is EA dying?

All discussions regarding Board, Card, and RPG Gaming, including industry discussion, that don't belong in one of the other gaming forums.

Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon

Post Reply
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 64143
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

is EA dying?

Post by Daehawk »

EA stock continues to sink today, as of this writing it's down another 14% after losing over $9 dollars a share with another hour and a half til market close. Yesterday, the stock fell 12%. More from Marketwatch who think that it's a broader problem than just hardware shortages:

Some of that weakness was due to shortages of Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's PlayStation 2, the most popular consoles used to play video games. But Electronic Arts, which has long benefited from strong sales of popular sports games like "FIFA Soccer" and "NBA Live" and its "Sims" series, is feeling the heat from titles made by upstart rivals like Take-Two Interactive Software.
"Certain EA franchises have performed poorly and are showing signs of fatigue," wrote Bear Stearns analyst R. Glen Reid in a note to clients.

Update: EA closed down almost 17% at the end of the day
I cant see this as a bad thing.
User avatar
tjg_marantz
Posts: 14688
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Queen City, SK

Post by tjg_marantz »

Maybe others can get some licenses back
Home of the Akimbo AWPs
User avatar
hitbyambulance
Posts: 10347
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:51 am
Location: Map Ref 47.6°N 122.35°W
Contact:

Re: is EA dying?

Post by hitbyambulance »

EA wrote:"Certain EA franchises have performed poorly and are showing signs of fatigue,"
ahhh! so that's what happens when you only make never-ending sequels!
User avatar
The Mad Hatter
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Funkytown

Re: is EA dying?

Post by The Mad Hatter »

Daehawk wrote:
Some of that weakness was due to shortages of Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's PlayStation 2, the most popular consoles used to play video games. But Electronic Arts, which has long benefited from strong sales of popular sports games like "FIFA Soccer" and "NBA Live" and its "Sims" series, is feeling the heat from titles made by upstart rivals like Take-Two Interactive Software.
"Certain EA franchises have performed poorly and are showing signs of fatigue," wrote Bear Stearns analyst R. Glen Reid in a note to clients.
Which ones have performed poorly, I wonder? I know that the Sims Online was a flop and they keep reversing course on a sequel to UO, but didn't the Sims 2 sell like hotcakes?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
User avatar
Ummagumma
Posts: 1008
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 6:51 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by Ummagumma »

Maybe the console market will crash again, and all these developers will have to come running back to the PC market that made thier name in the first place.

Yes, revenge is a dish best served with fava beans, and a nice ciante. SLLLUUURRRPPP!
User avatar
Vinda-Lou
Posts: 1454
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:46 pm

Post by Vinda-Lou »

The Avatar and Crusader (from No Remorse, duh) are chuckling evilly in their graves. :twisted:
User avatar
The Mad Hatter
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Funkytown

Post by The Mad Hatter »

Vinda-Lou wrote:The Avatar and Crusader (from No Remorse, duh) are chuckling evilly in their graves. :twisted:
Richard Garriott borked the Ultima franchise, not EA. I've never understood why he always gets a pass and it's all blamed on the evil corporate empire.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
User avatar
pr0ner
Posts: 17437
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA
Contact:

Post by pr0ner »

I really don't think it is a result of the console market crashing. EA's problem is putting out a ton of games, a lot of which are less than stellar. And the stellar games they have put out lately they didn't develop (see Burnout 3). Plus, they tossed out a TON of cash for the NFL and ESPN licenses. That had to hurt the bottom line in a big way.

Mike
Hodor.
User avatar
Vinda-Lou
Posts: 1454
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:46 pm

Post by Vinda-Lou »

The Mad Hatter wrote:
Vinda-Lou wrote:The Avatar and Crusader (from No Remorse, duh) are chuckling evilly in their graves. :twisted:
Richard Garriott borked the Ultima franchise, not EA. I've never understood why he always gets a pass and it's all blamed on the evil corporate empire.
I disagree. Sure he's ultimately responsible, no pun intended, but corporate pressure to turn it into what it was did not come from him. I still have an old PC Gamer with a huge article on U9 back before it became a Tomb Raider lookalike. I doubt he scrapped that whole idea and published what he thought was a masterpiece because he thought it was better. I could be wrong, but from what I remember it was EA putting the pressure on.
User avatar
EvilHomer3k
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7927
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

Post by EvilHomer3k »

Moving to GPCG.
User avatar
Jolor
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:25 am

Post by Jolor »

no pun intended,
none taken ...
User avatar
Peacedog
Posts: 13148
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:11 pm
Location: Despair, level 5
Contact:

Post by Peacedog »

Richard Garriott borked the Ultima franchise, not EA. I've never understood why he always gets a pass and it's all blamed on the evil corporate empire.
Well, Origin was on shakey financial ground when he sold to EA, wasn't it? It may be better to say "could: design games; could not: run a company" of Garriot. Origin's games were famous for pushing technological envelopes at the time, and they had some outrageous budgets (millions) back when people thought 6 figures was crazy.

