Wi-Fi 6

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82241
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Wi-Fi 6

Post by Isgrimnur »

Wired
Wi-Fi 6 is the latest generation of wireless connectivity technology. It hasn’t really launched yet, but it will soon, so tech makers have been building support into devices this year as a means of future-proofing their products.

As with most new standards, its stewards say that Wi-Fi 6 will ultimately make our tech lives better and faster. That’s probably true. But keep in mind that the main objective with the launch of Wi-Fi 6 is to increase the performance and reliability of wireless connectivity at a network level, not necessarily on a single device or at a single access point. Sure, your Roku and your Nintendo Switch will see wireless speed gains, but a lot of the new computational intelligence behind Wi-Fi 6 will be devoted to handling streaming to multiple gadgets at once. It’s Wi-Fi for a world crowded with mobile gadgets, IoT devices, and connected equipment..
...
These groups lay the foundation for new radio technologies every five years or so, which means Wi-Fi 6 has been in the works since the last standard was released in 2014. The current wireless networking standard we all use today is referred to as IEEE 802.11ac. The upcoming standard is called IEEE 802.11ax.

But you can just call it Wi-Fi 6. That simplified moniker actually represents a change in how the Wi-Fi Alliance is branding these standards. Every Wi-Fi standard will get named in sequence from now on—especially nice since Wi-Fi 6 certainly rolls off the tongue a lot more easily than “802.11ax.”
...
Wi-Fi 6 is expected to usher in the first major update to dual-band support since the 2009 rollout of Wi-Fi 802.11n—or Wi-Fi 4, since we’re calling it that now. Wi-Fi 4 operates on both 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz bands. Wi-Fi 5, née 802.11ac, only uses bands in the 5-GHz spectrum. Wi-Fi 6, or 802.11ax, is supposed to optimize for the transmission frequencies of both 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz bands. Two of its marquee features are multi-user, multiple-input, multiple-output technology (MU-MIMO), and something called Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA).

What the what?

Basically, this tech enables more devices to simultaneously operate on the same Wi-Fi channel, which improves the efficiency, latency times, and data throughput of your wireless network. And while Wi-Fi 6 is designed to improve the performance of Wi-Fi networks on the whole, on your own device you might experience up to four times the capacity and four times the data throughput (the amount of data moved from one point to another) that you would with older wireless network standards. Figueroa says this could mean a throughput of 9 to 10 gigabits per second in optimal conditions
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55352
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by LawBeefaroni »

I'll get it when/if I need it. Not before.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Jaymon
Posts: 3013
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by Jaymon »

with what I have got in the house now, we are good. several phones and tablets, tv, nintendo, alexa, couple of computers. nobody notices buffering of issues during downloads or gaming.

so I'll just naturally migrate as devices eventually break and i buy new ones that come with the new protocol built in.
Bunnies like beer because its made from hops.
morlac
Posts: 3898
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:25 pm
Location: Just outside the ATL

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by morlac »

Jaymon wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 5:16 pm with what I have got in the house now, we are good. several phones and tablets, tv, nintendo, alexa, couple of computers. nobody notices buffering of issues during downloads or gaming.

so I'll just naturally migrate as devices eventually break and i buy new ones that come with the new protocol built in.
Nobody needs it yet, they said as much. But how many of those devices stream in 4k? Hell, how many actually stream at full/real 1080p? Im close to wanting it now, I suspect ill need it as early as late next year. Im running dual bands now to isolate all the apple devices at 2.4ghz.
User avatar
The Meal
Posts: 27992
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by The Meal »

I tried no fewer than five MIMO-friendly routers to handle our poker-night barrage of devices (in our heavily-utilized IoT-connected home) without success. Ultimately I went with a meshed connection of 15 Plume wifi pods which have (mercifully) finally allowed wireless throughput on those nights we have 30 smart phones going in our home. Not the requirement for everyone, but Wi-Fi 6 would seem to be providing a solution I was in search of about two years ago.
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70186
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by LordMortis »

The Meal wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:02 pm I tried no fewer than five MIMO-friendly routers to handle our poker-night barrage of devices (in our heavily-utilized IoT-connected home) without success. Ultimately I went with a meshed connection of 15 Plume wifi pods which have (mercifully) finally allowed wireless throughput on those nights we have 30 smart phones going in our home. Not the requirement for everyone, but Wi-Fi 6 would seem to be providing a solution I was in search of about two years ago.
Aruba? They aren't expensive, are very easy to manage, have a good range, and can run POE so you can mount them with nothing but a Cat 6 cable with a POE switch/rotuer or a power injector between your router and the WAP.

https://www.arubanetworks.com/products/ ... ss-points/

I have three fairly old (but updated which costs extra for support over time so you can continue to keep them secure) WAP covering about 15,000+ square feet handling about 60 devices moving across them pretty seamlessly on on internal VLAN and an probably another 100+ on a guest VLAN on most days. I don't allow phones on our internal VLAN partially for security and partially because 70 phones will wreck my aggregate Internet if you don't set up a choke point, like a separate VLAN.

You'll still need a router on the back end but it sounds like you could benefit from a small enterprise level WAP, again not as expensive as you'd think.
Last edited by LordMortis on Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54653
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by Smoove_B »

Just knowing that Wi-Fi 6 doesn't cause cancer should really boost adoption rates.

/runs out of thread
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
The Meal
Posts: 27992
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion

Re: Wi-Fi 6

Post by The Meal »

LordMortis wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:11 pmYou'll still need a router on the back end but it sounds like you could benefit from a small enterprise level WAP, again not as expensive as you'd think.
Thanks for the heads-up. If Plume decides to play goofy with their pricing (again... fortunately I was grandfathered in before they started charging a yearly rate for some of their networking optimizations :shifty: ) I'd have to consider a new solution. Not today though!
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
Post Reply