widescreen gaming
Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon
-
- Posts: 1323
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:32 am
- Location: A burger joint near you
- Contact:
widescreen gaming
With a decent price in widescreen LCDs available, I was wondering what the consensus is on widescreen PC gaming nowadays? Is it worth spending the extra $40 on the widescreen LCD over the normal LCD even though you lose real estate?
- shaggy
P.S. Yes, I'm trying to get an answer to this question today. Credit Card is in hand and ready to go.
- shaggy
P.S. Yes, I'm trying to get an answer to this question today. Credit Card is in hand and ready to go.
- geezer
- Posts: 7551
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: widescreen gaming
I have a widescreen monitor (hp f2304) and just for PC games couldn't really recommend it, mainly because so few games support the widescreen aspect ratio (i.e. they'll stretch a 4:3 image, but that just kind alooks bad IMHO). For my dollar, a much cooler investment for PC gaming would be a projector for some serious big screen action.shaggydoug wrote:With a decent price in widescreen LCDs available, I was wondering what the consensus is on widescreen PC gaming nowadays? Is it worth spending the extra $40 on the widescreen LCD over the normal LCD even though you lose real estate?
- shaggy
P.S. Yes, I'm trying to get an answer to this question today. Credit Card is in hand and ready to go.
OTOH, I *love* the widescreen for playing Xbox games.
- Turtle
- Posts: 6310
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:09 am
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
A widescreen TV for the Xbox is a good way to go, many more Xb games support it than PC games. That said, some of the newer PC games are starting to support widescreen.
I think Half-Life 2 was one of them, although I may have confused it for some other game. The information was in an interview, so those are always taken with a grain of salt.
It's just not worth it for games, but if you do other things a lot, like watch movies or produce media, or any sort of app that uses a lot of screen space, it's a decent buy. As an artist, apps like photoshop, which needs a lot of screen space, the tools take up less space overall. However, if you're buying for this reason, it's often better to buy a cheap monitor to use as a second monitor entirely.
I think Half-Life 2 was one of them, although I may have confused it for some other game. The information was in an interview, so those are always taken with a grain of salt.
It's just not worth it for games, but if you do other things a lot, like watch movies or produce media, or any sort of app that uses a lot of screen space, it's a decent buy. As an artist, apps like photoshop, which needs a lot of screen space, the tools take up less space overall. However, if you're buying for this reason, it's often better to buy a cheap monitor to use as a second monitor entirely.
- Lee
- Posts: 12034
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:59 am
Widescreen games are becoming more common. The Sims 2 supports it, as well as Kohan2 I believe. (I don't game on my widescreen laptop much so I can't remember exactly what newer games I got that do support it). I just got the Mac version of War! Age of Imperialism and that supports it too.
For motivation and so Jeff V can make me look bad:
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
- Rip
- Posts: 26891
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
- Location: Cajun Country!
- Contact:
Hey, I didn't notice Sims2 supported widescreen. Now I have to install it on my laptop, just to see. Thanks! I love it when I get an excuse for installing a game on my laptop. Now it's technical research 8)Lee wrote:Widescreen games are becoming more common. The Sims 2 supports it, as well as Kohan I believe. (I don't game on my widescreen laptop much so I can't remember exactly what newere games I got that do support it). I just got the Mac version of War! Age of Imperailism and that supports it too.
“A simple democracy is the devil’s own government.”
— Benjamin Rush
--
— Benjamin Rush
--
- Asharak
- Posts: 7907
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:11 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
- ohbalto
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:37 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Contact:
- Kasey Chang
- Posts: 20751
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:20 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
- Meghan
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: The Group W Bench
- Buatha
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 1:16 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX
Plasma TV
I'd play forever on my plasma if it wasn't for burn-in worries. It's awesome to play on a 42 inch screen, but I ususally have to pause it so often to prevent the burn-in of health/armor/ammo/reticule indicators that never change.
- Lee
- Posts: 12034
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:59 am
Why? The widescreen is GREAT for everyday use. I hate using normal sized monitors anymore, I can have multiple windows open without having to minimize things to see everything.Meghan wrote:Dell's "gaming laptop", the Inspiron XPS has a wide aspect screen. I was really surprised when I saw that. I'm toying with buying their 600m just because it's got a normal screen.
More and more games are supporting widescreen, and those that don't will usually run with black lines on the side (KoToR wouldn't for me though for some reason) or you don't notice the stretched image (Warcraft3 and Spellforce). I think widescreen is the way of the future, Macs are already there and a lot of PC laptops are going that way, software supporting it will only become more common.
For motivation and so Jeff V can make me look bad:
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
- The Meal
- Posts: 27993
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
- Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion
Count me among the I heart widescreen gaming crowd. I've not yet run into a game where I can't play it either on a non-distorted resolution (having either a native 16:9 or 4:3 option available with side bars) or where stretching affects my gameplay. On the other hand, having the widescreen options is tremendously useful for having multiple applications open, and I would assume great for DVD playback (but I don't use my notebook for that).
~Neal
~Neal
- Meghan
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: The Group W Bench
hmmm. So games will run in a sort of sideways letterbox? That wouldn't be so bad. I wouldn't want to have graphics stretched oddly but I'm sure a letterbox - type arrangement wouldn't bother me. I've been worried about how it would work on older games and shareware titles like Geneforge. Of course there are so many games coming out this fall that I might never go back to the older games.
I agree that for non-gaming puposes it would be good but realistically there's no point in me buying a laptop that won't do well with games. So if my games - Diablo and Morrowind especially - would do well then I might just get that Sager.
I agree that for non-gaming puposes it would be good but realistically there's no point in me buying a laptop that won't do well with games. So if my games - Diablo and Morrowind especially - would do well then I might just get that Sager.
If I ventured in the slipstream / between the viaducts of your dream
aka merneith, aka kylhwch
aka merneith, aka kylhwch