The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Holman wrote: Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:54 pm
1) FBI Director Chris Wray clarified a timeline on the Rob Porter allegations that suggests the WH has known about them for eleven months. (Sarah Sanders tried pushing the line that the administration heard about the allegations the same day we did.)
It's always sort of amusing that so many Trump administration justifications are also incriminating on their own terms. Like, the Porter allegations are a matter of public record. So if the White House truly did not know about them until the same day that they blew up in the media, then there were some major fuck-ups in the background check process and/or the communication of the results of the background checks up to the White House.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

I don't think there are any Russians
And there ain't no Yanks
Just corporate criminals
Playin' with tanks

Nyah yah yah yah
yah yah yah
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

It's good to see that some people are starting to think that maybe there's a good chance President Trump is being blackmailed.
Indeed, sex is not the only kind of secret Trump harbors. He endured months of criticism first from Republican candidates, then Democrats, and all along from the media, for refusing to disclose his tax returns. Trump clearly feels protective of his financial information. Some of that information is in the hands of his business partners, many of whom are associated with Russia or are unsavory in some other way. All in all, the odds are disconcertingly high that Russia, or somebody, has blackmail leverage over the president of the United States.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

Holman wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:25 pm
Daehawk wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:51 pm Are there no laws against shit like that? He seems to be a real shitheaded moron. Should be some law against stupid people doing stupid things in a Gov job. Course then we'd have no gov at all.
I think you should rethink that attitude. "EVERYONE in government is stupid!" isn't true, and it stokes the kind of reaction that gives us Trump.
True. A lot of the bureaucracy isn't stupid even if there are some issues with the civil service. However the "political" leadership class in this administration are incredibly incompetent. And they are calling the shots. The Obama administration had some outliers of incompetence too but on the whole his administration was very competent.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

It's breaking that Mueller named and indicted 13 Russian nationals and 3 Russian entities for Russian hacking in the election. So much for the nothingburger.
Last edited by malchior on Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82093
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

Indictment on Scribd

CNBC
The indictment says that the defendants by early to mid-2016 were "supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump ... and disparaging Hillary Clinton."

The indictment said "the organization," known as the Internet Research Agency LLC, "sought, in part, to conduct what it called 'information warfare against the United States of America' through fictitious U.S. personas on social media platforms and other Internet-based media."

"By in or around May 2014, the organization's strategy included interfering with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, with the stated goal of "spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general," the indictment said.

An announcement from Mueller's office said that the government accuses all the defendants of conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Three defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud.

Five defendants are charged with aggravated identity theft.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Well! Seems like it's going to be marginally harder for Republicans to rotely assert that there's nothing to uncover. Although I'm sure that they're still going to try.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Also, there are lots of reports that Gates - Manafort's second in command- is close to a plea deal with Mueller.

Those two guys on Trump's team with legal pads better kick it up a notch.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

I just went through that and holy shit. Trumps response is obvious. "NO COLLUSION" because there is no mention of collusion. This all about independent Russian action. Very sophisticated and very well funded Russian action.

So Trump will be right, NO COLLUSION (proven) but holy shit that man and all of his Russian ties, who does nothing but suck Putin's dick while looking for approval for his technique, should be no where near confidential/secret government information.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

As to No Collusion...that door is definitely not closed with this phrase at the beginning of the Indictment:
...Defendents knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other (and with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury) to defraud the United States...
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20334
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Skinypupy »

El Guapo wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:23 pm Well! Seems like it's going to be marginally harder for Republicans to rotely assert that there's nothing to uncover. Although I'm sure that they're still going to try.
The early responses on social media seem to be some combination of:

- "See, it was all Russia. Americans had nothing to do with it"
- "People simply expressing opinions on which candidate they favor isn't illegal."
- (my personal favorite) "The indictment specifically mentions that these people actively worked on influencing others not to support Clinton. This proves that it's a liberal witchhunt!"
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Enough
Posts: 14688
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Serendipity
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Enough »

El Guapo wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:25 pm Also, there are lots of reports that Gates - Manafort's second in command- is close to a plea deal with Mueller.

