Help Support OO by buying through our affiliates: Amazon.com OO Link
For other methods please see this thread

[trailer] John Carter

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:31 pm

ImLawBoy wrote:I read A Princess of Mars when this thread originally popped up to see what this was about, and I've held off on posting my thoughts. Let's just say that I came to the conclusion that this book would be much more appealing if I read it when I was a kid. It didn't leave me wanting to go see the movie.


Heh, yeah. Ditto. Although I didn't hate it. Keeping in mind it was pulp even back then, and keeping a retro mentality, it was still iffy in places. There is better pulp from that time.

It won't keep me from seeing John Carter on dvd though.
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:44 pm

Scuzz wrote:I heard today that Disney expects now to lose $200m on John Carter. :shock:


I remember when Terminator 2 topped $100 million and people nearly had a coronary over that. Of course that doesn't include marketing costs while the $200 mil loss for John Carter almost certainly does.
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Jag » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:47 pm

GreenGoo wrote:
ImLawBoy wrote:I read A Princess of Mars when this thread originally popped up to see what this was about, and I've held off on posting my thoughts. Let's just say that I came to the conclusion that this book would be much more appealing if I read it when I was a kid. It didn't leave me wanting to go see the movie.


Heh, yeah. Ditto. Although I didn't hate it. Keeping in mind it was pulp even back then, and keeping a retro mentality, it was still iffy in places. There is better pulp from that time.

It won't keep me from seeing John Carter on dvd though.


I'm on Book 3 now and still enjoying it somewhat, but I think i'm done after this. I went into the books excepting a pulpy Conan-like adventure, which it is. It did make me want to see the movie, although I could have waited for DVD too.
Jag
User avatar
 
Posts: 11377
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: SoFla

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby hentzau » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:54 pm

Jag wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
ImLawBoy wrote:I read A Princess of Mars when this thread originally popped up to see what this was about, and I've held off on posting my thoughts. Let's just say that I came to the conclusion that this book would be much more appealing if I read it when I was a kid. It didn't leave me wanting to go see the movie.


Heh, yeah. Ditto. Although I didn't hate it. Keeping in mind it was pulp even back then, and keeping a retro mentality, it was still iffy in places. There is better pulp from that time.

It won't keep me from seeing John Carter on dvd though.


I'm on Book 3 now and still enjoying it somewhat, but I think i'm done after this. I went into the books excepting a pulpy Conan-like adventure, which it is. It did make me want to see the movie, although I could have waited for DVD too.


They get even more uneven after book 3, so that's a good stopping point.
"Women are naturally secretive, and they like to do their own secreting." - Sherlock Holmes, A Scandal in Bohemia
hentzau
User avatar
 
Posts: 8217
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Castle Zenda, Ruritania

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Odin » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:55 pm

Jag wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
ImLawBoy wrote:I read A Princess of Mars when this thread originally popped up to see what this was about, and I've held off on posting my thoughts. Let's just say that I came to the conclusion that this book would be much more appealing if I read it when I was a kid. It didn't leave me wanting to go see the movie.


Heh, yeah. Ditto. Although I didn't hate it. Keeping in mind it was pulp even back then, and keeping a retro mentality, it was still iffy in places. There is better pulp from that time.

It won't keep me from seeing John Carter on dvd though.


I'm on Book 3 now and still enjoying it somewhat, but I think i'm done after this. I went into the books excepting a pulpy Conan-like adventure, which it is. It did make me want to see the movie, although I could have waited for DVD too.


I bought a compilation of the first three novels, so that's all I read. I wouldn't be opposed to reading more, but they didn't leave me with an intense burning desire to go out and buy more of the series.
Odin
User avatar
 
Posts: 18819
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:20 pm

Now that the Honor Harrington thread has pointed out that some of those books are available for free, I suspect it will be a long while before I get to Book 2 of John Carter's legacy. If ever.

You know what could have saved A Princess of Mars? Sex. I don't normally give 2 craps about sex in my fiction, but if they had thrown in some B grade sexifying it probably would have helped it a bit. At least some Parental Guidance type stuff.
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Jag » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:20 pm

Odin wrote:
Jag wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
ImLawBoy wrote:I read A Princess of Mars when this thread originally popped up to see what this was about, and I've held off on posting my thoughts. Let's just say that I came to the conclusion that this book would be much more appealing if I read it when I was a kid. It didn't leave me wanting to go see the movie.


