Post-Withdrawal Iraq

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

User avatar
Lagom Lite
Posts: 3406
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Lagom Lite »

Kraken wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2020 8:33 pm Meanwhile, all of our real allies are like NOPE! nope nope nope.
Allies? Oh, you mean the Saudis. I think the others already left.
But you've seen who's in heaven
Is there anyone in hell?


"Lagom you are a smooth tongued devil, and an opportunistic monster" - OOWW Game Club
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

To paraphrase the conversation - Come on mate, don't be a cunt about this. Just get on with it without being a complete prat.

User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13132
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Paingod »

malchior wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:58 pmAmerican contractors get killed *all the time* in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This particular statement made me wonder what kind of contractors are being killed. Are we talking IT Vendors, building contractors, aid workers - or are we talking Mercenaries who happen to be American?

I keep hearing the word "contractors" and thinking "poor innocent people just trying to work" but it dawned on me that companies like Blackwater can be considered "contractors" too, but they're not exactly innocent; they're engaged in military-style work that involves exchange of gunfire with hostiles. I feel a lot less bad about someone with a gun getting killed than I do someone who goes over with a toolbox.
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13676
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by $iljanus »

Paingod wrote:
malchior wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:58 pmAmerican contractors get killed *all the time* in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This particular statement made me wonder what kind of contractors are being killed. Are we talking IT Vendors, building contractors, aid workers - or are we talking Mercenaries who happen to be American?

I keep hearing the word "contractors" and thinking "poor innocent people just trying to work" but it dawned on me that companies like Blackwater can be considered "contractors" too, but they're not exactly innocent; they're engaged in military-style work that involves exchange of gunfire with hostiles. I feel a lot less bad about someone with a gun getting killed than I do someone who goes over with a toolbox.
Not all military contractors are like Blackwater. Could have been an ex-military person training Iraqi troops.
Black lives matter!

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70097
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LordMortis »

malchior wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:07 am
Trump went on to say "The Hague Convention is a VERY bad deal for the US. We are the best at War. Nobody knows war like I do. We are being taken advantage of. We are withdrawing."

(And yeah, on the Contractor thing. I remember "all that are left are tens of thousands of contractors" when Dessert Storm was declared a success. They seemed to gloss over the volume of contractors there were mercenary private military.)
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Paingod wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:19 am
malchior wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:58 pmAmerican contractors get killed *all the time* in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This particular statement made me wonder what kind of contractors are being killed. Are we talking IT Vendors, building contractors, aid workers - or are we talking Mercenaries who happen to be American?

I keep hearing the word "contractors" and thinking "poor innocent people just trying to work" but it dawned on me that companies like Blackwater can be considered "contractors" too, but they're not exactly innocent; they're engaged in military-style work that involves exchange of gunfire with hostiles. I feel a lot less bad about someone with a gun getting killed than I do someone who goes over with a toolbox.
It's usually armed private military or truck drivers.

The two contractors just killed in Kenya were "DOD contractors" so possibly intelligence.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Isgrimnur »

LordMortis wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:44 am Dessert Storm
It's almost as if people are the problem.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:00 am
Paingod wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:19 am
malchior wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:58 pmAmerican contractors get killed *all the time* in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This particular statement made me wonder what kind of contractors are being killed. Are we talking IT Vendors, building contractors, aid workers - or are we talking Mercenaries who happen to be American?

I keep hearing the word "contractors" and thinking "poor innocent people just trying to work" but it dawned on me that companies like Blackwater can be considered "contractors" too, but they're not exactly innocent; they're engaged in military-style work that involves exchange of gunfire with hostiles. I feel a lot less bad about someone with a gun getting killed than I do someone who goes over with a toolbox.
It's usually armed private military or truck drivers.