I think that Origin's trouble started with that sale. Though there are a number of games that may not have existed without it. The sale was a mixed bag, clearly. Though if you were a UO fan, then you got pleasure out of it.
I disagree. Sure he's ultimately responsible, no pun intended, but corporate pressure to turn it into what it was did not come from him. I still have an old PC Gamer with a huge article on U9 back before it became a Tomb Raider lookalike. I doubt he scrapped that whole idea and published what he thought was a masterpiece because he thought it was better. I could be wrong, but from what I remember it was EA putting the pressure on.
The original U9 team was moved to work on UO if I recall correctly (and U9 had been underway for some time). I don't think EA had anything to do with that. Or if they did, ti was because they wanted UO done, not because they wanted something done (or not done) to U9.

When UO was done, they returned to the project and basically started over. And Garriot was at the center of it (eventually he even "got back under the hood" for the first time in years, as he put it).

There was corporate pressure (at least accoridng to the things I've read), but people are too quick to place too much blame on EA (who indeed do get blame), and often seem to overlook his role. Interviews of Garriot given during and since U:A make U:A look like the game he was trying to make. And I'm not talking about interviews given about U:A necessarily.
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Post by tgb »

Iirc, the first bad omen resulting from the Origin sale to EA was not UIX, but Ultima VIII - aka "Sonic the Avatar".
I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
User avatar
Peacedog
Posts: 13148
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:11 pm
Location: Despair, level 5
Contact:

Post by Peacedog »

Iirc, the first bad omen resulting from the Origin sale to EA was not UIX, but Ultima VIII - aka "Sonic the Avatar".
You aren't looking back far enough.

Ultima 7's combat was atrocious. Probably the worst combat I've ever encountered in a computer game. AFAIK, it reflected Garriot's ongoing philosophical shift (nor was it the only thing that did). I'm not saying U7 fortold U8. It pointed to the possibility U:A though, I think.

Also, the companies problems did start before EA. Without EA to step in and buy them, they may well have gone bellyup.
User avatar
Kobra
Posts: 3908
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:57 pm

Post by Kobra »

We can only hope EA goes out of business. It would do wonders for this industry.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 44539
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Post by Blackhawk »

You know, I'm not the type to wish death and destruction on anyone, but the gaming industry over the past few years has been in a narrow rut - they know that what they have isn't working, but are unable or unwilling to change it. I must admit that it might be beneficial to have part of the thing collapse - what is built from the pieces might very well be an improvement.

To quote Minsc, the industry "...is teeming with evil. Let's give it a good shake and see what falls out!"
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
User avatar
Peacedog
Posts: 13148
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:11 pm
Location: Despair, level 5
Contact:

Post by Peacedog »

EA the corporate entity, on the other hand, isn't really getting the job done. And they've been propped up for far too long by too long for a variety of reasons. EA the corproate entity going by the wayside is a natural and expected result because of this. I'm sorry that quite a few people will have to get a new job and possibly uproot (though I'm sure there are a couple of people here nd there that deserve to be out of a job). I won't morn EA's passing though.
User avatar
Kobra
Posts: 3908
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:57 pm

Post by Kobra »

Well most people remember the "White Slavery" blog that was so famous last year. Written by an EA spouse about how EA is evil and abuses her Husband by forcing him to work 20 hour days.

EA's stock seems to have taken more of a correction this week, rather than indicating anything longterm. Alibeit it was a SERIOUS correction that probably cost the executives there hundreds of millions.

Image
Biyobi
Posts: 5440
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: San Gabriel, CA

Post by Biyobi »

Kobra, that graph cracked me up because it looks like they had to add extra space on the bottom for the stock drop. :lol:
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Kobra
Posts: 3908
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:57 pm

Post by Kobra »

Biyobi wrote:Kobra, that graph cracked me up because it looks like they had to add extra space on the bottom for the stock drop. :lol:
LMFAO. I thought the same thing when I first saw it..

Lets hope it keeps dying, and EA is put out to pasture and all of the developers working there go off and form garage game companies.. Man, wouldn't that be somethin?

I hope the day comes.
User avatar
Faldarian
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:26 pm
Contact:

Re: is EA dying?

Post by Faldarian »

The Mad Hatter wrote: Which ones have performed poorly, I wonder? I know that the Sims Online was a flop and they keep reversing course on a sequel to UO, but didn't the Sims 2 sell like hotcakes?
Need for Speed and NFL Street (or Blitz, I can't remember who's is which) were the ones I think they quoted specifically as underperforming.
User avatar
knob
Posts: 3446
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:19 am
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Post by knob »

I don't think it'll happen, as nice as it would be.

Or if it does, atleast wait until after BF2 comes out. As much as I hate EA, Desert Combat provided me with many, many hours of fun.



(Sorry for not going into any sort of detail about why I don't think it'll happen. I'm pessimistic. And that's just my pessimism speaking)
If I had a sig, would you read it?
User avatar
Peacedog
Posts: 13148
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:11 pm
Location: Despair, level 5
Contact:

Post by Peacedog »

I don't think it'll happen, as nice as it would be.
I wonder how the sports franchises are selling these days. And I wonder how the football landscape is going to look when their exclusive license kicks in.
User avatar
Beer Goggles
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:48 am

Post by Beer Goggles »

I am hoping for some kind of Bell breakup of EA.
Post Reply