Should the media report election results before polls close?
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- DiscoJason
- Posts: 2082
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: Minnesota
Should the media report election results before polls close?
This is my first post in R&P because I usually avoid this, but I was just curious what others thought about this topic.
Last election, I was watching the news reports when I was in the Eastern time zone and they were showing who was leading in which eastern states. It got me thinking that this was influencing those on the west coast because if they saw that Bush seemed to be winning by a lot and they were Gore supporters, they may feel the election was already over and not bother to vote. Or they might be Bush backers who figure the race in already won and not go and vote for Bush, causing Gore to win. With the last election, NBC was predicting Gore the winner of the election before all the states were in.
Am I alone in thinking that the media shouldn't give us any results until the polls close in Hawaii?
Last election, I was watching the news reports when I was in the Eastern time zone and they were showing who was leading in which eastern states. It got me thinking that this was influencing those on the west coast because if they saw that Bush seemed to be winning by a lot and they were Gore supporters, they may feel the election was already over and not bother to vote. Or they might be Bush backers who figure the race in already won and not go and vote for Bush, causing Gore to win. With the last election, NBC was predicting Gore the winner of the election before all the states were in.
Am I alone in thinking that the media shouldn't give us any results until the polls close in Hawaii?
- Kraken
- Posts: 43805
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
- RunningMn9
- Posts: 24466
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
- Location: The Sword Coast
- Contact:
Re: Should the media report election results before polls cl
No. I think that the media should keep it's trap shut until the polls are closed everywhere.DiscoJason wrote:Am I alone in thinking that the media shouldn't give us any results until the polls close in Hawaii?
Not gonna happen. Although I bet they'll be a little more careful this year, after the FL debacle.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
- LordMortis
- Posts: 70233
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
- msduncan
- Posts: 14509
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Re: Should the media report election results before polls cl
CNN has called Florida for Kerry as of 1:30 pm.RunningMn9 wrote:No. I think that the media should keep it's trap shut until the polls are closed everywhere.DiscoJason wrote:Am I alone in thinking that the media shouldn't give us any results until the polls close in Hawaii?
Not gonna happen. Although I bet they'll be a little more careful this year, after the FL debacle.
- Eel Snave
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:09 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
They've been doing this for a while now.
Downwards Compatible
We're playing every NES game alphabetically! Even the crappy ones! Send help!
We're playing every NES game alphabetically! Even the crappy ones! Send help!
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 55367
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Unless the results are secret, they can report whatever they want. What I think they should refrain from doing is posting stupid predictions based on exit polls.
If the West Coast wants to party with everyone else, they need to change their polling times. Or hold off on their time change or something.
Sorry, the East Coast has to watch baseball or Monday Night Football past 1am. The West Coast can get up a bit early to vote.
If the West Coast wants to party with everyone else, they need to change their polling times. Or hold off on their time change or something.
Sorry, the East Coast has to watch baseball or Monday Night Football past 1am. The West Coast can get up a bit early to vote.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Well, I'm sure they'll be a little more careful this time, but considering that Florida is the only major gaffe, and then it was largely due to a close race and exit polls including bad date (peeople who voted for one person but thought they voted for someone else), I think they have a reasonably good track record.LawBeefaroni wrote:Unless the results are secret, they can report whatever they want. What I think they should refrain from doing is posting stupid predictions based on exit polls.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 70233
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
- Steron
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:47 am
- Location: Richmond-ish, Virginia
I think the news media should STFU until the last polls close. Alaska is the final poll to close at 0100 eastern time. If the results are annouced as the polls close, it could influence the vote. Especially in states, such as Florida, that are split by the timeline. The panhandle is an hour behind the rest of the state.
"There's always next year" The mantra of a KC Chiefs Fan.
- The Preacher
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:57 am
Don't forget calling the state before all the polls closed (the Panhandle is an hour behind the rest of the state). That was a major snafu.Nade wrote:Well, I'm sure they'll be a little more careful this time, but considering that Florida is the only major gaffe, and then it was largely due to a close race and exit polls including bad date (peeople who voted for one person but thought they voted for someone else), I think they have a reasonably good track record.LawBeefaroni wrote:Unless the results are secret, they can report whatever they want. What I think they should refrain from doing is posting stupid predictions based on exit polls.
You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
- MHS
- Posts: 9808
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:21 pm
- Location: Longmont CO
Yeah, Neal and I had this conversation today. I didn't vote in the last election, because when I got home from work, the news said Gore had won. Not was predicted to win, not was leading, but had won. (I lived in the panhandle at the time, in Pensacola). So, I didn't vote. (No one is allowed to point out that this makes me a bad person, and that I should care about the local stuff, I know already. I suck.) So, yes, in my experience, the media reporting things can and does affect people's votes and whether or not they vote at all. The argument can be made that someone as stupid as me (for believing the media, and not going and voting on the local stuff anyway) shouldn't be represented by a vote anyway, but there you have my opinion.Steron wrote:I think the news media should STFU until the last polls close. Alaska is the final poll to close at 0100 eastern time. If the results are annouced as the polls close, it could influence the vote. Especially in states, such as Florida, that are split by the timeline. The panhandle is an hour behind the rest of the state.