The two contractors just killed in Kenya were "DOD contractors" so possibly intelligence.
"Fun fact" - more 'contractors' died in Afghanistan and Iraq than US military. Like all things relating to the United States Federal government the wars heavily used contracting. The three letter agencies heavily do this as well. We stretched out our capacity by taking non-front line activity and farmed it to the private sector. Another benefit is that often members of the media would only report on actual US armed forces casualties. That was the basis of my 'all the time' remark. US armed force deaths have been down dramatically but that is because it has mostly been shifted 'off the books'.
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43688
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Kraken »

Lagom Lite wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:46 am
Kraken wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2020 8:33 pm Meanwhile, all of our real allies are like NOPE! nope nope nope.
Allies? Oh, you mean the Saudis. I think the others already left.
Europe, Japan, and SK aren't "former allies" yet, because they're just looking the other way while we rampage. One hopes that if we come to our senses next year we'll be invited to play nicely with our friends again. They'll never trust us the same way, but we're still the biggest kid in the sandbox.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »



The Pentagon has informed Iraq that US forces will be leaving the country.

There’s been some back and forth about whether this letter is real. Reuter’s is reporting that they’ve confirmed its authenticity from the Iraqi government.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
Roman
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Roman »

Reuters published the article: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq ... SKBN1Z520A

Can't locate it anywhere else.
While feeding all the beasties out back I let a nice big fart. The smell followed all the way back to the house. It's like it was my baby and felt abandoned.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 8486
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Alefroth »

Skinypupy wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:17 pm
Holman wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2020 4:57 pm

What are the odds that Trump believes this tweet gives him automatic Constitutional permission to strike a foreign nation?
We’re declaring war via Twitter now.

Awesome.
Bet they never thought they'd have to put that in their Terms of Use.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

I don't understand the disconnect here considering the meltdown from Trump last night and today. Is Iraq paying for that base?

More importantly who made the call? This is a massive shift. Big picture this may essentially cede Iraq to Iran and restrict access to Syria for ISIS containment. #winning

Edit: The below says this isn't about leaving Iraq....the language is vague enough to cover moving troops around. Possibly as a show to placate the Iraqi public. Yet other organizations are saying we are leaving. Verdict: No one knows what the fuck is going on because our nation is clown shoes.

User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

malchior wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 4:58 pm I don't understand the disconnect here considering the meltdown from Trump last night and today. Is Iraq paying for that base?

More importantly who made the call? This is a massive shift. Big picture this may essentially cede Iraq to Iran and restrict access to Syria for ISIS containment. #winning

Edit: The below says this isn't about leaving Iraq....the language is vague enough to cover moving troops around. Possibly as a show to placate the Iraqi public. Yet other organizations are saying we are leaving. Verdict: No one knows what the fuck is going on because our nation is clown shoes.

That's how I read it. "Expect a lot of activity as we move our pieces about the board..."

Any official notice of a withdrawal will undoubtedly come via twitter by whiny baby shitgoblin.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »

NPR was just reporting that the full extent of "redeployment" is uncertain but that the Pentagon says US forces will be leaving the Baghdad area (including the Green Zone, the nerve center of the entire US operation for the past 16+ years).

Whether we're simply rebasing into Kurdish areas or something more extreme, this is a retreat, and everyone sees it. It also gives the lie to Pompeo's one-day-old assertion that the Iraqis want us there and that they are safer for our presence.

Oh, and the US/NATO alliance has essentially called off the war on ISIS for now. I'm sure that won't be seen as giving up, though.

EDIT: OH, WAIT. WE TAKE IT BACK.



So the Iraqis explicitly asked us to leave and confirmed to news organizations that we said we were, and now we say we aren't.

Doesn't that make us something of an occupying power now?
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

Forgetting the occupying power part. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs doesn't know the status of a major combat force in a conflict zone. We also sent a "draft letter" to a foreign government promising to obey their order to leave. I half expect a fortress america style invasion as people realize we are probably completely undefended.

BTW - I looked at the image - nothing about it says draft. Every draft government document I've seen is marked draft. Often with big diagonal text (watermark style). My guess is that this is a product of chaos.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

malchior wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:47 pm Forgetting the occupying power part. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs doesn't know the status of a major combat force in a conflict zone. We also sent a "draft letter" to a foreign government promising to obey their order to leave. I half expect a fortress america style invasion as people realize we are probably completely undefended.