Heh, yeah. Ditto. Although I didn't hate it. Keeping in mind it was pulp even back then, and keeping a retro mentality, it was still iffy in places. There is better pulp from that time.

It won't keep me from seeing John Carter on dvd though.


I'm on Book 3 now and still enjoying it somewhat, but I think i'm done after this. I went into the books excepting a pulpy Conan-like adventure, which it is. It did make me want to see the movie, although I could have waited for DVD too.


I bought a compilation of the first three novels, so that's all I read. I wouldn't be opposed to reading more, but they didn't leave me with an intense burning desire to go out and buy more of the series.



Well, you really don't have to buy them since they are free...

http://gutenberg.net.au/sfproject.html
Jag
User avatar
 
Posts: 11377
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: SoFla

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby ImLawBoy » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:21 pm

GreenGoo wrote:Now that the Honor Harrington thread has pointed out that some of those books are available for free, I suspect it will be a long while before I get to Book 2 of John Carter's legacy. If ever.

You know what could have saved A Princess of Mars? Sex. I don't normally give 2 craps about sex in my fiction, but if they had thrown in some B grade sexifying it probably would have helped it a bit. At least some Parental Guidance type stuff.

Then my younger self would have really loved them!
We had subs. It was crazy
ImLawBoy
User avatar
Forum Admin
 
Posts: 6743
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Odin » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:36 pm

Jag wrote:Well, you really don't have to buy them since they are free...

http://gutenberg.net.au/sfproject.html


The words are free. The paper and binding cost money.
Odin
User avatar
 
Posts: 18819
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby hepcat » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:47 pm

Odin wrote:
Jag wrote:Well, you really don't have to buy them since they are free...

http://gutenberg.net.au/sfproject.html


The words are free. The paper and binding cost money.


You'll have to excuse Odin. He was cryogenically frozen in the year 1937. He's not up to speed on this whole "digital" thing.
because I jazz up my patties. - Kraken
hepcat
User avatar
 
Posts: 20973
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Jag » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:56 pm

You'd think a guy with a blog named "Virtual Vellum" would have figured it out by now! ;)
Jag
User avatar
 
Posts: 11377
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: SoFla

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby hentzau » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:58 pm

Yeah, but with John Carter, I actually prefer it in old, slightly weird smelling books that spent way too much time in my in-laws basement.
"Women are naturally secretive, and they like to do their own secreting." - Sherlock Holmes, A Scandal in Bohemia
hentzau
User avatar
 
Posts: 8217
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Castle Zenda, Ruritania

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Rip » Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:48 pm

hentzau wrote:Yeah, but with John Carter, I actually prefer it in old, slightly weird smelling books that spent way too much time in my in-laws basement.


Right next to the Cheetos and hand lotion?

:lol:
Rip
User avatar
Technical Admin
 
Posts: 12292
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Scuzz » Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:51 pm

GreenGoo wrote:
Scuzz wrote:I heard today that Disney expects now to lose $200m on John Carter. :shock:


I remember when Terminator 2 topped $100 million and people nearly had a coronary over that. Of course that doesn't include marketing costs while the $200 mil loss for John Carter almost certainly does.


The radio report this morning said John Carter was $240m to make and had a $100m marketing budget. What a waste of $100m.
Scuzz
User avatar
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: The Arm Pit of California

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby theohall » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:03 am

Scuzz wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
Scuzz wrote:I heard today that Disney expects now to lose $200m on John Carter. :shock:


I remember when Terminator 2 topped $100 million and people nearly had a coronary over that. Of course that doesn't include marketing costs while the $200 mil loss for John Carter almost certainly does.


The radio report this morning said John Carter was $240m to make and had a $100m marketing budget. What a waste of $100m.


With so much CGI, why $240M to make?
theohall
User avatar
 
Posts: 11065
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby AWS260 » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:23 am

theohall wrote:
Scuzz wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:
Scuzz wrote:I heard today that Disney expects now to lose $200m on John Carter. :shock:

I remember when Terminator 2 topped $100 million and people nearly had a coronary over that. Of course that doesn't include marketing costs while the $200 mil loss for John Carter almost certainly does.

