20" Dell Flat Panel - $679 shipped - UPDATE $599

The walrus awaits.

Moderator: The Preacher

Post Reply
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

20" Dell Flat Panel - $679 shipped - UPDATE $599

Post by Coskesh »

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/Prod ... l=en&cs=19

Ends today, and my mouse finger is itching over the order button.

You guys think this is a good deal?
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: 20" Dell Flat Panel - $679 shipped

Post by Rip »

Coskesh wrote:http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/Prod ... l=en&cs=19

Ends today, and my mouse finger is itching over the order button.

You guys think this is a good deal?
I'm ordering one now. I already have a few of them at the office. This is a pretty good deal. IMHO

Rip
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
User avatar
Boudreaux
Posts: 2816
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
Location: St. Louis

Post by Boudreaux »

I'm typing this on a Dell 20" LCD flat panel right now. Fantastic monitor. If you're at all interested, that's the lowest price I've ever seen it (previous record was $749).
User avatar
Charlatan
Posts: 1628
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Sekrit Pirate Hideowt!

Post by Charlatan »

Boudreaux wrote:I'm typing this on a Dell 20" LCD flat panel right now. Fantastic monitor. If you're at all interested, that's the lowest price I've ever seen it (previous record was $749).
Stop it all of you or I may have to kill every one of you! Someone please post how the monitor sucks so I can squelch the urge to get one.

Edited to say: this is the NEW WIDESCREEN monitor, not the old standby 20.1FP one. It's this:

Dell 2005FPW 20.1" Widescreen 1680 x 1050 LCD Monitor with 12ms Response for $679.15 with FREE Shipping!
When all is said and done, there's more said than done.
User avatar
Rubyeye
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:58 am
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by Rubyeye »

/me oogles
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Yeah the older monitor with 16ms response was on sale for 609$ a few days ago.


I tried to submit my order a few times, but the site is just hanging.

Maybe I should reconsider :p.
JCC
Posts: 2192
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:07 pm

Post by JCC »

So have they finally made LCD monitors look good with games? (No trails, etc.)

I haven't really followed this technology much, but I just remember not being happy about that whenever I used to look at LCDs.

It does look like a cool monitor! :)
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Yeah, I don't know about the trails. You probably still get them with an FPS type game even with a 12 ms response. I'll let you know in 5-7 days :P.
shaggydoug
Posts: 1323
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:32 am
Location: A burger joint near you
Contact:

Post by shaggydoug »

My 21" CRT started flipping out last night so I see this as a sign. I've got the 2001FP at work and really like it. However, I gotta ask, exactly how useful is the "widescreen" functionality of the monitor in normal day-to-day non-gaming operations? Is it actually a drawback to have widescreen because I see you give up 150 pixels in vertical height while gaining 80 horizontal? Is it worth the extra $40 to get the widescreen that is 4 ms faster on the refresh? Note that I do play games on the system as well, just not as often I would like to.

- shaggy
User avatar
gorham09
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:13 am
Location: PA/MD

Post by gorham09 »

But what about gaming with a widescreen? Most games don't support widescreen, so how does the game end up being rendered? Are there bars on the sides of the screen?

Moreover how does scaling work with this monitor? I don't have a videocard powerful enough to run FPS at resolutions as high as the native resolution on this one (1600 x 1200 or the widescreen variant thereof).

I like the idea and the specs of this monitor are great, but I am concerned that it is not a practical gaming monitor. Any insights from folks that have one of these would be appreciated.
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Damn, I didn't even notice the wide screen stuff!


I know alot of games support the non traditional 1280 x xxx formats (960, 768). I'm guessing that is for wide screen monitors?
User avatar
gorham09
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:13 am
Location: PA/MD

Post by gorham09 »

Well the problem with changing resolutions is that once you're outside the native resolution, you're scaling (and while the only LCD I have ever used is my Dell 17" at work) and scaling reduces the image quality. CRT's operate without distinction at different resolutions, however, my understanding of LCD's is that each one operates at a particular resolution. (In this case 1680 x1050) Once you venture outside that resolution, the monitor is scaling down or up to whatever resolution you choose and the image quality is reduced.

Someone can correct me if I am wrong here but I don't think that many games support widescreen gaming and even some of the ones that due don't do it natively, but rather stretch the screen, in the same manner that most widescreen tv's do with 4:3 broadcasts. As a result you get an image that's distorted. (People look short and squat, for example).

The biggest hurdle I am having in buying a nice LCD is the resolution issue. The native resolutions just seem to high for effective gaming and I've never seen how games look for example in 1024 x768 on an lcd whose native resolution is 1600 x 1200. I would love to hear from people that have first-hand experience.
Jeff V
Posts: 36420
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Post by Jeff V »

gorham09 wrote:The biggest hurdle I am having in buying a nice LCD is the resolution issue. The native resolutions just seem to high for effective gaming and I've never seen how games look for example in 1024 x768 on an lcd whose native resolution is 1600 x 1200. I would love to hear from people that have first-hand experience.
My laptop is native 1600x1200 and looks just fine when gaming.
User avatar
gorham09
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:13 am
Location: PA/MD

Post by gorham09 »

That's good to know Jeff. I really wanted to hear from someone who runs games non-native resolutions. What resolution do you run your games in?
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26891
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Post by Rip »

My laptop is widescreen. It distorts things slightly. Never really bothered me much.

We will see how bad it is with this monitor as I have one on the way. When I ordered it I thought it was a 1600x1200 native. I still would have got it, but didn't look that close.
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
shaggydoug
Posts: 1323
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:32 am
Location: A burger joint near you
Contact:

Post by shaggydoug »

I ended up picking up the 2001FP for $239 instead of the widescreen 2005FPW. The loss in real estate wasn't worth the other "bonuses" for me.