BTW - I looked at the image - nothing about it says draft. Every draft government document I've seen is marked draft. Often with big diagonal text (watermark style). My guess is that this is a product of chaos.
Amateur-hour is 24-7 with this Administration.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

She really wants VP - right!?! Enlisting as a Trumpist garbage human has to have a price right?

User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »



This is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Pro-jec-tion. And it's why they're expecting actual record crowds for Trump's coronation second inauguration.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:54 am

Amateur-hour is 24-7 with this Administration.
To wit:
WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper sought to douse an international outcry on Monday by ruling out military attacks on cultural sites in Iran if the conflict with Tehran escalates further, despite President Trump’s threat to destroy some of the country’s treasured icons.

Mr. Esper acknowledged that striking cultural sites with no military value would be a war crime, putting him at odds with the president, who insisted such places would be legitimate targets. Mr. Trump’s threats generated condemnation at home and abroad while deeply discomfiting American military leaders who have made a career of upholding the laws of war.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Smoove_B »

I've been repeatedly assured that Trump would only order attacks on lawful targets. Considering the deep, well-thought out analysis that took place in Trump's mind for the the attack that started this all, I'm confident he'll do the right thing.

Also, I'm trying to sarcasm so hard it comes back around and becomes true.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41243
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by El Guapo »

malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative. Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.

I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Smoove_B »

Either way, more people attended his funeral than were at Trump's inauguration, so I'm sure he's pissed. I mean, there was a stampede that killed at least 32 people. That's crazy.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
GungHo
Posts: 3940
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Second star to the right

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by GungHo »

El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:39 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative. Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.

I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
This is not the time nor place for measured, nuanced thought.

The Iranians a going to drop a nuclear bomb on king Donald!!
OR
cry in a corner that the world has come to a point where you have to pay for imaginary shit.

-Hiccup
User avatar
Lagom Lite
Posts: 3406
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Lagom Lite »

El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:39 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative. Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.

I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
Soleimani is seen as something of a war hero in Iran, as someone who fought and defeated ISIS (who is a threat to and wants to genocide Shia muslims). Brutal, yes, but a hero all the same.

It's like the Russian view of Stalin. Many Russians to this day consider him a hero for protecting them from the Nazis, even with his less than stellar record on reigns of terror and whatnot.

Authoritarian cultures and subcultures tend to do this. I don't see why those mourners wouldn't be genuine. Heck, you only need to look at your own authoritarians in America to get a sense of the sort of psychology of accepting cruelty that emerges when loyalty for country and leader is trumped up as the supreme virtue above all else.
But you've seen who's in heaven
Is there anyone in hell?


"Lagom you are a smooth tongued devil, and an opportunistic monster" - OOWW Game Club
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:39 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative.
Oh yeah? How do they know if individuals attended? Do they just carpet bomb towns if they don't turn out? Millions showed up. All of them or many of them feared death or physical violence? Come on - be reasonable.
Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.
Really? Sure it is a brutal regime but this is a stretch to say that millions turned out because of the implicit fear in the regime. It is way more likely they actually revered him because they were fed propaganda for years about him.
I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
No doubt but her point was bullshit. She knows it is bullshit. Getting into nuances about the popularity of authoritarian regimes is a side show.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41243
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by El Guapo »

malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:20 am
El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:39 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative.
Oh yeah? How do you know if individuals attended? Do they just carpet bomb towns if they don't turn out? Millions showed up. All of them feared death or physical violence? Come on - be reasonable.
Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.
Really? Sure it is a brutal regime but this is a stretch to say that millions turned out because of the implicit fear in the regime. It is way more likely they actually revered him because they were fed propaganda for years about him.
I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
No doubt but her point was bullshit. She knows it is bullshit. Getting into nuances about the popularity of authoritarian regimes is a side show.
No, obviously I'm not saying that all of them turned up because of compulsion. Obviously that's ridiculous. Obviously there's no individual attendance list or the like. HOWEVER, there are various government-affiliated gangs / militias / thugs. Lots of people are going to the funeral. I would expect that most people would not feel super comfortable saying "nah, I'm good" about going to the funeral. It's not that the regime is going to arrest you or execute you or the like. The fear would be that some regime-affiliated gang gets word that you / your family / etc. didn't show. Obviously you don't want to get on the radar of those gangs or government apparatchiks as someone who may not be fully enthusiastic about the regime.

