and almost getting the gauntlet off) yet those Avengers + more + Captain Marvel (who can fly through spaceships) somehow can't defeat Past Thanos in combat.

But you know, superheroes, I guess.
Black Lives Matter.
Post Reply