I wish. In NJ, most new construction are houses on tiny lots or townhomes with many new communities being 55+ only.Roman wrote:go with new construction purchase. no worries about offers etc
Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k
I wish. In NJ, most new construction are houses on tiny lots or townhomes with many new communities being 55+ only.Roman wrote:go with new construction purchase. no worries about offers etc
I was just browsing the MLS and came upon this house (the offer where the owners wouldn't sign until they found a new home even though I was going to give them 3 - 4 months to settle). They just dropped their listing price to around what we accepted their counter at. We would still be about 1 and half months from settlement based on the original schedule. If my current deal falls through, I would really consider re-visiting the property.Smoove_B wrote:Now, now -- no need to be hasty. If they come back, you get to lower your offer by $15K. As the person that was on the business end of that conversation it sucked but we had to take it -- so pay it forward.
$iljanus wrote:Zaxxon wrote:$iljanus wrote:Our Kelric is buying a home? My how time has passed sniff sniff
He's all growed-up!Smoove_B wrote:Do not underestimate the importance of being able to save money while you're living somewhere. There's always (SEE: always) insane random things that end up happening and if you're just barely making your monthly bills and not developing any type of financial cushion you might end up spiraling into (short or long term) debt rather quick over what amounts to normal home ownership.
Yeah, definitely wise to be buying below your max-approved price.
I remember when we were pre-approved. We both make good salaries and had good credit scores but the amount we were pre-approved for was a little ridiculous. And this was after the bubble burst. We just looked at the figure and thought about how much rope the bank was handing out to hang ourselves if we didn't use careful judgement.
Glad we don't have to do that all again for quite a number of years. But as I was talking to neighbors about home repairs and renovations, it seems that all the houses (neighborhood built in 1947) are hitting a point where things need to be changed. gulp So we may have to do the home equity loan dance in the future.
Carpet_pissr wrote:Sorry to burst your bubble lady, but why would I pay your agent anything?
Kelric wrote:Doing lots of math with the idea of writing up an offer this weekend if we get the condo docs we need and they pan out. I'm considering taking out some of my Roth IRA contributions to put toward a down payment for a few reasons. 1) It would make having cash for closing costs and a few months of payments on hand much easier, as I could use the Roth IRA as my down payment amount and my current savings as the reserves. 2) My retirement fund has only earned $150 total over the last two years anyway since I got hammered like many others in that time. 3) With a little effort, I can repay the entirety of the withdrawal in less than a year while still making my regular retirement contributions.
Thoughts?
Kelric wrote:Doing lots of math with the idea of writing up an offer this weekend if we get the condo docs we need and they pan out. I'm considering taking out some of my Roth IRA contributions to put toward a down payment for a few reasons. 1) It would make having cash for closing costs and a few months of payments on hand much easier, as I could use the Roth IRA as my down payment amount and my current savings as the reserves. 2) My retirement fund has only earned $150 total over the last two years anyway since I got hammered like many others in that time. 3) With a little effort, I can repay the entirety of the withdrawal in less than a year while still making my regular retirement contributions.
Thoughts?
Roman wrote:go with new construction purchase. no worries about offers etc
Good luck!Kelric wrote:Going to make an offer today. AAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!
He just got back to me. The old 'I had no updates' but he has since gotten an update. This deal just took a deal for the worse.Octavious wrote:What a bunch of asshats. I don't remember having any issues with the lawyer portion at all.
Trent: You know what you are? You're like a big bear with claws and with fangs...
Sue: ...big fucking teeth, man.
Trent: Yeah... big fuckin' teeth on ya'. And she's just like this little bunny, who's just kinda cowering in the corner.
Sue: Shivering.
Trent: Yeah, man just kinda... you know, you got these claws and you're staring at these claws and your thinking to yourself, and with these claws you're thinking, "How am I supposed to kill this bunny, how am I supposed to kill this bunny?"
I asked and got confirmation from the listing agent. It appeared to be part of the structure. I am not going to get construction permits to refinish an existing finished basement. Edit: Realized that I didn't answer the question directly. I read in a few places that you can't assume that 'furniture' even if built-in is included in the sale outside the kitchen and bathrooms.Carpet_pissr wrote:What made you ask if it was included in the first place (as opposed to merely assuming it was if it was built in)? (if I may play Devil's advocate here).
Oh, I agree. I can comfortably walk away anytime. I don't want to agree to buy the bar at all though. I don't care about it; it is the structure that I care about. I am already talking to the township about when it would be good to stop by and pull permits.Smoove_B wrote:Pffft. I repeat -- when we did our final walk through the day of the closing the homeowner took the goddamned mirrors from all the bathrooms. You can also take a gamble and agree to consider purchasing the bar. Then during the home inspection see what they can find and use that information to make trades -- because the home inspector ALWAYS finds something. Always. Also make sure you inquire as to the installation legitimacy (plumbing, electrical, etc...) with respect to all local and state codes (you're looking for permit and inspection records). You keep forgetting that you have so much power and leverage right now.
Luckily we are pretty jaded so we aren't all that invested in the actual house. I just want a clean deal. If they can show me the bar isn't part of the structure...Take it away. It eats up a ton of space anyway.Freezer-TPF- wrote:You have power as a buyer if you are willing to walk away and/or the seller is desperate. Otherwise, by the time you (or your spouse) begin to get emotionally and psychologically invested in the house, then, umm yeah....
