Re: The Trump foreign policy thread
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:56 am
He sure did hate "rats" until Barr took over the DOJ, now he wants sources for everything.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://www.octopusoverlords.com/forum/
He's denying something that isn't even in the NYT report!
He’s trying to change the subject. “I’m not corrupt. They’re corrupt. Ukraine! Hunter! Where’s the server? The emails!!”pr0ner wrote:He's denying something that isn't even in the NYT report!
Doesn’t the President-elect immediately start getting intelligence briefings directly from the IC? It doesn’t matter what the current clown show shreds, the IC can just present the same evidence/report to Biden, can’t they?Holman wrote:Just saw pointed out that, when he becomes the nominee, Biden can request a full and complete intelligence briefing. Trump got his in 2016 (and was in fact informed about Russian meddling).
But this is a norm, not a law. Trump's team could deny the briefing to Biden, or they could truncate it or even straight-up lie to him.
I really wonder what evidence they'll be shredding between November and January. Replacing Trump's toadies will be Biden's first job, but the second will be figuring out what actually went down during the past four years.
With all that plus the virus and the economy still problems, Biden is going to have the toughest first year of any president since Lincoln.
We'll have to see how far Trump's purge of non-loyalists has gone by then. Someone high up will be in charge of preparing and presenting the briefing.RunningMn9 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 28, 2020 11:20 amDoesn’t the President-elect immediately start getting intelligence briefings directly from the IC? It doesn’t matter what the current clown show shreds, the IC can just present the same evidence/report to Biden, can’t they?Holman wrote:Just saw pointed out that, when he becomes the nominee, Biden can request a full and complete intelligence briefing. Trump got his in 2016 (and was in fact informed about Russian meddling).
But this is a norm, not a law. Trump's team could deny the briefing to Biden, or they could truncate it or even straight-up lie to him.
I really wonder what evidence they'll be shredding between November and January. Replacing Trump's toadies will be Biden's first job, but the second will be figuring out what actually went down during the past four years.
With all that plus the virus and the economy still problems, Biden is going to have the toughest first year of any president since Lincoln.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/p ... 1a8ffdd726WASHINGTON — United States intelligence officers and Special Operations forces in Afghanistan alerted their superiors as early as January to a suspected Russian plot to pay bounties to the Taliban to kill American troops in Afghanistan, according to officials briefed on the matter.
The crucial information that led the spies and commandos to focus on the bounties included the recovery of a large amount of American cash from a raid on a Taliban outpost that prompted suspicions. Interrogations of captured militants and criminals played a central role in making the intelligence community confident in its assessment that the Russians had offered and paid bounties in 2019, another official has said.
Armed with this information, military and intelligence officials have been reviewing American and other coalition combat casualties since early last year to determine whether any were victims of the plot. Four Americans were killed in combat in early 2020, but the Taliban have not attacked American positions since a February agreement to end the long-running war in Afghanistan.
davidfrum wrote:Benghazi, but real.
Joe Biden attacked President Donald Trump on Saturday over a report that he said, if true, contains a “truly shocking revelation” about the commander in chief and his failure to protect U.S. troops in Afghanistan and stand up to Russia.
...
“The truly shocking revelation that if the Times report is true, and I emphasize that again, is that President Trump, the commander in chief of American troops serving in a dangerous theater of war, has known about this for months, according to the Times, and done worse than nothing,” Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, said during a virtual town hall.
...
Biden slammed Trump over his reported failure to act.
“Not only has he failed to sanction and impose any kind of consequences on Russia for this egregious violation of international law, Donald Trump has continued his embarrassing campaign of deference and debasing himself before Vladimir Putin,” the former vice president said.
Biden called it a “betrayal of the most sacred duty we bear as a nation — to protect and equip our troops when we send them into harm’s way.”
He said Americans who serve in the military put their life on the line. “But they should never, never, never ever face a threat like this with their commander in chief turning a blind eye to a foreign power putting a bounty on their heads,” he said.
“I’m quite frankly outraged by the report,” Biden said. He promised that if he is elected, “Putin will be confronted and we’ll impose serious costs on Russia.”
Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” longtime political columnist David Ignatius said that his own follow-up on the New York Times’ explosive report that Donald Trump’s administration was well aware that the Russians were offering a bounty for the death of U.S. military members revealed that Pentagon officials have “pounding on the door” and trying to get Donald Trump to do something about it.
“Based on my reporting trying to confirm the New York Times’ excellent story it’s clear in late March you had senior U.S commanders, senior civilian intelligence officials, in effect pounding on the door of the White House saying we need to do something about this, we need to come to a conclusion about what damage the Russian program is doing, we need to reassess our programs in Afghanistan and they couldn’t get an answer,” he reported.