Those two guys on Trump's team with legal pads better kick it up a notch.
I want to see Manafort pay as much (or maybe even more) as I do Trump, no deals for him.
My blog (mostly photos): Fort Ephemera - My Flickr Photostream

“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- (my personal favorite) "The indictment specifically mentions that these people actively worked on influencing others not to support Clinton. This proves that it's a liberal witchhunt!"
dafuq?
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Rip »

And after the election of Trump as president in November 2016, the defendants used fake personas to organize and coordinate political rallies in support of Trump, while also doing the same to create rallies "protesting the results" of the election, the indictment said.

On one day, Nov. 12, 2016, the defendants organized a rally in New York to "show your support for President-elect Donald Trump" while at the same time organizing a "Trump is NOT my president rally" that also was held in New York.
Rosenstein said there is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the scheme, nor is there any allegation that the scheme affected the outcome of the election.
"By in or around May 2014, the organization's strategy included interfering with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, with the stated goal of "spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general," the indictment said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/16/russian ... probe.html

Nothing really surprising.
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Unagi »

I think you mean "Nothingreallysurprising Burger"
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:11 pm
And after the election of Trump as president in November 2016, the defendants used fake personas to organize and coordinate political rallies in support of Trump, while also doing the same to create rallies "protesting the results" of the election, the indictment said.

On one day, Nov. 12, 2016, the defendants organized a rally in New York to "show your support for President-elect Donald Trump" while at the same time organizing a "Trump is NOT my president rally" that also was held in New York.
Rosenstein said there is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the scheme, nor is there any allegation that the scheme affected the outcome of the election.
"By in or around May 2014, the organization's strategy included interfering with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, with the stated goal of "spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general," the indictment said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/16/russian ... probe.html

Nothing really surprising.
Enlarge Image
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Enough wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:56 pm
El Guapo wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:25 pm Also, there are lots of reports that Gates - Manafort's second in command- is close to a plea deal with Mueller.

Those two guys on Trump's team with legal pads better kick it up a notch.
I want to see Manafort pay as much (or maybe even more) as I do Trump, no deals for him.
There is probably a lot of overlap (though not 100%) between what Gates knows and what Manafort knows - that's part of the suspicion of why Mueller arrested them together - so I imagine that the price of a plea deal for Manafort is going up.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

LordMortis wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:16 pm
Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:11 pm
And after the election of Trump as president in November 2016, the defendants used fake personas to organize and coordinate political rallies in support of Trump, while also doing the same to create rallies "protesting the results" of the election, the indictment said.

On one day, Nov. 12, 2016, the defendants organized a rally in New York to "show your support for President-elect Donald Trump" while at the same time organizing a "Trump is NOT my president rally" that also was held in New York.
Rosenstein said there is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the scheme, nor is there any allegation that the scheme affected the outcome of the election.
"By in or around May 2014, the organization's strategy included interfering with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, with the stated goal of "spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general," the indictment said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/16/russian ... probe.html

Nothing really surprising.
Enlarge Image
That picture is perfect.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Kurth »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:53 pm The early responses on social media seem to be some combination of:

- "See, it was all Russia. Americans had nothing to do with it"
- "People simply expressing opinions on which candidate they favor isn't illegal."
- (my personal favorite) "The indictment specifically mentions that these people actively worked on influencing others not to support Clinton. This proves that it's a liberal witchhunt!"
I actually struggle with this one on some level. What is the criminal act?

- Is it that they were using false identities? That's practically assumed on the Internet and throughout social media. News flash: I'm not really Kurth, and I bet you're not really Skinypupy!
- Is it that they were spreading false information? Again, isn't that pretty much an everyday occurrence?
- Is it that they are foreign nationals? Hard to see how that could be an element to a criminal offense.

I'm going to try to find some time this afternoon to read through the indictment. But I have a tough time with the notion that propagation of "fake news" by foreign nationals (or citizens, for that matter) with the intent to influence the election is a criminal offense.