Yikes! Overflowing condensation pan?Oh, and make sure the a/c drain is clear before you get into the high humidity season. Ask me how I know!
malchior wrote:Luckily we are pretty jaded so we aren't all that invested in the actual house. I just want a clean deal. If they can show me the bar isn't part of the structure. Take it away. It eats up a ton of space anyway.Freezer-TPF- wrote:You have power as a buyer if you are willing to walk away and/or the seller is desperate. Otherwise, by the time you (or your spouse) begin to get emotionally and psychologically invested in the house, then, umm yeah....Yikes! Overflowing condensation pan?Oh, and make sure the a/c drain is clear before you get into the high humidity season. Ask me how I know!
There is a list of included and not included items. The bar is not in either. For example, they are taking two light fixtures and my attorney wrote in that they must be replaced with functional builder's grade fixtures--that was fine by me.Roman wrote:what is so different from sales down there as opposed to sales up here?
Here the seller lists on the 'seller sheet' which items are included in a home purchase and specifically lists all items that are 'out of scope' (PM talk)
Do you guys have this down there? If so than they should have listed in seller agreement that the 'bar downstairs' is not included in the sale purchase.

Roman wrote:so by definition if the bar is not listed than it is assumed that it is part of the home & sale purchase. Some people are just dicks!
This is the crux of the problem. And whether the back wall of the bar is part of the bar. If it were to go there would be a huge hole in the finished basement. I expect a contiguous wall around the entirety of the finished portion. Pretty simple to me.coopasonic wrote:Roman wrote:so by definition if the bar is not listed than it is assumed that it is part of the home & sale purchase. Some people are just dicks!
It depends if it is attached. The couch isn't listed either, does that mean it stays?
Roman wrote:A buddy of mine bought a house and when he moved in all the antique light fixtures were removed by the previous owners. BIG MISTAKE. He sued and got the replacement value back. They were not listed under the 'chattels' section of items not included. Idiots.
coopasonic wrote:Roman wrote:so by definition if the bar is not listed than it is assumed that it is part of the home & sale purchase. Some people are just dicks!
It depends if it is attached. The couch isn't listed either, does that mean it stays?
Carpet_pissr wrote:Roman wrote:A buddy of mine bought a house and when he moved in all the antique light fixtures were removed by the previous owners. BIG MISTAKE. He sued and got the replacement value back. They were not listed under the 'chattels' section of items not included. Idiots.
I think the asshats that removed the mirrors in the post above could probably have been made to replace/return those. That is absolutely ridiculous (unless they were some family heirlooms, which if they were, should have been stated up front and listed in the contract)
When I asked my agent about certain outdoor items I wanted to take with me, that would be a pain to move around, he said it's easier on many levels if anything you want to keep is not in plain sight (in this case a collection of large river rock from my grandfather's farm, that I had been using in the landscaping, as well a couple of young, unique japanese maples). I even considered removing our natural stone bird bath, which cost me a few hundred bucks, primarily because I am not sure I can find one like it anymore, and I reallllly like it. Everything else? Keep it! (although now that I think about it, my little mini fridge I have in the garage...I wonder if that would be considered the same as a normal fridge (usually those stay, mainly due to size and pain of moving, I guess).
Carpet_pissr wrote:Roman wrote: Everything else? Keep it! (although now that I think about it, my little mini fridge I have in the garage...I wonder if that would be considered the same as a normal fridge (usually those stay, mainly due to size and pain of moving, I guess).

Roman wrote:we had one agent who advised us to remove the items that we did not want to include - items like an antique light fixture above our dining room harvest table. I disagreed because it added to the overall look of our home which adds to the selling points. We simply stated that the light fixture above harvest table in dining room was out of scope. Simple.
Agents who want to remove items from a home are silly IMHO. I want people to see what I have done and show my home off. If a deal were to fall through because I did not want to include a light fixture that I listed as out of scope than the buyer was not serious.
It is more extreme than a cutout. Just to give an idea I will attempt some Dwarf Fortress graphics. I've left out the right side of the basement below:Roman wrote:puhleeze. Within reason.
If the bar has been incorporated into the wall as described and the paneling has been 'cut out' to conform to the bar than......
I had a conversation with the lawyer this morning and we had a similar discussion. Basically we're agreeing for them to exclude the bar but they will restore the basement to match the rest of the space. We expect that they'll either drop it or sign as it is. He expects that the cost to remove it is going to be an issue and then the ball will be in their court when we assert that the bar is not included in the sale (the Trent route).Roman wrote:good news for you that should this issue become tenuous you can always state that you are good with them taking the bar with the condition that the open area on the wall be finished in accordance with the existing design (panels) and be stained to match. Also include that when the bar plumbing is terminated that it is done in such a manner that should you decide to complete a bar yourself that the fixtures be left in such a manner that you are able to do so ie: make sure they leave enough copper to weld to etc etc.
my guess here is that it will prove to be too much work for them to run with and they will simply abandon the argument.
malchior wrote:I had a conversation with the lawyer this morning and we had a similar discussion. Basically we're agreeing for them to exclude the bar but they will restore the basement to match the rest of the space. We expect that they'll either drop it or sign as it is. He expects that the cost to remove it is going to be an issue and then the ball will be in their court when we assert that the bar is not included in the sale (the Trent route).Roman wrote:good news for you that should this issue become tenuous you can always state that you are good with them taking the bar with the condition that the open area on the wall be finished in accordance with the existing design (panels) and be stained to match. Also include that when the bar plumbing is terminated that it is done in such a manner that should you decide to complete a bar yourself that the fixtures be left in such a manner that you are able to do so ie: make sure they leave enough copper to weld to etc etc.
my guess here is that it will prove to be too much work for them to run with and they will simply abandon the argument.
Return to Everything But Gaming
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Fretmute, Google [Bot], McNutt, miltonite, nasai, SpaceLord, UnicornPoint, Victoria Raverna, Vorret, zinckiwi and 9 guests