I'm saying it is a free country and a person has the right to not be attacked by someone they have not attacked. Whether they were following them or not and furthermore that someone who is physically attacked should be able to defend themselves.Reemul wrote:Following him was premeditated seeing as he was told to stop or did he follow him accidentally!!Rip wrote:Reemul wrote:It still seems so pointless, if he hadn't followed him none of this would have happened. It almost seems like he was trying to get a rise out of the person so he had an excuse to kill him. Then he could go round be the big I am having shot someone.
The whole thing is just so wrong on so many levels, guilty, not guilty etc 1 person is dead, 1 family have lost a son and nothing good can come of the whole thing yet it seems we never learn anything from it.
Talk about a stretch.
So I guess you are upset they didn't charge him with Murder I seeing how you apparently think it was premeditated?
As to a stretch, thats the whole problem with your society and violence, everything is an accident, a stretch, won't happen can't happen, we need to be safe blah blah. You go round killing each other like it's an ok thing to do, heck he looked at me funny in my house, he seemed dangerous, i need 15 guns in case we get invaded and so on yet all you conitue to do is kill each other.
For a civilized society you sure kill a lot of each other that maybe that's why the rest of the world looks at you with a sense of distaste and dislike.
Back to the point, are you saying that if he didn't follow him he would still have been killed by him, exactly and that is no stretch.
Attacking someone who has not broken the law or poses a specific identifiable physical threat can result in your death without any legal recourse against the person responsible for your death. Something I have no problem with.