Semaj wrote:Lassr wrote:Semaj wrote:
But if they test a seer first, they lose. Interesting math.
Oddly, you are going to harp on that when I am just trying to figure out if two wolves doing that would ever be a good play? In a hypothetical game with 2 misses left?
Heh... Funny.
Ok Lets get on to the quotefest known as Stessiers posts.
stessier wrote:Semaj wrote:Oddly... I meant less about tru1cy and more about you that whole ficasso. If you were the wolf and let me, who I said I would kill repeatedly and Lassr, who I had said I would have a hard time believing he was a wolf...live over tru1cy. I would probably have voted for Lassr on principle, which he himself would agree with, since he did it with grund.
However with the outting of Tru1cy, it became a moot point since in my eyes the wolves _had_ to kill tru1cy last night.
Interesting. Why did the wolf
have to kill tru1cy? tru1cy said he was willing to test
you. If I were the wolf, I like my odds bringing him and you into the last day. Lassr could feel the same way.
Now lets look at this from a wolves prospective, which wont be hard for one of you, early guess is Stessier.
Tru1cy Has 2 people announce he is as innocent as they come.
You have the death of Grund. Now You have 3 Options for night kills.
1) Yourself, seems kinda silly.
2) Me - I know I am a villager, but Grund did such a phenomenal job of making me look wolfish yesterday, I am the person most likely to get lynched and lose the game for the villagers. So Clearly I have to stick around.
2) Tru1cy - who is willing to test Semaj, but also considered a actual innocent by most.
3) The other person who isn't a wolf, either Stessier or Lassr.
Say I died last night
If Lassr is the Villager, He isn't voting for Tru1cy and Since I must be dead in this scenario, Odds are Stessier dies and the Wolves lose.
If Stessier is the Villager, he has Said he wont be voting Tr1ucy, so Odds are it would boil down to convincing tru1cy that Lassr is evil or the Villagers lose. Stessier wont be voting for tru1cy. So Lassr has 1 shot.
Say I don't die and they keep tru1cy alive.
Stessier or Lassr kill the other one (Of the Stessier/Lassr mix), leaving me, Stessier/Lassr and tru1cy: Clearly I wouldn't be voting for Tru1cy. It would be me vs the other guy who would of course have to go full bore into me.
With the Alignment we have right now. 1 person, and only 1 person (alive anyways) knows who really is the wolf. The two Villagers very much could vote for the other Villager. As such, this alignment gives the wolves the best chance at a V.
So yes, I like my belief Tru1cy dying was the smart play by the wolf. Since this alignment at least leaves the option of one of two Villagers making a mistake, not requiring the one to do it.
Argue what you want about why he didn't have to die. But Not seeing this as the best chance for a wolf victory is either you in denial or trying not to come up too wolfy.
stessier wrote:
And I'm not buying your spin. To set up your "test", you had to suspect the same person each day and find someone else innocent. That necessarily means a) you planned this from the beginning and b) you weren't looking for wolves. Not to mention the fact that long range planning is not the hallmark of Villagers. Funny that it was for you - especially when you are so known for getting yourself lynched.
You think it's me, but it can't be lassr? Interesting.
It could be Lassr. Its why I wont be putting out a vote until we have some chat time, and by we I mean, you me and Lassr. Nah... I had you on my possibly evil list with Tru1cy and Newcastle earlier on. Newcastle was seer and felt off. Tru1cy was on my shit list for voting last day 2 and You were there because you were not on my radar, which is never a good sign. Obviously my list changed... When Newcastle came out and more or less exonerated Tru1cy... At that point I stopped changing it tho. I figured the Seer would die that night, we'd have to deal with grund yesterday and then my only wonder was who would die last night. So I decided to keep going at you and see if it meant any changes in who died. Once tru1cy was cleared by you and grund, I realized it wasn't going to help me at all.
I mean I can re-say it 2 or 3 more times, but I'll be cutting and pasting.
stessier wrote:
It has to be one or the other and after what I found, yes - you are the wolf.
I think someone once said: What, it can't be Lassr?
stessier wrote:
So if you are the wolf and steadfast in your voting of me, lassr wins. If it's lassr as the other villager we should win this game eventually.
I'm not exactly sure what you are saying here, but yes...if Lassr votes for you, we Villagers will win.
heh... yeah I guess I should spend years analyzing every word I write, but I'm not a wolf so I dont pay attention until about 2 posts later. But if you want, feel free to keep harping on it.
stessier wrote:
Feel free to explain the method to your madness there.
What madness are you referring to?
Newcastle claimed Seer and gave us his scans. Grund claimed Seer. Newcastle had already given us his scans so we knew Remus was a wolf.
No we did not. We knew Newcastle said he was a wolf. We also knew someone else had claimed seer.
stessier wrote:Newcastle was only 90% sure Grund was bad. Really? The guy is claiming your Seer role. What possible reason is he not 100% sure he is a wolf at that point? Did he know that lynching Grund would show human and he wanted to leave himself wiggle room? A Seer doesn't equivocate! Why wouldn't you vote for Newcastle?
He was right, grund wasn't a wolf. Oddly, Newcastle knew Grund wasn't a seer, but he wasn't positive Grund was a wolf. You are stretching to find a reason to get him. I didn't vote Newcastle because I wanted to hear what Grund had to say, I wanted to test Remus to prove Newcaslte based on the fact I thought Newcastle seemed more Genuine.
However, I sure as hell was not going to throw the n-1 vote on the guy claiming to be a seer who claimed to have found a wolf before hearing everything out. And thats where I see a problem. Either You wanted the seer dead or didn't want to listen to any more chatting. Neither one seems right. The Villagers should want to hear all the facts before jumping into a lynch, no? Wolves want to get the lynch over and done with with as little information as possible transfering.
stessier wrote:And no, I didn't care if a wolf jumped on. Newcastle was a wolf - those are the ones we are looking to get rid of!
No, he wasnt a wolf and neither was grund. The only person that was a wolf, was the guy Newcaslte said was a wolf. The one you essentially sided with in this. But rather than debate the plausibility of this, you tried to get him killed before anything else could happen.
As for the whole testing the seer over his charges thing.
Lets look at this from my perspective:
Newcastle was the seer. He said so. Grund argued he was the seer. Newcastle said he wasn't positive grund was a wolf, because he hadn't scanned him, but he was fairly certain because Grund was faking seer.
So... The argument is, if you kill the seer now, you in theory haven't just wasted a miss, o no, you have confirmed either Newcaslte was the seer or faking seer. Grund and Newcastle are not on the hook so be it.
Killing Remus netted us a wolf. Why? The seer said so.
So in a game when I am seer and I say: Hey I got a wolf and a Villager! the test is to kill me, not the wolf?
Can you see why I was bamboozled by this concept? Now if Grund had come out with a wolf and a villager, we have real issues. And then Maybe testing newcaslte might be a viable pursuit. But Grund hadn't. He had done no such thing at that point, if anything he seemed to be wavering in his seer claim.
So you feel free to explain to me how this tidbit of information, of which none had occured yet, makes you seem less wolfy.
While were at it, how is it your positive I am the wolf, but have no intention of commenting on Lassr?
Is he not playing? DId a seer clear him? Or are you playing with the knowledge with the crapshoot between us three, your best chance of winning is turning Lassr on me?
You aint seeming to Human right now.