Also, is this anything more than symbolic? It's not like Russia is going to send the 13 Russian nationals over here to stand trial or that the 3 Russian entities will make an appearance. I suppose, if convicted, we could bar them from reentry into the U.S., but I doubt that's going to keep them up at night or really dis-incentivize this kind of thing going forward. What other sentence/penalty are the indicted parties really likely to face?

I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82093
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

Image
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20334
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Skinypupy »

Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:53 pm The early responses on social media seem to be some combination of:

- "See, it was all Russia. Americans had nothing to do with it"
- "People simply expressing opinions on which candidate they favor isn't illegal."
- (my personal favorite) "The indictment specifically mentions that these people actively worked on influencing others not to support Clinton. This proves that it's a liberal witchhunt!"
I actually struggle with this one on some level. What is the criminal act?

- Is it that they were using false identities? That's practically assumed on the Internet and throughout social media. News flash: I'm not really Kurth, and I bet you're not really Skinypupy!
- Is it that they were spreading false information? Again, isn't that pretty much an everyday occurrence?
- Is it that they are foreign nationals? Hard to see how that could be an element to a criminal offense.

I'm going to try to find some time this afternoon to read through the indictment. But I have a tough time with the notion that propagation of "fake news" by foreign nationals (or citizens, for that matter) with the intent to influence the election is a criminal offense.

Also, is this anything more than symbolic? It's not like Russia is going to send the 13 Russian nationals over here to stand trial or that the 3 Russian entities will make an appearance. I suppose, if convicted, we could bar them from reentry into the U.S., but I doubt that's going to keep them up at night or really dis-incentivize this kind of thing going forward. What other sentence/penalty are the indicted parties really likely to face?

I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
The crimes of conspiracy aside, which is the premise. There are a lot of details about identity theft and credit fraud and entering the US illegally running rampant through the indictment to support the conspiracy to undermine the election via foreign influence.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:16 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.

Nothing in the indictment that I could tell implicates any knowing COLLUSION from Trump or his cronies.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:53 pm The early responses on social media seem to be some combination of:

- "See, it was all Russia. Americans had nothing to do with it"
- "People simply expressing opinions on which candidate they favor isn't illegal."
- (my personal favorite) "The indictment specifically mentions that these people actively worked on influencing others not to support Clinton. This proves that it's a liberal witchhunt!"
I actually struggle with this one on some level. What is the criminal act?

- Is it that they were using false identities? That's practically assumed on the Internet and throughout social media. News flash: I'm not really Kurth, and I bet you're not really Skinypupy!
- Is it that they were spreading false information? Again, isn't that pretty much an everyday occurrence?
- Is it that they are foreign nationals? Hard to see how that could be an element to a criminal offense.

I'm going to try to find some time this afternoon to read through the indictment. But I have a tough time with the notion that propagation of "fake news" by foreign nationals (or citizens, for that matter) with the intent to influence the election is a criminal offense.

Also, is this anything more than symbolic? It's not like Russia is going to send the 13 Russian nationals over here to stand trial or that the 3 Russian entities will make an appearance. I suppose, if convicted, we could bar them from reentry into the U.S., but I doubt that's going to keep them up at night or really dis-incentivize this kind of thing going forward. What other sentence/penalty are the indicted parties really likely to face?

I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
From skimming the identity the core violations are these:

(1) Fraud - lying about your identity and other details in order to circumvent U.S. elections laws, and lying to banks and other financial institutions;
(2) Identity theft (aggravated identity theft, for what that's worth)

There's some stuff in there about destruction of evidence too, though I'm not sure whether that's separately charged. I printed out the indictment and am going to read through it on my way home.

As for the practical impact, they're not likely to be arrested anytime soon. But being wanted by the United States is no small thing - obviously they can't travel to the U.S., and also they can't really risk traveling to most other countries, as a lot of them would be inclined to arrest them and send them to the United States. Also any assets that can be tied to these individuals are at risk of forfeiture.

But yes, the real action is to come - the indictments of U.S. based individuals, "known and unknown" to the grand jury, who assisted the scheme.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

LordMortis wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:18 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:16 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.

Nothing in the indictment that I could tell implicates any knowing COLLUSION from Trump or his cronies.
It's one piece of the puzzle. This basically establishes (assuming that the allegations are true) a scheme by Russian nationals to influence the 2016 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump. It also establishes that there are other individuals "known and unknown to the Grand Jury" who assisted the scheme. The evidence of collusion by the Trump campaign with this scheme is things like the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting (including the e-mails beforehand to Donald Jr. offering Russian government assistance to the Trump campaign), all the stuff in the Papadapolous plea deal, and the 100,000 other suspicious pro-Russia ties and acts by people high up in the Trump world. And everything that Flynn and Gates are telling Mueller.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Rip »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:16 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.
Seems unlikely. These guys(and girls) went through great pains to hide the fact the were Russians. You would need not only contact but proof the American knew they were Russian. Lots of contacts identified in the indictment and not a single one was made aware they were Russian. I mean why would they after setting up a VPN for the sole purpose of appearing as Americans. Outing themselves as Russian to someone would have no upside.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:25 pm I mean why would they after setting up a VPN for the sole purpose of appearing as Americans. Outing themselves as Russian to someone would have no upside.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... ussia.html
The researchers quickly dismissed their initial fear that the logs represented a malware attack. The communication wasn’t the work of bots. The irregular pattern of server lookups actually resembled the pattern of human conversation—conversations that began during office hours in New York and continued during office hours in Moscow. It dawned on the researchers that this wasn’t an attack, but a sustained relationship between a server registered to the Trump Organization and two servers registered to an entity called Alfa Bank.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Rip »

LordMortis wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:32 pm
Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:25 pm I mean why would they after setting up a VPN for the sole purpose of appearing as Americans. Outing themselves as Russian to someone would have no upside.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... ussia.html
The researchers quickly dismissed their initial fear that the logs represented a malware attack. The communication wasn’t the work of bots. The irregular pattern of server lookups actually resembled the pattern of human conversation—conversations that began during office hours in New York and continued during office hours in Moscow. It dawned on the researchers that this wasn’t an attack, but a sustained relationship between a server registered to the Trump Organization and two servers registered to an entity called Alfa Bank.

Not the same people. But even so you would still have to show that the US person was aware they were communicating with a Russian concerning "electioneering". Very few people would be aware of the locations of servers they were communicating through or have any way of verifying the identity/nationality of whomever they are communicating with. If the US person were duped, which in all the cases in the indictment was true, then the US person has committed no crime.
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
Jeff V
Posts: 36414
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Jeff V »

Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:46 pm If the US person were duped, which in all the cases in the indictment was true, then the US person has committed no crime.
That's gonna be your defense strategy, huh?
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Rip »

Jeff V wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:51 pm
Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:46 pm If the US person were duped, which in all the cases in the indictment was true, then the US person has committed no crime.
That's gonna be your defense strategy, huh?
Not mine, I'm not a political activist. All of the people who were duped thus far were identified as political activists.

I don't electioneer for Americans or foreigners and I don't donate to political causes.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 8488
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Alefroth »

LordMortis wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:18 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:16 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.

Nothing in the indictment that I could tell implicates any knowing COLLUSION from Trump or his cronies.
If it's there, it won't come out before a Trump indictment.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 42239
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Er, that's circumstantial evidence that communication between money laundering russian bank and the Drumpf org took place during the election.

Also suspicious that the connection went away when made public only to reappear (how dumb are these people?) In another part of the Drumpf org.

It's clear to me that Meuller is establishing facts one at a time, so that each can be vetted and attacked and finally spun and accepted. Once the reps accept something as true but meaningless, Meuller will tie them all together with a nice big indictment bow. One fact will support another and with the reps on record that each fact is true individually, it will be much more difficult to repute the conclusions based on the facts as a whole.


Whether it works or not is another question.

Still waiting patiently for the end game.
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20334
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Skinypupy »

Alefroth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:55 pm
LordMortis wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:18 pm
Skinypupy wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:16 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm I'd be much, much more interested in learning that Trump and his cronies were working with these individuals/entities. That seems to me to clearly cross many, many lines and actually be something our justice system could address. Severely.
That's seems to be the key question here. If not, then I'm with you in that this isn't much more than a symbolic gesture.

If so...then it's a whole different story.

Nothing in the indictment that I could tell implicates any knowing COLLUSION from Trump or his cronies.
If it's there, it won't come out before a Trump indictment.
My guess is that this is intended to kick over a rock to see what might scatter from underneath.

If there are those in the campaign who are connected to/paid for/actively recruited the activities of these Russians, you can bet they just got really nervous. If not, then there's no real risk in indicting them as a symbolic gesture.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

Well, as others have stated, if the FBI has demonstrated that there was clearly intent and action on the part of Russian actors to influence the election in such a way as to propel Donald Trump into power, the first hurdle has been cleared. Now it's just a matter of demonstrating how much help they had.

We already discussed (months and months ago) that the Russians likely didn't care exactly who was elected; they were more interested in meddling in the process as it shakes the core of democracy in what was the greatest nation on Earth. However, given all the other smoke it sure doesn't seem like Trump was "only pawn in the game of life". I guess we'll need to wait and see what Mueller shares next. :coffee:
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 30126
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by YellowKing »

I don't think Mueller is the kind of guy who deals in "symbolic gestures."
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51302
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by hepcat »

Trump's ego will not let this stand. Commence the Tweetifying!
Covfefe!
User avatar
Fitzy
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Rockville, MD

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Fitzy »

Rip wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:25 pm

Seems unlikely. These guys(and girls) went through great pains to hide the fact the were Russians. You would need not only contact but proof the American knew they were Russian. Lots of contacts identified in the indictment and not a single one was made aware they were Russian. I mean why would they after setting up a VPN for the sole purpose of appearing as Americans. Outing themselves as Russian to someone would have no upside.
These aren't kids playing a prank who were indicted: Yevgeny Prigozhin

Why would a billionaire have bothered to finance the attacks? And one close to Putin at that. :eusa-think:
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70101
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

hepcat wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:33 pm Trump's ego will not let this stand. Commence the Tweetifying!

That's what I'm waiting for. With the exception of his sheep, there is no good PR for this. If he's suddenly silent, he looks like evil. If he's NO COLLUSION, he looks evil. All we need for Unagi to post  Trump 
 
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 30126
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by YellowKing »

I don't care whether you believe there was actual collusion or not, the mere fact that Trump vehemently denies Russian meddling even after intelligence community proof and indictments should send GIANT red flags. What US President, who had no shady ties with Russia, would need to come out so strongly against that? Why wouldn't you just say, "Yes, there was meddling, we will take proper steps to ensure this doesn't happen again" and move on?

Also, I dreamed last night that Trump resigned. I don't believe in psychic phenomena, but this is one case where I REALLY hope that was prophecy. :D
User avatar
Fitzy
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Rockville, MD

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Fitzy »

YellowKing wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:43 pm I don't care whether you believe there was actual collusion or not, the mere fact that Trump vehemently denies Russian meddling even after intelligence community proof and indictments should send GIANT red flags. What US President, who had no shady ties with Russia, would need to come out so strongly against that? Why wouldn't you just say, "Yes, there was meddling, we will take proper steps to ensure this doesn't happen again" and move on?

Also, I dreamed last night that Trump resigned. I don't believe in psychic phenomena, but this is one case where I REALLY hope that was prophecy. :D
I have no idea if collusion took place or not, but I believe I can answer your questions.

Trump is a Narcissist. He has to believe that he and he alone won the election. He can give tiny bits of credit to people he chose, but even there the greatest amount goes to him. Now along comes people saying he wouldn't have even won without the Russians help. His narcissism will not let him acknowledge that. He will do and say anything, it's even possible he believes it all at this point, because he is simply that great.

This opinion is a combination of years of close proximity to a narcissist and talking with experts on assholes narcissists. I could be wrong, but it does fit.

Also, I'd like to retire, could you dream me winning the lottery, I'll toss in $10 million to you. You might need to dream me buying a ticket too though.
Post Reply