That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://www.octopusoverlords.com/forum/
Barr is also an ideologue to the core. He's part of Opus Dei, the reactionary Catholic cabal that would be perfectly happy to see theocratic principles enshrined in American law.YellowKing wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:39 am Sadly he's just a representation of millions of Americans who would vote for anything with an (R) rather than admit to themselves that the party they've been groomed to despise is the better option.
The "party of fertilization". You don't even need me to tell you who said the above; you know it.“We want to help the women because they were going to end fertilization, which is where, when the IVF, where women go to the clinics and they get help in having a baby, and that’s a good thing, not a bad thing. And we’re for it a 100%. They tried to say that they weren’t for it. They actually weren’t for it and aren’t for it as much as us, but women see that,” he said.
+1 I was ?? at "end fertilization" and then by "when the IVF" it was obvious
. Though if it weren't for the context of the post, I would have assumed I was missing a reference to some sort of sarcasm in the style of...
As she has gotten older, Kristi continues to “Barbify” herself more and more. Also looking at older photos it’s pretty obvious she’s had done work done over the years.LordMortis wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:04 pm N V T S - Nuts! And they made her a governor. Remind to not drive the SD again the next time I head out west. I'd hate to get the dog treatment.
Well, there's that, since it's a question about an event that did indeed happen. But she's also saying that if she is VP, she won't take the Pence route. It's an explicit nod that she can be counted on to subvert the constitution for her master. I don't doubt that this was on her flash card for questions about Pence and/or Jan 6.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:03 pm I'm enraged just reading that, I dare not click play to listen to someone being that stupid (or intentionally obtuse).
I have noticed the "hypothetical defense' being used by politicians more and more recently. It's as if some image consultant has been teaching it to various clients and it's spreading. "Now listen, to avoid the "gotcha" press, anytime they ask you about ANYthing that you or others might or might not do in the future, just say "I don't answer hypotheticals" and BAM! you got em!
Except poor, dumb Kristi with a K is only vaguely aware of how it's supposed to work, or even what the meaning of "hypothetical" is, and totally cocked it up.
We are literally talking about it. Because the media is talking about it. For days now.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) revealed in an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail that she believed her former staffers spied on her, mismanaged close to $1 million from the office budget, and “threatened the interns.”...
However, some of those former staffers not only deny the allegations, they refute the idea that anything was “hacked” — because Mace granted them access herself: “Everything the staff had access to was granted by her.” One staffer said:
She had a personal calendar, a political calendar, and official calendar. All three of those calendars were managed and shared with senior staff so that we could go about the daily operations. No one hacked her accounts. She set them all up.
She routinely would try to revoke access, be like “you can no longer see my calendar” for a couple of weeks. And you know what, we couldn’t do our jobs.
A different staffer also retorted: “This seems to be stemming from paranoia and trust issues. She’s clearly unwell and I hope she gets help.”
My point was that being a delegate doesn't give him anything. He's already famous for being Trump's son. He would get the same exposure from being seen at a restaurant or at a ballgame.GreenGoo wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 3:18 pmWe are literally talking about it. Because the media is talking about it. For days now.
The point is not that you transition from nomination-delegate directly to the white house. That's absurd. Your friend is not drumpf Jr. (I hope?!) and nomination-delegate is not the final result of all of this.
A better test would be: Quick: Name a nomination delegate that has made national headlines previously.
As I said, this is the start of a long con. Get back to me when he turns 35.
So optimistic that he'll be a nominee, as if we'll have voting.GreenGoo wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 6:15 pm I don't know what to say. If you don't see any value in tying Junior's name early (like, 17 years early) and often to the Republican party so that the average Republican voter associates the two, fair enough.
I disagree.
When the time comes, he'll be the defacto Rep nominee, because of years of conditioning the Rep party to that fact. He'll be touted as the Right's great white hope until it becomes a fundamental truth long before he's actually eligible.
That's the very definition of conditioning.
News: Trump’s son Barron will no longer serve as a delegate at this summer’s Republican National Convention, per a senior Trump campaign adviser & a statement from Melania Trump’s office
The stmt from Melania Trump’s office said "he regretfully declines due to prior commitments"
But if Trump win, it'll be his last time to be president, right? So not going to be another chance for him to have to count on his VP to steal the election.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 1:34 pmWell, there's that, since it's a question about an event that did indeed happen. But she's also saying that if she is VP, she won't take the Pence route. It's an explicit nod that she can be counted on to subvert the constitution for her master. I don't doubt that this was on her flash card for questions about Pence and/or Jan 6.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:03 pm I'm enraged just reading that, I dare not click play to listen to someone being that stupid (or intentionally obtuse).
I have noticed the "hypothetical defense' being used by politicians more and more recently. It's as if some image consultant has been teaching it to various clients and it's spreading. "Now listen, to avoid the "gotcha" press, anytime they ask you about ANYthing that you or others might or might not do in the future, just say "I don't answer hypotheticals" and BAM! you got em!