The radio report this morning said John Carter was $240m to make and had a $100m marketing budget. What a waste of $100m.

With so much CGI, why $240M to make?

Because CGI is expensive? I don't know anything about the industry, but it seems to me that CGI-heavy films generally have big ol' budgets.
Steam: [OO]AWS260; Xbox: Captain Harper
AWS260
User avatar
 
Posts: 6537
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:27 pm

AWS260 wrote:Because CGI is expensive? I don't know anything about the industry, but it seems to me that CGI-heavy films generally have big ol' budgets.


They used to, and bleeding edge CGI is still expensive, but overall it seems like CGI is the cheap way out these days. On location filming is much more expensive than a few nerds in front of a workstation these days.
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Peoux » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:13 pm

Incidentally, Project Gutenberg reports Princess of Mars as their #1 most downloaded book for March 20th with 1301 downloads!

The link is to a dynamic page showing the top 100 downloads of the last day, not specifically March 20th, but uhmm yeah.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes, that way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. - Jack Handey
Peoux
User avatar
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:32 am
Location: Trondheim, Norway

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Zurai » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:09 pm

I'd take any income/cost numbers out of Hollywood with an oil tanker full of salt. According to Hollywood, only a handful of movies have ever made a profit. See: Hollywood Accounting. A choice quote: "Winston Groom's price for the screenplay rights to his novel Forrest Gump included a share of the profits; however, due to Hollywood accounting, the film's commercial success was converted into a net loss, and Groom received nothing."
Zurai
User avatar
 
Posts: 4343
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby sgoldj » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:21 pm

I haven't seen the John Carter movie yet and will probably rent the disc. But I agree that the Barsoom, Pelucidar, Carson books worked best my first reading in the 8th grade. I also think that Tarzan stories had a different feel to them, more varied. I certainly loved the fact that Tarzan really grew up (the way I remember it) by some sort of tribe that was between ape and man ( mangani?). Gorillas were different, as were lower primates and monkeys.

I'd love a new story set on Barsoom or Pelucidar.
sgoldj
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:34 am

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Odin » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:27 pm

Zurai wrote:I'd take any income/cost numbers out of Hollywood with an oil tanker full of salt. According to Hollywood, only a handful of movies have ever made a profit. See: Hollywood Accounting. A choice quote: "Winston Groom's price for the screenplay rights to his novel Forrest Gump included a share of the profits; however, due to Hollywood accounting, the film's commercial success was converted into a net loss, and Groom received nothing."


J. Michael Straczynski (of Babylon 5) has talked about this quite a bit over the years. It's all a big sham.
Odin
User avatar
 
Posts: 18819
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:43 am

Odin wrote:J. Michael Straczynski (of Babylon 5) has talked about this quite a bit over the years. It's all a big sham.


Which part? Accounting in Hollywood or Hollywood accounting?

How's that for confusing?

What I mean is, does he agree or disagree that Hollywood Accounting (in the, nothing has ever made any money, ever context) exists?
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Zurai » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:11 pm

He very much agrees that it exists. Babylon 5 has made over a billion in revenue, but Hollywood claims it's actually still in debt to them. From the link:

Hollywood accounting is not limited to movies. An example is the Warner Bros. television series Babylon 5 created by J. Michael Straczynski. Straczynski, who wrote 90% of the episodes in addition to producing the show, would receive a generous cut of profits if not for Hollywood accounting. The series, which was profitable in each of its five seasons from 1993–1998, has garnered more than US$1 billion for Warner Bros., most recently US$500 million in DVD sales alone. But in the last profit statement given to Straczynski, Warner Bros. claimed the property was $80 million in debt. "Basically", says Straczynski, "by the terms of my contract, if a set on a WB movie burns down in Botswana, they can charge it against B5's profits."
Zurai
User avatar
 
Posts: 4343
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:42 pm

Thanks for the clarification.
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Ariana_FFD » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:19 pm

Jag wrote:I'm collecting 'essential' classic movies for my son who's 11. Unfortunately they all seem to be rated R, so the conversation goes like this:

"Can I watch this one?"
"No"
"This one?"
"No"
"This one??"
"No."

