The Global Warming Thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

malchior wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:34 pm It's almost like people have no idea what their individual impact is and what would be expected of them.
For sure. See also: 2-car families where both are still powered entirely by dino juice.

If you want more depressing NIMBY discussion, see John Oliver's latest piece.

User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 20969
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by coopasonic »

Individuals have little power to have an impact. Change needs to come from the top down and people need to support and go along with it. Unfortunately, for many, the person/organization/body saying it is necessary determines their level of acceptance and compliance. That might still be ok, because the biggest impacts would be to businesses/industries that are the real source of most of the problem.... and also have a whole lot of money with enough leftover to slip into lawmakers PACkets to prevent progress.

Yeah, we're screwed. We will act, but it will be well after the point of no return and likely be insufficient anyway. Enough to make you reconsider the decision to have kids.
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 20969
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by coopasonic »

Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:38 pm
malchior wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:34 pm It's almost like people have no idea what their individual impact is and what would be expected of them.
For sure. See also: 2-car families where both are still powered entirely by dino juice.
If I can't convince my own damn wife to go electric after owning a Tesla for 3 years... then there are all the people that simply can't afford it or wouldn't have access to adequate charging infrastructure in their urban location.
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

coopasonic wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:49 pm
Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:38 pm
malchior wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:34 pm It's almost like people have no idea what their individual impact is and what would be expected of them.
For sure. See also: 2-car families where both are still powered entirely by dino juice.
If I can't convince my own damn wife to go electric after owning a Tesla for 3 years... then there are all the people that simply can't afford it or wouldn't have access to adequate charging infrastructure in their urban location.
I'm not looking to derail this thread, but the studies have been done--something like 90% of 2-car families could make it work right now for at least one of the vehicles, but don't. Largely because they don't know.
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24461
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

Zaxxon wrote:For sure. See also: 2-car families where both are still powered entirely by dino juice.
I’ve got a 3-car family powered entirely by dino juice. Well, the cars are powered by dino juice, my house is mostly powered by sun juice.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24461
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

Zaxxon wrote:I'm not looking to derail this thread, but the studies have been done--something like 90% of 2-car families could make it work right now for at least one of the vehicles, but don't. Largely because they don't know.
Teach me. I currently have three dino-mobiles that I own outright. How can I make it work to transition some/all of those to electric?

I can see the argument that if I was in the market to buy a new car, I could make an EV work. But I don’t see how I could make it work if I wasn’t already in the market to replace a car. And I’m not resistant. I *want* to only own EVs. I *want* to slap power walls on my house to get me off the grid. The money gods make it hard.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70100
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:46 pm I'm not looking to derail this thread, but the studies have been done--something like 90% of 2-car families could make it work right now for at least one of the vehicles, but don't. Largely because they don't know.
Serious question do 90% of 2 car families have the reasonable ability to charge overnight? That would seem like the first and largest hurdle. The second becomes how many of 2 car families with the reasonable ability to charge overnight can reasonably afford a new car? 90% seems very high to me but just because it seems high doesn't mean it is. I would think I have less of a barrier to entry than most two car families but initial outlay, redoing my electric, and the own a car aaS takes it out of range for now. I'm putting off my next car for as long as reasonable, in part, to see if that changes.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43490
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Blackhawk »

We're a two care dinojuice family. Until you can get a used electric for prices that are comparable to a 15+ year-old used used gas guzzler, it'll be that way. I'd switch right now if I could simply do a car-for-car swap, and if I could could be certain that I could pull off charging it at night (I have no idea how - there are no outside outlets and no garage, so we're talking running an extension cord out of our second story apartment here.) As it is, though, it's like trying to buy a $100 meal with a $10 bill. No matter how hard you might wish to, it just can't happen. I could say the same thing about solar. If my landlady were willing to coat the roof of this dilapidated 130-year-old house with solar panels, I'd be cheering. But she won't, so I get my juice from the coal plant down the road.

I envy the people with money and opportunity for the changes that they can make. But not everybody can.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by malchior »

Even if everyone could buy EVs ... you still can't. I ordered a car in July for September. It's mid-November and I'm still burning dino juice. Capacity to switch is getting better but we're not even close to having enough capability to do so for the larger population.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

LordMortis wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:26 pmSerious question do 90% of 2 car families have the reasonable ability to charge overnight? That would seem like the first and largest hurdle. The second becomes how many of 2 car families with the reasonable ability to charge overnight can reasonably afford a new car? 90% seems very high to me but just because it seems high doesn't mean it is. I would think I have less of a barrier to entry than most two car families but initial outlay, redoing my electric, and the own a car aaS takes it out of range for now. I'm putting off my next car for as long as reasonable, in part, to see if that changes.
RunningMn9 wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:23 pm
Zaxxon wrote:I'm not looking to derail this thread, but the studies have been done--something like 90% of 2-car families could make it work right now for at least one of the vehicles, but don't. Largely because they don't know.
Teach me. I currently have three dino-mobiles that I own outright. How can I make it work to transition some/all of those to electric?

I can see the argument that if I was in the market to buy a new car, I could make an EV work. But I don’t see how I could make it work if I wasn’t already in the market to replace a car. And I’m not resistant. I *want* to only own EVs. I *want* to slap power walls on my house to get me off the grid. The money gods make it hard.
The key to what I said is 'powered entirely by dino juice,' and that I'm specifically talking about multi-vehicle households (and in my mind, I meant that literally--households, though admittedly I didn't say that. It matters as folks in houses can overwhelmingly charge at home). I'm not suggesting everyone go out and buy a *new* car (which both of you mentioned). Nor am I suggesting that a Tesla is the way to go for all these folks. The average US driver drives 29 miles/day.

Current used-vehicle market pricing explosion aside, a used 2012 Leaf can be had for $8k--most households with two cars could swap one out for an old Leaf at zero cost, and that would meet the mileage needs of most households [for their second vehicle]. Other options include Volts or other PHEVs where at the least the *bulk of* the miles could be met via electricity. My 90% was likely too high--what I'm actually thinking in my head when I make these comments is the plethora of folks I know personally for whom their vehicle loadout could easily be improved, climate-wise, with little to no disruption in their life. The percentage isn't really the point--90% is admittedly high for electrifying today, but it's definitely not, for example, 10%.

By any reasonable measure, millions and millions and millions of US households could make this change relatively easily, but do not. That's what I'm trying to convey. Consider me chastened on my specific use of 90%, but it's ankle-biting--I screwed up the #, but the point remains valid.

In other words, forget electrifying entirely. How many households have multiple SUVs or pickup trucks? How many of those households actually need that (spoiler: an extremely small percentage)?

Electrifying is certainly not doable for everyone (Blackhawk's commentary hits some really good points, but again they do not apply to most folks, and not to the large cohort to whom my ire is directed). My key point is that for a ginormous number of folks, the vehicle choices they're making are not the most-ideal-for-the-climate choice that would actually work for them. Examples of the US mindset that I'm talking about:
  • But I occasionally take road trips! Great; use the primary car for those trips, or get a long-range EV, or have your 2ndary be a PHEV so that you're knocking out your daily-driver miles on electric but can still take road trips.
  • But my spouse and I both love the raised drive height of an SUV! OK, get over it. One of you can drive a Corolla.
  • But we occasionally need a large vehicle for transporting big items! A) You probably could get by renting as needed and save money relative to owning the giant vehicle. B) Do you need two of them?
malchior wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:54 pm Even if everyone could buy EVs ... you still can't. I ordered a car in July for September. It's mid-November and I'm still burning dino juice. Capacity to switch is getting better but we're not even close to having enough capability to do so for the larger population.
Indeed, but the larger population instead still buy new ICE vehicles. At the very least, for most folks at this point, if your next vehicle can't be an EV, then it shouldn't be a new vehicle. Sending the signal to continue production of ICE vehicles as the bulk of our overall production is a travesty. (And to head off misguided retorts--yes, it's absolutely a societal failure, a governmental failure, and not an individual one for most folks.) Buy used, and put in a reservation on an electric of your choice while you wait. If you need a new pickup, buy used and put a reservation in for an F-150 Lightning.

The issue of which you complain--not enough capacity--is simply a symptom of people not moving to electrify en masse. It's literally just another side-effect of the core problem. It's not a core problem in itself. If the market for new ICE vehicles dried up in favor of massive reservations for EVs, the production would shift. We're here in late 2021 with exactly one manufacturer producing EVs at scale not because the composition of the universe demands it. We're here because the powers that be continue[d] to put the transition off as long as possible, and the market did not object.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by malchior »

Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:22 pm
malchior wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:54 pm Even if everyone could buy EVs ... you still can't. I ordered a car in July for September. It's mid-November and I'm still burning dino juice. Capacity to switch is getting better but we're not even close to having enough capability to do so for the larger population.
Indeed, but the larger population instead still buy new ICE vehicles. At the very least, for most folks at this point, if your next vehicle can't be an EV, then it shouldn't be a new vehicle.
There is a fundamental issue though. The supply of used ICE vehicles is insufficient. We're seeing that right now. New cars are supply constrained and used car prices are extremely high right now. Supply of replacement EVs is insufficient for current needs. I agree with you on the principle but the problem is that is not achievable with our current market mix. Unfortunately, the United States is just not set up to make buying only used or EVs a realistic option. It probably won't be a realistic path this *decade*. Tesla is obviously paving a path but EVs are still an early adopter technology. And that absolutely is a governmental failure. We should have started tackling this 5 or 10 years ago at a minimum but that we don't really have much of a well-trod path forward even now is unforgiveable.
The issue of which you complain--not enough capacity--is simply a symptom of people not moving to electrify en masse. It's literally just another side-effect of the core problem. It's not a core problem in itself. If the market for new ICE vehicles dried up in favor of massive reservations for EVs, the production would shift.
I agree the core problem is not the capacity but it is the most pressing issue - right now. There is obviously significant market pressure just in Tesla's sales trajectory to begin a shift in the mix between EV/ICE but again we're effective still in an early adoption phase here. We are probably years away from widespread adoption. There are still hurdles to huge changes happening right now around different issues (for example competing battery chemistries) that aren't settled.
We're here in late 2021 with exactly one manufacturer producing EVs at scale not because the composition of the universe demands it. We're here because the powers that be continue[d] to put the transition off as long as possible, and the market did not object.
There is this and the continuation of policies that allowed the oil and gas sector to cause a MASSIVE amount of damage and not held to any account. Heck they are still being subsidized and rewarded for their bad behavior.

The good news is that if we do get a lot of EV/solar/wind incentives in the otherwise flawed BBB bill. It's not enough. It's not nearly enough but anything that changes the trajectory can't be sneezed at anymore.
Last edited by malchior on Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

Agree. But I've been here watching this closely for 8+ years now. Didn't have to be this way. It's downright embarrassing that we are where we are.
User avatar
stessier
Posts: 29816
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: SC

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by stessier »

Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:46 pm Agree. But I've been here watching this closely for 8+ years now. Didn't have to be this way. It's downright embarrassing that we are where we are.
Are we still talking about EVs? Viruses? Global Warming? I'm lost.
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running____2014: 1300.55 miles____2015: 2036.13 miles____2016: 1012.75 miles____2017: 1105.82 miles____2018: 1318.91 miles__2019: 2000.00 miles
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

stessier wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:13 pm
Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:46 pm Agree. But I've been here watching this closely for 8+ years now. Didn't have to be this way. It's downright embarrassing that we are where we are.
Are we still talking about EVs? Viruses? Global Warming? I'm lost.
Global viruses that warm EVs, I think.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43490
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Blackhawk »

Humanity. It's a random modifier on every roll.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82085
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

Blackhawk wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:14 pm Humanity. It's a random modifier on every roll.
And we ain't rolling 3d6 every time. Maybe 3d4.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43490
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Blackhawk »

Isgrimnur wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:45 pm
Blackhawk wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:14 pm Humanity. It's a random modifier on every roll.
And we ain't rolling 3d6 every time. Maybe 3d4.
The real problem is that we're rolling 3d6 with a +/- 1d100 modifier.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

Blackhawk wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:13 pm
Isgrimnur wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:45 pm
Blackhawk wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:14 pm Humanity. It's a random modifier on every roll.
And we ain't rolling 3d6 every time. Maybe 3d4.
The real problem is that we're rolling 3d6 with a +/- 1d100 modifier.
And a DM who's... a firecracker.
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24461
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

If the plan involves me buying a used Leaf, there’s a flaw in your plan. :)

I get where you are coming from though, and my next vehicle will almost certainly be an EV or plug-in hybrid. But that’s years away (two kids in college).
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43490
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Blackhawk »

To be honest, in about six months my youngest graduates from college, and my average driving is going to drop from ~400 miles/week to maybe ~60. That'll be enough of a reduction that I won't feel too terrible about the gas guzzler.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43688
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Kraken »

Likewise: When we eventually have to replace Wife's car, it will most likely be an EV. I hope that day is still 4-5 years off. Her Honda is 11 years old but only has 70k miles on it, and she's still fond of it. My Mazdarati is 4 years old and has 8,000 miles. It's unlikely that I'll ever replace it. When I get too old and stiff to climb in and out of the cockpit, we'll go down to sharing one practical (electric) car.

(edit because who even knows how punctuation works?)
User avatar
Formix
Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:48 am

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Formix »

RunningMn9 wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:23 pm
Zaxxon wrote:I'm not looking to derail this thread, but the studies have been done--something like 90% of 2-car families could make it work right now for at least one of the vehicles, but don't. Largely because they don't know.
Teach me. I currently have three dino-mobiles that I own outright. How can I make it work to transition some/all of those to electric?

I can see the argument that if I was in the market to buy a new car, I could make an EV work. But I don’t see how I could make it work if I wasn’t already in the market to replace a car. And I’m not resistant. I *want* to only own EVs. I *want* to slap power walls on my house to get me off the grid. The money gods make it hard.
Might I suggest a pre-order for an Aptera? Of all of the subsidies go through, you're looking at something like $15-20K for a new car with minimal maintenance, and potentially no charging at all for 95% of your driving. Only a 2-seater, true, but for most of us, we could get away with swapping out at least one of our dino-guzzlers for that.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

Blackhawk wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:43 pm To be honest, in about six months my youngest graduates from college, and my average driving is going to drop from ~400 miles/week to maybe ~60. That'll be enough of a reduction that I won't feel too terrible about the gas guzzler.
Kraken wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:46 pm Likewise: When we eventually have to replace Wife's car, it will most likely be an EV. I hope that day is still 4-5 years off. Her Honda is 11 years old but only has 70k miles on it, and she's still fond of it. My Mazdarati is 4 years old and has 8,000 miles. It's unlikely that I'll ever replace it. When I get too old and stiff to climb in and out of the cockpit, we'll go down to sharing one practical (electric) car.

(edit because who even knows how punctuation works?)
My rah-rah stance on EVs aside, these solutions are of course extremely important, too. Fewer miles are always a positive, and dropping an ICE vehicle with no replacement is awesome. I just generally don't bring it up because if you think people will attack inability to charge at home, wait until you see the reactions to 'just drive less.' Something that's both very difficult for a lot of folks due to the nature of America's geographic setup (and routinely terrible non-car layout) and also anathema to many Americans.
RunningMn9 wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:09 pm If the plan involves me buying a used Leaf, there’s a flaw in your plan. :)
No, it's a flaw in the average American's thinking. Hello, average American! ;) I'm kidding, kind of. I don't know your circumstances, but 'actually need 3 dino-guzzlers as a middle/upper-middle class American with a home and garage' is a very specific use case. It's highly likely that most folks in your case are prime candidates for a cheapo used EV or PHEV for that 2nd or 3rd vehicle. Again, I don't know your specifics--entirely possible you do need all 3 of those, and it's not practically or financially feasible to swap any of the 3 out for a PHEV/BEV--especially if those two kids in college are commuting from your house. It's not so likely in the general case of homeowning 3-vehicle households, though.
I get where you are coming from though, and my next vehicle will almost certainly be an EV or plug-in hybrid. But that’s years away (two kids in college).
:wub:
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24461
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

Zaxxon wrote:No, it's a flaw in the average American's thinking. Hello, average American! ;) I'm kidding, kind of. I don't know your circumstances, but 'actually need 3 dino-guzzlers as a middle/upper-middle class American with a home and garage' is a very specific use case. It's highly likely that most folks in your case are prime candidates for a cheapo used EV or PHEV for that 2nd or 3rd vehicle. Again, I don't know your specifics--entirely possible you do need all 3 of those, and it's not practically or financially feasible to swap any of the 3 out for a PHEV/BEV--especially if those two kids in college are commuting from your house. It's not so likely in the general case of homeowning 3-vehicle households, though.
I’m very close to needing four cars. Two kids that both commute to college on very different schedules (so that’s two cars), and right now my wife and I share the Camaro because we are both working from home most of the time. As soon as Army decides to stop letting me do that, we will have a transportation problem.

As for the used Leaf, I’m a shade under 6’ 7”. I’m not folding myself into a Leaf. :)

To some people, a car is more than a practical conveyance. A used Leaf will not appeal to them, ever.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 20969
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by coopasonic »

RunningMn9 wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:51 pm To some people, a car is more than a practical conveyance. A used Leaf will not appeal to them, ever.
I'd suggest most of those people are willing to spend a lot more for a car which opens up a lot more interesting options.
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

Yeah, the used Leaf piece is there for those who want to electrify without spending anything significant. If you thought I, of all people, was suggesting that's the ideal way to go...

Image
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4312
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by gilraen »

My 2002 Hyundai Sonata is at 200k miles, and the biggest distance I ever drive is when I go skiing 3-5 times a year. Is an EV reliable enough for mountain driving at elevation above 10000'? I have no idea, but that's the main consideration. We have 3 vehicles in the household but that does not equal 3 vehicles on the road. We help the climate change problem by driving very little overall, since we both work from home...
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

gilraen wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:40 am My 2002 Hyundai Sonata is at 200k miles, and the biggest distance I ever drive is when I go skiing 3-5 times a year. Is an EV reliable enough for mountain driving at elevation above 10000'? I have no idea, but that's the main consideration. We have 3 vehicles in the household but that does not equal 3 vehicles on the road. We help the climate change problem by driving very little overall, since we both work from home...
They're more reliable than ICE at elevation--no loss of power at lower O2 levels, and much more efficient going downhill. It's super-fun accelerating up I-70 relative to ICE vehicles.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 70100
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by LordMortis »

Elevation shouldn't be a problem for electricity. Cold is more a question for me but there are a growing number for BEVs in our cold climate which bodes well for my concerns. We'll see how many are sitting out come winter time. They weren't common place until this year, now I should be able to spot them easily enough.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

LordMortis wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:48 am Elevation shouldn't be a problem for electricity. Cold is more a question for me but there are a growing number for BEVs in our cold climate which bodes well for my concerns. We'll see how many are sitting out come winter time. They weren't common place until this year, now I should be able to spot them easily enough.
Range loss in very cold weather is a thing (~30% on my non-heat-pump Teslas, less on newer ones). Other than that, they're fine. If you're in a cold-weather climate, you should just be ensuring that the EV you have is rated for more than your actual needs, or that you can have it plugged in to precondition most of the time.
User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 20969
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by coopasonic »

Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:43 am
gilraen wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:40 am My 2002 Hyundai Sonata is at 200k miles, and the biggest distance I ever drive is when I go skiing 3-5 times a year. Is an EV reliable enough for mountain driving at elevation above 10000'? I have no idea, but that's the main consideration. We have 3 vehicles in the household but that does not equal 3 vehicles on the road. We help the climate change problem by driving very little overall, since we both work from home...
They're more reliable than ICE at elevation--no loss of power at lower O2 levels, and much more efficient going downhill. It's super-fun accelerating up I-70 relative to ICE vehicles.
and as I learned back in Feb, my Model 3 is WAYYYYYY better on snow than my Infinitis were (using similar all season tires).
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

Yeah, also true. The simplest way I can put it is that EVs have 2 big potential drawbacks: entry cost and range. If neither of those is a show-stopper for you, just consider that a BEV will be superior for you in every other way. I view it similarly to the flip phone to smartphone transition: everyone worried about far-inferior battery life, increased cost, and the lack of keyboards. The first two are definitely true, and the third was a non-issue for most. Even so, today, who buys an old-school flip phone?

The 2017 Leaf I had, relative to today's Teslas, Mach-Es, Bolts, etc, was an absolute piece of trash. Yet it was awesome. Ran circles around the sport-trim Camry V6 we came from, and we chose it over the Volvo whenever we didn't need the range or size of the Volvo. That's rather absurd, yet it was not a close call on driving fun.

Consider that you never have to scrape snow off your car again. Never have to enter a car that's too cold or too hot. Have far-improved traction (relative to most ICE vehicles, but not all). The car goes where you tell it to when you tell it to, unlike every single ICE. Far-improved efficiency, no need to go to the gas station (if you can charge at home it's a huge advantage; if you can't then obviously you still don't have to get gas but it can be a PITA). Much more control over fuel prices since electricity is highly regulated. Much lower maintenance cost and frequency.

And now, despite my initial comment about not derailing, I think we derailed as far as is possible.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by malchior »

Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:29 pm
LordMortis wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:48 am Elevation shouldn't be a problem for electricity. Cold is more a question for me but there are a growing number for BEVs in our cold climate which bodes well for my concerns. We'll see how many are sitting out come winter time. They weren't common place until this year, now I should be able to spot them easily enough.
Range loss in very cold weather is a thing (~30% on my non-heat-pump Teslas, less on newer ones). Other than that, they're fine. If you're in a cold-weather climate, you should just be ensuring that the EV you have is rated for more than your actual needs, or that you can have it plugged in to precondition most of the time.
I watched about 5 hours of video about the Tesla heat pump-based thermal management system and the octovalve system prior to ordering. It is crazy impressive. It was one of the factors that drove me to put in an order for one. I'm not too hung up on the range impact but if they put that much effort into turning their car into a Fremen stillsuit for heat? I mean when you leave the car it pulls the left over cabin heat into the battery. For real! It just showed me that they're willing to improve wherever they can...mechanically and technologically speaking.
User avatar
stessier
Posts: 29816
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: SC

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by stessier »

Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:17 pm Even so, today, who buys an old-school flip phone?
My brother. He's a bit crazy though. Even my kids pick on him for "using a brick." His old one was outdated when 3G shut down and his carrier sent him another flip phone. I don't think he'll ever get to a smart phone.
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running____2014: 1300.55 miles____2015: 2036.13 miles____2016: 1012.75 miles____2017: 1105.82 miles____2018: 1318.91 miles__2019: 2000.00 miles
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

stessier wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:38 pm
Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:17 pm Even so, today, who buys an old-school flip phone?
My brother. He's a bit crazy though. Even my kids pick on him for "using a brick." His old one was outdated when 3G shut down and his carrier sent him another flip phone. I don't think he'll ever get to a smart phone.
There are Jeff Vs in every area of life. :)
User avatar
Little Raven
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Little Raven »

Friedman weighs in.
I spent last week talking to all sorts of people gathered for the U.N. climate summit in Glasgow, and it left me with profoundly mixed emotions.

Having been to most of the climate summits since Bali in 2007, I can tell you this one had a very different feel. I was awed by the energy of all the youth on the streets demanding that we rise to the challenge of global warming and by some of the amazing new technological and market fixes being proposed by innovators and investors. This was not the old days — everyone waiting for the deals cut by the priesthood of climate diplomats huddled behind closed doors. This was the many talking to the many — and I am buoyed by that.

But for me, there was one question that hovered over every promise coming out of this summit: When you see how hard it’s been for governments to get their citizens to just put on a mask in stores, or to get vaccinated, to protect themselves, their neighbors and their grandparents from being harmed or killed by Covid-19, how in the world are we going to get big majorities to work together globally and make the lifestyle sacrifices needed to dampen the increasingly destructive effects of global warming — for which there are treatments but no vaccine? That’s magical thinking, and it demands a realistic response.

...

Read this from CNBC’s website on Nov. 3 and weep: “The global supply of renewables will grow by 35 gigawatts from 2021 to 2022, but global power demand growth will go up by 100 gigawatts over the same period. … Countries will have to tap traditional fuel sources to meet the rest of the demand. … That shortfall will only widen as economies reopen and travel resumes,” which will spark “sharp rises in prices for natural gas, coal and electricity.”

We need to stop deluding ourselves that we can have it all — that we can do foolish things like close down nuclear plants in Germany that provided massive amounts of clean energy, just to show how green we are, and then ignore the fact that without sufficient renewables in place, Germany is now back to burning more of the dirtiest coal. This moral preening is really counterproductive.

Energy is a scale problem. It requires a TRANSITION, and that means a transition from the dirtiest fossil fuels to cleaner fuels — like natural gas or nuclear — to wind and solar and, eventually, sources that don’t today even exist. Those who propose ignoring that transition risk producing a huge backlash against the whole green movement this winter if people can’t heat their homes or run their factories.
/. "She climbed backwards out her
\/ window into Outside Over There."
User avatar
TheMix
Posts: 10903
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Broomfield, Colorado

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by TheMix »

Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:43 am
gilraen wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:40 am My 2002 Hyundai Sonata is at 200k miles, and the biggest distance I ever drive is when I go skiing 3-5 times a year. Is an EV reliable enough for mountain driving at elevation above 10000'? I have no idea, but that's the main consideration. We have 3 vehicles in the household but that does not equal 3 vehicles on the road. We help the climate change problem by driving very little overall, since we both work from home...
They're more reliable than ICE at elevation--no loss of power at lower O2 levels, and much more efficient going downhill. It's super-fun accelerating up I-70 relative to ICE vehicles.
We really have to get you up to our neck of the woods. I need a "salesman" (that's knowledgeable) to talk to her about EVs. Plus a test drive might be nice. And I think I promised to let you take a VR stroll.

Black Lives Matter

Isgrimnur - Facebook makes you hate your friends and family. LinkedIn makes you hate you co-workers. NextDoor makes you hate your neighbors.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

TheMix wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:43 pm
Zaxxon wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:43 am
gilraen wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 11:40 am My 2002 Hyundai Sonata is at 200k miles, and the biggest distance I ever drive is when I go skiing 3-5 times a year. Is an EV reliable enough for mountain driving at elevation above 10000'? I have no idea, but that's the main consideration. We have 3 vehicles in the household but that does not equal 3 vehicles on the road. We help the climate change problem by driving very little overall, since we both work from home...
They're more reliable than ICE at elevation--no loss of power at lower O2 levels, and much more efficient going downhill. It's super-fun accelerating up I-70 relative to ICE vehicles.
We really have to get you up to our neck of the woods. I need a "salesman" (that's knowledgeable) to talk to her about EVs. Plus a test drive might be nice. And I think I promised to let you take a VR stroll.
You're welcome to come test drive the 3 whenever you'd like.

Image
User avatar
pr0ner
Posts: 17424
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA
Contact:

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by pr0ner »

Little Raven wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:54 pm Friedman weighs in.
I never have understood the pivot away from nuclear energy.
Hodor.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Global Warming Thread

Post by malchior »

pr0ner wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 8:29 pm
Little Raven wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:54 pm Friedman weighs in.
I never have understood the pivot away from nuclear energy.
It's the economics. Nuclear energy has a very poor ROI and higher *direct* risk than nearly all the alternatives. Coal and natural gas have between 2 to 4 times the return per dollar and much of the risk is externalized. Capital also got burned last decade on new nuclear projects and has no interest investing in nuclear. Especially after Fukushima and the huge failure of the SCE&G nuclear project. Even if we did a carbon tax it'd be hard to get the ROI to a place to overcome the risks the market sees in nuclear projects. Government policy probably can't even correct for this one.
Last edited by malchior on Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply