Religion Randomness
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 82308
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
- El Guapo
- Posts: 41338
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
The Catholic tradition of "The Harrowing of Hell" says that Christ, between his crucifixion and resurrection, descended into Hell and made Salvation available to all the righteous (meaning mostly the good people in the OT) who died before his sacrifice.
I'm not sure how much of that tradition survives in Protestantism. In my churches growing up, not much was said about it. Presumably it all falls under the blanket assumption that the rules were different B.C. and A.D.
I'm not sure how much of that tradition survives in Protestantism. In my churches growing up, not much was said about it. Presumably it all falls under the blanket assumption that the rules were different B.C. and A.D.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- gbasden
- Posts: 7671
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Religion Randomness
I'd be a lot more forgiving about the condemnation they heap on others if they actually were interested in following any part of the rest of the bible. Given that the majority of these chuckleheads are fine with wearing WWJD bracelets while building walls to keep the poor away, gutting social programs to feed and house the poor and take away any health care the poor might get, I'm not ok with giving them the benefit of the doubt when interpreting Leviticus.
- Kraken
- Posts: 43793
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
The question was occasioned by a TV show with a story arc set in hell. There's a caveman there. Seemed to me like he got a raw deal, what with no commandments laid down or any possibility of redemption. In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right? So before Christianity hell hadn't even been "discovered" yet.Holman wrote:The Catholic tradition of "The Harrowing of Hell" says that Christ, between his crucifixion and resurrection, descended into Hell and made Salvation available to all the righteous (meaning mostly the good people in the OT) who died before his sacrifice.
I'm not sure how much of that tradition survives in Protestantism. In my churches growing up, not much was said about it. Presumably it all falls under the blanket assumption that the rules were different B.C. and A.D.
It just got me wondering, is all. I'm not surprised that there's no universally accepted answer. Still think that caveman got a raw deal, though.
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
The Harrowing story is a very Catholic thing. (There's a ton of church art about it.)
Now that I think about it, I recall the official answer from my suburban Evangelical upbringing was that there actually is no "time before Christ's sacrifice" because Christ's sacrifice is the lynchpin of history. Those people who had the kind of faith before Christ that would have accepted Christ had they known about him are saved retroactively (although it isn't actually retroactive because See Immediately Preceding).
Of course this introduces the new problem of why people who have that kind of faith AFTER (in human history) the sacrifice of Christ don't get the same leniency into heaven even if they never know Christ. In other words, why does a good-souled 1000 B.C. Greek get retro-saved when a good-souled 1000 A.D. Chinese doesn't?
I then had someone try to explain that the necessity of accepting Christ only applies to people who have heard of Christ, which immediately led my 14-year-old self to wonder if it wouldn't then have been better for the Christian Church to have stayed minutely small rather than spreading itself out and threatening more and more souls with damnation. I believe the doctrinal answer here was that you have a better chance of being good with Christ than of lucking into being good on your own, but this never sat all that well with me either.
And of course it's important to remember that there are many, many Christians who do not view salvation and damnation in these literal, mechanical, legalistic ways. But you can be sure that most of the conservative Evangelicals signing things like the Nashville Statement do.
Now that I think about it, I recall the official answer from my suburban Evangelical upbringing was that there actually is no "time before Christ's sacrifice" because Christ's sacrifice is the lynchpin of history. Those people who had the kind of faith before Christ that would have accepted Christ had they known about him are saved retroactively (although it isn't actually retroactive because See Immediately Preceding).
Of course this introduces the new problem of why people who have that kind of faith AFTER (in human history) the sacrifice of Christ don't get the same leniency into heaven even if they never know Christ. In other words, why does a good-souled 1000 B.C. Greek get retro-saved when a good-souled 1000 A.D. Chinese doesn't?
I then had someone try to explain that the necessity of accepting Christ only applies to people who have heard of Christ, which immediately led my 14-year-old self to wonder if it wouldn't then have been better for the Christian Church to have stayed minutely small rather than spreading itself out and threatening more and more souls with damnation. I believe the doctrinal answer here was that you have a better chance of being good with Christ than of lucking into being good on your own, but this never sat all that well with me either.
And of course it's important to remember that there are many, many Christians who do not view salvation and damnation in these literal, mechanical, legalistic ways. But you can be sure that most of the conservative Evangelicals signing things like the Nashville Statement do.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 41338
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: Religion Randomness
That cave man could've been a huge asshole, though, for all you know.Kraken wrote:The question was occasioned by a TV show with a story arc set in hell. There's a caveman there. Seemed to me like he got a raw deal, what with no commandments laid down or any possibility of redemption. In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right? So before Christianity hell hadn't even been "discovered" yet.Holman wrote:The Catholic tradition of "The Harrowing of Hell" says that Christ, between his crucifixion and resurrection, descended into Hell and made Salvation available to all the righteous (meaning mostly the good people in the OT) who died before his sacrifice.
I'm not sure how much of that tradition survives in Protestantism. In my churches growing up, not much was said about it. Presumably it all falls under the blanket assumption that the rules were different B.C. and A.D.
It just got me wondering, is all. I'm not surprised that there's no universally accepted answer. Still think that caveman got a raw deal, though.
Black Lives Matter.
-
- Posts: 3051
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 11:03 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
See "Cleveland Blakemore"?El Guapo wrote:That cave man could've been a huge asshole, though, for all you know.Kraken wrote:The question was occasioned by a TV show with a story arc set in hell. There's a caveman there. Seemed to me like he got a raw deal, what with no commandments laid down or any possibility of redemption. In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right? So before Christianity hell hadn't even been "discovered" yet.Holman wrote:The Catholic tradition of "The Harrowing of Hell" says that Christ, between his crucifixion and resurrection, descended into Hell and made Salvation available to all the righteous (meaning mostly the good people in the OT) who died before his sacrifice.
I'm not sure how much of that tradition survives in Protestantism. In my churches growing up, not much was said about it. Presumably it all falls under the blanket assumption that the rules were different B.C. and A.D.
It just got me wondering, is all. I'm not surprised that there's no universally accepted answer. Still think that caveman got a raw deal, though.
Sims 3 and signature unclear.
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
Interesting Pew report on a recent religion survey:
U.S. Protestants Are Not Defined by Reformation-Era Controversies 500 Years Later.
One weird result is that apparently 30% of American Protestants believe in Purgatory. That's very odd, since I don't know of *any* Protestant denominations that teach or preach the idea of Purgatory. It's not like it's something that people talk up in popular consciousness, either (is it?).
I'm about to pick up a new history of American Evangelicals by Frances FitzGerald (yes, that Frances FitzGerald).
U.S. Protestants Are Not Defined by Reformation-Era Controversies 500 Years Later.
One weird result is that apparently 30% of American Protestants believe in Purgatory. That's very odd, since I don't know of *any* Protestant denominations that teach or preach the idea of Purgatory. It's not like it's something that people talk up in popular consciousness, either (is it?).
I'm about to pick up a new history of American Evangelicals by Frances FitzGerald (yes, that Frances FitzGerald).
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 42343
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Religion Randomness
Don't the rules have to be in place before you can break them? This retro-judgment seems unfair.El Guapo wrote:
That cave man could've been a huge asshole, though, for all you know.
Wait, no, that's right up ol' Testamenty's alley.
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
Where did Cain get his wife?GreenGoo wrote:Don't the rules have to be in place before you can break them? This retro-judgment seems unfair.El Guapo wrote:
That cave man could've been a huge asshole, though, for all you know.
Wait, no, that's right up ol' Testamenty's alley.
Enjoy!
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Re: Religion Randomness
Incorrect. Jews believe in an afterlife, but it isn't nearly as detailed a concept as other religions or the focus or the religion, because the emphasis is supposed to be the here and now. They don't believe in a Hell, however, which may be what you're thinking of. IIRC, there's Gehenom, the closest thing to hell, which is where the wicked go to suffer as they atone for their sins, until they proceed to the afterlife, while the very evil don't proceed to the afterlife.Kraken wrote: In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right?
- Kraken
- Posts: 43793
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
Does the bible even support the popular heaven/hell understanding, or was that tacked on later? I vaguely remember somebody believing that they're supposed to just molder in place until the Second Coming, whereupon they all get physically resurrected. The heaven/hell/judgment day model was added as a behavioral control device and for marketing reasons.Defiant wrote:Incorrect. Jews believe in an afterlife, but it isn't nearly as detailed a concept as other religions or the focus or the religion, because the emphasis is supposed to be the here and now. They don't believe in a Hell, however, which may be what you're thinking of. IIRC, there's Gehenom, the closest thing to hell, which is where the wicked go to suffer as they atone for their sins, until they proceed to the afterlife, while the very evil don't proceed to the afterlife.Kraken wrote: In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right?
Or did I just now make that up?
- Rip
- Posts: 26891
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
- Location: Cajun Country!
- Contact:
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
In brief, Heaven and Hell are never fully explained in the Christian Bible. There are mentions and suggestions, but there's never any point where Jesus or anyone else lays it out systematically. It's all very vague, and it's even less clear in the Hebrew Bible.Kraken wrote:Does the bible even support the popular heaven/hell understanding, or was that tacked on later? I vaguely remember somebody believing that they're supposed to just molder in place until the Second Coming, whereupon they all get physically resurrected. The heaven/hell/judgment day model was added as a behavioral control device and for marketing reasons.Defiant wrote:Incorrect. Jews believe in an afterlife, but it isn't nearly as detailed a concept as other religions or the focus or the religion, because the emphasis is supposed to be the here and now. They don't believe in a Hell, however, which may be what you're thinking of. IIRC, there's Gehenom, the closest thing to hell, which is where the wicked go to suffer as they atone for their sins, until they proceed to the afterlife, while the very evil don't proceed to the afterlife.Kraken wrote: In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right?
Or did I just now make that up?
If all you had to go on was the New Testament, you would probably come away with the sense that good Christians would eventually live forever with God in some new kingdom on Earth rather than somewhere called "heaven," although again it's never clearly explained.
The traditional idea of Heaven and Hell comes from later Church fathers and from Dante, Milton,and other influential artists.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Kraken
- Posts: 43793
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
That's more or less what I thought.
I was raised in a fire-and-brimstone Old Testament Hell tradition, offset by a vague milk-and-honey, harps-and-hymns heaven, and even to my young mind it all seemed like something adults pretended to believe in order to make us kids behave.
It's no wonder they don't know what to do with those poor unenlightened cavemen.
I was raised in a fire-and-brimstone Old Testament Hell tradition, offset by a vague milk-and-honey, harps-and-hymns heaven, and even to my young mind it all seemed like something adults pretended to believe in order to make us kids behave.
It's no wonder they don't know what to do with those poor unenlightened cavemen.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 30197
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
I was always taught growing up (good ol' Southern Baptist), that pre-saved-by-Jesus folks were just sort of grandfathered into Heaven. I don't think that was official church teaching, just what my mom told me when I asked the question.
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
You made it up. Jesus actually talked about hell quite a bit.Kraken wrote:Does the bible even support the popular heaven/hell understanding, or was that tacked on later? I vaguely remember somebody believing that they're supposed to just molder in place until the Second Coming, whereupon they all get physically resurrected. The heaven/hell/judgment day model was added as a behavioral control device and for marketing reasons.Defiant wrote:Incorrect. Jews believe in an afterlife, but it isn't nearly as detailed a concept as other religions or the focus or the religion, because the emphasis is supposed to be the here and now. They don't believe in a Hell, however, which may be what you're thinking of. IIRC, there's Gehenom, the closest thing to hell, which is where the wicked go to suffer as they atone for their sins, until they proceed to the afterlife, while the very evil don't proceed to the afterlife.Kraken wrote: In fact, Jews don't believe in an afterlife, right?
Or did I just now make that up?
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
No doubt Jesus believed in some sort of hell, but his mentions of it occur in the context of parables and references he expected his listeners to already get. There's never any attempt to explain the afterlife. Pretty much everything definite that Christianity says about it is a later formulation.Grifman wrote:You made it up. Jesus actually talked about hell quite a bit.Kraken wrote:
Does the bible even support the popular heaven/hell understanding, or was that tacked on later? I vaguely remember somebody believing that they're supposed to just molder in place until the Second Coming, whereupon they all get physically resurrected. The heaven/hell/judgment day model was added as a behavioral control device and for marketing reasons.
Or did I just now make that up?
If you collect every mention of Hell (or related imagery) in the Bible, most of them are metaphoric or allusive, and the idea is always assumed, never explained. Hell looks like a myth or folk belief being carried along as part of cultural baggage rather than like some kind of strict doctrine. The Jewish tradition in the Old Testament (no stranger to rules and specificity) never spells it out.
(My understanding is that in Jesus' time the mainstream rabbis did not emphasize an afterlife, but there were a variety of sects and radical teachers who did. John the Baptist was one of these, and it seems that Jesus was one of John's followers before launching his own ministry. It's possible that Jesus could assume his followers knew John's teachings, but of course we don't have those today.)
What *does* happen is that Hell becomes important to Christian teaching as Christianity becomes socially and politically powerful. Christian teaching emphasizes Hell as Christianity becomes central to keeping order in Western civilization.
