[TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Everything else!

Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k

Post Reply
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

I'm with you on pretty much everything you just wrote.

But at least Discovery had a great season that captured the soul of Star Trek (exploration, the needs of the many outweighing Spock, the importance of trying to find common ground with your enemies, etc.). I really think it's become a worthy successor to TOS and TNG.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Sudy
Posts: 8279
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:11 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Sudy »

El Guapo wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:57 am ugh, I hated Picard episode 3.
Spoiler:
YMMV but I've never loved the "Star Trek characters time travel back to the present day" stories. It's inevitably a bunch of dumb jokes + characters being out of place + high minded and vague moralizing, plus it feels more like fan fiction than actual Star Trek. And here traveling back to 2024 United States as a pivot about having a fascist future or not, PLUS including an illegal immigration subplot, I mean... I generally support the politics here, but god damn is this all heavy handed. At this point I wouldn't be shocked if the pivotal timeline event here turns out to be whether Trump gets elected again or not.

Like, can we have some exploration of space at some point?
We'll see, but I'm not totally sure that I'll finish the season at this point.
Spoiler:
That's funny, because I love it. I realize in part it's just a taste thing. But I really have no problem with an updated The Voyage Home. I do absolutely agree it's heavy handed, and there's some cringeworthy dialogue/moralizing. But I still find it more palatable than, say, Discovery's feelings-fests.

I would be happier if e.g. the immigration stuff was done with a lighter touch as I'm concerned it becomes too polarizing otherwise. On the other hand, some of this stuff has become so overt in the real world that perhaps it doesn't matter.

We seem to have (at least) two very different camps of fans here. Discovery is honestly the show I'm having trouble finishing this season. I'm trying to have an open mind and I'm happy hepcat et al. are enjoying it, but it's nowhere near classic Trek for me.

I saw a commercial on late night TV. It said, "Forget everything you know about slipcovers." So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were. -- Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

Sudy wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:49 pm
Spoiler:
But I still find it more palatable than, say, Discovery's feelings-fests.

I would be happier if e.g. the immigration stuff was done with a lighter touch as I'm concerned it becomes too polarizing otherwise. On the other hand, some of this stuff has become so overt in the real world that perhaps it doesn't matter.

We seem to have (at least) two very different camps of fans here. Discovery is honestly the show I'm having trouble finishing this season. I'm trying to have an open mind and I'm happy hepcat et al. are enjoying it, but it's nowhere near classic Trek for me.
Yeah, we definitely are polar opposites as I completely disagree with pretty much everything you wrote.

What surprised me was your complaint that Discovery was too much of a “feelings fest” after initially complaining it was too much of an action show earlier. Which is funny as Picard has turned into an Abram’s like Star Trek, while Discovery has embraced classic Trek in theme and execution.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Sudy
Posts: 8279
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:11 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Sudy »

Yes, action and feelings. The two components of each Discovery episode lol. I evidently need to stop watching these shows while high on grass... perhaps I'm not getting an accurate read.

Unfortunately, I think both of these shows are firmly implanted in the post-Abrams-verse in terms of execution, though occasionally they surprise me.

I saw a commercial on late night TV. It said, "Forget everything you know about slipcovers." So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were. -- Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

Sudy wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:24 pm Yes, action and feelings. The two components of each Discovery episode lol.
Well, I’m heartened to read you now agree that Discovery is more like classic Trek, at least. :lol:
He won. Period.
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12687
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Rumpy »

Sudy wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:24 pm Unfortunately, I think both of these shows are firmly implanted in the post-Abrams-verse in terms of execution, though occasionally they surprise me.
Execution is a big one for me, and I'm still not convinced the cinematic format is the best fit for a Trek series. That's why I'm looking forward to Strange New Worlds. At the very least, they'll be able to explore different themes and explore characters from different angles.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

Been watching videos all day. Species 10-C is amazing! Finally a species that isn't a human with a headbone somewhere. A Class 2 extra galactic civilization and they pulled it off so well. I should watch this now. Just have YT clips to piece it all together. Carl Sagan would be proud.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
Sudy
Posts: 8279
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:11 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Sudy »

Picard S02E04:
Spoiler:
- Going back to episode 3 for a second, one thing that did seem insincere was Raffi's relationship with Elnor. As Red Letter Media pointed out, all the development seemed to happen off screen, between seasons? I do recall from season one that Raffi is estranged from her own son I believe, so the underlying motivation makes sense.
- That was really Kirk Thatcher on the bus in the Star Trek IV throwback scene! I thought it was kind of silly, but it was also great.
- I'm surprised they chose to recast younger Guinan. I wish they'd have used Goldberg in both time periods and just ignored her real-world aging. Also, that a version of 10 Forward existed some 300 years before TNG is just stupid. You're telling me Guinan sought a position on the Enterprise D just so she could preserve the name of her bar?
- The borg queen is a little smarmy for me. Parts of the storyline are interesting, but it's a little silly.

I'm still enjoying it. Yeah, the social messages aren't the least bit nuanced, but I can excuse it. This isn't classic Trek, but I find it fun.

I saw a commercial on late night TV. It said, "Forget everything you know about slipcovers." So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were. -- Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

Way too heavy handed and simplistic on the political messaging. Also find it lazy that the writers returned to the Guinan in the past device.

This is basically just one giant Abram’s level Stat Trek show at this point. It can be fun, but if you want something closer to classic Trek, Discovery is much, much better.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43844
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Blackhawk »

Image
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

For that time period, that was positively ground breaking....and much more subtle than what Picard is doing right now, believe it or not.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43844
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Blackhawk »

I haven't caught up on the current season. It's a family show, and we're currently finishing up Lost in Space. But as long as it isn't as bad as Supergirl, which had all the nuance of an afterschool special.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

I mean, Supergirl IS a CW show. What were you expecting? :twisted:
He won. Period.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43844
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Blackhawk »

hepcat wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:03 pm I mean, Supergirl IS a CW show. What were you expecting? :twisted:
Yes. Yes it was. They all get like that to some degree, but Supergirl was easily the worst of them. I almost expected her to swoop down before the credits and tell everybody what the lesson of the day was. Batwoman is getting almost as bad sometimes. But Black Lightning managed to do it without the heavy handedness, and Superman & Lois has so far, too.

Any, I digress. Back to the Star Trek. Has Picard done space hippies yet? Picard is such a Herbert.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

I just like watching Spock’s jam session on that episode.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Sudy
Posts: 8279
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:11 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Sudy »

Picard S02E05:
Spoiler:
- There's a little cool stuff going on, and a lot of stuff I'm really not engaged by. I expected to get here eventually, though perhaps not for a couple more episodes. The reveals just aren't that interesting. I feel like they could be doing better things with the premise and plot.
- I don't know whether the TOS/supervisor callback is cool or forced since I barely remember that TOS episode. This is one of the reasons it might be problematic.
- As someone with depression and anxiety disorders, I appreciate the plot with Picard's ancestor. But in the real world, don't those with a tendency toward mental illness get screened out of space programs for safety reasons? As well, a mission to Europa? In... what year is it, 2024? This obviously isn't a true parallel timeline. I'm presuming it jibes with current Trek history, though.
- It's kind of annoying for everyone in Picard's family tree to be stupendous. Even though there are families like this in reality, it's still annoying.
- I don't understand Qs motivation at all. And we're not supposed to yet... I get it. But I'm kind of afraid that when it is revealed, it's going to be... stupid.
- I still don't much care for Agnes or the Borg queen. But... the storyline's kind of cool.
- Nice to see Brent Spiner again, even if it's to play yet another arrogant asshole Soong ancestor. I'll take what I can get. I kind of hate Isa Briones being rolled into the Soong legacy (but have nothing against the actress). It just feels like it plays into the insufferable need for everything to be connected.
- I didn't hate the Rios/ICE subplot, but is that it? Like, it didn't really go on to say anything else or do anything other than take up time. It just feels so sloppy. Couldn't you write better?

I saw a commercial on late night TV. It said, "Forget everything you know about slipcovers." So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were. -- Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12687
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Rumpy »

Blackhawk wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:18 pm
hepcat wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:03 pm I mean, Supergirl IS a CW show. What were you expecting? :twisted:
Yes. Yes it was. They all get like that to some degree, but Supergirl was easily the worst of them. I almost expected her to swoop down before the credits and tell everybody what the lesson of the day was. Batwoman is getting almost as bad sometimes. But Black Lightning managed to do it without the heavy handedness, and Superman & Lois has so far, too.

Frankly, Supergirl was much better in its first few seasons when it was on CBS before it moved to the CW. Once it went to the CW, it became heavy handed.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

On the 5th of this month, Paramount + is premiering the new Director’s edition of Star Trek the Motion Picture. Sounds like a lot of work went into it.. I’ll definitely be watching. As a kid, it was an event for my friends and I.
Spoiler:
He won. Period.
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12687
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Rumpy »

Sudy wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 12:52 am Picard S02E04:
Spoiler:
- Going back to episode 3 for a second, one thing that did seem insincere was Raffi's relationship with Elnor. As Red Letter Media pointed out, all the development seemed to happen off screen, between seasons? I do recall from season one that Raffi is estranged from her own son I believe, so the underlying motivation makes sense.
- That was really Kirk Thatcher on the bus in the Star Trek IV throwback scene! I thought it was kind of silly, but it was also great.
- I'm surprised they chose to recast younger Guinan. I wish they'd have used Goldberg in both time periods and just ignored her real-world aging. Also, that a version of 10 Forward existed some 300 years before TNG is just stupid. You're telling me Guinan sought a position on the Enterprise D just so she could preserve the name of her bar?
- The borg queen is a little smarmy for me. Parts of the storyline are interesting, but it's a little silly.

I'm still enjoying it. Yeah, the social messages aren't the least bit nuanced, but I can excuse it. This isn't classic Trek, but I find it fun.

I'm a little late to this one, but I loved it. Lots of humor, and overall quite a fun episode. It's not perfect, no, but I found it quite endearing. I like that there are lighthearted moments throughout.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

hepcat wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 9:22 pm On the 5th of this month, Paramount + is premiering the new Director’s edition of Star Trek the Motion Picture. Sounds like a lot of work went into it.. I’ll definitely be watching. As a kid, it was an event for my friends and I.
Spoiler:
Anything would be an improvement. Ive always disliked it. Its also always last on my ranking of ST movies. BUT I saw this after seeing all the others. I might not have seen ST6 yet. But this was a rental from a video store as I missed the original theater release. So theres no way it could hold up to the others. Its was weird, boring, LOoooong which made it seem even more boring. In fact on rental I hated it. Was glad to return it.

But I think if Id looked at it as one long episode and ignored the movies Id seen past it I think I would have enjoyed it. At least more than I did. And at that time I was HUGE HUGE trekkie.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

Star Trek Picard on who will be in the cast this season.....
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

Christ…Picard just gets worse and worse
Spoiler:
A frigging music video sequence? What’s next, a montage of Picard training to beat those bully rich kid skiers at the lodge?

And let’s not get started on taking the guy with an android body to a 21st century doctor.

But hey, they got a chance this season to force an actress from season 1 back into the story…as awkward at that is.
:roll:

I think the worst thing about it though is that it doesn’t even feel like a Star Trek show at this point.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

Thought the Picard crowd might enjoy this. I DO NOT KNOW if there are spoilers in this so beware. Most likely are.

--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
rittchard
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by rittchard »

hepcat wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:56 pm
I think the worst thing about it though is that it doesn’t even feel like a Star Trek show at this point.
Who cares! It’s all about Season 3 now :mrgreen:
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12687
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Rumpy »

Regarding episode 6, just getting to this now. And yikes, I agree it didn't feel much like Trek.
Spoiler:
- I suspect the reason for doing these time travel episodes are for reduced budgets. They don't have to create fancy space scenes with lots of special effects. They can just use ordinary looking sets possibly from other shows. That party for instance could have easily been from any other show.
- The way they edited this episode was super confusing with the quick cuts to Picard down on the ground then back at the party, then back on the ground.
- And when Picard is in the hospital, it felt like they were proposing to do almost the same exact scenario they'd done earlier in the season with the Borg Queen. That disappoints me. How can you use the same trope twice within a single season?
-And to add to that, I thought Picard being transferred to an Android body in the first season was supposed to fix whatever's now going on with his heart. Super confused.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

Enlarge Image
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63725
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Daehawk »

--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

Finally forced myself to watch the last couple episodes of Picard.

I wish they’d just put this (and us) out of our misery and cancel season 3. This is Zack Snyder’s version of Star Trek.
He won. Period.
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 12687
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by Rumpy »

Yeah, I have to admit, I enjoyed myself with the first half of the season, but it's as if they're trying their hardest to not be Star Trek. I have to wonder if it's a budgetary reason in shooting in LA streets and all. But all these situations they find themselves are getting increasingly non-trek territory. And the whole Jurari/Borg Queen storyline feels so tacked on. It's as if the producers said, "We've got to have some hint of Star Trek in there. How about the Borg Queen taking control of Jurati. " She's the weakest link. Just an awful character that stands around most of the time doing nothing. The Jurati/Borg Queen storyline just ends up being a little too odd as a result. The feeling I get from Picard, and this started way back in Season 1, but is feeling reinforced in Season 2, is that it's a massive missed opportunity of a series that could explore the consequences from both the events of Nemesis and the 2009 movie/Romulus destruction seeing as we hadn't seen Picard or the 24th century since those events. But aside from a few throwaway lines, it doesn't seem interested in any intellectual exploration. It just seems interested in a bulletpoint list of things to tick off, and it's incredibly shallow. The most Trek-like thing this season was the brief glimpse of the new Starship in the first episode. And they use the same tired trope of visiting someone's mind twice this season. It's enough to make me wonder what the point of it all is, and not in a good way.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

It's just so bleak and hopeless. This isn't Star Trek anymore. It's a depressing examination of how awful people are. That is decidedly anti-Star Trek.
He won. Period.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41312
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by El Guapo »

That essentially the whole season is set in 2024 United States is certainly part of what I dislike about the season, since the whole season doesn't have any, you know, Stars, and fairly minimal Trekking. But honestly the main thing that I hate about it is that the writing is just so stupid. Sure, Jurati has to do a musical number to save the crew, but oh wait that singing gave the secret Borg Queen inside her head just the opportunity to take over her mind! But the Borg Queen has to randomly shatter some restaurant's window in order to keep control! Oh, and to gain the ability to assimilate the Borg Queen has to eat f'ing car batteries that would annihilate Jurati's body but somehow doesn't.

I mean...sure, that all might as well happen. I will say that I am winding up enjoying this season in kind of a hate watch fashion, plus I'm enjoying watching youtube videos after each episode ruthlessly mocking how stupid it is.
Black Lives Matter.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by malchior »

@El Guapo - you just nailed what I was trying to internalize. It's just so, so dumb. I can't help but make a parallel to the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. I had an employee who loved it (I liked it too) but something rubbed me wrong about it. We got to talking about it in depth one day at lunch and we realized something. When you think about the plot of it...it makes no sense. The chain of events is a series on disconnected choices that are unworkable but used to 'build the Enterprise crew' from individuals. The dumbest plot sequence of these I can refer to is that Kirk gets marooned for no reason that makes any sort of sense but that is how he finds Scotty. It's just nonsense plotting but it mostly works. This is nonsense plotting and it doesn't work.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

My favorite bit is found in the episode before last.
Spoiler:
Picard, in a coma, needs some kind of medical assistance to help him through it. Rios has someone on his ship beam him over some kind of special brain tool that he needs to stabilize Picard....which he then promptly hands to the doctor from 400 years ago. It's like me taking a defibrillator back to the 1500s and handing it to a village healer to help her save someone after a heart attack.

But wait...turns out the only special skill you need to use this advanced brain tool is the ability to hold it 4 inches from their head for 10 minutes. Hey Rios, your advanced piloting skills never included "holding things still"?
He won. Period.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41312
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by El Guapo »

malchior wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 10:16 am @El Guapo - you just nailed what I was trying to internalize. It's just so, so dumb. I can't help but make a parallel to the first JJ Abrams Star Trek movie. I had an employee who loved it (I liked it too) but something rubbed me wrong about it. We got to talking about it in depth one day at lunch and we realized something. When you think about the plot of it...it makes no sense. The chain of events is a series on disconnected choices that are unworkable but used to 'build the Enterprise crew' from individuals. The dumbest plot sequence of these I can refer to is that Kirk gets marooned for no reason that makes any sort of sense but that is how he finds Scotty. It's just nonsense plotting but it mostly works. This is nonsense plotting and it doesn't work.
Yeah, I agree with that. The Abrams Trek movies are really pretty dumb in terms of plot but they do have the benefit of being well executed and well acted enough that if you don't think about the plot they're pretty entertaining. This season lacks that and so is just kind of a mess.

Also I watched a preview of the next episode and I already LOL'd at a stupid plot point in just a 1.5 minute preview!
Spoiler:
Jurati, now in what is the Borg Queen's head, is talking to her. And she basically says that she was rooting around in the Borg Queen's mind to find out why she insisted on assimilating so many people and worlds and whatnot.
And the answer is... the Borg Queen is just like Jurati and is lonely! :roll:
Black Lives Matter.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by malchior »

To be fair, they sort of set the bar in the first episode right from the get go. I remember it distinctly. IIRC it correctly, season 2 opened on crew members riding the turbolift to the bridge for a battle. The best way they thought they could convey the risk to the audience beyond the EXPLOSIONS AND SHAKY CAM was the computer saying something like 'Ship Systems Rebooting'. I said to my wife that she should be aware that the way I'm going to announce unactionable, non-specific dire trouble at home in the future is yell out House Systems Rebooting.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

What's frustrating to me is that they started off with an interesting premise. Could the Borg change and join the Federation. The inference I was getting in the first episode was that the Borg had encountered something that frightened even them and they were forced to look for allies. That could be enough to shake up a civilization to the point where they may change. And that was where I was hoping it was going. But instead of that, we got Back to the Future IV with Picard as Marty McFly and Dr. Soong as a ludicrously homicidal Biff Tannen.
He won. Period.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41312
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by El Guapo »

Also it's great to see John de Lancie again as Q, and he's great at it, but the way that they're using him is completely baffling. Like they kind of set it up in episode 1 / 2 where this is another of Q's tests, which is in line with what he does, but since then it's seems like it's changed where this isn't a test but Q is an outright adversary, who is acting because he's vaguely dying, and so doing this because...death related reasons? Or something?

Plus he lost his powers for no discernable reason. But then, what's the point of having Q around without any powers? And like without any powers how is he doing all this shit in the past, like getting into FBI offices in FBI gear?
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51478
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by hepcat »

I also find it humorous that a group of super beings held peace talks a long time ago that ended up with a genie bottle for future communication.

....yeah, the dumb on this show is staggering when you hold it up to the light.
He won. Period.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by malchior »

hepcat wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:52 am I also find it humorous that a group of super beings held peace talks a long time ago that ended up with a genie bottle for future communication.

....yeah, the dumb on this show is staggering when you hold it up to the light.
Right. So I just did a sanity check and looked up the showrunner for this and it's Akiva Goldsman. Responsible for screenwriting Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, I am Legend, I, Robot, the DaVinci Code movies. Guess that explains all of this.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41312
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?

Post by El Guapo »

malchior wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 12:01 pm
hepcat wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:52 am I also find it humorous that a group of super beings held peace talks a long time ago that ended up with a genie bottle for future communication.

....yeah, the dumb on this show is staggering when you hold it up to the light.
Right. So I just did a sanity check and looked up the showrunner for this and it's Akiva Goldsman. Responsible for screenwriting Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, I am Legend, I, Robot, the DaVinci Code movies. Guess that explains all of this.
Also the showrunner for ST: Discovery, though. Which certainly has its whoppers at times (honestly the whole myceleal network thing is a little dumb, and the big resolution at the end of season 1 was incredibly stupid) but overall it's just a lot smarter and better done. Makes me think he's less involved in that one?
Black Lives Matter.
Post Reply