The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Defiant »

In retrospect, there were signs that Kushner was going to be trouble.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

I'd love for the WH to try to pull Executive privilege and Comey to just say, "I'm not an employee anymore *and* you already talked about it publicly fucknuts."
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24537
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

I always believed that Executive Privilege was something that was used to give cover for people that didn't want to testify before Congress. Can it be used to prevent someone that wants to testify before Congress?
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

RunningMn9 wrote:I always believed that Executive Privilege was something that was used to give cover for people that didn't want to testify before Congress. Can it be used to prevent someone that wants to testify before Congress?
I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that sometimes, yes. Privileges that allow you to keep someone else from voluntarily testifying are rare, but they exist. The Attorney-Client privilege is the clearest example. If I hire an attorney and tell them my sundry misdeeds to get legal advice, that lawyer can't turn around and tell investigators. I can affirmatively block that (even if I have fired my attorney, with regards to things I tell them before I fire them).

I believe that courts have given similar treatment to executive privilege in some circumstances. But without being an expert in this, the obvious problems with Trump asserting it here would seem to be that: (1) that Trump has publicly talked about his private conversations with Comey (at least in the attorney-client privilege context, you can't disclose only the parts of the privileged materials that you want); and (2) while the FBI Director is in the executive branch, he's not really the president's confidential advisor in a way that's comparable to the relationship between an attorney and a client.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
pr0ner
Posts: 17503
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by pr0ner »

SIGN ME UP FOR THIS!
Hodor.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 53842
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by hepcat »

Trump and twitter is like watching an inebriated monkey with a loaded handgun.
Lord of His Pants
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 55930
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Smoove_B wrote:How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"
Reportedly four prominent law firms so far have turned down representing Trump on Russia issues, for fear that he won't listen and won't pay.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13201
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Paingod »

El Guapo wrote:
Smoove_B wrote:How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"

"That'll be $450"
Reportedly four prominent law firms so far have turned down representing Trump on Russia issues, for fear that he won't listen and won't pay.
FTFBOY
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Paingod wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
Smoove_B wrote:How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"

"That'll be $450"
Reportedly four prominent law firms so far have turned down representing Trump on Russia issues, for fear that he won't listen and won't pay.
FTFBOY
I take your point, but I wouldn't dismiss the "won't listen" part. Any reputable firm that takes on Trump and Russia will take an immediate reputational hit with many of their clients and lawyers (good luck staffing a matter like that). On top of that you would have an issue with god knows what you and your lawyers will learn, which may create ethical issues and (more problematic for the firm) may well lead one or more lawyers to leak to the press, for which Trump could try to come down hard on the firm itself (and, you know, refuse to pay).

On top of *that*, now the firm will own whatever Trump says on Russia to a large degree, which could further hurt its reputation. And since Trump has a history of disregarding advice and doing whatever the hell he wants, the firm is taking on a risk to its reputation that it can't realistically control or define.

So the "won't pay" part is important, but there's a lot more too.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Pyperkub
Posts: 24133
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Pyperkub »

RunningMn9 wrote:I always believed that Executive Privilege was something that was used to give cover for people that didn't want to testify before Congress. Can it be used to prevent someone that wants to testify before Congress?
It's actually so that the President can solicit honest opinions without the opiner having to worry about being sued/slandered/having them end up in the public record.

It has been used (abused) as you state, but that's not why it's there.
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!

Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 29703
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Holman »

El Guapo wrote:
Smoove_B wrote:How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"
Reportedly four prominent law firms so far have turned down representing Trump on Russia issues, for fear that he won't listen and won't pay.
Another part of it, per that Isikoff article making the rounds, is that firms' other clients have already been touched by the investigation.
Others mentioned potential conflicts with clients of their firms, such as financial institutions that have already received subpoenas relating to potential money-laundering issues that are part of the investigation.
This is more confirmation that things are not limited to collusion around the election but have extended to include Trump and his associates' long-term financial dealings.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Holman wrote:
El Guapo wrote:
Smoove_B wrote:How on earth is there a single lawyer on his payroll? Do they just take an allowance and shrug their shoulders?

"Stop talking. Stop posting things on Twitter."

"Don't tell me what to do!"
Reportedly four prominent law firms so far have turned down representing Trump on Russia issues, for fear that he won't listen and won't pay.
Another part of it, per that Isikoff article making the rounds, is that firms' other clients have already been touched by the investigation.
Others mentioned potential conflicts with clients of their firms, such as financial institutions that have already received subpoenas relating to potential money-laundering issues that are part of the investigation.
This is more confirmation that things are not limited to collusion around the election but have extended to include Trump and his associates' long-term financial dealings.
Financial crimes charges seem like the most plausible indictments. Treason and the like, even if one assumes the worst, seems like it would be incredibly difficult to prove. Whereas Trump's circle has been dealing with shady characters for awhile now, and the odds that they were scrupulously following the law in their dealings seems remote.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 16957
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Zarathud »

I would be happy with Trump getting impeached over financial crimes. It would drive home the Republican Party's kleptocracy.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

I'm watching the Coats/Rogers hearing and there are some hints from their very terse and crafted responses that there is a lot going on. Unfortunately it looks like we aka the subjects of Emperor Trump aren't going to get any answers via this process.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Christopher Wray mostly seems like one of the best possible choices - he seems qualified and pretty well regarded, at least in his public service.

My main concern is just that since Trump fired Comey due to insufficient personal loyalty and unwillingness to kill the Russia investigation, I would assume that Trump would only consider candidates who were willing to pledge loyalty and to kill the Russia investigation.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 15359
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by ImLawBoy »

El Guapo wrote:Christopher Wray mostly seems like one of the best possible choices - he seems qualified and pretty well regarded, at least in his public service.

My main concern is just that since Trump fired Comey due to insufficient personal loyalty and unwillingness to kill the Russia investigation, I would assume that Trump would only consider candidates who were willing to pledge loyalty and to kill the Russia investigation.
I tend to agree here. I haven't really delved into it, but on its surface this seems like a perfectly cromulent pick. I do also share concerns about what Wray might have agreed to with Trump. My hope is that with Trump's reasonable choices dwindling, Wray was able to avoid having to pledge personal loyalty and convince Trump of the lunacy of killing the Russia investigation at this point. That doesn't sound very Trump, though.

Also, absent some specific shadiness (and I haven't read Smoove's link yet), I'm not worried about the mega-firm from which Wray comes having offices and business in Russia.
That's my purse! I don't know you!
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

My personal concern with Wray is his association with Chris Christie. A crony of a crony is transitively a crony even if that first level crony was spurned. :)
User avatar
Ralph-Wiggum
Posts: 17449
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:51 am

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Ralph-Wiggum »

I would hope (but I doubt) that anyone Trump appointed to head the FBI would recuse themselves from any decisions about the Russia investigation. Seems like there's an inherent conflict of interest there.
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4498
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by gilraen »

El Guapo wrote:Christopher Wray mostly seems like one of the best possible choices - he seems qualified and pretty well regarded, at least in his public service.

My main concern is just that since Trump fired Comey due to insufficient personal loyalty and unwillingness to kill the Russia investigation, I would assume that Trump would only consider candidates who were willing to pledge loyalty and to kill the Russia investigation.
Trump at this point will consider anyone who agrees to take the job (being qualified for the job is a bonus but not required). We should start taking bets on when Wray is either fired or resigns.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

ImLawBoy wrote:
El Guapo wrote:Christopher Wray mostly seems like one of the best possible choices - he seems qualified and pretty well regarded, at least in his public service.

My main concern is just that since Trump fired Comey due to insufficient personal loyalty and unwillingness to kill the Russia investigation, I would assume that Trump would only consider candidates who were willing to pledge loyalty and to kill the Russia investigation.
I tend to agree here. I haven't really delved into it, but on its surface this seems like a perfectly cromulent pick. I do also share concerns about what Wray might have agreed to with Trump. My hope is that with Trump's reasonable choices dwindling, Wray was able to avoid having to pledge personal loyalty and convince Trump of the lunacy of killing the Russia investigation at this point. That doesn't sound very Trump, though.

Also, absent some specific shadiness (and I haven't read Smoove's link yet), I'm not worried about the mega-firm from which Wray comes having offices and business in Russia.
The best case scenario here is that Trump fucked up. I don't want to count on that, but it's possible, especially since Trump tends to do that.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26952
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Rip »

malchior wrote:I'm watching the Coats/Rogers hearing and there are some hints from their very terse and crafted responses that there is a lot going on. Unfortunately it looks like we aka the subjects of Emperor Trump aren't going to get any answers via this process.
If they don't give the answers you want there has to be something amiss?

You can't get much more direct than this.
“In the three-plus years that I have been the director of the National Security Agency, to the best of my recollection, I have never been directed to do anything that I believe to be illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate. And to the best of my collection … I do not recall ever feeling pressured to do so,” Rogers told Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate panel.

“Did the president … ask you in any way, shape or form to back off or downplay the Russia investigation?” Warner asked.

Rogers said that he would not discuss specifics of conversations he had with Trump, but added: “I stand by the comment I just made, sir.”
“In my time of service … I have never been pressured, I have never felt pressure, to intervene or interfere in any way, with shaping intelligence in a political way or in relationship to an ongoing investigation,” Coats testified Wednesday.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 53842
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by hepcat »

Now, let's hear from people Trump actually talked to. :mrgreen:
Lord of His Pants
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

Rip wrote:If they don't give the answers you want there has to be something amiss?
No I take that from them saying they wouldn't answer unclassified questions about an unclassified matter without going private. That negates that it is about keeping private conversation with the President confidential. The direct question asked was whether the President directed them to intervene on the Russia investigations. Would that be de facto not illegal? And thus make their statements about illegal orders accurate? Maybe but it sure is a political and potentially legal problem for the President himself.

Note: An interesting theory I just saw is that they aren't protecting the President but the Special Counsel investigation. That seems a bit too hopeful for my tastes in this hopeless time.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 16957
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Zarathud »

Not directed. Leaves some room for interpretation. Asked? Suggested?

Trump doesn't have to ask all of them, just some.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
User avatar
Combustible Lemur
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:17 pm
Location: houston, TX

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Combustible Lemur »

Ralph-Wiggum wrote:I would hope (but I doubt) that anyone Trump appointed to head the FBI would recuse themselves from any decisions about the Russia investigation. Seems like there's an inherent conflict of interest there.
Like Jeff Sessions did?Image

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Is Scott home? thump thump thump Crash ......No.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by malchior »

That exchange was very painful but I'm glad it happened. They better have a very good reason or it appears they may be acting in a lawless fashion.
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13201
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Paingod »

It sounded as though the White House legal counsel basically told them to shut up, but expressly said "Don't you dare call this Executive Privilege" ... if I'm not mistaken ... with with one of them going so far as to mutter that he couldn't talk about Executive Privilege because of Executive Privilege.
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
User avatar
Combustible Lemur
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:17 pm
Location: houston, TX

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Combustible Lemur »

malchior wrote:That exchange was very painful but I'm glad it happened. They better have a very good reason or it appears they may be acting in a lawless fashion.
None of those guys are trump appointees right? It seems most likely that those conversations are now involved in the myriad criminal investigation of the broad nebulous abyss that is the campaign, administration, and individual persons associated with the former, that may or may not be overlapping and coordinating with the special investigation.

But yeah, I agree that it's one of those conversations that needs to happen publicly.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Last edited by Combustible Lemur on Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Is Scott home? thump thump thump Crash ......No.
User avatar
Captain Caveman
Posts: 11687
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:57 am

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Captain Caveman »

Comey's opening statement tomorrow has it all. link

Basically, all the reports from before about Trump pressuring Comey to back off the investigation are accurate (though more details are provided here) but so too is Trump's claim that Comey told him that he personally wasn't the target of the investigation. At least Trump will have that to console him, but the obstruction of justice here is just so damning.
User avatar
noxiousdog
Posts: 24627
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by noxiousdog »

Captain Caveman wrote:Comey's opening statement tomorrow has it all. link

Basically, all the reports from before about Trump pressuring Comey to back off the investigation are accurate (though more details are provided here) but so too is Trump's claim that Comey told him that he personally wasn't the target of the investigation. At least Trump will have that to console him, but the obstruction of justice here is just so damning.
WTH?
On the morning of March 30, the President called me at the FBI. He
described the Russia investigation as “a cloud” that was impairing his ability to act
on behalf of the country. He said he had nothing to do with Russia, had not been
involved with hookers in Russia
, and had always assumed he was being recorded
when in Russia.
He's insane.
Black Lives Matter

"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
User avatar
Captain Caveman
Posts: 11687
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:57 am

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Captain Caveman »

The ominous ending of the opening statement:
He said he would do that and added, “Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.”
It's not made explicit, but "that thing" is almost certainly about Clinton. He seems to be acknowledging that Comey's actions aided him in the election. It's Trump's mob boss-like way of saying, "We're in this together", and notably when he fired Comey just a short time later, he used the Clinton stuff against him as a rationale for the firing.
Last edited by Captain Caveman on Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71491
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by LordMortis »

He said he would do that and added, “Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.” I said only that the way to handle it was to have the White House Counsel call the Acting Deputy Attorney General. He said that was what he would do and the call ended.
That was the last time I spoke with President Trump.
That really sums up the mafia syndicate nature of the DJT administration in whole, doesn't it?
User avatar
Octavious
Posts: 20047
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Octavious »

Honestly I don't see this changing anything. Nothing will be done about it, he will write some insane comment on Twitter, everyone will comment on it and then same old same old. I'm burnt out even trying to care at this point.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.

Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

noxiousdog wrote:
Captain Caveman wrote:Comey's opening statement tomorrow has it all. link

Basically, all the reports from before about Trump pressuring Comey to back off the investigation are accurate (though more details are provided here) but so too is Trump's claim that Comey told him that he personally wasn't the target of the investigation. At least Trump will have that to console him, but the obstruction of justice here is just so damning.
WTH?
On the morning of March 30, the President called me at the FBI. He
described the Russia investigation as “a cloud” that was impairing his ability to act
on behalf of the country. He said he had nothing to do with Russia, had not been
involved with hookers in Russia
, and had always assumed he was being recorded
when in Russia.
He's insane.
I assume the hooker thing is a reference to the allegations in the Steele dossier, among them of course the allegation that Trump had watched hookers pee on each other in Russia (or something like that), and that because of that and other things Putin might have blackmail on Trump. So it's a little less random than something like that would normally be.

Though it's interesting that Trump was focused on that.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13888
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by $iljanus »

LordMortis wrote:
He said he would do that and added, “Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.” I said only that the way to handle it was to have the White House Counsel call the Acting Deputy Attorney General. He said that was what he would do and the call ended.
That was the last time I spoke with President Trump.
That really sums up the mafia syndicate nature of the DJT administration in whole, doesn't it?
In my head I can hear Donald "Thumbs" Trump saying all that in a Italian mobster's voice.
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Octavious
Posts: 20047
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by Octavious »

Don't have time to read through it myself, but does it say that he told Trump he's not under investigation? That would tick me off it's true he told him that. I see that's what Fox News is implying.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.

Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Captain Caveman wrote:The ominous ending of the opening statement:
He said he would do that and added, “Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.”
It's not made explicit, but "that thing" is almost certainly about Clinton. He seems to be acknowledging that Comey's actions aided him in the election. It's Trump's mob boss-like way of saying, "We're in this together", and notably when he fired Comey just a short time later, he used the Clinton stuff against him as a rationale for the firing.
Makes me wonder if Trump thought that Comey sent the letter leading up to the election with the explicit intention of helping elect Trump, and that because of that he assumed that Comey was on his side. Wouldn't be the craziest conclusion.

The other plausible option is that by "that thing" he's referring to the dinner that Trump and Comey had together on January 6th, discussed at the top of the testimony. That's where Trump asked for Comey's loyalty, and Comey pushed back, ultimately agreeing to "honest loyalty". If Trump took Comey's agreement to that as a pledge of loyalty to Trump (which would help explain why Trump didn't replace Comey at the start of his presidency), it's possible that what Trump was saying there was essentially, "look, you gave me your loyalty. I've been loyal to you, but you have not been loyal to me, despite our agreement."
Black Lives Matter.
Post Reply