Jesus refers to Hell briefly and allusively maybe eight or nine times. Christian rulers and their preachers go on to talk about Hell pretty much all the time for centuries upon centuries.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
I guess that depends on what you mean by "explain". Jesus makes quite clear that hell is a real place of suffering and anguish, populated by those that choose not to repent. I'm not sure what else was needed.Holman wrote:No doubt Jesus believed in some sort of hell, but his mentions of it occur in the context of parables and references he expected his listeners to already get. There's never any attempt to explain the afterlife.
That might be true for Catholicism with it's emphasis on purgatory, but Protestant Christianity holds pretty much to what Jesus said, and not much more.Pretty much everything definite that Christianity says about it is a later formulation.
I would disagree with that. Jesus spoke of hell/punishment in far more than parables. I can bore you with verses from the Bible if you want me toIf you collect every mention of Hell (or related imagery) in the Bible, most of them are metaphoric or allusive, and the idea is always assumed, never explained.
You're going to need to provide evidence here, though I agree with your assessment of OT JudaismHell looks like a myth or folk belief being carried along as part of cultural baggage rather than like some kind of strict doctrine. The Jewish tradition in the Old Testament (no stranger to rules and specificity) never spells it out.
This is definitely not true. There were three main factions in 1st century Judaism, the priestly/temple leaders, the Sadducees (the scribes) and the Pharisees. The Sadducees did not believe in an afterlife, while the Pharisees did. In fact the Sadducces, not believing heaven, asked Jesus a "trick" question once, hoping to embarrass him:(My understanding is that in Jesus' time the mainstream rabbis did not emphasize an afterlife, but there were a variety of sects and radical teachers who did.
Mark 12:18-23New International Version (NIV)
I'll leave it to those interested to look up Jesus' response18 Then the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. 19 “Teacher,” they said, “Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and raise up offspring for his brother. 20 Now there were seven brothers. The first one married and died without leaving any children. 21 The second one married the widow, but he also died, leaving no child. It was the same with the third. 22 In fact, none of the seven left any children. Last of all, the woman died too. 23 At the resurrection[a] whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?”
"It seems . . ." There is no historical mention of this in the gospels or any other document of the time period, so this is pure speculation.John the Baptist was one of these, and it seems that Jesus was one of John's followers before launching his own ministry. It's possible that Jesus could assume his followers knew John's teachings, but of course we don't have those today.)
Again, assertion without evidence You could be right, you've just given us no reason to accept this view.What *does* happen is that Hell becomes important to Christian teaching as Christianity becomes socially and politically powerful. Christian teaching emphasizes Hell as Christianity becomes central to keeping order in Western civilization.
Jesus doesn't give us a detailed view of hell but it is quite clear that he believed it existed and he almost always spoke it it with a warning included. There are also a number of times where he did not mention "hell" directly but spoke of punishment in the afterlife.Jesus refers to Hell briefly and allusively maybe eight or nine times.
You compiled a list of all the sermons and writings of Christian leaders, theologians and pastors for 2,000 year, analyzed them for content, and then made this determination?Christian rulers and their preachers go on to talk about Hell pretty much all the time for centuries upon centuries.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
Both Catholic and Protestant Christianity elaborate legalistic doctrines of Hell that present strict (and immutable, if you reject purgatory) judgments and punishments. Hell since 100 AD has been an eternal torture sentence.Grifman wrote:I guess that depends on what you mean by "explain". Jesus makes quite clear that hell is a real place of suffering and anguish, populated by those that choose not to repent. I'm not sure what else was needed.Holman wrote:No doubt Jesus believed in some sort of hell, but his mentions of it occur in the context of parables and references he expected his listeners to already get. There's never any attempt to explain the afterlife.
That might be true for Catholicism with it's emphasis on purgatory, but Protestant Christianity holds pretty much to what Jesus said, and not much more.Pretty much everything definite that Christianity says about it is a later formulation.
When Jesus speaks of Hell, it is always about immediate separation from God, and often the possibility of release or relief is the whole point of the anecdote. There is no clear sense that Hell is forever or immutable. There is definitely no clear sense that the whole point of religion is to escape or assign eternal punishment.
I have seen them all. The churches of my upbringing were obsessed with them.I would disagree with that. Jesus spoke of hell/punishment in far more than parables. I can bore you with verses from the Bible if you want me toIf you collect every mention of Hell (or related imagery) in the Bible, most of them are metaphoric or allusive, and the idea is always assumed, never explained.
We could debate questions of the historical Jesus for as long as you like. But Kraken's question was about how clear the Bible is about the afterlife, and my point was that it isn't terribly clear at all and that most doctrine/imagery/impression derives from later elaboration.......
I'm confident that study of theology and church history bears this out. (Plus, let's be honest, the Bible is a mess. That's why theology happens.)
Would such a total project really be necessary to understanding the ways in which divine judgment has been employed socially and politically in the history of Christendom?You compiled a list of all the sermons and writings of Christian leaders, theologians and pastors for 2,000 year, analyzed them for content, and then made this determination?Christian rulers and their preachers go on to talk about Hell pretty much all the time for centuries upon centuries.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 42343
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Religion Randomness
The chances that there are not one, but many thesis on this subject must be incredibly high. It wouldn't take personal effort but only a passing familiarity with the subject know what the generally accepted scholastic view point is on the subject.Grifman wrote:
You compiled a list of all the sermons and writings of Christian leaders, theologians and pastors for 2,000 year, analyzed them for content, and then made this determination?
I don't have that familiarity nor interest, but I can't for a moment believe that the idea of hell has not been studied to death by theologists.
- hitbyambulance
- Posts: 10262
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:51 am
- Location: Map Ref 47.6°N 122.35°W
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
if i may borrow a page from you, you could say they've studied the hell out of itGreenGoo wrote: I don't have that familiarity nor interest, but I can't for a moment believe that the idea of hell has not been studied to death by theologists.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 42343
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Religion Randomness
Zing!
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
The question isn't whether hell has been studied or not, but whether the church talked about it "all of the time" as Holman asserted.GreenGoo wrote:The chances that there are not one, but many thesis on this subject must be incredibly high. It wouldn't take personal effort but only a passing familiarity with the subject know what the generally accepted scholastic view point is on the subject.
I don't have that familiarity nor interest, but I can't for a moment believe that the idea of hell has not been studied to death by theologists.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 42343
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Religion Randomness
Yeah. That would be part of the study. I mean, I assume. People talking about hell is literally all there is to study about hell.
Is your concern the frequency or the content of these discussions?
Is your concern the frequency or the content of these discussions?
- Holman
- Posts: 28994
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Religion Randomness
You don't think the scheme of heavenly reward and eternal punishment was very heavily stressed by Christian teaching in the centuries when Christianity was socially and politically dominant in Europe?Grifman wrote:The question isn't whether hell has been studied or not, but whether the church talked about it "all of the time" as Holman asserted.GreenGoo wrote:The chances that there are not one, but many thesis on this subject must be incredibly high. It wouldn't take personal effort but only a passing familiarity with the subject know what the generally accepted scholastic view point is on the subject.
I don't have that familiarity nor interest, but I can't for a moment believe that the idea of hell has not been studied to death by theologists.
Because yes, it was.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51501
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Religion Randomness
Well crap,the Rapture is this Saturday.
If learned biblical scholar Father Guido Sarducci is to be believed, those of us who haven't done anything really bad, but haven't done anything really good either, are only going to get about 3 or 4 feet off the ground and then just hover. That's going to be rough. I may try to find a pair of those boots they used to give deep sea divers.
If learned biblical scholar Father Guido Sarducci is to be believed, those of us who haven't done anything really bad, but haven't done anything really good either, are only going to get about 3 or 4 feet off the ground and then just hover. That's going to be rough. I may try to find a pair of those boots they used to give deep sea divers.
He won. Period.
- Unagi
- Posts: 26560
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Religion Randomness
At the very least, one should have a 5-6 foot branch or pole to help themselves move around a little.
been a while since I've thought of Sarducci.
been a while since I've thought of Sarducci.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 82308
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
No church services? Pay your taxes.
Churches in Montreal are becoming concerned about hosting community groups after being hit with bills for municipal taxes.
...
Provincial law exempts churches and manses from paying municipal taxes but Coppetiers was told that if a manse is vacant for several months between ministers, it's taxable.
Following that, city officials arrived for an inspection of every room in the church and how they were used.
"The indication is there's not an exemption for the church as a whole, there's only an exemption for those areas used for public worship and things directly related to it," said Coppetiers.
As a result, many churches in Montreal that host community groups, such as food banks, or Girl Guides or Boy Scouts, are facing mounting tax bills.
...
When Trinity Memorial Church in NDG closed earlier this year, the city started enacting taxes immediately following the last service.
