Pictures and Videos for R&P

Moliere · Post by **Moliere** » Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:13 pm

Caption contest!

"Hey, so by the time I get elected you will be, what 17 or 18? I will give you my personal tour of the White House. Give daddy a little sugar."

Defiant · Post by **Defiant** » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:42 am

Zarathud · Post by **Zarathud** » Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:57 am

Moliere · Post by **Moliere** » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:56 pm

Moliere · Post by **Moliere** » Tue Feb 10, 2015 2:11 am

Vorret · Post by **Vorret** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:47 pm

Canada is red?
Uh?

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:49 pm

I think it's orange.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:53 pm

Based on what I've found, it should be red.

Legal Code wrote:296. (1) Every one who publishes a blasphemous libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

Vice

True, no one has been prosecuted under the law in more than 70 years; charges against the Canadian distributor of the Monty Python film Life of Brian in 1980, for example, were later dropped. But secular advocacy groups say it's plainly hypocritical for Canada to keep an anti-blasphemy law on the books when it accuses other countries of using similar laws to justify human rights abuses.
...
But that's not enough for Iman Willoughby. A self-described ex-Muslim living in Halifax, Willoughby supports the repeal of Canada's anti-blasphemy law. "Never in a million years," she says, did she expect to find such a law here. "I had to go do my own research out of disbelief."

Some argue that the law is dead, a harmless historical relic. But that's little comfort to Willoughby, who emigrated from Saudi Arabia. "Will a judge say, 'Nah, I won't use this law. It's too old'? Is that enough protection for those like myself who speak openly against gods and religion?"

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:44 pm

Cool.

I did not know that, but I'm only mildly surprised. Frankly, I'm not sure I can be surprised by stupid things people do any more.

For the record, Lois is not the person in charge of our laws, it's French for laws.

Don't get me started about bilingual URL's.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:48 pm

It's not like it should be hard to just reserve both separately. It's not like the English and French versions aren't already cross-referenced and maintained separately anyway.

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:12 pm

Isgrimnur wrote:It's not like it should be hard to just reserve both separately. It's not like the English and French versions aren't already cross-referenced and maintained separately anyway.

Do. Not. Get. Me. Started.

I said. Nice try though.

Moliere · Post by **Moliere** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:16 pm

Moliere wrote:

Caption contest!

"Hey, so by the time I get elected you will be, what 17 or 18? I will give you my personal tour of the White House. Give daddy a little sugar."

Proving he's a creep with the older ladies too:

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:30 am

Personal space. Do you know what it is?

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:39 am

Is this a caption this contest?

"Is that green apple I smell in your hair? I love green apple. You smell good enough to eat."

Zarathud · Post by **Zarathud** » Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:38 am

Turns out Joe Biden whispered a joke to her after dragging her on camera for the swearing in. You people are so serious.

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:49 am

Dragging her onstage? Who does he think he is, Ray Rice?

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:07 pm

Ca a peace prize be far away?

Zarathud · Post by **Zarathud** » Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:44 pm

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:09 am

Zarathud wrote:Turns out Joe Biden whispered a joke to her after dragging her on camera for the swearing in. You people are so serious.

That doesn't explain the behavior depicted in these other candid photos though.

Zarathud · Post by **Zarathud** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:05 am

Daehawk · Post by **Daehawk** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:29 am

deadzone wrote:

That still makes me sad.

Holman · Post by **Holman** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:11 am

Zekester · Post by **Zekester** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:05 am

noxiousdog · Post by **noxiousdog** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:06 pm

That's not funny.

That's downright offensive.

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:08 pm

It is offensive and funny.

noxiousdog · Post by **noxiousdog** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:10 pm

Rip wrote:It is offensive and funny.

How it is funny? I couldn't even find a joke to try to understand.

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:11 pm

noxiousdog wrote:
Rip wrote:It is offensive and funny.

How it is funny?

Don't you watch family guy?

It is funny because it is TRUE!

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:11 pm

noxiousdog wrote:That's not funny.

That's downright offensive.

Forget it, Jake. It's Zeketown.

noxiousdog · Post by **noxiousdog** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:18 pm

Rip wrote:
noxiousdog wrote:
Rip wrote:It is offensive and funny.

How it is funny?
Don't you watch family guy?

It is funny because it is TRUE!

I hope the post gets deleted.

It's not funny.
It's racist and misogynist.

And as you well know, I'm neither a left winger nor politically correct. I typically don't understand why people find things racist or misogynist. But I can tell that most certainly is.

Zekester · Post by **Zekester** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:33 pm

Pinpoint exactly how it's racist and misogynist.

It's a rip on Hillary's sex-life, or assumed lack of.

And nothing in there is anti-Muslim.

noxiousdog · Post by **noxiousdog** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:39 pm

Zekester wrote:Pinpoint exactly how it's racist and misogynist.

It's a rip on Hillary's sex-life, or assumed lack of.

And nothing in there is anti-Muslim.

Well, I like that joke. Very self deprecating.

Jaymann · Post by **Jaymann** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:18 pm

hepcat wrote:
noxiousdog wrote:That's not funny.

That's downright offensive.
Forget it, Jake. It's Zeketown.

Now THAT's funny.

Zekester · Post by **Zekester** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:22 pm

^ brown-noser

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:46 pm

Rip wrote:It is offensive and funny.

For the record, I don't have any problem with it. But I love me some family guy and american dad too.

It's certainly offensive. And I didn't find it funny, but I don't have any specific problem with it.

I don't tend to get offended by much, although I have my triggers like anyone.

Kraken · Post by **Kraken** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:41 pm

IMO it's offensive and juvenile, but of course funny is subjective. I don't think it's inappropriate for this thread, though. Offending people is kind of the point of political cartoons.

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:44 pm

Still fun when you can get someones panties in a wad over a picture or cartoon without getting killed for it. In some corners of the world at least.