Secret Hitler II - The Revenge of Hitler - Game On

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 4:41 pm

El Guapo wrote:I spoke to Chaosraven just now, and he said that he's going to vote NO on any ticket that does not include El Guapo.

I think your a big fat faker!

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 4:51 pm

RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I spoke to Chaosraven just now, and he said that he's going to vote NO on any ticket that does not include El Guapo.
I think your a big fat faker!

You know, it's really sad how cynical voters are these days.

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 4:53 pm

El Guapo wrote:
RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I spoke to Chaosraven just now, and he said that he's going to vote NO on any ticket that does not include El Guapo.
I think your a big fat faker!
You know, it's really sad how cynical voters are these days.

Are you calling me well rounded?

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 4:56 pm

RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I spoke to Chaosraven just now, and he said that he's going to vote NO on any ticket that does not include El Guapo.
I think your a big fat faker!
You know, it's really sad how cynical voters are these days.
Are you calling me well rounded?

It is also sad how cylindrical voters are these days.

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:04 pm

El Guapo wrote:
RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:I spoke to Chaosraven just now, and he said that he's going to vote NO on any ticket that does not include El Guapo.
I think your a big fat faker!
You know, it's really sad how cynical voters are these days.
Are you calling me well rounded?
It is also sad how cylindrical voters are these days.

That's more like it!!!

stessier · Post by **stessier** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:10 pm

I'm not sure either of you is eligible for office. I've talked to scholars and they agree there are questions. I'm not saying you're not, I'm just saying there are others bringing up serious questions and I think the voters have to decide.

Vorret · Post by **Vorret** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:16 pm

I hope Stessier will work for hours making stats that are completely useless again!

Chaosraven · Post by **Chaosraven** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:16 pm

NO vote sent.

As per Grunds instructions.

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:16 pm

Chaosraven wrote:NO vote sent.

See? What did I tell you, RMC.

Chaosraven · Post by **Chaosraven** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:18 pm

JAWOHL MEIN ELGESTAPO

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:22 pm

I just hope this sends a message to the youth of America that not all politicians are corrupt and self-serving.

stessier · Post by **stessier** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:24 pm

Vorret wrote:I hope Stessier will work for hours making stats that are completely useless again!

So the odds for the first 4 policies never change - which I find interesting. You can map them out and then eliminate stuff based on what is enacted - but the overall scheme doesn't change.

It's also not very useful, but was fun to put together so I didn't mind so much.

Chaosraven · Post by **Chaosraven** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:24 pm

Just the ones in Ohio

bb2112 · Post by **bb2112** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:36 pm

All votes are in and tallied. The ticket for Vorret/RMC was an overwhelming success.

Election Results:
Everyone - Yes

Policies will be handed to the president shortly. At this time there should be no more discussion from Vorret/RMC until a policy is enacted.

RMC will announce the policy to the group once he has made his decision at which point Vorret and RMC may resume discussion.

Vorret · Post by **Vorret** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:40 pm

stessier wrote:
Vorret wrote:I hope Stessier will work for hours making stats that are completely useless again!
So the odds for the first 4 policies never change - which I find interesting. You can map them out and then eliminate stuff based on what is enacted - but the overall scheme doesn't change.

It's also not very useful, but was fun to put together so I didn't mind so much.

I was kidding, by the way, it was pretty cool to see all the scenarios even though in the end the results we're wrong because the original data was... well wrong.

Still, I liked it !

Holman · Post by **Holman** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:56 pm

I still can't believe I drew F-F-F *twice* in that first game.

Never tell me the odds, I guess.

bb2112 · Post by **bb2112** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:58 pm

Vorret wrote:
stessier wrote:
Vorret wrote:I hope Stessier will work for hours making stats that are completely useless again!
So the odds for the first 4 policies never change - which I find interesting. You can map them out and then eliminate stuff based on what is enacted - but the overall scheme doesn't change.

It's also not very useful, but was fun to put together so I didn't mind so much.
I was kidding, by the way, it was pretty cool to see all the scenarios even though in the end the results we're wrong because the original data was... well wrong.

Still, I liked it !

SHHHHHH, as President you not supposed to say anything until RMC has announced the policy that is enacted.

bb2112 · Post by **bb2112** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:58 pm

Everyone stare at RMC.

Vorret · Post by **Vorret** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:01 pm

bb2112 wrote:
Vorret wrote:
stessier wrote:
Vorret wrote:I hope Stessier will work for hours making stats that are completely useless again!
So the odds for the first 4 policies never change - which I find interesting. You can map them out and then eliminate stuff based on what is enacted - but the overall scheme doesn't change.

It's also not very useful, but was fun to put together so I didn't mind so much.
I was kidding, by the way, it was pretty cool to see all the scenarios even though in the end the results we're wrong because the original data was... well wrong.

Still, I liked it !
SHHHHHH, as President you not supposed to say anything until RMC has announced the policy that is enacted.

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:05 pm

I have enacted the following Policy: Fascist

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:06 pm

And I did it because the damn President is a fascist, because he only gave me fascist policies to play!

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:08 pm

Now is a fine time to speak, Vorret.

Holman · Post by **Holman** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:09 pm

So it begins.

bb2112 · Post by **bb2112** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:10 pm

The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:11 pm

bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.

Great, like we would trust his butt.

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:13 pm

Of course now we need to decide whom Vorret should scan. Presumably there's no particular reason for him to scan RMC - if he passed FL then he already knows that RMC is a fascist, and him announcing it via a scan that only he can see doesn't add any information for the village. If Vorret drew FFF and passed FF then I suppose RMC is no better or worse than anyone else as I scan target.

Other than that I guess Vorret can pick anyone he likes.

Scoop20906 · Post by **Scoop20906** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:14 pm

Nice, that removes two players from the pool.

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:15 pm

bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.

Since he PMs the scan target to you, can he lie about who he scanned?

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:17 pm

El Guapo wrote:
bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.
Since he PMs the scan target to you, can he lie about who he scanned?

Man, you are very cynical El Guapo. And that would suck if he could do that, which I assume he can. <sigh>

Scoop20906 · Post by **Scoop20906** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:18 pm

El Guapo wrote:
bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.
Since he PMs the scan target to you, can he lie about who he scanned?

Hmmm, in the face to face game that is impossible so I don't believe it should be possible in the forum. BB should let us know who Vorret has selected when he sends the PM to vorret.

El Guapo · Post by **El Guapo** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:20 pm

RMC wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.
Since he PMs the scan target to you, can he lie about who he scanned?
Man, you are very cynical El Guapo. And that would suck if he could do that, which I assume he can. <sigh>

I assume that in a table top situation the president couldn't really lie about their target, because I am assuming that they take a loyalty card from someone and look at it (or something like that). SO I am guessing that they can't, but I just want to check to see what a fascist Vorret's options could be.

Holman · Post by **Holman** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:21 pm

The Prez cannot lie about the scan target, only the result. At least that's what was decided last game.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:21 pm

El Guapo wrote:
bb2112 wrote:The President, Vorret, gets to conduct a scan of one player and this must be PM'd to me. There may be discussion amongst the group prior to the scan.
Since he PMs the scan target to you, can he lie about who he scanned?

In face-to-face, everyone would know whom the president scans because there's an actual passing of an envelope containing an alignment card.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:22 pm

The last few people wanna say it, too?

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:43 pm

Deck 1: FFFFFFFFFFFLLLLLL
Enactment 1 (F)
1.1: Discards
1.1.a. Discards if FFF: FF
1.1.b. Discards if FFL: FL
1.1.c. Discards if FLL: LL
1.2: Talon
1.2.a. Talon if FFF: FFFFFFFFLLLLLL
1.2.b. Talon if FFL: FFFFFFFFFLLLLL
1.2.c. Talon if FLL: FFFFFFFFFFLLLL

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:44 pm

RMC wrote:And I did it because the damn President is a fascist, because he only gave me fascist policies to play!

Why are you so sure of this?

RMC · Post by **RMC** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:09 pm

Grundbegriff wrote:
RMC wrote:And I did it because the damn President is a fascist, because he only gave me fascist policies to play!
Why are you so sure of this?

Well I am not, but what are the odds that he got 3 Fascist policies.

Chaosraven · Post by **Chaosraven** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:17 pm

stessier does odds and charts and photographs with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one is.

Chaosraven · Post by **Chaosraven** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:18 pm

I would suggest we decide who is going to be chancellor next round and have him scan THAT player.

Either we get a change of decision or start a wall of electorate

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:30 pm

RMC wrote:Well I am not, but what are the odds that he got 3 Fascist policies.

Higher now than at any other time in the game?