Re: The Trump Presidency Thread
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:03 pm
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://www.octopusoverlords.com/forum/
Normally, this would be true. I'm not convinced that it is this time, for 2 reasons.
More like Flaw and Border.Little Raven wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 1:48 pmNormally, this would be true. I'm not convinced that it is this time, for 2 reasons.
- Unlike most Republican Presidents, Trump is not viewed by anyone as an agent of order.
The group that attacked the police at the Columbus statue here were highly organized. Sharpened PVC pipes concealed in banners, bags of frozen water bottles and soda cans, explosives. They peeled off to change clothes and arm up, under "cover" of umbrellas and banners, and attacked a bunch of bike cops at a post that had been peaceably dealing with non-violent protestors for several days.
It can only be antifa! [/s] Seriously speaking there have definitely been odd - actions - since Minneapolis began. The suspicious man who broke the windows / possibly burned down the Autozone across from the 3rd precinct is a good example. It is just too easy to fly under the radar and cause mayhem. So people are taking their shots. Unfortunately we don't have a good idea about the who and why. And we shouldn't trust any threat information being released by the Federal government.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:33 pmI'm not sure who and why but it has been highly coordinated and organized.
I mean I'm not sure who and why here. In Portland it could be someone else. But at least at the local level in most of these events there is some fairly sophisticated coordination amongst the agitators.malchior wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:58 pmIt can only be antifa! [/s] Seriously speaking there have definitely been odd - actions - since Minneapolis began. The suspicious man who broke the windows / possibly burned down the Autozone across from the 3rd precinct is a good example. It is just too easy to fly under the radar and cause mayhem. So people are taking their shots. Unfortunately we don't have a good idea about the who and why. And we shouldn't trust any threat information being released by the Federal government.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:33 pmI'm not sure who and why but it has been highly coordinated and organized.
RIght. The problem is that there are so many possibilities and we (as in the public at least) are in the dark. I was talking this with a NY/NJ PA cop because they saw coordinated action in NY too. The Feds kept telling them it was ANTIFA! but showed absolutely no evidence. Pat explanation. No evidence? Red flags IMO.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:56 pmI mean I'm not sure who and why here. In Portland it could be someone else. But at least at the local level in most of these events there is some fairly sophisticated coordination amongst the agitators.malchior wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:58 pmIt can only be antifa! [/s] Seriously speaking there have definitely been odd - actions - since Minneapolis began. The suspicious man who broke the windows / possibly burned down the Autozone across from the 3rd precinct is a good example. It is just too easy to fly under the radar and cause mayhem. So people are taking their shots. Unfortunately we don't have a good idea about the who and why. And we shouldn't trust any threat information being released by the Federal government.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:33 pmI'm not sure who and why but it has been highly coordinated and organized.
I meant to respond to this. I share some of the concern but I am thinking about it from a different angle. I'm not too worried about Trump benefiting because in the end it is a wash to lean negative for Trump - at least for now. What worries me is that the big blow out in June showed signs that Galtung's predictions about the United States may prove prescient.Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 1:32 pm Just read through this run down of the protests downtown last night from Oregon Live. The deployment of federal troops by Trump was clearly an act to inflame the left and distract from the core BLM protest. But what’s going on in Portland right now after midnight is not protest. It’s provocation designed to illicit an armed, violent response from law enforcement. The shit’s gone off the rails.
What I see now has very little to do with BLM. The people shooting lasers at the eyes of law enforcement, throwing fireworks at them, and trying to destroy the federal courthouse are the same group of anarchists that pop up now and again in Portland. These are the assholes who vandalized the Biketown bike sharing stations throughout the city a few years ago because the initiative was sponsored and run by Nike. I still remember walking past one of those stations with the bikes all destroyed and some spraypainted bullshit about corporate greed. These people are idiots. You want to protest Nike for some reason, be my guest, but don’t destroy a freaking bike share station.
