2024 Fundraising - $329 / $2000 CDN for the year, June/July Renewal. Paypal Donation Link US dollars
[TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
BTW, the mushroom research officer (Discovery) is called ..Paul Stamets?! Lol!
A bit on the nose there.
A bit on the nose there.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 82533
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
At least it's not Mike Collagy.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 44296
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I don't think there are, and I wasn't referring to anyone in particular. But I'd say that anything related to specific shows (released from 1938 on, of course) should be spoilered if not in a dedicated thread. There's some responsibility on the reader to avoid spoilers - it is easy to avoid the Strange New Worlds thread before you're caught up, for instance, but a general Star Trek thread should be something safe to read. It's the same reason one wouldn't put spoilers for the latest MCU film in Random Randomness.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Star Trek Very Short Treks coming soon (to celebrate 50 years of animated Trek).
And, of course, Lower Decks is returning in a couple of days.
And, of course, Lower Decks is returning in a couple of days.
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Finally a decent Very Short Trek
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I signed up for Paramount+ again to get caught up on Star Trek. I had planned to start with S3 of Picard, that being the weakest of the new ST shows, only to find out that it's not available. WTF? Do I need the premium version of Paramount+? It's available to buy for $3 per episode on Prime, but that ain't gonna happen.
Started Brave New Worlds tonight instead.
Started Brave New Worlds tonight instead.
- Daehawk
- Posts: 64007
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Strange New WorldsKraken wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:29 pm I signed up for Paramount+ again to get caught up on Star Trek. I had planned to start with S3 of Picard, that being the weakest of the new ST shows, only to find out that it's not available. WTF? Do I need the premium version of Paramount+? It's available to buy for $3 per episode on Prime, but that ain't gonna happen.
Started Brave New Worlds tonight instead.
I just went and checked and S3 of Picard is there for me.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Right. I knew that.
I don''t need to solve the Picard problem until I get caught up on the rest of the shows and am ready to cancel again. But S3 definitely is not available for me as a new subscriber to the base-level Paramount+. Seasons 1 and 2 are there. The interface is confusing but I think it wants me to buy the premium level to see S3.
I don''t need to solve the Picard problem until I get caught up on the rest of the shows and am ready to cancel again. But S3 definitely is not available for me as a new subscriber to the base-level Paramount+. Seasons 1 and 2 are there. The interface is confusing but I think it wants me to buy the premium level to see S3.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I started watching Prodigy after it showed up on Netflix. I’m honestly surprised how good it is. I’m glad Netflix is making more of it.
He won. Period.
- Daehawk
- Posts: 64007
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
AFAIK I dont have premium. I got P+ free with my Walmart+ or Amazon Prime membership. Think its part of Walmart.
I should be watching Reacher 1st season.
I should be watching Reacher 1st season.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I have Paramount + Essential (which is what you're calling Basic I believe, as I see nothing lower than that) and I definitely have Picard season 3 available to me. So I don't believe it's your subscription level. Sounds like you might have something else going on. Try using this direct link to get to season 3 on your PC.Kraken wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:17 am Right. I knew that.
I don''t need to solve the Picard problem until I get caught up on the rest of the shows and am ready to cancel again. But S3 definitely is not available for me as a new subscriber to the base-level Paramount+. Seasons 1 and 2 are there. The interface is confusing but I think it wants me to buy the premium level to see S3.
Edit: did you sign up for it directly in their app, or through Amazon, Roku or some other service, it shouldn’t matter, but sometimes those services are wonky. I tend to go to the source. If not, then there’s something wrong with the cache on your streaming device, I’m guessing. Try clearing the cache for the app you’re using and reboot. Another possibility is that maybe you’re using the wrong login. Double check that.
Picard season 3 is definitely available though. Even at the lowest sub tier.
He won. Period.