He's a big sci-fi/fantasy fan and he liked JC but said he found the whole Mars and Earth segments confusing.



Soylent Green. One of the best adaptions!
poof!
Ariana_FFD
User avatar
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Ariana_FFD » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:20 pm

Chaosraven wrote:Is your grudge against Film not faithfully following Book?

I found the film Visually Appealing, the CGI effects were not a jarring jolt to the senses, and it was a Blast.

If you are looking for great depth of any character, ok, you will likely be disappointed. But as SCIFI ACTION FLIX, I loved it. Which is what I went to see.

It's like going to see Captain America or Iron Man or Thor (which we did) and somehow expecting YEARS of character development (which you get in the comics) crammed into the fifteen minutes of exposition amongst the two hours of fists and bolts a-flyin'.

Each time we saw a Superhero movie (xmen to ff to hellboy), and Carbon Unit Designated "Wife" noticed I had Comix of any of them, she would ask how it compared.

And honestly, if you read something with Years of backstory, you had better be ready to accept an alternate or stop going to movies (hell, even shortterm, WATCHMEN, I am looking at you)



Visually appealing does not satisfy the mind! Which is what real SF readers are looking for.
poof!
Ariana_FFD
User avatar
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Ariana_FFD » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:26 pm

Doomboy wrote:It is kinda weird to me that Avatar made bajillions of dollars, and this movie is not doing well at all. Avatar had a very simple, smack you on the head with its eco-message. I admit, there isn't much of a plot to John Carter other than "Where am I and how do I get home?" But I want to see John Carter again, and sequels to it. Whereas I do not feel the same about Avatar.

I actually liked the aliens in John Carter. I didn't really care one way or the other about the blue cat people. The folks at work refuse to see JC because it "looks dumb" and is a ripoff of Avatar. They don't seem to understand the words coming out of my mouth when I tell them that Avatar is the ripoff.

Oh well. Just one more piece of evidence that I am out of touch with the rest of the planet. And sometimes it makes me feel much better that I am.


Avatar rocked. Simple message... yes. But the beauty of the message sang through. The visuals were stunning. The N'avi were intriguing, and the concept of avatars is cutting edge future concepts for man, where you can change your appearance by slipping on a new avatar body! Very cool. At least though the message is repeated from many other classics, it is an important message that man must learn or perish because of his inabillity to see the truth of things.
poof!
Ariana_FFD
User avatar
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Zarathud » Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:34 am

I just read that John Carter star Taylor Kitsch is also in Battleship.

What idiot is this guy's agent? If John Carter didn't kill his career, the second catastrophic box office bomb in one year will. Battleship has fail written all over.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein
Zarathud
User avatar
 
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby hepcat » Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:13 am

I highly doubt his agent thought John Carter was going to bomb. As for battleship, it may suck but that doesn't automatically equal box office bomb. See Transformers for further examples.
because I jazz up my patties. - Kraken
hepcat
User avatar
 
Posts: 20973
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby SlapBone » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:57 am

Zarathud wrote:What idiot is this guy's agent?


The idiot that got him in a movie with Liam Neeson
SlapBone
User avatar
 
Posts: 3061
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:08 pm
Location: Bayou City

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Pyperkub » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:45 am

Jag wrote:I'm collecting 'essential' classic movies for my son who's 11. Unfortunately they all seem to be rated R, so the conversation goes like this:

"Can I watch this one?"
"No"
"This one?"
"No"
"This one??"
"No."

He's a big sci-fi/fantasy fan and he liked JC but said he found the whole Mars and Earth segments confusing.


Classic SF:
Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1st or 2nd
The Thing (from another world)
Forbidden Planet
Star Wars
Star Trek 2
Planet of the Apes


Epic 4g/Tapatalk
There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
OO GW2 Mumble Server on Ehmry Bay
Pyperkub
User avatar
 
Posts: 9893
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Jaymon » Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:12 am

How old does a movie have to be before its considered classic?
Bunnies like beer because its made from hops.
Jaymon
User avatar
 
Posts: 1165
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby RuperT » Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:12 am

Haven't seen it yet, but I'm glad to hear some of you enjoyed it (I'm hoping for stygian canals and weird science, but barely). A decent movie that flopped is better than ERB might've fared.
It is funny to consider how much Lucas borrowed. I'd never thought about it.
Live: MooseFoe
PSN: Rupyrt
RuperT
User avatar
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:01 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Jag » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:26 am

RuperT wrote:Haven't seen it yet, but I'm glad to hear some of you enjoyed it (I'm hoping for stygian canals and weird science, but barely). A decent movie that flopped is better than ERB might've fared.
It is funny to consider how much Lucas borrowed. I'd never thought about it.