- shaggy
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

shaggydoug wrote:I ended up picking up the 2001FP for $239 instead of the widescreen 2005FPW. The loss in real estate wasn't worth the other "bonuses" for me.

- shaggy
$239?!?!?! WOW. I would have gone that route. Damn, I hope this monitor fits the bill. I prob won't order another one for atleast 4 - 5years. Hopefully, games will start supporting wide screen :(.
Jeff V
Posts: 36420
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Post by Jeff V »

gorham09 wrote:That's good to know Jeff. I really wanted to hear from someone who runs games non-native resolutions. What resolution do you run your games in?
Usually, if it doesn't just adopt the desktop resolution, I'll pick 1024x768. In fact, I had to drop it to that res for Rise of Nations because at 1600x1200, some of the detail was too tiny for my ancient eyes to read comfortably.

My mother uses a 15" NEC flat panel that has a native resolution of 1024x768, but she drops it at the desktop to 800x600 because that is too small for her. While clearly not optimal at that resolution (which these days is cumbersome no matter what equipment you have), it is perfectly serviceable and isn't really noticeable once in a game.

FWIW, I briefly had a widescreen laptop as Dell attempted to buy off my rage by sending me a 8500 to replace a 8200 they can't seem to fix. I couldn't warm up to the wide screen display at all, and the kicker was when I played a wide screen DVD and the image was still significantly banded. I wound up telling Dell the thing was functionally useless and sent it back.
Jeff V
Posts: 36420
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Post by Jeff V »

shaggydoug wrote:I ended up picking up the 2001FP for $239 instead of the widescreen 2005FPW. The loss in real estate wasn't worth the other "bonuses" for me.

- shaggy
Where did you find it for $239? The Dell website lists it at $719.
User avatar
gorham09
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:13 am
Location: PA/MD

Post by gorham09 »

I really do appreciate these comments. I have been teetering on the brink of getting one of these for a long time, but have always been worried about the scaling issue and ghosting. Now that resopnse times are lightning quick, ghosting has become much less of an issue, so the main thing holding me back is the resolution. I can see having my desktop at 1600 x1200 but I can never see gaming at that resolution. My eyes just can't take it. Hearing from people with practical experience though it sounds like scaling isn't an issue when gaming.
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 20033
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Post by Carpet_pissr »

I am considering hooking up my old 19" Samsung CRT to my vid card in addition to my current Dell LCD, for two reasons:

1. Scaling: SOME games, like Silent Storm for one, and many others, do not support the native resolution of my LCD (1280x1024). Result? Crap. Sure, I can get around it by just cranking the in game resolution, and maxxing out the AA and AF, but my current rig cannot handle that in many cases.

2. Dark games: Painkiller on my lcd...just awful. The inherent nature of LCD tech, though improved greatly in past couple of years, can still not match the deep blacks of a CRT, and makes the game almost unplayable IMO (I played Painkiller on both CRT and LCD, so I could compare) Buyer beware: contrast ratio is crucial if you are shopping for an LCD to game on.
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Anyone know Dell's return policy off hand? If I can't return the thing opened, I might just send it back and wait for a non-wide screen sale.

I'd like to give it a shot, but not at the expense of having to keep it.
shaggydoug
Posts: 1323
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:32 am
Location: A burger joint near you
Contact:

Post by shaggydoug »

Decided to check this to see if anyone had gotten there displays yet and noticed all the commotion I caused. Sorry, I typoed. $639, not $239. Big, big typo.

- shaggy
User avatar
Bad Demographic
Posts: 7774
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:21 am
Location: Las Cruces, NM

Post by Bad Demographic »

I saw the $239 but figured it was a typo.

I did get one of these monitors - in response to a thread started elsewhere (General Computing?) and am really pleased with it. My desk wasn't deep enough for to put the 17" crt monitor on it in a "normal" position and then put the keyboard in front. So the old monitor sat in a corner, facing toward the diametrically opposite corner and I sat sideways to the desk. The mouse sat beside me, so using it was hard on my shoulder. Now, with the flat panel, the keyboard is right in front of the monitor. I sit the way you're supposed to sit at a desk and on top of everything else, the picture is much bigger.

Thanks!
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Just got the widescreen one, and loving it! Only game I have installed atm is EQ2, and it supports the 1600x1050 res.

Sample Screenshot here.



EDIT: Running EQ2 with medium textures ingame, performance options in the ATI panel, so don't base EQ2's graphics on this shot.
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 20033
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Post by Carpet_pissr »

If you get the "Delff" coupon code, you can get the non widescreen 20" LCD (16ms response) for $549 shipped from Dell...not shabby at all.

I also have a problem with the fixed native resolution of 1600x1200 though...I have seen several Dell LCD monitors scale to playable resolutions in games and it wasn't pretty.
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

Was playing Vampire Bloodlines last night at 1280x1024 resolution on the 1600x1050 native widescreen, game looked great.

The 1024 and lower resolutions do look noticibly worse though quality wise. The edge of text and stuff looks like projection TV quality.
Coskesh
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by Coskesh »

For anyone interested, Dell is now offering the 20.1" 16:10 widescreen flatpanel LCD for $599.

I've played EQ2, Vampire, and now HalfLife2 without any ghosting. Both EQ and HL2 support 1600x1050, Vampire looks good running 1280x1024.


http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/Prod ... sting.aspx to order, then enter

Code: Select all

SGS8?T0JFVF1CR
as a coupon to get $290 off.

Can probably use it for the 20.1" 1600x1280 native resolution 4:3 flatpanel as well.
Post Reply