Now they want to destroy the federal courthouse. Great. My job takes me there on a regular basis, and there’s actually a lot of good work that gets done in that building in support of civil rights and justice. But because the idiot in chief sent federal troops in to guard it, now you want to burn it down? And in trying to do so night after night, all they’re doing is helping to justify the presence of the troops in the first place.
The scenes playing out in Portland now after midnight worry me. I’m seriously concerned that these violent, chaotic clashes are going to strengthen Trump’s base. This is just catnip to Fox News and their viewers. I know some don’t give a shit because that segment of the populace is lost already, but I’ve never been in that camp.
I hate this thought, but it's probably best to let the corruption and misdeeds of the past 4 years go and just focus on fixing the nation and mending bridges. Anything less would just further conflict. Reconciliation is a top priority.malchior wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:30 am
If we are going to make it through this we need to get Biden into office and he will have to spend his time trying to figure out a way to start a process of 'conflict resolution' to bring the tenuous political situation under control. And he'll be wrestling with an out of control pandemic most likely and widespread economic disarray. It's beyond a bad opening hand.
That's the rub. Can you have reconciliation if you let it all go? He'll have the left baying for blood and might create his own 'tea party'. It is going to be a hell of a line to walk.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:50 amI hate this thought, but it's probably best to let the corruption and misdeeds of the past 4 years go and just focus on fixing the nation and mending bridges. Anything less would just further conflict. Reconciliation is a top priority.malchior wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:30 am
If we are going to make it through this we need to get Biden into office and he will have to spend his time trying to figure out a way to start a process of 'conflict resolution' to bring the tenuous political situation under control. And he'll be wrestling with an out of control pandemic most likely and widespread economic disarray. It's beyond a bad opening hand.
I don't know if he figured anything out but he'll definitely be leaving many fires behind.Undoubtedly Trump will/has figured this out and will do his best to leave as many fires burning as possible.
I tend to agree, with the caveat that a significant part of a Biden administration will be to put mechanisms in place that formalize many of the "unwritten rules" for governance that have been a guiding component of the US government, but have been completely disregarded by Trump. Ensure that the abuses of power that he and his swamp have thrived on aren't able to be exploited again, by either side.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:50 amI hate this thought, but it's probably best to let the corruption and misdeeds of the past 4 years go and just focus on fixing the nation and mending bridges. Anything less would just further conflict. Reconciliation is a top priority.malchior wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:30 am
If we are going to make it through this we need to get Biden into office and he will have to spend his time trying to figure out a way to start a process of 'conflict resolution' to bring the tenuous political situation under control. And he'll be wrestling with an out of control pandemic most likely and widespread economic disarray. It's beyond a bad opening hand.
This is constitutionally and practically difficult and maybe impossible. Any mechanism that they can they put in place *in the executive* can be rolled back. Say they went the legislative route then they have to win the Senate and likely kill the filibuster outright. Even then, a future executive can just pretty much challenge it by just flouting the law and let the slowness of the court system work for them like they did with Trump's tax returns. This is the aspect we learned a lot via Trump; we now have proof that the system (maybe fatally) depends heavily on norms that can't be fixed in practicality. That said, they can do the equivalent of boarding up the windows but systematic change is going to take a lot of work. More than we seem capable of at least anymore.Skinypupy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:26 amI tend to agree, with the caveat that a significant part of a Biden administration will be to put mechanisms in place that formalize many of the "unwritten rules" for governance that have been a guiding component of the US government, but have been completely disregarded by Trump. Ensure that the abuses of power that he and his swamp have thrived on aren't able to be exploited again, by either side.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:50 amI hate this thought, but it's probably best to let the corruption and misdeeds of the past 4 years go and just focus on fixing the nation and mending bridges. Anything less would just further conflict. Reconciliation is a top priority.malchior wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:30 am
If we are going to make it through this we need to get Biden into office and he will have to spend his time trying to figure out a way to start a process of 'conflict resolution' to bring the tenuous political situation under control. And he'll be wrestling with an out of control pandemic most likely and widespread economic disarray. It's beyond a bad opening hand.
This I agree. A cosmetic effort might go far but the risk probably will remain with us.It's a pipe dream, I'm sure, but one that would go a long ways towards repairing the damage.
I've always disliked Favre for a multitude of reasons nearly as long as the JeffV hate list. This just adds to it. Which is good because it has been losing ground to Jeff's list for years and he hates that.
Agreed. I would only add that even IF you could overcome the problems you mention, (and I'm not convinced that you could) you would end up with a President so hobbled that he would be unable to properly exercise power in the case of a real emergency - leaving the country the unenviable choice between a paralyzed executive or an emerging dictator. (history suggests the latter)
You would have to either raise the bar on who could run for president, or raise the bar on who can vote. Either option come with significant risk of excluding minorities and poor. (not that a poor person could realistically run for president now, but I am just saying)Little Raven wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:36 pmAgreed. I would only add that even IF you could overcome the problems you mention, (and I'm not convinced that you could) you would end up with a President so hobbled that he would be unable to properly exercise power in the case of a real emergency - leaving the country the unenviable choice between a paralyzed executive or an emerging dictator. (history suggests the latter)
The solution here is actually fairly simple - don't elect reality television stars. Running the most powerful country in the world is a terrible responsibility. Treat it appropriately.
Maybe. Maybe not. I maintain that the biggest reason that we have not seen a repeat of the 9-11 attacks is NOT the TSA, which is mostly security theater. It is the fact that it would not work. If you tried to hijack a plane today, the passengers would swarm you. Nobody is going to take the chance of a "peaceful hijacking" after what we've seen.
Just how many times during this presidency has Trump completely invented something. Not just lies, but absolute fabrication. Often entirely disprovable and typically self-aggrandizing. I knew a kid back in high school that was a pathological liar; he'd lie about the color of the sky if you weren't there to see it first. I'm fairly sure he was more honest than Trump.There was one problem: Trump had not actually been invited on that day by the Yankees. His announcement surprised both Yankees officials & White House staff.
I knew a guy like that from before my undergrad days. Just crazy lies but they made me laugh and he never hurt nobody, so all was good. I had connected with him again on FB. We were in touch until 2017 as he became vocal nonsensical Trump supporter and bible thumping came out of nowhere and he got turned off in my second culling.Paingod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 6:25 amJust how many times during this presidency has Trump completely invented something. Not just lies, but absolute fabrication. Often entirely disprovable and typically self-aggrandizing. I knew a kid back in high school that was a pathological liar; he'd lie about the color of the sky if you weren't there to see it first. I'm fairly sure he was more honest than Trump.There was one problem: Trump had not actually been invited on that day by the Yankees. His announcement surprised both Yankees officials & White House staff.
But that loser Dr Fauci got to throw out a pitch, so DJT had to have been invited, too. Believe me. The best pitches.Paingod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 6:25 amJust how many times during this presidency has Trump completely invented something. Not just lies, but absolute fabrication. Often entirely disprovable and typically self-aggrandizing. I knew a kid back in high school that was a pathological liar; he'd lie about the color of the sky if you weren't there to see it first. I'm fairly sure he was more honest than Trump.There was one problem: Trump had not actually been invited on that day by the Yankees. His announcement surprised both Yankees officials & White House staff.
We should be seeing the complete health-care package that he announced in the Chris Wallace interview would be ready in two weeks any day now.Paingod wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 6:25 amJust how many times during this presidency has Trump completely invented something. Not just lies, but absolute fabrication. Often entirely disprovable and typically self-aggrandizing. I knew a kid back in high school that was a pathological liar; he'd lie about the color of the sky if you weren't there to see it first. I'm fairly sure he was more honest than Trump.There was one problem: Trump had not actually been invited on that day by the Yankees. His announcement surprised both Yankees officials & White House staff.