Page 1 of 1

Will the makeup of the Bush administration change?

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:57 pm
by Captain Caveman
I remember hearing rumors early in the campaign that Colin Powell would not return if Bush was reelected. Is this still the current line of thinking? Is it pretty certain that Condi, Rummy, and the others will be coming back?

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:07 pm
by Dirt

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:14 pm
by Mr. Sparkle
If they replace Ashcroft with Gulliani, that will definately make me feel better.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:18 pm
by Defiant
OK, my eyes just glazed over at reading that article. So, are they going to televise the game o musical chairs, or will they just tell us the results?

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:19 pm
by Defiant
Mr. Sparkle wrote:If they replace Ashcroft with Gulliani, that will definately make me feel better.
Same here.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:22 pm
by The Preacher
No Cabinet survives two terms without significant change. That article is quite interesting, especially the idea of getting Rudy on board as AG (esp. given his stellar record as NY's back in the 80's).

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:22 pm
by hepcat
i wasn't aware they even WORE makeup!

BADA BING!

thank you, thank you...i'm here all week

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:23 pm
by gellar
I'd LOVE to see Rice gone. I really, really dislike her.

gellar

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:31 pm
by Kadoth Nodens
Nade wrote:
Mr. Sparkle wrote:If they replace Ashcroft with Gulliani, that will definately make me feel better.
Same here.
Me three. He occasionally did some crazy shit* as Mayor of NYC, but the bastard got results.



*like stalking the parking lot of an Ikea in NJ to try and get New Yorkers to pay additional sales tax on furniture! :shock:

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:32 pm
by Mr. Sparkle
Kadoth Nodens wrote:
Nade wrote:
Mr. Sparkle wrote:If they replace Ashcroft with Gulliani, that will definately make me feel better.
Same here.
Me three. He occasionally did some crazy shit* as Mayor of NYC, but the bastard got results.



*like stalking the parking lot of an Ikea in NJ to try and get New Yorkers to pay additional sales tax on furniture! :shock:
And I'm pretty sure he knows there is a Constitution that he is supposed to uphold... whether he personally agrees with it or not.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:33 pm
by The Preacher
Let me add one more thought/question:

Will Cheney last the entire term?

I'm thinking that there is a reasonable chance he will not but that's just a guess.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:37 pm
by noxiousdog
The Preacher wrote:Let me add one more thought/question:

Will Cheney last the entire term?

I'm thinking that there is a reasonable chance he will not but that's just a guess.
In that he would resign, or in that he would die?

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:37 pm
by The Preacher
noxiousdog wrote:
The Preacher wrote:Let me add one more thought/question:

Will Cheney last the entire term?

I'm thinking that there is a reasonable chance he will not but that's just a guess.
In that he would resign, or in that he would die?
I was thinking that he might step down for health reasons.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:42 pm
by Hetz
Ashcroft is going to step down?? Rice gone as well? Woah, things are looking MUCH brighter already!! :D

Things like this will help me get through a second Bush term.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:43 pm
by SuperHiro
I can't fathom Rice stepping down.

No way, she has too many strange and just flat-out weird ties to the Bush family.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:45 pm
by Mr. Sparkle
The Preacher wrote:
noxiousdog wrote:
The Preacher wrote:Let me add one more thought/question:

Will Cheney last the entire term?

I'm thinking that there is a reasonable chance he will not but that's just a guess.
In that he would resign, or in that he would die?
I was thinking that he might step down for health reasons.
What would happen then? Does the president just get to appoint a new Veep? Or does the "line of succession" come into play?

He's technically an elected official... but I guess Governors get to pick replacements for Senators and stuff, and Bush is sort of the Uber-Governor...

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:47 pm
by Defiant
Mr. Sparkle wrote: What would happen then? Does the president just get to appoint a new Veep? Or does the "line of succession" come into play?

He's technically an elected official... but I guess Governors get to pick replacements for Senators and stuff, and Bush is sort of the Uber-Governor...
He picks a replacement that's confirmed by congress. (eg, Ford)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:47 pm
by hepcat
personally, i would hate to see powell disappear from the president's circle. ANY leader, if he wants to be effective, needs someone who'll disagree with him and provide a counterpoint for consideration.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:48 pm
by The Preacher
The resignation of the VP would allow the President to appoint a new one subject to Congressional confirmation.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:50 pm
by malchior
I feel sorry for Powell. He had so much promise and it all just kind of evaporated...his son is a different matter enitrely though.

Also, I'd be happy to see Ashcroft go. I just can't trust him. Guiliani is definitely a good choice.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:52 pm
by malchior
hepcat wrote:personally, i would hate to see powell disappear from the president's circle. ANY leader, if he wants to be effective, needs someone who'll disagree with him and provide a counterpoint for consideration.
He's decisive. The counterpoint is unnecessary. ;)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:02 pm
by hepcat
malchior wrote:
hepcat wrote:personally, i would hate to see powell disappear from the president's circle. ANY leader, if he wants to be effective, needs someone who'll disagree with him and provide a counterpoint for consideration.
He's decisive. The counterpoint is unnecessary. ;)
hmmmm....good point! :D

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:25 pm
by setaside
One of the tinfoil hat rumors floating around is that Cheney will step down at some point due to "health reasons" to give another veep a chance to get entrenched for the fight in '08 against the rumored Hillary candidacy.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:13 pm
by Dramatist
I keep hearing about Hillary running in 08. I can't imagine her being nominated.

In Texas Hillary would get 25% of the vote if she were running unopposed.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:52 pm
by Edmond
She would win the state automatically if running unopposed.

A democrat will not carry Texas anyway. If she's able to tip the EV-fat swing states (OH,FL anyone?), she have a chance.

If an ex-President can run for VP, it would be interesting to see a Clinton/Clinton ticket in '08 :wink:

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:26 pm
by Freezer-TPF-
He's technically an elected official... but I guess Governors get to pick replacements for Senators and stuff, and Bush is sort of the Uber-Governor...
Speaking of the Uber-Governor, too bad this guy is not eligible! ;)

Image

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:32 pm
by Zarathud
Cheney is President G.W. Bush's life insurance policy. Nobody is going to impeach him (if they could) or assassinate him if the alternative is a Dick Cheney Presidency. It's like having a "get out of jail free" card handy.

Rumsfeld was on his way out before 9/11, so he's expendable. If it wasn't politically inexpedient if you claim to have "made no mistakes", I think Rumsfeld would have been fired months ago. I certainly think that if the news media really starts to look hard (hah, silly me...the media has no backbone anymore), there will be a bunch of suppressed stories about how badly Iraq is going will hit the newspapers. Rumsfeld will have to take it for the team.

Ashcroft I think will stick around. His fundamentalist view fits with the administration. And it's not suprising that all of the noise about prosecuting the terrorists and siezing their money has just turned out to be a political ploy with no real convictions to back it up.

If Rumsfeld, Ashcroft and Cheney had real jobs, they'd have been fired at least a year ago for gross incompetence. But since their boss has nine (or more) political lives, they're at least around a bit longer.

I think that Colin Powell can't leave the administration fast enough. The way Colin Powell was backstabbed, undermined and marginalized by the Bush administration is a big part of the reason why I'm so incredibly annoyed (in addition to being a moderate Republican on the social and tax issues). The 2000 Presidency could have been Colin Powell's if he wanted, but instead he played loyal. And paid the price for it -- to the bitter end. What a waste of a good man's integrity.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:51 pm
by Dirt
The country isn't ready for a black President. Powell could pave the way, but the Presidency could never be his.

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:48 am
by Defiant
From Drudge:
Attorney General John Ashcroft 'plans to submit his resignation to Bush in the next several days'...

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:21 am
by Hamsterball_Z
Dirt wrote:The country isn't ready for a black President. Powell could pave the way, but the Presidency could never be his.
Colin Powell is BLACK?!?!? :P

By the way, have you ever heard anyone pronounce his name correctly? It's Col-IN not Col-ON. Bugs me every time I hear it.

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:00 pm
by SuperHiro

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:05 pm
by Jason Donati
Hamsterball_Z wrote:
Dirt wrote:The country isn't ready for a black President. Powell could pave the way, but the Presidency could never be his.
Colin Powell is BLACK?!?!? :P

By the way, have you ever heard anyone pronounce his name correctly? It's Col-IN not Col-ON. Bugs me every time I hear it.
Heh, I've never heard anyone pronounce his name Col-ON. Just thinking about it gives me a small fit of giggles.

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:00 pm
by DD
The Preacher wrote:No Cabinet survives two terms without significant change.
Yep, there tends to be a lot of turnover; look at Clinton's cabinet through his second term, same thing with Reagan. High stress jobs, I would imagine....