Except poor, dumb Kristi with a K is only vaguely aware of how it's supposed to work, or even what the meaning of "hypothetical" is, and totally cocked it up.
You think a two term limit is going to stop the Orange Turd? At a minimum he could steal the election for one of his devil spawn. At a maximum he could "suspend" elections altogether.Victoria Raverna wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 7:46 pmBut if Trump win, it'll be his last time to be president, right? So not going to be another chance for him to have to count on his VP to steal the election.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 1:34 pmWell, there's that, since it's a question about an event that did indeed happen. But she's also saying that if she is VP, she won't take the Pence route. It's an explicit nod that she can be counted on to subvert the constitution for her master. I don't doubt that this was on her flash card for questions about Pence and/or Jan 6.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:03 pm I'm enraged just reading that, I dare not click play to listen to someone being that stupid (or intentionally obtuse).
I have noticed the "hypothetical defense' being used by politicians more and more recently. It's as if some image consultant has been teaching it to various clients and it's spreading. "Now listen, to avoid the "gotcha" press, anytime they ask you about ANYthing that you or others might or might not do in the future, just say "I don't answer hypotheticals" and BAM! you got em!
Except poor, dumb Kristi with a K is only vaguely aware of how it's supposed to work, or even what the meaning of "hypothetical" is, and totally cocked it up.
Holy shit? Seriously, VR? Have you not been paying attention to anything that’s been going on in the U.S.?Jaymann wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 8:01 pmYou think a two term limit is going to stop the Orange Turd? At a minimum he could steal the election for one of his devil spawn. At a maximum he could "suspend" elections altogether.Victoria Raverna wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 7:46 pmBut if Trump win, it'll be his last time to be president, right? So not going to be another chance for him to have to count on his VP to steal the election.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 1:34 pmWell, there's that, since it's a question about an event that did indeed happen. But she's also saying that if she is VP, she won't take the Pence route. It's an explicit nod that she can be counted on to subvert the constitution for her master. I don't doubt that this was on her flash card for questions about Pence and/or Jan 6.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:03 pm I'm enraged just reading that, I dare not click play to listen to someone being that stupid (or intentionally obtuse).
I have noticed the "hypothetical defense' being used by politicians more and more recently. It's as if some image consultant has been teaching it to various clients and it's spreading. "Now listen, to avoid the "gotcha" press, anytime they ask you about ANYthing that you or others might or might not do in the future, just say "I don't answer hypotheticals" and BAM! you got em!
Except poor, dumb Kristi with a K is only vaguely aware of how it's supposed to work, or even what the meaning of "hypothetical" is, and totally cocked it up.
I think I minimum is to choose a puppet who isn't his spawn, but family is the more probable. It's TFG's way. I don't see the maximum happening but he has been know to exceed my expectations and his senility/dementia really does seem to be picking up the pace. If he wins, and I don't see that as highly improbable, I don't see his influence ending in four years unless he dies of natural causes and infighting destroys the party.
If he is powerful enough to change the term limit and be a candidate for the third term, I don't think he is going to need a VP's help to steal election, right?Kurth wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2024 12:52 amHoly shit? Seriously, VR? Have you not been paying attention to anything that’s been going on in the U.S.?Jaymann wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 8:01 pmYou think a two term limit is going to stop the Orange Turd? At a minimum he could steal the election for one of his devil spawn. At a maximum he could "suspend" elections altogether.Victoria Raverna wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 7:46 pmBut if Trump win, it'll be his last time to be president, right? So not going to be another chance for him to have to count on his VP to steal the election.LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 1:34 pmWell, there's that, since it's a question about an event that did indeed happen. But she's also saying that if she is VP, she won't take the Pence route. It's an explicit nod that she can be counted on to subvert the constitution for her master. I don't doubt that this was on her flash card for questions about Pence and/or Jan 6.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 5:03 pm I'm enraged just reading that, I dare not click play to listen to someone being that stupid (or intentionally obtuse).
I have noticed the "hypothetical defense' being used by politicians more and more recently. It's as if some image consultant has been teaching it to various clients and it's spreading. "Now listen, to avoid the "gotcha" press, anytime they ask you about ANYthing that you or others might or might not do in the future, just say "I don't answer hypotheticals" and BAM! you got em!
Except poor, dumb Kristi with a K is only vaguely aware of how it's supposed to work, or even what the meaning of "hypothetical" is, and totally cocked it up.
Exactly what Jaymann said.
The President cannot change the US Constitution unilaterally. However, the term limit for president in the US Constitution does not prevent anyone from running for a third term. It only states that they are ineligible to *serve* a third term.Victoria Raverna wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2024 2:05 am If he is powerful enough to change the term limit and be a candidate for the third term, I don't think he is going to need a VP's help to steal election, right?