Not quite. He's saying the Intel wasn't credible according "intel". One of his typical evasions. "No. I don't take any responsibility at all". A double down on Richard Grenell of leaks and partial reports and not understanding intelligence and playing politics while still evading.
Oh, he's a weasel, but there's no doubt "Possibly another fabricated Russia Hoax, maybe by the Fake News NYT" is meant as a denial. "Intel" is just the framing.LordMortis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:22 am Not quite. He's saying the Intel wasn't credible according "intel". One of his typical evasions. "No. I don't take any responsibility at all". A double down on Richard Grenell of leaks and partial reports and not understanding intelligence and playing politics while still evading.
We should look into this John Bolton guy. What ever happened to him?Top officials in the White House were aware in early 2019 of classified intelligence indicating Russia was secretly offering bounties to the Taliban for the deaths of Americans, a full year earlier than has been previously reported, according to U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the intelligence.
The assessment was included in at least one of President Donald Trump’s written daily intelligence briefings at the time, according to the officials. Then-national security adviser John Bolton also told colleagues he briefed Trump on the intelligence assessment in March 2019.
The number of human rights is getting excessive, according Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
As he was unveiling a report by his Commission on Unalienable Rights on Thursday, Pompeo stated that the U.S. is “forced to grapple with the tough choices about which rights to promote.”
“Americans have not only unalienable rights, but also positive rights, rights granted by governments, courts, multilateral bodies. Many are worth defending in light of our founding; others aren’t,” he asserted.
And even within the narrow scope of whatever rights the Trump administration official deems to be worth shielding, some are apparently less important than others.
“Prioritizing which rights to defend is also hard,” he said.
...
“No one can enjoy the pursuit of happiness if you cannot own the fruits of your own labor, and no society can retain its legitimacy or a virtuous character without religious freedom,” the Trump official argued.
He described the report as a guide that “helps us to judge” how other countries violate human rights “that we care most about.”
“More rights does not necessarily mean more justice,” said Pompeo.
Although the secretary did not specify which rights he believed to be superfluous, his “religious liberty” dogwhistle combined with his hardline opposition to abortion and LGBTQ rights further bolster concerns that Pompeo’s purpose behind assembling the “Unalienable Rights” panel was to pursue an anti-abortion and LGBTQ agenda in U.S. foreign policy.
The United States government has abruptly ordered China to "cease all operations and events" at its consulate in Houston, Texas, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, in what it called an "unprecedented escalation" in recent actions taken by Washington.
Late Tuesday evening, police in Houston said they responded to reports of smoke in the courtyard outside the consulate, located on Montrose Boulevard, in the city's Midtown area. Local media shared video of what appeared to be officials inside the compound burning documents.
US State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus said the consulate was directed to close "in order to protect American intellectual property and Americans' private information" but did not immediately provide additional details of what prompted the closure. Chinese media reported that the consulate had been given 72 hours to close.
...
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who was just in Europe rallying leaders to take a harder line with Beijing and meeting with exiled Chinese dissidents, declined to offer details about the decision in remarks Wednesday. But the top US diplomat is set to deliver remarks on China on Thursday at the Richard Nixon Museum and Library in California.
The billionaire NFL owner who serves as President Donald Trump's ambassador to the United Kingdom was investigated by the State Department watchdog after allegations that he made racist and sexist comments to staff and sought to use his government position to benefit the President's personal business in the UK, multiple sources told CNN.
Robert Wood "Woody" Johnson, the top envoy since August 2017 to one of the United States' most important allies, made racist generalizations about Black men and questioned why the Black community celebrates Black History Month, according to exclusive new information shared with CNN by three sources and a diplomat familiar with the complaints to the State Department inspector general.
His comments about women's looks have been "cringeworthy," a source with knowledge of the situation said, and two sources said it was a struggle to get him on board for an event for International Women's Day.
...
Another source recounted that after Johnson returned from a trip to Washington where he met with the President in early 2018, the ambassador told Lukens, who was still deputy chief of mission at that time, that Trump wanted to host The Open at his Turnberry resort in Scotland. Johnson asked which British government officials he could speak to about making that happen, the source said. Johnson brought it up again with Lukens on another occasion not long after, the source noted, and in both cases Lukens told Johnson not to mention the topic to government officials, as doing so would be unethical.
Given they did not convict him for trying to extort Ukraine in an effort to impact our election why would they care if he exerts pressure on Britain in an effort to make a few bucks? Thats just good business.
Yep - one of the defense talking points is that the President doesn't read.Trump’s team says he was not verbally briefed on the matter before a June 26 report from the New York Times brought the controversy out into the open.