So the idea that everyone at the protest was compelled to be there is absurd. But the general power dynamic around the regime means that there would be an implicit threat involved in the decision to attend / not attend the funeral. All of which just complicates using the funeral attendance as a barometer of popular support for Suleimani / the regime.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41243
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by El Guapo »

Lagom Lite wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:17 am
El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:39 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Well, I disagree that it doesn't pass the basic logic test, though it is speculative. Obviously this funeral was a big deal to the Iranian regime, as a venue for showing strength and unity. If the funeral was poorly attended or (even worse) if there were protests of some type, that would be deeply embarrassing. Every Iranian would know that this funeral is important to the Iranian regime, and would also know that the regime is often not shy about beating people up who dissent or who otherwise cause problems for the regime. So one issue with using the attendance at the funeral as a measure of Iranian popular support for the regime / Soleimani / what have you is that there is at least an implicit threat of violence around this, as well as around everything that is important to the regime.

I think it's reasonable to assume that the Soleimani strike is helpful to the regime domestically in terms of rallying nationalist support. It's also reasonable to assume that many / most of the people at the funeral were there voluntarily. But assessing popular support in authoritarian regimes is always complicated.
Soleimani is seen as something of a war hero in Iran, as someone who fought and defeated ISIS (who is a threat to and wants to genocide Shia muslims). Brutal, yes, but a hero all the same.

It's like the Russian view of Stalin. Many Russians to this day consider him a hero for protecting them from the Nazis, even with his less than stellar record on reigns of terror and whatnot.

Authoritarian cultures and subcultures tend to do this. I don't see why those mourners wouldn't be genuine. Heck, you only need to look at your own authoritarians in America to get a sense of the sort of psychology of accepting cruelty that emerges when loyalty for country and leader is trumped up as the supreme virtue above all else.
Soleimani was also deeply involved in the brutal crackdown on mass Iranian protests earlier this year, right? I would assume that there would also be some ill will domestically about that.

I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the Iranian street here. My general assumption is that, by the nature of his role, there must be a significant number of people in Iran who loved the man, and a significant number who loathed him. And I'm not sure of how exactly we would reliably assess the balance of those.
Black Lives Matter.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by malchior »

El Guapo wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:32 amNo, obviously I'm not saying that all of them turned up because of compulsion. Obviously that's ridiculous. Obviously there's no individual attendance list or the like. HOWEVER, there are various government-affiliated gangs / militias / thugs. Lots of people are going to the funeral. I would expect that most people would not feel super comfortable saying "nah, I'm good" about going to the funeral. It's not that the regime is going to arrest you or execute you or the like. The fear would be that some regime-affiliated gang gets word that you / your family / etc. didn't show. Obviously you don't want to get on the radar of those gangs or government apparatchiks as someone who may not be fully enthusiastic about the regime.
This last sentence is the crux of it. With the numbers of people involved the only ones at risk are the people *already on the radar* and those people are absolutely being compelled. Is that a lot of people? I don't know but I doubt it. This regime has been in power a long time now.
So the idea that everyone at the protest was compelled to be there is absurd. But the general power dynamic around the regime means that there would be an implicit threat involved in the decision to attend / not attend the funeral. All of which just complicates using the funeral attendance as a barometer of popular support for Suleimani / the regime.
I don't disagree but again the point the Senator made was bullshit. 'Attend or die'. Again to follow her logic - I guess Iran is killing 75 million people then? (Just matching hyperbole with hyperbole).
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »

I’ve seen it pointed out that the Iranian regime has sometimes paid (note: not threatened with killing) crowds to appear for official proclamations and so on, but that none has ever been 2% of what we see here.

The general was a national hero and had been for years. He was also an awful guy, but he was THEIR awful guy, and he had come to stand for national pride.

All we did in kill8ng him was unite the numerous Iranian factions behind a hardline response.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
noxiousdog
Posts: 24627
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by noxiousdog »

Lagom Lite wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:17 am Authoritarian cultures and subcultures tend to do this. I don't see why those mourners wouldn't be genuine. Heck, you only need to look at your own authoritarians in America to get a sense of the sort of psychology of accepting cruelty that emerges when loyalty for country and leader is trumped up as the supreme virtue above all else.
See: Jackson, Andrew
Black Lives Matter

"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »

noxiousdog wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 1:04 pm
Lagom Lite wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:17 am Authoritarian cultures and subcultures tend to do this. I don't see why those mourners wouldn't be genuine. Heck, you only need to look at your own authoritarians in America to get a sense of the sort of psychology of accepting cruelty that emerges when loyalty for country and leader is trumped up as the supreme virtue above all else.
See: Jackson, Andrew
Or Eddie Gallagher at a Trump rally.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 21196
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Grifman »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:49 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Pro-jec-tion. And it's why they're expecting actual record crowds for Trump's coronation second inauguration.
Actually, there's some truth to the senator's post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... soleimani/

Not everyone in Iran loved the general, many hated him.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 28906
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Holman »

Grifman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:01 pm
LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:49 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Pro-jec-tion. And it's why they're expecting actual record crowds for Trump's coronation second inauguration.
Actually, there's some truth to the senator's post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... soleimani/

Not everyone in Iran loved the general, many hated him.
That's paywalled, and my WaPo subscription has run out. Would you post the gist of it?
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Fretmute
Posts: 8513
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:05 pm
Location: On a hillside, desolate

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by Fretmute »

Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:06 pm That's paywalled, and my WaPo subscription has run out. Would you post the gist of it?
Not everyone in Iran loved the general, many hated him.
The media in the Islamic Republic is heavily controlled. Public gatherings are allowed only if they are pro-regime. Critics are jailed or shot. (Even I, living outside the country, have received a death threat on Iranian national TV for my coverage of Soleimani’s killing.) So it’s not hard to use all the tools and resources of the state to stage a funeral procession.

. . .

There are many Iranian voices who think Soleimani was a war criminal, but Western journalists rarely reach out to them. Ironically, the Western media is more skeptical of such state-organized events in other countries, such as Russia or North Korea, but seems to leave its critical sense at the border when it comes to the Islamic Republic. While it’s true that Western correspondents face daunting conditions when it comes to reporting the truth from Iran, that shouldn’t excuse the many times they’ve shown unwarranted gullibility toward the official version of events.
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4312
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by gilraen »

Mourning or otherwise, at least 56 people are confirmed dead in the crush at the funeral procession in Soleimani's home town.

The whole "attend or be killed" statement is ridiculous not because anyone is going to argue that Iranians all loved this guy, but because who the hell would take attendance in a crowd like this:

Enlarge Image

Bet Trump wishes he had inauguration crowds like this...
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Grifman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:01 pm
LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:49 am
malchior wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:46 am
Holman wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:30 amThis is such bullshit.
“Sen. Marsha Blackburn” wrote:This is what happens when you’re given the choice of attending or being killed.
It doesn't even come close to passing the basic logic test. But then again she knows the deplorables are cultist drones.
Pro-jec-tion. And it's why they're expecting actual record crowds for Trump's coronation second inauguration.
Actually, there's some truth to the senator's post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... soleimani/

Not everyone in Iran loved the general, many hated him.
Paywalled op-ed but my point was that they are projecting their own ambitions regardless of what is or isn't actually happening on Iran.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55315
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Post-Withdrawal Iraq

Post by LawBeefaroni »

gilraen wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:30 pm Mourning or otherwise, at least 56 people are confirmed dead in the crush at the funeral procession in Soleimani's home town.

The whole "attend or be killed" statement is ridiculous not because anyone is going to argue that Iranians all loved this guy, but because who the hell would take attendance in a crowd like this:

Enlarge Image

Bet Trump wishes he had inauguration crowds like this...
Also because it appears to be "attend and possibly be killed."
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
Post Reply