As a result churches feel pressured to sell swiftly, with Trinity Memorial being sold to Stanford Properties Group within two months.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 82308
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: Religion Randomness
Ireland
State-run primary schools are taking formal religious instruction for pupils off the timetable.
The umbrella body for community national schools has decided that preparation for sacraments, such as First Communion, will no longer take place inside the school day.
The move by Education and Training Boards Ireland (ETBI) represents a significant milestone in the long-running debate over the place of religion teaching in primary schools.
...
Community national schools have been offering a hybrid approach to religious education - mainly a multi-belief programme for entire classes.
However, although practices varied within schools, time may also be allowed for instruction in particular faiths, if parents request it.
This involves segregating children and, in practice, it has mainly been requested by parents of Catholic children, who make up about half of the 4,000 pupils in 12 community national schools who have made such requests.
In this way, community national schools have differed from Educate Together, whose policy is not to provide time within the school day for religion.
...
Although there are only 12 community national schools, ETBI has ambitions to grow that number under the plan to increase diversity in the education sector through the transfer of Catholic schools.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
The Southern Baptists are the third largest disaster relief organization in the US:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/09/us/09baptist.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/09/us/09baptist.html
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Paingod
- Posts: 13135
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Religion Randomness
Makes it sound like they're being really nice, but then you kind of realize it's a perfect opportunity to take advantage of some really beaten down, vulnerable people and get some recruiting in. It's always easier to snag some new followers if you can catch them at rock bottom.
Article wrote:Religion and secular rescue efforts do not always mix easily. Jessica Powers, a Red Cross volunteer from New York who ran the feeding operation in conjunction with the Southern Baptist group here, said that on a disaster mission in Louisiana, a Baptist worker riding along with the Red Cross was proselytizing victims.
Black Lives Matter
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
- Moliere
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:57 am
- Location: Walking through a desert land
Re: Religion Randomness
Floodwater receding from Houston LDS temple, church sends supplies and volunteers to help
All I know is that when the Apocalypse hits I want to be around Mormons. They will have all the food, water, and guns.
All I know is that when the Apocalypse hits I want to be around Mormons. They will have all the food, water, and guns.
"The world is suffering more today from the good people who want to mind other men's business than it is from the bad people who are willing to let everybody look after their own individual affairs." - Clarence Darrow
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
One does not preclude the other. You can have several motivations in anything you do. Christ called his followers both to help people and spread his gospel. As long as aid is not contingent on someone converting or even listening, I see nothing to object to.Paingod wrote:Makes it sound like they're being really nice, but then you kind of realize it's a perfect opportunity to take advantage of some really beaten down, vulnerable people and get some recruiting in. It's always easier to snag some new followers if you can catch them at rock bottom.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Jaymann
- Posts: 19492
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
- Location: California
Re: Religion Randomness
According to the fundies, the Rapture is starting tomorrow. Does that mean I don't have to go to my business meeting on Sunday?
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
- Paingod
- Posts: 13135
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Religion Randomness
It's also possible to just render aid without stuffing your beliefs into the sandwich.Grifman wrote:One does not preclude the other. You can have several motivations in anything you do. Christ called his followers both to help people and spread his gospel. As long as aid is not contingent on someone converting or even listening, I see nothing to object to.Paingod wrote:Makes it sound like they're being really nice, but then you kind of realize it's a perfect opportunity to take advantage of some really beaten down, vulnerable people and get some recruiting in. It's always easier to snag some new followers if you can catch them at rock bottom.
Black Lives Matter
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 55367
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Religion Randomness
Free clothes!Jaymann wrote:According to the fundies, the Rapture is starting tomorrow. Does that mean I don't have to go to my business meeting on Sunday?
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Grifman
- Posts: 21282
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Religion Randomness
Sure, but there's nothing wrong with sharing with people about what you believe is very important. In fact, it would hypocritical and dishonest to not do so. If one believes that there is an eternal destination for people, and that there is a God who loves them, then just providing them food and shelter when there are issues such as this would be negligent if not immoral not so share this with them according to one's own beliefs. People are free to listen or not.Paingod wrote:It's also possible to just render aid without stuffing your beliefs into the sandwich.Grifman wrote:One does not preclude the other. You can have several motivations in anything you do. Christ called his followers both to help people and spread his gospel. As long as aid is not contingent on someone converting or even listening, I see nothing to object to.Paingod wrote:Makes it sound like they're being really nice, but then you kind of realize it's a perfect opportunity to take advantage of some really beaten down, vulnerable people and get some recruiting in. It's always easier to snag some new followers if you can catch them at rock bottom.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton