Election Year Sensitivities

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Election Year Sensitivities

Post by malchior »

So every other year the DOJ is going to shut down *investigations* of candidates? How could this go wrong?

User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 8545
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by Alefroth »

McConnell really hit the jackpot.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54663
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by Smoove_B »

I am speechless. Somebody get the lights on the way out.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by malchior »

What concerns me isn't the headline per se, it's everything that's implied by this. It isn't entirely crazy for investigations against political candidates to need to be vetted through the AG especially after Clinton. It is a mostly reasonable thing designed to paper over the problems underneath. Mostly reasonable meaning it sounds great until you look two steps ahead and draw a bright line to Trump's noise about announcing his candidacy 2 years ahead of an election.

This memo doubles down on Garland's number one priority IMO - protecting the DOJ first. Yes and I believe it leaves the American people a distant last. The DOJ was badly damaged by the Trump AGs and especially Bill Barr. We saw several instances of political interference with prosecutions and other shenanigans. We've also seen no hint of any accountability for the bad behavior in the DOJ. It went into a memory hole.

So what does Garland do to show that the DOJ is a stable institution? He releases a mostly reasonable memo that shows continuity between Garland's DOJ and Barr's DOJ. He is chanting the DOJ is in a normal operating state and it always was.
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 20386
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by Skinypupy »

Help me out here. I've read both memos this morning (Garland's and the Barr memo it references) and it appears to read that the DOJ can't investigate without specific approval of the AG.

So this isn't a blanket squash of any potential investigation simply because someone declares their candidacy, but rather it would require Merrick Garland to personally show a spine (one that has been entirely absent so far) before anything could potentially happen.

That about right?
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by malchior »

Yeah that's pretty much it. It raises the Barr (har har!) on investigations. It's not crazy - you've however correctly IMO read between the lines and I'm arguing it's more. But still that's the essence of the plain text. However, Garland is to put it mildly ridiculously cautious. And a Trumpist would hardly be restrained by this policy.
User avatar
waitingtoconnect
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by waitingtoconnect »

My thesis is increasingly that many in the Democrats and their appointments are actually on the side of the fascists and this is just a game while they seize power. Just as occurred in Germany.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54663
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by Smoove_B »

A significant number of federally elected officials certainly are part of an "elite class" that is disconnected completely from the day-to-day existence of most Americans. They've made it so they make money off the laws the pass (or squash) so I guess this is what happens.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
stessier
Posts: 29838
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: SC

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by stessier »

waitingtoconnect wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:08 am My thesis is increasingly that many in the Democrats and their appointments are actually on the side of the fascists and this is just a game while they seize power. Just as occurred in Germany.
You've been subscribing to Drazzil's newsletter.
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running____2014: 1300.55 miles____2015: 2036.13 miles____2016: 1012.75 miles____2017: 1105.82 miles____2018: 1318.91 miles__2019: 2000.00 miles
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by malchior »

stessier wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:23 am
waitingtoconnect wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:08 am My thesis is increasingly that many in the Democrats and their appointments are actually on the side of the fascists and this is just a game while they seize power. Just as occurred in Germany.
You've been subscribing to Drazzil's newsletter.
This model is certainly easier to consume than the one we are likely dealing with which is a complex governance failure.
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43766
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by Kraken »

stessier wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:23 am
waitingtoconnect wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:08 am My thesis is increasingly that many in the Democrats and their appointments are actually on the side of the fascists and this is just a game while they seize power. Just as occurred in Germany.
You've been subscribing to Drazzil's newsletter.
Drazzil isn't always wrong, he just usually sounds that way.
User avatar
coopasonic
Posts: 20981
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Dallas-ish

Re: Election Year Sensitivities

Post by coopasonic »

Kraken wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 11:08 am
stessier wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:23 am
waitingtoconnect wrote: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:08 am My thesis is increasingly that many in the Democrats and their appointments are actually on the side of the fascists and this is just a game while they seize power. Just as occurred in Germany.
You've been subscribing to Drazzil's newsletter.
Drazzil isn't always wrong, he just usually sounds that way.
There is a reason they aren't fighting like crazy to save democracy. Remember Pelosi's net worth is 9 digits and she isn't alone.
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
Post Reply