Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k
Mr. Fed wrote:Any reason not to go SSDD?
Exodor wrote:The only reasons not to go SSD are cost and storage space. You can get a 256GB SSD for ~$200 these days which is plenty for an OS and a reasonable amount of data.
The speed increase far outweighs any other consideration. I wouldn't consider building a PC without one.
TheMix wrote:One more thing to consider (though I will confess to not actually doing any research on the matter) is hybrid. Depending on your needs.
ChrisGrenard wrote:One word of warning on SSD's. Sometimes their firmware is a bit faulty. I had months of BSOD's (about 1 a week) until OSZ finally patched their firmware to fix it.
This might not be an issue with Intel or Crucial drives. I don't know.
Exodor wrote:ChrisGrenard wrote:One word of warning on SSD's. Sometimes their firmware is a bit faulty. I had months of BSOD's (about 1 a week) until OSZ finally patched their firmware to fix it.
This might not be an issue with Intel or Crucial drives. I don't know.
I've read that some SSDs have a problem with hibernating and will blue screen when coming out of it.
I've got an Intel and never had a problem with it.
Carpet_pissr wrote:Some of those OCZ Vertex (3 I think?) drives were notorious for BSOD's, but at the time they came out, they were the fastest by far, so they were also popular. Result: Lots of nerd rage and ratings on newegg reviews. I think they mostly fixed that problem with a firmware update though?
Exodor wrote:ChrisGrenard wrote:One word of warning on SSD's. Sometimes their firmware is a bit faulty. I had months of BSOD's (about 1 a week) until OSZ finally patched their firmware to fix it.
This might not be an issue with Intel or Crucial drives. I don't know.
I've read that some SSDs have a problem with hibernating and will blue screen when coming out of it.
I've got an Intel and never had a problem with it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest