SCOTUS Watch

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 43690
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Kraken »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:40 am
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:21 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:10 am The military could step in and call a constitutional convention, clear out the dead wood. They will not.


Lol. What!?

What is it you picture the military doing ?

Ordering legislators to DC so that they can be executed?
I thought in certain times of deep national crisis the military is allowed to do such. Maybe I'm wrong?
Boy howdy, are you ever.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 8489
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Alefroth »

waitingtoconnect wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:23 am One wonders what Thomas will do when the other judges override the interracial marriage ruling of 1967. The wedding cake controversies started with interracial not same set marriage.
That's easy. Move, if he has to.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55316
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:40 am
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:21 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:10 am The military could step in and call a constitutional convention, clear out the dead wood. They will not.


Lol. What!?

What is it you picture the military doing ?

Ordering legislators to DC so that they can be executed?
I thought in certain times of deep national crisis the military is allowed to do such. Maybe I'm wrong?


"This sucks, I want a fascist military junta instead!"
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by malchior »

I was pointed by a overseas former colleague who said they can't believe the police in our country. I suspect police rioting against suburban moms is going to play differently than "antifa".

Last edited by malchior on Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:40 am
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:21 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:10 am The military could step in and call a constitutional convention, clear out the dead wood. They will not.


Lol. What!?

What is it you picture the military doing ?

Ordering legislators to DC so that they can be executed?
I thought in certain times of deep national crisis the military is allowed to do such. Maybe I'm wrong?
Honestly. Your frustration with the government is totally reasonable. That’s where it ends. What you just proposed is totally weird if not batshit nuts. How do you feel normal/reasonable proposing the US army purges the US government of ‘the dead wood’. Listen to yourself.

I don’t think I could picture a deeper national crisis than the US military rounding up democratically elected citizens for execution.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51303
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by hepcat »

For someone who hates what’s happening to our country at the hands of the extremist right, Drazzil sure sounds like someone from the extremist right sometimes.
Covfefe!
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Drazzil wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:20 pm

I can drive really REALLY well. I'm a phenom at making a spectacle. I'm REALLY good at customer service. I know how to cook and bake commercially. I can scale recipes into formulas. I know all of what a nursing assistant can do. I can do dosages for medications. I am a decent writer. I know how to run projects. I can operate a pistol, I'm a decent shot, but I am not a front lines fighter.
I think you should think about adding “I’m a stranger to reason” to your list of skills there.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by El Guapo »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:40 am
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:21 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:10 am The military could step in and call a constitutional convention, clear out the dead wood. They will not.


Lol. What!?

What is it you picture the military doing ?

Ordering legislators to DC so that they can be executed?
I thought in certain times of deep national crisis the military is allowed to do such. Maybe I'm wrong?
Not legally, no. The military of course has a lot of guns and at least in theory could seize control of the government and tell people what to do by virtue of the guns (i.e. a military coup) but that's not something that they're allowed to do.
Black Lives Matter.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by malchior »

You know you fucked up when Boris Johnson is on the right side of the issue.

User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Carpet_pissr »

“I the regret what seems to me on to be a backward step."

Da fuck? Was he the drunk on to be an interview?
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63530
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Daehawk »

Its reading stuff like this when Im baked that leads to me questioning my sanity.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:56 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 2:40 am
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:21 am
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:10 am The military could step in and call a constitutional convention, clear out the dead wood. They will not.


Lol. What!?

What is it you picture the military doing ?

Ordering legislators to DC so that they can be executed?
I thought in certain times of deep national crisis the military is allowed to do such. Maybe I'm wrong?
Honestly. Your frustration with the government is totally reasonable. That’s where it ends. What you just proposed is totally weird if not batshit nuts. How do you feel normal/reasonable proposing the US army purges the US government of ‘the dead wood’. Listen to yourself.

I don’t think I could picture a deeper national crisis than the US military rounding up democratically elected citizens for execution.
What about the US military rounding up anyone not white, straight, rich or christian? Obviously your picture device thingy is broken. :D

I'd also take issue with the "democratically elected" part. Poli's sliming their way out of bumfuck jerrymandered to hell areas to destroy our body politic and national discourse and exert their bumfuckery on the rest of us isin't democracy.
Last edited by Drazzil on Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:03 am
Drazzil wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:20 pm

I can drive really REALLY well. I'm a phenom at making a spectacle. I'm REALLY good at customer service. I know how to cook and bake commercially. I can scale recipes into formulas. I know all of what a nursing assistant can do. I can do dosages for medications. I am a decent writer. I know how to run projects. I can operate a pistol, I'm a decent shot, but I am not a front lines fighter.
I think you should think about adding “I’m a stranger to reason” to your list of skills there.
You know what? I think I will. Reason and being "reasonable" is how we got here.

I think its time to get a little crazy and mad. Like, "get on all fours and bark at a pine cone for half an hour cause it looked at you wrong" mad.

:whistle:
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

hepcat wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:58 am For someone who hates what’s happening to our country at the hands of the extremist right, Drazzil sure sounds like someone from the extremist right sometimes.
Yeah. I guess I'm what happens when someone who would normally be from the extremist right reads a lot of books, goes to college, looks at his earning and income potential and his skin tone and decides he better do his extreme"ing" from the other side of the fence.

I wear that tag with pride.

Back on topic. I'm amazed that the riots aren't larger.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Jarvetly bee fizzle
User avatar
stessier
Posts: 29819
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: SC

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by stessier »

malchior wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:56 am I was pointed by a overseas former colleague who said they can't believe the police in our country. I suspect police rioting against suburban moms is going to play differently than "antifa".

That's where I live - we hit the big times! And to thinki missed it being in DC this weekend.

Woke up early and did a run around the National Mall this morning. There are barricades up everywhere for the 4th celebrations, but even still the amount around the Supreme Court and Capitol were notable. There were also cops every 500 ft around the Capitol... at 5am. I actually asked if I was allowed to be there because it was so freaky (I was).
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running____2014: 1300.55 miles____2015: 2036.13 miles____2016: 1012.75 miles____2017: 1105.82 miles____2018: 1318.91 miles__2019: 2000.00 miles
User avatar
waitingtoconnect
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by waitingtoconnect »

Military coups rarely end in a positive outcome. Just ask the Roman Empire and its successor the Byzantine Empire.

A military coup would mean American emperors.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by malchior »

We're once again reminded that the police have chosen a side. It is not the people. They don't deserve our support.

User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51303
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by hepcat »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:18 pm
hepcat wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:58 am For someone who hates what’s happening to our country at the hands of the extremist right, Drazzil sure sounds like someone from the extremist right sometimes.
Yeah. I guess I'm what happens when someone who would normally be from the extremist right reads a lot of books, goes to college, looks at his earning and income potential and his skin tone and decides he better do his extreme"ing" from the other side of the fence.

I wear that tag with pride.

Back on topic. I'm amazed that the riots aren't larger.
Just a reminder: you voted for Trump. You made your bed. Sadly, we also have to sleep in it.
Covfefe!
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

hepcat wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:24 pm
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:18 pm
hepcat wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:58 am For someone who hates what’s happening to our country at the hands of the extremist right, Drazzil sure sounds like someone from the extremist right sometimes.
Yeah. I guess I'm what happens when someone who would normally be from the extremist right reads a lot of books, goes to college, looks at his earning and income potential and his skin tone and decides he better do his extreme"ing" from the other side of the fence.

I wear that tag with pride.

Back on topic. I'm amazed that the riots aren't larger.
Just a reminder: you voted for Trump. You made your bed. Sadly, we also have to sleep in it.
Just a reminder, the conditions for voting for Trump were created by people who would rather scapegoat and ignore large swaths of the population when it was clear they were in trouble.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51303
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by hepcat »

Just a reminder: who he was and what he represented was apparent to anyone with even a modicum of awareness.

I repeat: you made your bed.
Covfefe!
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

waitingtoconnect wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 7:01 pm Military coups rarely end in a positive outcome. Just ask the Roman Empire and its successor the Byzantine Empire.

A military coup would mean American emperors.
Which lasted collectively for over two thousand years AFTER Caesar crossed the Rubicon. The USA as we know her is already gone, after a scant 260 years.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Drazzil »

Stupid question... What would happen if large swaths of Democrats who didn't like what the party was doing decided to pack up and move to the locales with "outsize representation" What if the progressive voices in the Democrat party decided to register as Republican in those areas? Wouldn't that essentially mean that the Republican strategy would be nullified?

A "pack the party" movement if you will.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 51303
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by hepcat »

Start a go fund me for the billions of dollars it’s going to cost the millions of people who need to pack up and move and maybe quit their jobs in the process.
Covfefe!
User avatar
Little Raven
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Little Raven »

Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:16 pm Stupid question... What would happen if large swaths of Democrats who didn't like what the party was doing decided to pack up and move to the locales with "outsize representation" What if the progressive voices in the Democrat party decided to register as Republican in those areas? Wouldn't that essentially mean that the Republican strategy would be nullified?
Yup. You don't even need millions of people....many of these "deep red" states have surprisingly small margins. Move 200,000 Democrats to Wyoming and it turns deep blue permanently. You can get South Dakota for just 120,000. You can have Montana for just 100,000. And if you're willing to dig a little more, you can get Florida for just 500,000.

Of course, I suspect that you'd run into the problem that once someone moves to, say, South Dakota....their new environment may change their political orientation fairly quickly.
/. "She climbed backwards out her
\/ window into Outside Over There."
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by El Guapo »

Little Raven wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 10:14 pm
Drazzil wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:16 pm Stupid question... What would happen if large swaths of Democrats who didn't like what the party was doing decided to pack up and move to the locales with "outsize representation" What if the progressive voices in the Democrat party decided to register as Republican in those areas? Wouldn't that essentially mean that the Republican strategy would be nullified?
Yup. You don't even need millions of people....many of these "deep red" states have surprisingly small margins. Move 200,000 Democrats to Wyoming and it turns deep blue permanently. You can get South Dakota for just 120,000. You can have Montana for just 100,000. And if you're willing to dig a little more, you can get Florida for just 500,000.

Of course, I suspect that you'd run into the problem that once someone moves to, say, South Dakota....their new environment may change their political orientation fairly quickly.
Well, I suspect the bigger issue is that getting even "just" a few hundred thousand people to move for purposes of more efficient voting is never going to happen.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Little Raven
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Little Raven »

Yeah, the free state project managed only a few tens of thousands, at most.

For better or worse, political concerns are pretty low on the list of reasons people use when evaluating where to live.
/. "She climbed backwards out her
\/ window into Outside Over There."
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

I always assumed Bill Gates turned Washington blue.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55316
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

malchior wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:01 pm We're once again reminded that the police have chosen a side. It is not the people. They don't deserve our support
Unfortunately the system we live in is dependent on the police to maintain functioning society. They've been infiltrated and co-opted to serve commercial and political interests but they're all we have.

I have the scanner on right now for the annual Pride Parade aftermath and it's an endless litany of people being idiots/assholes. And it's going to repeat next weekend. It would be absolute chaos without even our understaffed cops.


Image
Note the tattoo, of course.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 26376
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Yeah, at first it looked like it read "Baton to the Kidney"... but I guess it says "United We Stand" :roll:
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 43501
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Blackhawk »

Nobody needs to move. Just get the people already there to vote.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Little Raven
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Little Raven »

Time to impeach!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday said she believes it's an "impeachable offense" for a Supreme Court justice to lie under oath.

...

Ocasio-Cortez, speaking in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press," said she believes the court is facing a "crisis of legitimacy" and justices must face consequences if they lie under oath.

"If we allow Supreme Court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, without basis," she said, "we must see that through. There must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and a hostile takeover of our democratic institutions."

"To allow that to stand is to allow it to happen," she continued. "And what makes it particularly dangerous is that it sends a blaring signal to all future nominees that they can now lie to duly elected members of the United States Senate in order to secure Supreme Court confirmations and seats on the Supreme Court."
/. "She climbed backwards out her
\/ window into Outside Over There."
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Carpet_pissr »

LOL
User avatar
stessier
Posts: 29819
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: SC

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by stessier »

Little Raven wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 10:14 pm
Of course, I suspect that you'd run into the problem that once someone moves to, say, South Dakota....their new environment may change their political orientation fairly quickly.
I seriously doubt that.
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running____2014: 1300.55 miles____2015: 2036.13 miles____2016: 1012.75 miles____2017: 1105.82 miles____2018: 1318.91 miles__2019: 2000.00 miles
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by malchior »

Noted communist Scarborough hyperventilating this morning. [/sarcasm]

This warning has to be taken seriously ans we need to understand the very real and mounting danger. They are coming for the "others".



Edit: Also some perspective on what's to come.



User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55316
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Little Raven wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:58 am Time to impeach!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday said she believes it's an "impeachable offense" for a Supreme Court justice to lie under oath.

...

Ocasio-Cortez, speaking in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press," said she believes the court is facing a "crisis of legitimacy" and justices must face consequences if they lie under oath.

"If we allow Supreme Court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, without basis," she said, "we must see that through. There must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and a hostile takeover of our democratic institutions."

"To allow that to stand is to allow it to happen," she continued. "And what makes it particularly dangerous is that it sends a blaring signal to all future nominees that they can now lie to duly elected members of the United States Senate in order to secure Supreme Court confirmations and seats on the Supreme Court."
That she believed what they said under oath is more telling of her than them. Hopefully lesson learned for next time, although it's likely too late now.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by El Guapo »

LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:27 am
Little Raven wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:58 am Time to impeach!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday said she believes it's an "impeachable offense" for a Supreme Court justice to lie under oath.

...

Ocasio-Cortez, speaking in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press," said she believes the court is facing a "crisis of legitimacy" and justices must face consequences if they lie under oath.

"If we allow Supreme Court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, without basis," she said, "we must see that through. There must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and a hostile takeover of our democratic institutions."

"To allow that to stand is to allow it to happen," she continued. "And what makes it particularly dangerous is that it sends a blaring signal to all future nominees that they can now lie to duly elected members of the United States Senate in order to secure Supreme Court confirmations and seats on the Supreme Court."
That she believed what they said under oath is more telling of her than them. Hopefully lesson learned for next time, although it's likely too late now.
FWIW AOC's views on this are far from crazy. In theory if a justice makes a representation before the Senate and then is revealed to have lied, they could be prosecuted for perjury. Now a perjury case against anyone on those grounds would be incredibly difficult (and *especially* against a sitting SCOTUS judge), but it's hard to avoid the conclusion that at least some of the more recently appointed justices (especially Kavanaugh) lied about their view of Roe v. Wade.

And setting that aside, if Congress feels like it was lied to during the nomination process, impeachment seems like a perfectly reasonable remedy.

But of course, it's never ever ever going to happen because the votes will never be there.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Little Raven
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Little Raven »

Impeachment is a political process, not a judicial one. You can impeach someone for anything. We could impeach Kavanaugh for wearing the wrong tie.

So the question isn't "Did they do the thing?" it's "Do you have the votes?" Right now I don't think we do.

But maybe Ilhan Omar knows something I don't.

/. "She climbed backwards out her
\/ window into Outside Over There."
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by El Guapo »

Well, she's 100% right about the Thomas part.

The Roe part is IMO conceptually reasonable, but not worth the trouble most likely.
Black Lives Matter.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by malchior »

Signs things are going well? Right now most of the Conservatives are being doxxed on TikTok this morning. Home addresses, credit card numbers , social security numbers, etc.
Post Reply