Did Lucas borrow from JC? I always thought his movies had roots in the "Hero" mythology dating back to greek times, which may also be where ERB also drew inspiration.
Jag
User avatar
 
Posts: 11377
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: SoFla

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby GreenGoo » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:51 am

Jaymon wrote:How old does a movie have to be before its considered classic?


It just has to be good in some way.

"Instant Classic".
2012
----------------------------------------
Running:
13.0 km
Swimming: 0.0 km
Cycling: 0.0 km

2011 - Running:179.11 km - Interval Walk/Jog: 58.82/48.40 km - Swimming: 1.30 km - Cycling: 429.71 km
GreenGoo
User avatar
 
Posts: 19999
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby theohall » Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:58 am

Jag wrote:
RuperT wrote:Haven't seen it yet, but I'm glad to hear some of you enjoyed it (I'm hoping for stygian canals and weird science, but barely). A decent movie that flopped is better than ERB might've fared.
It is funny to consider how much Lucas borrowed. I'd never thought about it.


Did Lucas borrow from JC? I always thought his movies had roots in the "Hero" mythology dating back to greek times, which may also be where ERB also drew inspiration.


He most definitely borrowed. Ships that hover and are basically flat platforms - from ERB. Princess Leia chained to Jabba the Hut in whatever outfit she is wearing is very similar to a cover of Princess of Mars where she is chained to a rock wearing the revealing outfit (top left in picture below). Yes. Lucas borrowed heavily from ERB.

Image
theohall
User avatar
 
Posts: 11065
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Default » Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:40 am

What this movie lacked was Doug McClure. And rubber hand puppet monsters.





You'd aaaalllllll talk out of the other side of your mouth then!
I see no point in paying to have my southern geography chafed by dorsal fins.
Default
User avatar
 
Posts: 4167
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: somewhere in the buckwheat

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby hepcat » Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:42 am

RuperT wrote:Haven't seen it yet, but I'm glad to hear some of you enjoyed it (I'm hoping for stygian canals and weird science, but barely). A decent movie that flopped is better than ERB might've fared.
It is funny to consider how much Lucas borrowed. I'd never thought about it.


I don't think there's any definite time. hence the term "instant classic" when referring to some really great current films. Although if the producers/studio of the film in question are the ones calling it an instant classic, I'm not sure I would buy into it. :wink:
because I jazz up my patties. - Kraken
hepcat
User avatar
 
Posts: 20973
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Ariana_FFD » Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:53 am

Just popped in to see what has happened here. Still have not seen the movie. Lost interest after talking to several friends who did go. Said the acting was real bad. *sigh I had hopes, now I'll wait for RedBox. When you have great authors, it just doesn't guarantee great movie adaptions. Plus unfortunately sci-fi is just not a respected genre for most industry people. The thought of expanding on a theme and going for quality acting and sets is like a mind block, they think sci-fi, low end audience, low end efforts. So when people say that Avatar was predictable, at least they made the effort to have better scripting dialog and explaination of the issues. Predictable? Of course, but beautiful creatures and execution.

Missed ya!
Ariana
poof!
Ariana_FFD
User avatar
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: [trailer] John Carter

Postby Odin » Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:16 am

I might have taken the kids to see this during spring break next week, but it's not even in the theaters anymore. :( Hopefully it'll come to the cheap second-run theater and we can see it there sometime. They're showing Journey 2: Mysterious Island next week, so we'll probably hit that up. Not much else playing next week to take the kids to, really. Unless we want to see Hunger Games a second time.
Odin
User avatar
 
Posts: 18819
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

PreviousNext

Return to Everything But Gaming

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exodor, Google [Bot], RiniaSom32, zoopyteepejoT and 1 guest