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I subscribed through Prime, and Paramount doesn't accept my Prime login. In Prime's Paramount interface, I can watch Discovery, Lower Decks, and Strange New Worlds. Picard is available to buy.hepcat wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 9:30 amI have Paramount + Essential (which is what you're calling Basic I believe, as I see nothing lower than that) and I definitely have Picard season 3 available to me. So I don't believe it's your subscription level. Sounds like you might have something else going on. Try using this direct link to get to season 3 on your PC.Kraken wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:17 am Right. I knew that.
I don''t need to solve the Picard problem until I get caught up on the rest of the shows and am ready to cancel again. But S3 definitely is not available for me as a new subscriber to the base-level Paramount+. Seasons 1 and 2 are there. The interface is confusing but I think it wants me to buy the premium level to see S3.
Edit: did you sign up for it directly in their app, or through Amazon, Roku or some other service, it shouldn’t matter, but sometimes those services are wonky. I tend to go to the source. If not, then there’s something wrong with the cache on your streaming device, I’m guessing. Try clearing the cache for the app you’re using and reboot. Another possibility is that maybe you’re using the wrong login. Double check that.
Picard season 3 is definitely available though. Even at the lowest sub tier.
No idea why Picard is locked for Prime customers; the ways of the streaming world are strange. I was trying to avoid installing yet another app with yet another login for a service that I don't want to keep for more than 2-3 months, but alas. I'll have to cancel my Prime/Paramount account when the free week is up and then resubscribe directly through the Paramount app. On the plus side, I should get the free week again when I resubscribe.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Getting any streaming service through Amazon is a bad idea. They often limit what you can watch. You pay the same but you get less. I had similar issues with an AMC plus sub through Amazon and I swore never again.
He won. Period.
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Well I want one ring to rule them all. Paying for half a dozen different services and still not being able to see anything I want is puppies. I don't care who wins the streaming war, I just want someone to take all of my money and give me everything. But stop screwing up my Star Trek in the meantime.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 44296
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Dear god, no.
You're describing cable. I don't want a new entertainment monopoly.
You're describing cable. I don't want a new entertainment monopoly.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
We're already in a world where reconstructing cable costs as much as cable did, and there are still shows I can't watch. So yeah, bring back cable, or whatever makes TV easy again.
Except sports. Keep your sports and give me half price.
Except sports. Keep your sports and give me half price.
- Daehawk
- Posts: 64007
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
My cable place offers streaming but Im not sure what channels and networks with so many out there. Maybe its just what they normally have by wire is now streaming..so everything...maybe.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Cable cost over a hundred a month to get what you wanted for some. Netflix is really the only one that offers subs that break the 20 dollar level for their high end. The rest offer significantly less expensive tiers. I’ve dropped most of my subscriptions to ad supported when available and I think I’m paying around 50 bucks a month now for about 5 services. Plus, I can turn them on and off in seconds without having to deal with a cable company rep. We’re nowhere near cable costs….or cable inconvenience.
Besides, your attempt to use Amazon to get it all just reinforces why going back to the old model isn’t a great idea. One ring rule to rule them all means everyone has to have the same size finger.
He won. Period.
- Kraken
- Posts: 43914
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
YTTV is $72 a month -- that's my cable substitute that provides access to live TV and DVR functionality. Add $16 for Max, $6 for Paramount+, $15 for Netflix, and however you want to calculate how much Prime costs (I consider it free, but of course it isn't really), and oops, we're a little over $100.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:56 amCable cost over a hundred a month to get what you wanted for some. Netflix is really the only one that offers subs that break the 20 dollar level for their high end. The rest offer significantly less expensive tiers. I’ve dropped most of my subscriptions to ad supported when available and I think I’m paying around 50 bucks a month now for about 5 services. Plus, I can turn them on and off in seconds without having to deal with a cable company rep. We’re nowhere near cable costs….or cable inconvenience.
Besides, your attempt to use Amazon to get it all just reinforces why going back to the old model isn’t a great idea. One ring rule to rule them all means everyone has to have the same size finger.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
You don't need the higher level tiers, as I wrote. I pay less than 10 bucks for Max.
Also, YouTube TV isn't cable. The subject I (and you) specifically referred to was Cable. Many of the so called "cable alternatives" that exist on streaming are rather expensive because they're paying fees to all the different networks they collect under their service.
But back on the topic of streaming vs cable: streaming is still the cheaper option unless you get only the very basic channels. Even then it's oftentimes less expensive to get their counterparts on streaming.
I think the biggest selling point for me though is that I can both shop for better deals when I have time (most of the services offer deals during holidays and other times of the year), and I can control when I subscribe and when I don't via their web sites and within seconds. I realize not everyone wants to deal with that though. In which case, you'll end up paying extra for the convenience of just having someone else handle all your subscriptions, and you'll be at their mercy as to what you get. But that's the way with most services like that.
Also, YouTube TV isn't cable. The subject I (and you) specifically referred to was Cable. Many of the so called "cable alternatives" that exist on streaming are rather expensive because they're paying fees to all the different networks they collect under their service.
But back on the topic of streaming vs cable: streaming is still the cheaper option unless you get only the very basic channels. Even then it's oftentimes less expensive to get their counterparts on streaming.
I think the biggest selling point for me though is that I can both shop for better deals when I have time (most of the services offer deals during holidays and other times of the year), and I can control when I subscribe and when I don't via their web sites and within seconds. I realize not everyone wants to deal with that though. In which case, you'll end up paying extra for the convenience of just having someone else handle all your subscriptions, and you'll be at their mercy as to what you get. But that's the way with most services like that.
He won. Period.
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
If you want ad free with HDR/Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos on Max, you're shelling out over $20 a month now. Ad free on Amazon Prime is over $20 a month, too.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:56 amCable cost over a hundred a month to get what you wanted for some. Netflix is really the only one that offers subs that break the 20 dollar level for their high end. The rest offer significantly less expensive tiers. I’ve dropped most of my subscriptions to ad supported when available and I think I’m paying around 50 bucks a month now for about 5 services. Plus, I can turn them on and off in seconds without having to deal with a cable company rep. We’re nowhere near cable costs….or cable inconvenience.
Besides, your attempt to use Amazon to get it all just reinforces why going back to the old model isn’t a great idea. One ring rule to rule them all means everyone has to have the same size finger.
Last edited by pr0ner on Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hodor.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
I pay a little less than 9.99 for the ad free version as I took advantage of a holiday sale last year. As for them dropping atmos and 4k from the the lower tier, I knew that was coming and complained about it before. But since cable tv doesn't even offer 4k and atmos (at least not since I last looked and certainly not in great numbers even if they do now), I don't think it's a fair comparison.
He won. Period.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 44296
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
The real advantages of a streaming model (individual companies) vs a cable model (one company you get the others through) are 1) that the streaming model means that if they treat you like garbage, you can just cancel and watch their competition. With a single company, you get what they choose to allow you to have. And Amazon is famous for giving customers [whatever], then pulling it back piece by piece while raising prices. The cable model is easy because they eliminate options and control. And 2) you can subscribe to P+, catch up on Picard and Lower Decks without silly limitations, then cancel and subscribe to Max for whatever show you're into, then cancel and subscribe to Netflix (rinse and repeat.) Maybe subscribing to everything at once would be as expensive as cable, but that's not how streaming works for most people. You keep 2-3 subscriptions, and rotate them as shows come on that you want to see. You can always sub at the drop of a hat if you get the urge to watch something, but you're not paying for services (channels) that you aren't using.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Also, the Gorilla Channel is only available on streaming.
He won. Period.
- hepcat
- Posts: 51888
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: [TV] New Star Trek Show in Development?
Well crap, they announced that the upcoming season of Lower Decks will be its last. I really grew to love this little gem of fan service.
He won. Period.