NY vs. Trump - Financial Fraud Case

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 21321
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: NY vs. Trump - Financial Fraud Case

Post by Grifman »

Sounds like Trump’s bond company has a number of issues and can’t really guarantee his bond:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... ffect/amp/

State lawyers argued Knight is a “small insurer that is not authorized to write business in New York” and, until Trump, had “never before written a surety bond in New York.”


The company has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million, the filing says. Under New York state law, companies like Knight can’t expose themselves to liabilities — like a bond — or any potential loss greater than 10 percent of their surplus.

“Based on KSIC’s policyholder surplus in its most recent annual financial statement of $138,441,671, the limitation of loss on any one risk that KSIC is permitted to write is $13.8 million,” the lawyers wrote. “The face amount of the bond exceeds this limitation by $161.2 million.”
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 8588
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: NY vs. Trump - Financial Fraud Case

Post by Alefroth »

Well that delay worked out pretty well for him.
Post Reply